* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lecture 21: Elastic Collisions and Conservative Forces
Survey
Document related concepts
Relativistic mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Newton's theorem of revolving orbits wikipedia , lookup
Classical mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Hunting oscillation wikipedia , lookup
Hooke's law wikipedia , lookup
Length contraction wikipedia , lookup
Coriolis force wikipedia , lookup
Fictitious force wikipedia , lookup
Mass versus weight wikipedia , lookup
Work (thermodynamics) wikipedia , lookup
Newton's laws of motion wikipedia , lookup
Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Lecture 21: Elastic Collisions and Conservative Forces • Another elastic collision example: • We drop a tennis ball and a basketball from a height h. The tennis ball is slightly above the basketball. What will be the initial upward velocity of the tennis ball, assuming all collisions are elastic? • We begin by considering the motion of the basketball. Just before hitting the ground, it has a velocity of v = − 2 gh (we can obtain this result using the work-energy theorem) • The collision between the ball and the earth is elastic, so: mB vB ,i = mB vB , f + mE vE , f vE , f = mB ( vB ,i − vB , f ) mE 1 1 1 2 2 mB vB ,i = mB vB , f + mE vE2 , f 2 2 2 mB ( vB ,i − vB , f 1 1 1 2 2 mB vB ,i = mB vB , f + mE mE 2 2 2 v 2 B ,i −v 2 B, f mB = vB ,i − vB , f ( mE ) 2 ) 2 (v (v B ,i B ,i vB ,i − vB , f )( v + vB , f mB ) = m ( vB,i − vB, f E B ,i mB + vB , f ) = vB ,i − vB , f ( mE ) 2 ) mB mB 1− = −vB , f 1 + mE mE vB , f = − vB ,i mB 1− mE mB 1+ mE • Since the earth is so much more massive than the ball, we can approximate this as: vB , f = − vB ,i = 2 gh • Now for the tennis ball colliding with the basketball. Let’s analyze this is the frame where the basketball is at rest. In that case, we already know the answer: vT , f = − vT ,i mT 1− mB 1+ 0.057kg 0.55kg = −0.81vT ,i 0.057kg 1+ 0.55kg 1− = − vT ,i mT mB • In the frame where the basketball is at rest the initial velocity of the tennis ball is vT ,i = vTE ,i + vEB ,i = − 2 gh − 2 gh = −2 2 gh • So the final velocity is: vT , f = 1.62 2 gh • Translating this to the frame of reference of the Earth, we find: vTE , f = vTB , f + vBE , f = 1.62 2 gh + 2 gh = 2.62 2 gh • The tennis ball can reach a height almost 7 times greater than that from which it was dropped! Conservative Forces • Consider the work done by gravity as an object is lifted a height h and then lowered back to its original position • On the upward trip, the work is mgh, while on the downward trip it is –mgh – Thus the total work done by gravity during the round trip is zero • Any force for which this is true (the work done by the force during a round-trip is zero) is called a conservative force • • Another example: Force due to a spring Imagine an object attached to a spring, which is then stretched to a length x = d 1. The object will experience a force pulling it back toward x = 0. The work done by the spring is 1 2 2 kd 2. The object shoots past x = 0, compressing the spring to x = -d. The work done by the spring is 1 2 − kd 2 3. The object is now accelerated back toward x = 0. The work done 1 2 by the spring is 2 kd 4. The object once again shoots past x = 0, coming to rest when the spring is stretched to x = d. The work done by the spring is 1 • − kd 2 2 We see that the “round-trip” work is zero, so the spring force is conservative • Finally, consider friction • An object slides down a ramp, experiencing friction as it goes – Since friction acts in the direction opposite the motion, it does negative work • Now the object is pushed back up the ramp by some other force, but still experiences friction – Once again, the work done by friction is negative (kinetic friction always acts in the direction opposite the motion) • The total work done by friction in the round-trip is not zero • Friction is not a conservative force Conservative Forces: Definition 2 • Consider an object moving from point 1 to point 2. Some possible paths for the object are shown: b 2 a 1 • In general, the complex motion that causes the object to follow any one of these paths might be the result of several forces acting on it • But let’s consider one force, that happens to be conservative • The work done by the conservative force in following path a from 1 to 2, then path b from 2 back to 1 must be zero: 2 Wtot = F ( r ) ⋅ dr + 1,a 2 1,a 1 F ( r ) ⋅ dr = 0 2,b 1 2 2,b 1,b F ( r ) ⋅ dr = − F ( r ) ⋅ dr = F ( r ) ⋅ dr • Therefore, the work done by our conservative force as the object moves from 1 to 2 is independent of the path taken • This property also can be used to define a conservative force Potential Energy • We have already studied the work-energy theorem, which relates the total work done on an object to the change in kinetic energy: Wtot = ∆KE • For a conservative force, the work done by that force as an object travels from point 1 to point 2 is defined. We define a new kind of energy, potential energy, as: WF = −∆U = U1 − U 2 – Note that here we are talking about the work done by a single force One-dimensional Case • In general, rf ∆U = U ( rf ) − U ( ri ) = −W = − F ⋅ dr ri – Note that only a difference in potential energy is meaningful, since we can always redefine what we call r = 0 • If the force only acts in one dimension, and only depends on one dimension, (call it x), this simplifies to: xf U ( x f ) − U ( xi ) = − Fx ( x ) dx xi