Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
THE POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT IN THE LATE 60S BC 1. i) After the majority vote in the Senate on 5th December 63 BC which recommended the death penalty for the conspirators who had been arrested in Rome, CICERO arranged for them to be conveyed immediately to Rome’s prison where they were strangled. ii) He would pay dearly later for not allowing them to appeal to “the People”. 2. CATILINE who, along with MANLIUS, had already been declared a “public enemy”, was killed in battle in early January 62 BC at the “Battle of Pistoria” (north-west of Florence). 3. The crisis was over, Cicero was a hero, but the modern scholarly community remains divided over i) whether CATILINE really was “the mastermind” behind a grand conspiracy or ii) whether CICERO, for political ends, linked at least two separate but dangerous pockets of discontent and accused CATILINE of co-ordinating joint action by the leaders of the two. 4. And not long after all of this, a victorious POMPEY returned to Italy from his huge successes in the eastern Mediterranean only to be shunned by the Senate which refused to recognize his achievements or to make land available in Italy for his veteran troops. THE FIRST TRIUMVIRATE, THE RISE OF JULIUS CAESAR, HIS CONSULSHIP IN 59 BC and THE 50s BC 1. During the 60s CICERO (b. 106) had, through observation and through participation in an active senatorial career (culminating in his consulships in 63 BC), developed a particular political outlook or ‘political philosophy’ referred to as “the Harmony of the Orders” (CONCORDIA ORDINUM). 2. i) During his consulship, in the face of crisis, all “rightthinking men” had rallied around him to protect the state from “revolution”. ii) He believed that continuing co-operation between senators, ‘equestrians’ and other “solid” citizens would guarantee political stability for the foreseeable future. iii) In particular the “optimates” in the Senate must work at all times with the ‘equestrian’ leadership. iv) If they did so, radical “tribunes of the Plebs” and radical proposals would always fail to command a majority in the Popular Assemblies – because of the powerful ‘patron-client’ system – and “populists” would make no headway. v) CO-OPERATION (“Harmony”) would be the key. 5. a) The 60s had seen POMPEY racing ahead in his career but now unable to get his acjievements recognized. b) The 60s had seen CRASSUS, despite his wealth, frustrated at every turn in his desire to gain a second “special military command”. 6. a) During the 60s too a slightly younger Gaius IULIUS CAESAR (b. 100 BC) had made headway in his career, but, being in considerable debt, had been able to satisfy his creditors (who could block his advancement) only by reaching an agreement with CRASSUS who had offered financial support. b) He was probably only too aware also that political conservatives (including Cicero) viewed him with a certain degree of suspicion over where he stood politically. GNAEUS POMPEIUS (b. 106 BC) MARCUS LICINIUS CRASSUS (b. ca 115 BC) MARCUS TULLIUS CICERO (b. 106 BC) GAIUS IULIUS CAESAR (b 100 BC) SOME DEVELOPMENTS at the END of the 60s 1. By late 61 BC the short-lived co-operation between the conservative majority in the Senate (“the optimates”) and the leaders of the ‘Equestrian Order’ was severely threatened. 2. We find Cicero writing to his friend Atticus on 5th December 61 BC: “I assume that you have heard that our friends the equestrians have virtually broken with the Senate!” 3. Two specific issues were caused tension: a) jury bribery; and b) the tax-collecting contract for the province of ASIA. BRIBERY OF JURORS 1. a) There had been unquestionable examples of jurors being bribed. b) The most notorious case had been the acquittal of a guilty Publius CLODIUS PULCHER in ‘the “Bona Dea” Affair’ [“the Affair of ‘the Good Goddess”]. c) Publius CLODIUS Pulcher, of noble patrician background [b. 93 BC], had committed sacrilege by attending the exclusively female rites of BONA DEA (“the GOOD GODDESS”) dressed as a woman and was charged accordingly. 2. CICERO in court disproved his alibi but he was still found ‘not guilty’ because equestrian jurors had been bribed. 3. The SENATE soon proposed a judicial enquiry into jury-bribery generally, something CICERO resisted because he realized that it would alienate “the Equestrians” from the “optimate” cause. 4. More and more the SENATE failed to listen to Cicero’s arguments and more and more followed the leadership of the extremely conservative and very moral CATO THE YOUNGER (Marcus Porcius CATO) [b. 95 BC], (a greatgrandson of CATO THE ELDER). 5. i) The judicial enquiry was established. ii) It did its work. iii) No one was prosecuted for bribery. iv) “The Equestrians” were alienated from the optimates by the whole affair - and unwilling to co-operate as before. CATO THE YOUNGER (95 – 46 BC) great-grandson of CATO THE ELDER (CATO THE CENSOR) (234 – 149 BC) THE ‘ASIAN’ TAX-COLLECTING CONTRACT 1. In early 60 BC, members of the “Equestrian Order” who had won the contract to collect taxes in the “province” of ASIA concluded that their bid had been too high and their profits would be minimal. 2. They wanted the contract re-negotiated. 3. The SENATE staunchly refused on principle– although we find Cicero writing, in his purely private correspondence: “We should have made the sacrifice – to keep the whole [equestrian] order on our side”. 4. The Senate’s refusal drove the “Equestrians” away politically. [The contract was re-negotiated the next year] 5. The “optimates” controlling the Senate had taken a stand on two issues, under Cato’s influence, on moral grounds and had been weakened politically as a result. 6. With ‘equestrian’ support “populists” would now have an easier time in the Popular Assemblies but would not necessarily always get what they wanted. 7. i) And POMPEY was no closer to getting his work recognized or (and this was more pressing) getting land for his troops. ii) A “Flavian Bill” which had at last been introduced in early 60 BC and which would have provided the vitally needed land had failed - frustrating even Cicero who had tried introducing amendments in order to save the proposal. JULIUS CAESAR PLAYS A VITAL ROLE 1. 60 BC also saw Julius CAESAR deciding to stand as a candidate for one of the consulships of 59 BC. 2. The opposition to him on the part of the “optimates”, under CATO’s leadership, was massive. 3. Fearing that they might not be able to stop him (because he had quite wide popular support and had Crassus’ money behind him), they devised a plan to destroy his career in the year 4. after his consulship if he managed to get elected. a) The “provinces” to which the consuls would go as governors after their year as consuls had to be decided in advance of the elections. b) Now “province” (provincia in Latin) technically meant ‘any area of public responsibility’. c) And so the “optimates” declared that the ‘consular provinces’ for 58 BC would be silvae callesque (“the forests and cattle-runs [of Italy]”). d) CAESAR would hardly be able to gain gloria (an enhanced military reputation – including military ‘glory’) overseeing forests and cattle-runs! 5. Fully aware of the opposition to him, CAESAR came up with a bold, an ‘impossible’ plan. 6. a) The bitter rivals, CRASSUS and POMPEY, were each totally frustrated in trying to achieve their aims. b) CAESAR would persuade them to forget their differences, to pool their private resources, and to work with him – to achieve the goals of all three. 7. Working on the needs and ambitions of both Pompey and Crassus and using his natural charm and considerable powers of persuasion, he somehow succeeded in convincing them to join his ‘plan’ and work together. 8. i) The three formed a purely PRIVATE agreement which we call “the FIRST TRIUMVIRATE” – a political coalition powerful enough to give them dominance in the state. ii) No other combination of forces at that point appears to have had the ability to resist them successfully – and for quite some time their agreement remained secret anyway. 9. Once the news leaked, the “optimates” rushed to organize a fund to bribe electors to vote against Caesar in the elections. THE FIRST TRIUMVIRATE 1. The year of CAESAR’s consulship, 59 BC, (and he had been easily elected despite the fund) saw important legislation. 2. He proposed to take to the Popular Assembly, as consul, a bill which: a) would make land available to Pompey’s veterans (at last); b) would recognize and ratify Pompey’s work in the East (at last); c) would renegotiate the tax-collecting contract in ASIA entered into by members of the “equestrian order”. 3. He gave the SENATE ample chance to support these measures first – all to no avail. 5. He then went to the Popular Assembly, where his “optimate” colleague in the consulship, Marcus Calpurnius BIBULUS, vetoed the bill’s introduction. 6. CAESAR accepted the temporary set-back and opted for a different approach. 7. Soon a friendly ‘tribune of the plebs’, Publius VATINIUS, was found to introduce to the Plebeian Assembly a measure a) to assign to CAESAR for 58 BC not the “forests and cattleruns [of Italy]” but CISALPINE GAUL and for five years (not one); b) to allow him four legions to undertake whatever tasks were necessary in his “province”; and c) to have him begin his governorship immediately, not when his consulship ended. 8. No “optimate” tribune applied his veto (perhaps out of fear that violence might erupt) BUT Caesar’s co-consul BIBULUS announced that he had observed adverse omens and that no public business could, therefore, take place that day. 9. Vatinius (the tribune) simply ignored this and pressed ahead with his bill – which quickly passed into law (although its validity would be challenged at a later date). 10. Since CAESAR was already enlisting the legions assigned to him, the SENATE chose not to intervene further. 11. CAESAR then re-introduced the part of his earlier bill to provide Pompey’s veterans with land. 12. BIBULUS threatened to use his veto again but withdrew the threat when rioting broke out - and the bill passed. 13. a) POMPEY should have been delighted! b) He wasn’t! c) It seems that he was beginning to have doubts about his relationship with CAESAR if it meant that advantages could be gained only by means of questionable legitimacy. 14. CAESAR could not afford to lose POMPEY. 15. He applied a centuries-old Roman solution: he offered POMPEY (aged 47) his daughter JULIA (aged about 24) in marriage. 16. a) The marriage re-cemented the political bond between Caesar and Pompey. b) And the marriage appears to have proved an unusually happy one. 17. CAESAR now pushed through the other parts of his original bill: a) ratification of Pompey’s arrangements in the East; and b) a re-negotiated tax-collecting contract for CRASSUS’ equestrian friends. 18. a) POMPEY even persuaded the SENATE to add ‘Transalpine Gaul’ to Caesar’s governorship – for one year. b) The Senate’s reluctant agreement probably resulted from fear that, otherwise, a bill might be taken to “the People” to give Caesar ‘Transalpine Gaul’ for five years. 19. CAESAR would be away in ‘the Gauls’ until the late 50s BC. CAESAR’S MOVEMENTS BETWEEN 58 AND 52 BC THE SURRENDER OF VERCINGETORIX 52 BC AT THE END OF CAESAR’S CAMPAIGNS “Vercingetorix Throws Down His Arms at the Feet of Julius Caesar” Lionel Noel Royer, 1899 THE HEAD OF A GAUL ON A ROMAN denarius of 48 BC 58 BC 1. One problem for CRASSUS, POMPEY, and CAESAR was to see that Caesar’s legislation of 59 BC was not overturned once he ceased to be consul and was away in “Gaul”. 2. To this end, they put all their efforts into a) getting consuls sympathetic to their cause elected for 58 BC b) ensuring an aggressive ‘tribune of the Plebs’, also sympathetic to them, would be elected for 58 BC and would protect the achievements of 59 BC even if other ‘tribunes’ opposed him. 3. a) The sympathetic consuls elected were Aulus Gabinius, a protégé of POMPEY, and Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus, an adherent of CAESAR. b) The ‘tribune of the Plebs’ who would protect their interests was Publius CLODIUS PULCHER (he who had favoured female attire) – but he was a “patrician” and CAESAR, as Pontifex Maximus, and POMPEY, as one of the nine augurs, had had to use their religious offices (amid much debate) to have him adopted into a plebeian family to solve the problem. 4. To weaken the opposition further, the “TRIUMVIRS” planned to have CATO and CICERO, their most vocal opponents, “leave town”. 5. a) CATO was sent on formal public business to Cyprus. b) CICERO, who refused to accept a position on Caesar’s staff in GAUL, had to be forced into exile – although this did not happen until early in 58 BC. 6. CAESAR, already on his way to GAUL with his legions, could only hope that enough mechanisms were in place to protect his interests while he was away. 7. He would be fighting Gallic tribes, visiting Britain, and adding the territories of the Gallic tribes to Rome’s empire between 58 and 50 BC – for eight years (as we noted). 8. The climax would come in 52 BC at the Battle of ALESIA and the total surrender of the Gallic chieftain VERCINGETORIX (illustrated by Lionel Noel Royer, as we noted before). THE SURRENDER OF VERCINGETORIX 52 BC “Vercingetorix Throws Down His Arms at the Feet of Julius Caesar” Lionel Noel Royer, 1899