Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Quorum sensing wikipedia , lookup
Cyanobacteria wikipedia , lookup
Neisseria meningitidis wikipedia , lookup
Bacteriophage wikipedia , lookup
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth wikipedia , lookup
Unique properties of hyperthermophilic archaea wikipedia , lookup
Human microbiota wikipedia , lookup
Bacterial taxonomy wikipedia , lookup
B LO G E XC E r P T S Small Things Considered The Microbe Blog (at http://www.smallthingsconsidered.us) A Bacterial Mouth by Mark Martin, guest author http://schaechter.asmblog.org/ schaechter/2007/08/a-bacterial-mou.html This tale begins with Elio’s Talmudic Question #3: Why are no bacterial pathogens known to use a Bdellovibrio-type of mechanism to penetrate into eukaryotic cells? Since I have done a little work with predatory prokaryotes, this subject particularly interests me. We are only now starting to understand how Bdellovibrio obtains entry into that enigmatic compartment of gram-negative cells, the periplasm. Type IV pili have been implicated by a recent publication from Liz Sockett’s group in the United Kingdom. The periplasm is quite a unique place, full of osmotic challenges and diverse solutes, with a gel-like consistency. Eukaryotic cells do not possess a periplasm, so the simplest way to answer Elio’s question may be to state that there is no need for a Bdellovibrio-like mechanism. Instead, pathogens and symbionts hijack the mechanisms that eukaryotic cells use to internalize materials from their surroundings: phagocytosis and pinocytosis. So I would turn Elio’s ques- tion around with a not-quite Talmudic reply: why do prokaryotes not have phagocytosis or pinocytosis? This lead us to a seemingly bizarre question: can a bacterium have a “mouth?” Many bacteria consume long polymers, such as cellulose or chitin. One strategy used by gliding bacteria of the Cytophaga/ Flavobacteria group is to attach themselves to these polymers and secrete enzymes that release monomers or small oligomers. The fragments are then transported into the bacterial cytoplasm and further metabolized. One problem with this approach is that the importable fragments are available to other microbes, not just the organisms doing the “work.” Diffusion works against these polymer-degrading organisms, as well. This prompted me to recall a presentation I attended several years ago at ASMCUE by Julian Davies of the University of British Columbia. Julian told us about, of all things, a “bacterial mouth.” A gram-negative bacterium, Sphingomonas sp. strain A1, does something a bit unexpected. In response to the presence of alginate, it synthesizes an alginate lyase to depolymerize the polymer. But the cell also synthesizes a “pit” on its surface, approximately 0.02 Talmudic Question of the Month* What if all the bacteria and archaea on Earth decided to go on strike and stop their metabolism all at once? Which of the global cycles of matter would be affected first? How long would it take for life as we know it to come to a stop? Answers? Add a comment online to Talmudic Question #4, December 19, 2006. http://schaechter.asmblog.org/schaechter/2006/12/talmudic_quesit.html *We use this term to denote questions whose answers cannot be found by a Google search. 264 • Microbe / Volume 3, Number 5, 2008 Elio Schaechter and Merry Youle, fellow writer and editor to 0.1 μm in diameter. Only one pit is synthesized per cell, and it appears to be lined with ABC-type transporters specific for alginate-derived oligomers and monomers. This presents a solution to how a polymer can be broken down in an exclusive fashion: using a pit or proto-mouth linked to polymer degrading enzymes and an ABC transport system. The pit appears to concentrate the released oligomers, further reducing loss by diffusion. If bacteria can have a “mouth,” do they then “swallow?” Prokaryotes, it appears, don’t have much of a vacuolar system. However, this discussion of a pit and proto-mouth leads to the possibility of evolution toward something like phagocytosis and pinocytosis. We may yet find processes that resemble phagocytosis among the prokaryotes. We should start looking, perhaps, among the cell wall-less bacteria and archaea, which could conceivably form vacuoles by “engulfing” particles from the environment, much as eukaryotic amoebae do. In a nutrient-rich gut, or a hot spring, or within a complex biofilm, I believe that some uniquely weird and wonderful prokaryotes are waiting to be discovered. Perhaps even ones with a “mouth” and “teeth!” Mark Martin is assistant professor in the Department of Biology, University of Puget Sound. Evans, K. J., C. Lambert, and R. E. Sockett. 2007. Predation by Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100 requires type IV pili. J. Bacteriol. 189:4850–4859. Momma, K., M. Okamoto, Y. Mishima, S. Mori, W. Hashimoto, and K. Murata. 2000. A Novel Bacterial ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter System That Allows Uptake of Macromolecules. J. Bacteriol. 182:3998– 4004.