Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Fictitious force wikipedia , lookup
Electrical resistance and conductance wikipedia , lookup
Centrifugal force wikipedia , lookup
Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup
Centripetal force wikipedia , lookup
Friction-plate electromagnetic couplings wikipedia , lookup
Friction Frictional resistance to the relative motion of two solid objects is usually proportional to the force which presses the surfaces together as well as the roughness of the surfaces. Since it is the force perpendicular or "normal" to the surfaces which affects the frictional resistance, this force is typically called the "normal force" and designated by N. The frictional resistance force may then be written: ffriction = &mu N &mu = coefficient of friction Standard model &muk = coefficient of kinetic friction of friction &mus = coefficient of static friction The frictional force is also presumed to be proportional to the coefficient of friction. However, the amount of force required to move an object starting from rest is usually greater than the force required to keep it moving at constant velocity once it is started. Therefore two coefficients of friction are sometimes quoted for a given pair of surfaces a coefficient of static friction and a coefficent of kinetic friction. The force expression above can be called the standard model of surface friction and is dependent upon several assumptions about friction. While this general description of friction (which I will refer to as the standard model) has practical utility, it is by no means a precise description of friction. Friction is in fact a very complex phenomenon which cannot be represented by a simple model. Almost every simple statement you make about friction can be countered with specific examples to the contrary. Saying that rougher surfaces experience more friction sounds safe enough - two pieces of coarse sandpaper will obviously be harder to move relative to each other than two pieces of fine sandpaper. But if two pieces of flat metal are made progressively smoother, you will reach a point where the resistance to relative movement increases. If you make them very flat and smooth, and remove all surface contaminants in a vacuum, the smooth flat surfaces will actually adhere to each other, making what is called a "cold weld". Kinetic Friction When two surfaces are moving with respect to one another, the frictional resistance is almost constant over a wide range of low speeds, and in the standard model of friction the frictional force is described by the relationship below. The coefficient is typically less than the coefficient of static friction, reflecting the common experience that it is easier to keep something in motion across a horizontal surface than to start it in motion from rest. Static Friction Static frictional forces from the interlocking of the irregularities of two surfaces will increase to prevent any relative motion up until some limit where motion occurs. It is that threshold of motion which is characterized by the coefficient of static friction. The coefficient of static friction is typically larger than the coefficient of kinetic friction. In making a distinction between static and kinetic coefficients of friction, we are dealing with an aspect of "real world" common experience with a phenomenon which cannot be simply characterized. The difference between static and kinetic coefficients obtained in simple experiments like wooden blocks sliding on wooden inclines roughly follows the model depicted in the friction plot from which the illustration above is taken. This difference may arise from irregularities, surface contaminants, etc. which defy precise description. When such experiments are carried out with smooth metal blocks which are carefully cleaned, the difference between static and kinetic coefficients tends to disappear. When coefficients of friction are quoted for specific surface combinations are quoted, it is the kinetic coefficient which is generally quoted since it is the more reliable number. Coefficients of Friction Friction is typically characterized by a coefficient of friction which is the ratio of the frictional resistance force to the normal force which presses the surfaces together. In this case the normal force is the weight of the block. Typically there is a significant difference between the coefficients of static friction and kinetic friction. Note that the static friction coefficient does not characterize static friction in general, but represents the conditions at the threshold of motion only. Friction and Automobile Tires The friction between the tires of your automobile and the road determine your maximum acceleration, and more importantly your minimum stopping distance. So the nature of that friction could actually be a matter of life and death. But like all applications of friction, it has frustrating ambiguities. Many years of research and practice have led to tread designs for automobile tires which offer good traction in a wide variety of conditions. The tread designs channel water away from the bearing surfaces on wet roads to combat the tendency to hydroplane - a condition which allows your car to "ski' on the road surface because you have a layer of water lubricant under all parts of your tire. Jones and Childers report coefficients of friction of about 0.7 for dry roads and 0.4 for wet roads. The tread design represents an "all weather" compromise. If you were an Indianapolis race driver, you would use "slick" racing tires with no tread. On dry surfaces you might get as high as 0.9 as a coefficient of friction, but driving them on wet roads would be dangerous since the wet road coefficient might be as low as 0.1 . Sooner or later, most people have to deal with the tricky judgment of how hard to put on the brakes in an emergency stop. It is a difficult issue, and no final answers are given here. But the illustration below may point out some of the relevant physical principles involved. In the best case scenario, you should keep your wheels rolling while braking because the bottom point of the tire is instantaneously at rest with respect to the roadway (not slipping), and if there is a significant difference between static and kinetic friction, you will get more braking force that way. But you generally don't have the luxury of time to make a delicate judgment about how hard to put on the brakes. For good tires on dry surfaces, there is not much difference between rolling and sliding friction, and if you back off the braking force very much, you will get less braking than if you just locked them down. The other issue is that in an extreme emergency, the braking is instinctive and you tend to hit the brakes as hard as you can before you can even think about it. Maybe locking the brakes is not so bad in good conditions on the dry road, and you may not be able to keep from doing so in an extreme emergency. But if you lock the wheels on a wet road, the results could be disastrous! I don't have anything like reliable estimates of the effective coefficient of friction, but I am guessing that it could easily drop to less than half of the "wheels rolling" braking because you are sliding on a surface which is lubricated by water. It may be that even with wheels rolling you might have in the neighborhood of 0.4 as a coefficient compared to 0.7 on the dry road, and it might drop down to the 0.1 of the slick tire. Those scary scenarios are depicted below in a qualitative way - I don't have reliable numbers. Normal Force Frictional resistance forces are typically proportional to the force which presses the surfaces together. This force which will affect frictional resistance is the component of applied force which acts perpendicular or "normal" to the surfaces which are in contact and is typically referred to as the normal force. In many common situations, the normal force is just the weight of the object which is sitting on some surface, but if an object is on an incline or has components of applied force perpendicular to the surface, then it is not equal to the weight. The above cases are the commonly encountered situations for objects at rest or in straight line motion. For curved motion, there are cases like a car on a banked curve where the normal force is determined by the dynamics of the situation. In that case, the normal force depends upon the speed of the car as well as the angle of the bank. Friction Assumptions In the standard model for friction between surfaces, there are certain inherent assumptions: 1. The frictional force is independent of area of contact Exceptions 2. The frictional force is independent of the velocity of motion Exceptions 3. The frictional force is proportional to the normal force. Exceptions One can readily find circumstances where any or all of these assumptions are invalid, but they provide a straightforward framework for a beginning treatment of friction that satisfactorily describes many phenomena. Friction and Area of Contact Part of the standard model of surface friction is the assumption that the frictional resistance force between two surfaces is independent of the area of contact. While exceptions exist, the assumption has enough validity to be useful in many circumstances. For example, it implies that wide tires will not in general give better traction than narrow tires, and will not change the normal braking distance for a car. Better traction can be obtained with wide tires, or tires with lower pressure, if the pressure changes the coefficient of friction, as on a surface of snow. Friction and Velocity Part of the standard model of surface friction is the assumption that the frictional resistance force between two surfaces is independent of the velocity of relative movement. While this is approximately true for a wide range of low speeds, as the speed increases and air friction is encountered, it is found that the friction not only depends on the speed, but upon the square and sometimes higher powers of the speed. If there are fluid lubricants involved, then viscous resistance is encountered, and it is speed dependent. Like the other standard assumptions, exceptions are easy to find, but the assumption is nevertheless useful for modeling a wide variety of circumstances where two solid materials move relative to each other. Friction and Normal Force Part of the standard model of surface friction is the assumption that the frictional resistance force between two surfaces is proportional to the normal force pressing them together. A common exception occurs in snow where greater traction occurs by having wider tires with lower pressure. The same normal force is exerted, but the traction (friction) is greater with the wider tire since it doesn't pack the snow as much. The packing of the snow tends to depend on the pressure exerted on the snow, and supporting the same weight on a smaller area implies that more pressure is exerted. This example is also an exception to the assumption of independence of area of contact. With a given area of contact, increasing the normal force will pack the snow, decreasing the effective coefficient of friction. While exceptions such as this are easily found, the assumption that friction is proportional to the normal force is still reasonably valid in many cases and forms a useful model for many circumstances. A valid question is why does the frictional resistance increase proportionally with normal force? Jones and Childers have a thoughtful discussion of this. They point out that the area of coverage for a sliding block is actually much larger than the area of contact. Because of microscopic irregularities in the surface, the block is actually riding on a small fraction of the coverage area. Because such points of contact are deformable, an increase in normal force will actually increase the area of actual contact and increase the resistance to movement. Friction Plot Static friction resistance will match the applied force up until the threshold of motion. Then the kinetic frictional resistance stays about constant. This plot illustrates the standard model of friction. The above plot, though representing a simplistic view of friction, agrees fairly well with the results of simple experiments with wooden blocks on wooden inclines. The experimental procedure described below equates the vector component of the weight down the incline to the coefficient of friction times the normal force produced by the weight on the incline. Having taken a large number of students through this experiment, I can report that the coefficient of static friction obtained is almost always greater than the coefficient of kinetic friction. Typical results for the woods I have used are 0.4 for the static coefficient and 0.3 for the kinetic coefficient. When carefully standardized surfaces are used to measure the friction coefficients, the difference between static and kinetic coefficients tends to disappear, indicating that the difference may have to do with irregular surfaces, impurities, or other factors which can be frustratingly non-reproducible. To quote a view counter to the above model of friction: "Many people believe that the friction to be overcome to get something started (static friction) exceeds the force required to keep it sliding (sliding friction), but with dry metals it is very hard to show any difference. The opinion probably arises from experiences where small bits of oil or lubricant are present, or where blocks, for example, are supported by springs or other flexible supports so that they appear to bind." R. P. Feynman, R. P. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. I, p. 125, Addison-Wesley, 1964. Standard Newton's Laws Problems Some examples of standard "building block" problems which help build understanding of the principles of mechanics. Click on any of them for further details.