Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Schiehallion experiment wikipedia , lookup
Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup
Hotspot Ecosystem Research and Man's Impact On European Seas wikipedia , lookup
History of geology wikipedia , lookup
Plate tectonics wikipedia , lookup
Magnetotellurics wikipedia , lookup
Age of the Earth wikipedia , lookup
Ring of Fire wikipedia , lookup
Mantle plume wikipedia , lookup
Introduction. Planet Earth’s internal structure and the processes that give rise to it are thought to be known to a first order, as a result of geophysical and geological data and the interpretation of this data. Since sampling of the Earth’s interior below a few kilometers has only been possible through the eruptive products from volcanism and results of seismology, the geochemistry of erupted lavas plays an important role in constraining the Earth’s structure and history. The geochemistry of the lavas is mostly well explained by the theory of plate tectonics, and the related large-scale convection of the mantle, erupting at the boundaries of the Earth’s tectonic plates. However, a different type of volcanism erupts away from plate boundaries, which requires a different process generating magma and supplying the volcanoes. Known as tropical vacation destinations like Hawaii to most, these volcanoes are known as “hotspot” volcanoes to geologists, named after the likely cause for volcanism away from plate boundaries (likely to be anomalously hot, which generates magma). For the last four decades, the temperature anomaly has been explained with an upwelling hot plume of mantle material from the deep mantle, and this has been part of teaching material for introductory geology classes. In stark contrast, a group of well-established scientists have recently begun to argue against the existence of such mantle plumes, instead arguing for an overall warmer mantle, that feeds eruptions wherever the plates happen to crack and break. The controversy that has followed is of great importance to our understanding of the Earth’s interior, because mantle plumes require a particular set of physical conditions to exist, and their existence or lack thereof thus significantly impacts our understanding (of conditions) of the Earth’s dynamic interior. Some of the fuel for this controversy comes from a couple of island groups that do not fit the “plume” model perfectly. One of these groups is the Line Islands, located south of Hawaii (Figure 1), and the currently available (age) data requires geochemical fingerprinting to establish the origin for the volcanic chain. I therefore propose to guide a MSc. student in using the Geology Department’s facilities to measure the geochemical composition of an existing set of samples from the Line Islands, for which some key (age) data is already available. Radiogenic isotopes in geochemistry. In order to fingerprint the mantle material that produced the erupted lavas, usually the relative proportion of radiogenically produced isotopes (atoms with a different mass of the same element) compared to stable isotopes of the same element are measured. For example, the radioactive Figure 1. Google Earth image of the Pacific Ocean floor, where blue colors show deep ocean floor, while yellow and orange colors are shallow. The Line Islands are outlined by a red ellipse. The black lines indicate the age of the ocean floor. Since the Line Islands run parallel to the age contours, they were thought to have formed at a mid-oceanic plate boundary, however volcano ages suggest a more complicated origin. 2 decay of uranium (U) generates two different isotopes of lead (Pb) with atomic mass 206 and 207 (206Pb, 207 Pb). If U is given a significant amount of time, a lot of radiogenic 206Pb and 207Pb will be generated. The actual amount generated can be gauged by measuring the radiogenic isotopes against the stable isotope, 204Pb, which will remain unchanged over time. Therefore, the proportions of 206Pb and 207Pb versus 204Pb provide an estimate of time (commonly used to provide true ages for rocks). In addition, the amount of U compared to Pb is important, because if there was hardly any U to begin with, it will not produce significant amounts of 206Pb and 207Pb, thus leaving proportions of the 206Pb and 207Pb versus 204 Pb unchanged. In short, the measured Pb isotope proportions in volcanic rocks yield an integrated result of time for decay and initial relative proportions of U to Pb. These two factors are variable in the mantle source that provides the magma erupted at the surface, and therefore can be and have been used to track processes in the Earth’s interior. Combining the measurement of Pb isotopes with measurements of the daughter products of other radioactive systems (e.g. strontium - Sr, neodymium - Nd, hafnium Hf) makes it possible to constrain a number of different processes affecting the mantle through geologic time. As a result, it is relatively common to obtain multiple isotope measurements on a subset of the studied lava samples. The combined isotope data for sample sets from a variety of different “hotspot” volcanic systems define a significant range in measured isotope ratios. In a multi-dimensional plot of (Pb, Sr, Nd) isotope ratios, the data are confined within a tetrahedron, whose corners define isotopic compositions that have been associated with different dynamic processes within the Earth (Zindler and Hart, 1986; Hart et al., 1992; Figure 2). More importantly, the different volcanic systems take up different areas within the tetrahedron, making it possible to distinguish different “hotspots” by their geochemical composition. This is important in areas where volcanoes of different ages and origins are located in the same region, since the combination of geochemical compositions and ages can help unravel what volcanoes belong together and what process lies at their origin. The ages play an important role in this type of study, because “hotspot” volcanoes typically form a chain of progressively older volcanoes as a result of continued volcanic activity “burning a hole” into the bottom of a moving tectonic plate, building volcanoes that are slowly displaced from the source that feeds them. Therefore, hotspot volcanoes can be expected to show a chain of age-progressive volcanoes with a similar geochemical composition. Plate tectonics and hotspots. A key factor in the comparison of ages and geochemical compositions for different volcanoes is thus knowledge of how the Earth’s tectonic plates have moved through time. Based on a number of different datasets, ranging from geological to physical (GPS) measurements, plate motion models (e.g. Altamimi et al., 2002; Wessel and Kroenke, 2008) have been constructed over the last few decades, allowing for reconstruction of the original eruptive location of volcanoes, given the volcano’s age and current location. As a result, a complex region with volcanoes of various ages can be interpreted in terms of origin by taking each volcano’s age and reconstructing where plate motion models suggest the volcano would have been when it first erupted. Volcanoes that were fueled by the same “hotspot” should all reconstruct to roughly the same geographical location, while non-related volcanoes will reconstruct in entirely different locations. This approach was successfully used by Konter et al. (2008) to interpret the origin of submarine volcanoes in the western Pacific Ocean, an area crowded with submarine volcanoes. Multiple different sets of volcanoes, all older than fifty million years, reconstruct in three different clusters of eruptive locations, centered on three recently active volcanoes in the southwest Pacific Ocean (Figure 2). However, to truly prove a genetic relationship between the old volcanoes and recent volcanism the geochemical compositions should also match within each cluster. 3 Figure 2. Map of the southwest Pacific Ocean floor (color shows depth). Symbols show reconstructed eruptive locations for different “hotspot” volcanic chains. Isotopic compositions, shown in color (see inset), highlight compositional similarity within clusters with recent volcanism (stars), and differences between clusters. Map after Konter et al (2008). The geochemical comparisons are inherently multi-dimensional in nature and prompted Konter et al. (2008) to create a color-coding for the isotopic compositions of the measured lavas, where each corner of the isotopic range of all Earth’s hotspot volcanoes (tetrahedron shape; Figure 2) are represented by a different color. Each sample is assigned a color, the saturation of which is dependent on how close the sample is to the corners in isotopic space. As is visible in Figure 2, the combination of reconstructed eruptive locations based on volcano ages and the colors based on the geochemical compositions produces three clear “hotspot” locations of distinct compositions. Therefore, the results of this study showed that the volcanoes in this region actually are sourced in three focused areas despite the variable ages found for neighboring volcanoes, a feature found in few hotspot volcanic systems that has been used to argue against the existence of mantle plumes (e.g. Foulger and Natland, 2003). As a result, the work by Konter et al. (2008) stirred up quite a controversy with the researchers that have abandoned the plume model (and was highlighted on their website). Two other volcanic systems that define ambiguous age progressions are the Samoan volcanic chain and the volcanoes of the Line Islands. Currently funded and recent research of the PI and colleagues is unraveling the origin for Samoan volcanism (Koppers et al., 2008; Konter and Jackson, 2010; Jackson et al., 2010). However, for the Line Islands only age data are available, while it appears that this chain of volcanoes consists of at least four or five groups of volcanoes. Motivation for the proposed study. The Line Islands are some of the oldest hotspot volcanoes in Pacific Ocean basin, making them important for our understanding of the Earth’s mantle nearly one hundred million years ago, yet they are poorly understood in terms of their origin (Winterer, 1976; Schlanger et al., 1984; Epp, 1989). The currently available age data can be interpreted as either widespread volcanism along the entire chain during multiple time spans in geologic history, or overlapping volcanic chains resulting from multiple hotspots (Figure 3). If volcanism was active only during particular intervals in history, and the erupting volcanoes all along the island chain were genetically related shown by distinct compositions during each particular time period, these data would suggest a non-plume origin for the Line Islands. Alternatively, if there is no relationship in terms of origin between synchronously erupting volcanoes, and instead there is a relationship between location in the chain and age (i.e. an age progression), arguments can be made supporting the eruption of multiple plume-fed volcanoes constructing one long and complex volcanic chain. Geochemical data is required to distinguish between these two possibilities, where we might expect consistent geochemical (isotopic) compositions within the four or five potential hotspot volcanic chains. If plume-fed hotspots are not the 4 cause of the Line Islands, we might expect random compositions along potential hotspot volcanic chains. This proposal, therefore, requests funds to obtain isotope measurements at UTEP to distinguish between these options, and the different mantle structure they imply (Figure 4). Due to the large variation in hotspot lava isotope compositions (described above), the type of fingerprinting proposed here is best done with a combination of isotope systems (Sr, Nd, Pb, Hf). Goals and anticipated outcomes. I will use the funds requested in this proposal to achieve two major goals. First, I will analyze a subset (~10 samples) of the available samples, using the Geology clean laboratory Figure 3. Volcano age versus location (latitude). The wide and NSF-funded multi-collector mass scatter of the data might be the result of multiple plume-fed spectrometer. I have set up the laboratory hotspots generating volcanoes in different places along the chain. Each hotspot would generate a progressively older techniques required to measure the proposed chain away from the active location, which would generate different isotope ratios over the last few parallel slopes (orange lines). Alternatively, there may have years, and the funds requested will mainly been arbitrary volcanic activity along the entire chain at cover the supplies required for careful sample several different times. Geochemical data can resolve processing and purification for mass whether the sloped trends and thus plumes are realistic here. spectrometry. The other goal of this proposal will be to involve a student in this project and train her in the field of isotope geochemistry. A MSc. student that recently started working with me, Lauren Storm, has expressed interest in this project, and if funded this project will make up a significant part of her MSc. thesis. Since there are many facets to precise and effective laboratory procedures, I will work closely with Lauren guiding her through the complete process from sample dissolution, through purification, and mass spectrometry. My recent MSc student, Lynnette Crocker, first shadowed me through the entire procedure, and then processed the next set under my direct supervision. Since samples are run in small sets, a small number of samples are run this way, and then the remainder can be processed by the student independently, which has proven to be an effective approach (Crocker and Konter, 2010). Lauren has already started following me on a different project, which uses the same procedures, preparing her for her own sample sets. The intention is to have a Lauren present the results of this project at an international scientific conference, such as the Fall meeting of the American Geophysical Union. Part of the budget reflects this, with some travel funds requested for her to attend such a meeting. This research will subsequently be written up in a paper to be submitted to a top-tier refereed scientific journal (student will be first author). The exposure from presenting and publishing will allow me to seek external funding for further research of this type from the National Science Foundation (NSF). The NSF typically requires a pilot study to have been carried out as part of the argument for more detailed analysis. I anticipate writing such a proposal while we are working on the journal publication. 5 Figure 4. (Top) If multiple plume-fed hotspots created the Line Islands, the mantle would likely contain a number of focused upwelling plumes. (Bottom) If volcanoes were constructed along the island chain, randomly in location and composition, a compositionally variable (upper) mantle is required. Dynamically this implies a very different history and evolution for the Earth’s deep interior. Modified from Jackson et al. (2010). Work plan, and student involvement. The required laboratory techniques necessary to perform the proposed research are in place, and I have direct access to the samples from the Line Islands that were age-dated. Therefore, if this proposal is funded, my student Lauren and I will start immediately with processing the samples for purification and measurement. Since the techniques will require a number of standard geochemistry laboratory expendable items, I will immediately start purchasing supplies to carry out the laboratory work. These items include protective gear for clean room use (e.g. gloves, clothes), clean acids/reagents, multiple Teflon sample containers for each sample, ion-exchange resin, and smaller essential equipment such as pipette tips, centrifuge tubes, laboratory wipes and storage containers. I currently have some supplies available from other projects that will allow us to get started while the ordered supplies come in. Therefore, we will be able to get started with our sample dissolution right away. During this time sample splits will also be prepared for concentration analysis, since concentration data are required to interpret the isotope data. For example, understanding mixing of magmas requires knowledge of concentrations and isotope ratios to calculate the composition of potential mixtures. In the laboratory, the related steps to dissolution will take on the order of about a week, after which the chemical separation and purification will be started in at least two separate sets, running each isotope system sequentially. This will take on the order of two to three months. However, after each isotope system is prepared for one of the sample sets, mass spectrometry will be carried out, to ensure time is not wasted should something have gone wrong during the chemical procedures. During this entire process, the student will be exposed to highly technical sample preparation and purification, as well as learning to operate a state of the art multi collector mass spectrometer. Such experience will provide her with the qualifications to work in a commercial laboratory setting, or to continue on in a PhD program. Timeline. In the first 6 months we will focus on the chemical purification of the samples and start with mass spectrometry. The supplies will be purchased during this period, and sample concentration data will be obtained during this time. In the following 6 months, mass spectrometry will be finished, and data interpretation of both concentration and isotopic data will begin in preparation for both a presentation and a journal article. 6 Bibliography Altamimi, Z., Sillard, P., Boucher, C., 2002. ITRF2000; a new release of the international terrestrial reference frame for earth science applications. Journal of Geophysical Research 107, doi:10.1029/2001JB000561. Crocker, L.E., and Konter, J.G., 2010, Mantle-crust interactions and implications for the lithosphere of the Southern Rio Grande Rift (New Mexico) from Pb isotope data, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 74, A195. Epp, D., 1984, Possible perturbations to hotspot traces and implications for the origin and structure of the Line Islands. Journal of Geophysical Research , 89 (B13), 11273-11286. Foulger, G.R., Natland, J.H., 2003. Is "hotspot" volcanism a consequence of plate tectonics? Science 300, 921-922. Hart, S.R., Hauri, E.H., Oschmann, L.A., Whitehead, J.A., 1992. Mantle Plumes and Entrainment Isotopic Evidence. Science 256, 517-520. Jackson, M.G., Hart, S.R., Konter, J.G., Koppers, A.A.P., Staudigel, H., Kurz, M.D., Blusztajn, J., Sinton, J.M., in press—2010, The Samoan hotspot track on a “hotspot highway”: Implications for mantle plumes and a deep Samoan mantle source, submitted to Geochem., Geophys., Geosyst.. Konter, J.G.; Hanan, B.B., Blichert-Toft, J., Koppers, A.A.P., Plank, T., Staudigel, H., 2008, One hundred million years of mantle geochemical history suggest the retiring of mantle plumes is premature, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 275, 285-295. Konter, J.G., and Jackson, M.G., 2010, Examining the cause of rejuvenated volcanism in Samoa, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 74, A530. Koppers, A.A.P.; Russell, J.A.; Jackson, M.G.; Konter, J.; Staudigel, H.; Hart, S.R., 2008, Samoa reinstated as a primary hotspot trail, Geology, 36, 435-438. Schlanger, S., Garcia, M., Keating, B., Naughton, J., Sager, W., Haggerty, J., et al. (1984). Geology and geochronology of the Line Islands. Journal of Geophysical Research , 89 (B13), 11261. Wessel, P., Kroenke, L.W., 2008, Pacific absolute plate motion since 145 Ma: An assessment of the fixed hot spot hypothesis. Journal of Geophysical Research 113, doi: 10.1029/2007JB005499. Winterer, E. (1976). Bathymetry and regional tectonic setting of the Line Islands Chain, Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project , 33, 731-748. Zindler, A., Hart, S., 1986. Chemical geodynamics. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 14, 493571. 8