Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory wikipedia , lookup
Sustainable city wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Account planning wikipedia , lookup
Postdevelopment theory wikipedia , lookup
Embedded liberalism wikipedia , lookup
Development theory wikipedia , lookup
Sustainability advertising wikipedia , lookup
Development economics wikipedia , lookup
Economic calculation problem wikipedia , lookup
Home economics wikipedia , lookup
13 October 2005 Sustainable Consumption: The need for a strong consumer policy Paper prepared for presentation at the Sixth Open Meeting of the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Research Community University of Bonn Prof. Dr. Edda Müller Executive Director, Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. Berlin Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. Markgrafenstraße 66 10969 Berlin [email protected] www.vzbv.de 1. Introduction For sustainable consumption to become reality there is a vital need for a strong consumer policy. Traditionally, environmental and social policy have been in the focus of sustainability advocates. Environmental policy instruments such as emission limit values or eco-taxes have been developed to offset negative effects of economic growth while social standards have been established in order to prevent wage dumping and working conditions which pose serious health risks. Yet with globalization gaining ground, this strategy is approaching its limits. Higher wages and stricter social and environmental standards are being contested by international competitors, who profit from lower prices. In this situation, consumer policy can provide an alternative to a ruinous “race to the bottom”: Consumers´ increased willingness to actively contribute to sustainability could help to reconcile sustainability with competitiveness on the global market. This will, however, not happen by itself. A political commitment to actively shape consumer demand is necessary. Consumer policy has to be strengthened by institutional reforms and by introducing effective instruments to protect consumer interests and direct consumer demands towards sustainable choices. Above all, a strengthening of consumer research is needed. This entails the following measures: • A new understanding of consumer policies which have the potential of being an engine to sustainable development. • Efficient demand side oriented institutional structures in the social, governmental and international trade fields need to be set up. • Programs and instruments are needed to change the dynamics which are currently solely responsive to supply-side economic factors, to include the demand side and thus develop sustainability. In particular, this requires legislation granting the consumer a “right to know”about the sustainability of products and services – especially with regard to the production process. • Consumer research has to provide support and legitimacy for such a consumer policy. It has to provide an independent theoretical framework for the demand-side function of the market, thus supplementing supply-side economic theories. Sustainable Consumption: The need for a strong consumer 2 policy vzbv / 13.10.2005 2. The weakness of consumer research is the weakness of consumer policy At present consumer research comprises what Reisch calls a “point cloud”of numerous sectoral research approaches. What these have in common is a primary focus on the consumer as individual. In this context, consumer policy has the function of providing protection for the consumer in terms of health and material well-being, of ensuring his fitness as a “sovereign, responsible economic citizen“and of limiting economic power by establishing a general framework for “fair competition”between enterprises on the market. For business and a supply-orientated economic policy, consumer and economic policy thus represent a zero sum game in the sense that increasing consumer protection is equated with increasing disadvantage for business It is thus hardly surprising that, despite the threat of a worldwide shortage of resources and increasing ecological destabilization, the EU commissioner for Industrial Policy characterizes consumer and environmental policy as fundamental barriers to the recovery of the economy of the European Union and wants to see his strategy of de-bureaucratization and deregulation applied above all in these areas of policy. The political debate within Germany is equally symptomatic of the prevailing interpretation of consumer policy. Proposals for a rejuvenation of the economy and the creation of jobs focus exclusively on the supply side of the market. In spite of stagnating national economy, such proposals propagate passing costs to consumers and thus further limiting their purchasing power. In my view this short-sightedness can be explained not least by the fact that as yet consumer research has not developed an independent theory of the function of collective consumer demand for goods and services. Instead it has relied on theories of economic competition and subordinated itself to them. Supply-orientated competition theory continues to suffer from an incapacity to counter the failure of the market through the externalization of ecological, cultural and social costs of production and consumption. In the global market, a complete internalization would only be possible on the basis of a framework agreed between political actors at the nation-state level. Given the widely differing levels of economic development of the individual states, such a hope seems utopian. The task of an independent theory of consumer research should therefore be to establish the function of collective consumer demand with regard to the achievement of general economic and social goals such as the guarantee of growth and employment, employee security, the protection of nature and the environment and the quality of life of present and future generations under the actual conditions of the world economy. Following Scherhorn, what we are concerned with here is the functional capacity of the market as a community asset. What is needed is a steering and governance model that incorporates the shaping of the demand side of the Sustainable Consumption: The need for a strong consumer 3 policy vzbv / 13.10.2005 market as a political (and not necessarily state-based) task. In principle, we are thus concerned with a theory for an eco-social market economy on a global scale. 3.Consumer policy as a motor of sustainable development In view of the current state of global trade and competition, sustainable production and sustainable consumption constitute more than a survival strategy for our planet and the precondition for sustainable future development in the Third World. They also constitute the precondition for maintaining social peace and democratic systems in the established industrial countries. Current world economic mechanisms, which are characterized by the boundless mobility of capital and a philosophy of free trade that provides an almost unlimited capacity for social and environmental dumping, can only be kept in check by demand, i.e. by affluent consumers in the developed nations. The social market economy that, at least in Germany, ensured a broad level of affluence, stabile systems of social security and a high level of acceptance of the democratic polity during the post-war period on the basis of an equilibrium between two social partners – the representatives of capital and labor – today requires the power of the consumer as a third social partner. However, this power does not emerge from the isolation of and fixation on the individual consumer but can only unfold as a collective power. It follows that this collective force requires a political entity which not only upholds consumer concerns in a defensive sense as a corrective to supply-orientated economic policy but also understands itself in offensive terms as a motor for a socially and environmentally compatible economy on a national, European and worldwide scale. Shifting responsibility in this context to the business sector and scientific research does not bring us any further. Both have done their homework. Sustainable consumption is possible. The insufficient market penetration of products that are efficient in terms of energy and raw materials, of renewable energies, of textiles and toys produced under humane conditions and of foodstuffs produced in an environmentally friendly way and within animal-welfare guidelines, to name only a few examples, is not the fault of producers but the result of inadequate demand. However, blame cannot be exclusively placed on the consumer. Sustainable Consumption: The need for a strong consumer 4 policy vzbv / 13.10.2005 There are many reasons for this state of affairs including: • The lack of plausible and reliable consumer information on the “process quality”of goods and services, i.e. of information on the social and ecological conditions of production. • An extensive lack of transparency regarding the running and additional costs of energy-dependent devices, vehicles, buildings and housing. • Insufficient information on the origin of products and the social and ecological consequences of their manufacture in the supply contracts of producers who are supplying the end-user market. • The reduction of consumer access and consumers’choice due to the concentration in the retail sector and the increasing lack of retail outlets and infrastructure in rural areas. Even given adequate information and a corresponding range of purchasing options, not all consumers will lend their support to sustainable development. However, examples show that the potential for such consumer reorientation can be significantly increased and thereby create a “pull-effect.”Research into consumer behavior attributes a conformist orientation to the majority of consumers, i.e. the product that is purchased is not necessarily the cheapest but the one that conforms with the behavior of the group in the society with particularly high spending power. It is above all important that businesses adopting sustainable production are able to realize their advantage in competitive terms. The prevailing policy framework hinders rather than helps pioneering enterprises. It does not reward them. Consumer policy must change this state of affairs and, in this sense, define itself as a demand-orientated economic policy. Sustainable Consumption: The need for a strong consumer 5 policy vzbv / 13.10.2005 4. An empowerment and reorientation of consumer research is needed Consumer research must become more political. It needs to examine critically large-scale trends in the world economy and provide reasons why a free-trade concept that – as is the case in the WTO regime – relies exclusively on unimpeded trade between producers is no longer in keeping with the times. The market and therefore also trade have two sides: supply and demand. Demand cannot exclusively be understood even in theoretical terms as the automatic result of competition between suppliers. Consumer research should see itself as an independent partner of primarily supplyorientated economic research and confront the latter with the specific mechanisms and conditions characterizing market demand. The IHD program offers an ideal platform from which to provide support for a new branch of consumer research, a focus for the various institutions involved in consumer research and a means of incorporating their efforts in the political process. Initially it is important that a consistent, common research program is elaborated. In my view, the central focus of such a program should not be on the refinement of analytical instruments relating to sustainable consumption such as life-cycle assessment, material-flow accounting and labeling. What is most needed at present is an investigation of the current destabilization of the national economies of the industrial countries along with the development of the newly industrialized and developing countries from the point of view of consumer demand. I have confidence in the capacity of science and research in this regard and I am therefore devoting my efforts to increasing the profile of consumer research within public research programs. However, the content and viability of such research programs must come from the research community itself. Large-scale, consistent and well coordinated research themes are far more viable than a collection of individual, sectoral projects. The continuation of the IHD program offers a great opportunity not only to map out the future themes of consumer research but also to increase the status of consumer research in the context of research into global environmental change. Let us make use of this opportunity. Sustainable Consumption: The need for a strong consumer 6 policy vzbv / 13.10.2005