* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Dr Richard Everts - `Diagnosis and treatment of infected skin ulcers`
Antibiotics wikipedia , lookup
Brucellosis wikipedia , lookup
Traveler's diarrhea wikipedia , lookup
Middle East respiratory syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Neglected tropical diseases wikipedia , lookup
Gastroenteritis wikipedia , lookup
Herpes simplex wikipedia , lookup
Toxoplasmosis wikipedia , lookup
Hookworm infection wikipedia , lookup
Cryptosporidiosis wikipedia , lookup
West Nile fever wikipedia , lookup
Tuberculosis wikipedia , lookup
Chagas disease wikipedia , lookup
Sexually transmitted infection wikipedia , lookup
Anaerobic infection wikipedia , lookup
Staphylococcus aureus wikipedia , lookup
Marburg virus disease wikipedia , lookup
Clostridium difficile infection wikipedia , lookup
Visceral leishmaniasis wikipedia , lookup
African trypanosomiasis wikipedia , lookup
Onchocerciasis wikipedia , lookup
Leptospirosis wikipedia , lookup
Trichinosis wikipedia , lookup
Human cytomegalovirus wikipedia , lookup
Neisseria meningitidis wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis C wikipedia , lookup
Sarcocystis wikipedia , lookup
Dirofilaria immitis wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis B wikipedia , lookup
Neonatal infection wikipedia , lookup
Lymphocytic choriomeningitis wikipedia , lookup
Schistosomiasis wikipedia , lookup
Fasciolosis wikipedia , lookup
Oesophagostomum wikipedia , lookup
Diagnosis and treatment of infected skin ulcers Richard Everts Infectious Diseases Physician/Microbiologist Nelson Bays Primary Health Diagnosis What is infection? Disease presents as a continuum or spectrum of symptoms, signs and other features E.g. Asthma, mental illness Neisseria meningitidis Asymptomatic bacteriuria What is infection? A point in the continuum from harmless contamination to invasive disease at which the patient has symptoms, signs or complications/ problems (e.g. poor healing). Not infection Infection Harmless contamination ↓ Colonisation ↓ Heavy colonisation – mild immune reaction ↓ Invasive disease – major immune reaction What is infection? A point in the continuum from harmless contamination to invasive disease at which the patient has symptoms, signs or complications/ problems (e.g. poor healing). Not infection Infection Harmless contamination ↓ Colonisation ↓ Heavy colonisation – mild immune reaction ↓ Invasive disease – major immune reaction Immune reaction Cytokines, dilated blood vessels, leaky capillaries, migration of cells, debris Pain Swelling Lymphangitis Malaise Fever Redness Pus Lymphadenitis AbN vital signs CRP rise What is CRP? C-reactive protein Made by the liver in response to any tissue damage or inflammation Infection Trauma Auto-immune/connective tissue disease (RA, PMR, Crohn’s disease) Cancer A common laboratory test (cost $7-10) Most strikingly elevated in bacterial infection. CRP to diagnose infection CRP = 195 CRP = 13 Harmless transient contamination Colonisation Thanks to Susie Wendelborn Colonisation Swabbing a non-infected ulcer is like picking your nose in public... You need to think what you might do if you find something. Haemophilus ducreyi H. ducreyi •Causes chancroid (STI) in adults •2007 Auckland: 3 children from Samoa with skin ulcers •2013 PNG: 90 chronic skin ulcers: 42 H. ducreyi; 19 yaws; 12 both •Identify by PCR, not culture Yaws Infection Infection Infection Infection Infection Infection Why swab an infected ulcer? If suspect MRSA Recent previous positive If flucloxacillin is failing If there is frank pus. (And take blood cultures if febrile.) Skin cancer removed and grafted. Graft broke down. A little red, goopy, sore, not healing. Is it infected? Clinical signs alone? Which signs? (Thermal imaging?????) Patient measures temperature? Test CRP? Taking a sample for culture? If so, how? Trial of antibiotics? If so, which antibiotic? Collecting a sample WARNING: LOW-DATA TOPIC Tissue best (but hassle, invasive) Properly collected quantitative swab is reasonable alternative ‘Expert’ opinion: Clean site by wiping or irrigating with sterile water or saline to clear debris and exudate Debride if necrosis/eschar Moisten swab first if wound/ulcer-bed dry (??) Levine method: twirl with pressure on 1 cm2 area Patricia Bonham. Swab cultures for diagnosing wound infections: A literature review and clinical guideline. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2009; 36(4): 389-95 Assessing the swab result Surface swab culture correlates somewhat with biopsy culture J Trauma 1976; 16:89-94 and many others...... Gram stain microscopy Lots of white cells? Lots of pathogenic bacteria? Culture Pure or heavy growth? Pathogen? Who robbed the bank? Pseudomonas aeruginosa Coliforms (E. coli, Klebsiella etc.) Coagulase-negative staphylococci Anaerobes Staphylococcus aureus or Group A streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes) Colonisation Microscopy: No leucocytes seen Moderate GPC seen Culture: Heavy growth of normal skin flora Colonisation (but need to watch!) Microscopy: No leucocytes Moderate GNB Occasional GPC Culture: (1) Moderate growth of mixed coliform bacilli (2) Moderate growth of P. aeruginosa (3) Scanty growth of Staphylococcus aureus Heavy colonisation – may be contributing to non-healing Microscopy: Scanty leucocytes Scanty GNB Occasional GPC Culture: (1) Heavy growth of E. coli Colonisation Microscopy: No leucocytes Moderate GPC Moderate GPB Scanty GNB Culture: (1) Heavy growth of mixed coliforms (2) Moderate growth of Enterococcus spp. (3) Moderate growth of anaerobes Infection Microscopy: Moderate leucocytes Moderate GPC Culture: (1) Heavy growth of Staphylococcus aureus (2) Scanty growth of skin flora Infection (S. aureus) and heavy colonisation (coliforms) – with symptoms (pain) and complications (graft failure, not healing) Microscopy: Moderate leucocytes Moderate GPC Moderate GNB Culture: (1) Heavy growth of Staphylococcus aureus (2) Moderate growth of mixed coliform bacilli (3) Moderate growth of coagulase-negative staphylococci Summary - diagnosis No symptoms or signs of infection – don’t swab, no need for systemic antibiotic treatment Uncertain – consider correctly taken swab and assess result carefully; or trial of systemic antibiotic treatment Flucloxacillin > cephalexin/cefazolin > clindamycin Obviously infected – swab in selected cases, give systemic antibiotic treatment as above. Treatment Treatment of infected ulcers Treat underlying cause. Invasive disease Choice of systemic antibiotic Empiric – cover S. aureus and beta-haem strep – e.g., flucloxacillin Targeted Route and dose of systemic antibiotic Symptoms and signs of invasive infection Initially high-dose (IV or probenecid-boosted) Duration – varies. Density of bacterial tissue invasion correlates with delayed healing Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1964; 10: 147 Treatment of heavy colonisation What evidence is there for doing this? Surface colonisation correlates somewhat with tissue invasion on biopsy. 2. Topical antibacterial agents probably improve healing even in the absence of features of invasive infection. 1. Treatment of heavy colonisation Debride necrotic/devitalised material/eschar Remove slough/goop (toxins, WC, bacteria)? Dressings (none better than any other) Topical antibacterial agents Silver sulphadiazine Cadexomer iodine Povidone iodine Honey Peroxide Chlorhexidine Others..... Do topical antibacterial products or dressings kill bacteria? Kill bacteria in lab? – YES Kill bacteria on surface of ulcer – YES (for how long?) Kill bacteria deep in tissues – YES Chronic pressure ulcers. Test = reduce to < 105/g in biopsy in 3 weeks. Success rates: SSD (n = 15) 100%; saline (n=14) 79%; pov-iod (n=11) 64%. J Am Geriatr Soc 1981; 29(5): 232- Improve signs of infection – YES Chronic wounds (n=34). Test = infection checklist score change in 4 weeks. Silver alginate dressing 3.3 to 1.3; control 2.2 to 2.3. Advances in Skin and Wound Care 2012; 25(11): 503-8 Do topical anti-bacterial products or dressings cause damage? Allergic reaction? – OCCASIONALLY Damage cells (e.g. fibroblasts) in-vitro models SSD – YES Chlorhexidine – YES Povidone iodine – YES But in-vivo?? Anti-microbial resistance – SOME YES The ultimate test.... Randomised controlled trials of ulcer healing Requirements: Independent investigator (publication bias, assessment of outcome bias etc.) Ethics approved Patienti consent, ability to withdraw if choose Randomised Reasonable numbers Objective outcome scoring.... Topical anti-bacterial agents for venous ulcer healing Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014 45 RCTs, 53 comparisons, 4486 patients Poor design - small, high risk of bias, different baseline status, different duration of treatment.... Overall – difficult to know if effective or not! Results: Cadexomer iodine (12 RCT) – likelihood of complete healing at 4 to 12 weeks improved by RR 2.17 compared with standard care No evidence of benefit for povidone iodine (7 RCT), honey (2 RCT) Cochrane review of honey 2015 – may help burns and post-op wounds Surrogate markers only for silver (12 RCT – size, not % healed) and peroxide (4 RCT.) Thanks