Download Urban Forest Diversity - UC Davis Plant Sciences

Document related concepts

Tropical rainforest wikipedia , lookup

Fauna of Africa wikipedia , lookup

Tropical Africa wikipedia , lookup

Kasanka National Park wikipedia , lookup

History of the forest in Central Europe wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Urban Forest Diversity
Definition and Determination
Joe R. McBride
Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning
University of California
Berkeley, CA
1
Objectives
1. Define urban forest diversty
2. Describe measurement of species composition in urban forests
3. Identify factors contributing to urban forest species diversity
4. Identify trends in species diversity
5. Discuss the potential consequences of these trends
6. Review recommendations for establishment and maintenance
of urban forest diversity
2
Urban Forest Diversity
“The complexity of tree species composition,
the size distribution of trees, and the patterns
of distribution of trees within an urban
forest”
3
Importance of Diversity
1. In natural ecosystems there is a relationship
between stability and diversity
2. Maintaining more diverse urban forests
promotes greater stability
3. Diversity adds to functional and aesthetic
values of urban forests
4
Measures of Species Composition
1. Species Richness
2. Species Abundance
3. Species Diversity
5
Species Richness
Number of species in an area
6
Tree Species Richness
in Three California Cities
City
South Lake Tahoe
Menlo Park
Santa Barbara
Richness
35
145
1,226
7
Species Abundance
Relative numbers of individuals of species
8
Abundance of Street Trees in Berkeley
9
Species Diversity
Measure of species richness and abundance
10
Species Richness
Species
Urban Forest #1 Urban Forest #2
A


B


C

D

11
Species Abundance
Species
Urban Forest #1 Urban Forest #2
A
100
380
B
90
15
C
125
15
D
80
15
12
Simpson’s Diversity Index
D=
1
(pi)2
D = diversity index
pi = proportion
of
individuals in
the population
belonging to
species i
13
Simpson’s Divesity Indicies
of Hypothetical Urban Forests
Urban Forest #1
Urban Forest #2
3
Urban Forest #3
Proportion of Population Represented by Species (pi)
Forest ___
are needed
QuickTime™
decompressor
to see this
and
picture.
a
___
___
___
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
are needed
QuickTime™
decompressor
to see this
and
pictu
a
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Simpson’s Index
1
0.50
0.50
0
0
2.00
2
0.425
0.25
0.20
0.125
2.98
3
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
4.00
14
Comparison of Urban Forest Diversity
City
Index
Simpson’s Diversity
Mt. Vernon, Ohio
2.1
Newark, New jersey
2.3
Austin, Minnesota
2.7
Perrysburg, Ohio
3.0
Eugene, Oregon
3.3
Los Angeles, California
3.9
From: McPherson and Rowntree, 1989
15
Factors contributing to the variation
in Urban Forest Species Diversity
1. Climate
2. Tree Species Richness of Local Biome
3. History
4. Expert Advise
5. Spiritual/Psychological Values
6. Availability of Planting Stock
7. Epidemics of Insects and Disease
8. Public Popularity
16
Climate and Urban Forest Diveristy
Species Richness Analysis
17
Koppen’s Climate Classification
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
From: FAO - SDRN - Agrometeorology Group - 1997
18
Cities Surveyed in each Climate Zone
Tropical Moist
Bangkok
Lagos
New Delhi
Rio de Janeiro
Singapore
Dry Climates
Cario
Dubai
Lhasa
Phoenix
Moist, Mid-latitude, Mild Winters
Beijing
Moscow
Stockholm
Tokyo
Polar
Murmansk
Nuuk
Reykjavik
Moist, Mid-latitude, Mild Winters
Athens
New York
Brasilia
Paris
Buenos Aires
Quito
Cusco
Seattle
Hong Kong Sydney
Jacksonville
Tel Aviv
London
Vancouver
Los Angeles
19
Moscow - Distribution of Samples
20
Urban Forest Surveys
21
Street Data Form
Cross-section Sketch
22
Climate and Species Richness
Koppen Climate
Tropical Moist
Example City Average Species
Richness
Singapore
37
Dry
Cairo
Moist, Mid-latitude New York
with mild winters
Moist, Mid-latitude Moscow
with cold winters
Polar
Murmansk
28
48
32
9
23
Urban Forest Species Richness
in Relation to Climate
50
A = Tropical Moist Climates
B = Dry Climates
C = Moist, Mid-latitude Climates
with mild winters
D = Moist, Mid-latitude Climates
with cold winters
E = Polar Climates
•
40
¨
•
•
30
•
20
10
•
A
B
C
Koppen
¨ Climate
D
E
24
Frost Hardiness Zones
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
25
Urban Forest Species Richness
in Relation to Hardiness Zones
Hardiness
Zone
Temperature
Range (oF)
Example City
3-4
-40 to -20
Murmansk
Average
Species
Richness
9
5-6
-20 to 0
Moscow
32
7-8
0 to 20
Paris
42
9 - 10
20 to 40
Athens
42
11 - 12
40 to 60
Cairo
46
13 - 14
60 to 80
Dubai
30
26
Urban Forest Species Richness
in Relation to Hardiness Zones
3-4 = -40 to -20o F
5-6 = -20 to 0
7-8 = 0 to 20
9-10 = 20 to 40
11-12 = 40 to 60
13-14 = 60 to 80
50
•
•
•
40
¨
•
30
•
20
10
•
3-4
5-6
7-8
9-10
Hardiness Zone
11-12
13-14
27
Factors contributing to the variation
in Urban Forest Speices Diversity
1. Climate
2. Tree species richness of local biome
3. History
2. Spiritual/Psychological Values
4. Safety
5. Expert Advise
6. Availability of Planting Stock
7. Maintenance Costs
8. Epidemics of Insects and Disease
28
Biomes of the World
29
Tropical Forest Biome - Distribution and Climate
30
Coniferous Forest Biome - Distribution and Climate
31
32
33
Cities Surveyed in each Biome
Tropical Forest
Savanna
Bangkok
Rio de Janeiro
Singapore
Brasilia
Lagos
New Delhi
Broadleaf Evergreen Forest
Grassland
Hong Kong
Sydney
Tokyo
Buenos Aires
Johannesburg
Tehran
Deciduous Forest
Desert
New York
London
Paris
Cairo
Dubai
Phoenix
Mixed Deciduous-Coniferous Forest
Tundra
Beijing
Moscow
Stockholm
Murmansk
Nuuk
Reykjavik
Coniferous Forest
Highlands
Jacksonville
Seattle
Vancouver
Cusco
Lhasa
Quito
Mediterrean Woodland-Scrub
Athens
Los Angeles
Tel Aviv
34
Average Tree Species Richness
in Cities in Different Biomes
Biome
Tropical Forest
Broadleaf Evergreen
Deciduous Forest
Mixed Deciduous-Coniferous Forest
Coniferous Forest
Mediterranean Woodland-Scrub
Savanna
Grassland
Desert
Tundra
Highland
Average Number of Tree Species*
35
36
49
32
45
49
51
41
29
9
34
* Trees in the public right-of-way
35
36
Factors contributing to the variation
in Urban Forest Species Diversity
1. Climate
2. Tree Species Richness of Local Biome
3. History
4. Expert Advise
5. Spiritual/Psychological Values
6. Availability of Planting Stock
7. Epidemics of Insects and Disease
8. Public Popularity
37
Historical Factors Influencing Urban Forest
Tree Species Diversity
1. Exploration
2. Colonization
3. National Pride
38
John Bartram
Commonly Encountered English
Park Trees Introduced by Bartram
Eastern White Pine
Honey Locust
Scarlet Oak
Silver Maple
Southern Magnolia
Sugar Maple
Sweetgum
Sycamore
Tulip Tree
39
David Douglas
Commonly Encountered English
Park Trees Introduced by Douglas
Douglas-fir
Grand Fir
Noble Fir
Sitka Spruce
40
Oglethorpe’s Plan for Savannah, GA
41
Tree Species Introduced to America during
the British Colonial Period
Introduced Tree Species
Italian Poplar
Italian Cypress
English Oak
European Birch
Paper Mulberry
English Holly
Weeping Willow
42
British Colonization and the spread of London Plane Tree
London
43
Occurrence of London Plane trees
in British Colonial Cities
Biome*
Deciduous Forest
Grassland
Broadleaf Evergreen
Coniferous Forest
Presence of London Plane Tree**
British
Non-British
Colonial
Colonial
Cities(%)
Cities(%)
100
100
100
50
100
0
100
0
Average
100
38
* Biomes with cities in which London Plane tree was one of the top five most
frequently encountered street tree species
** London Plane tree was one of the tops five most frequently encountered
species
44
City
Mod al Boule var d tr ee
Spacin g (ft.)
Lond on
40
N ew Yor k*
40
N ew De lhi*
40
Cairo *
40
Ho ng Kong*
40
Lagos*
40
Singa pore *
40
Vancouv er*
40
Syd ney*
50
Johanne sbu rg*
35
Par is
38
Seatt le
35
Athen s
30
Stoc kho lm
28
Tokyo
25
Moscow
20
Teh ra n
20
*
Forme r British Colon ial City;
Modal Spacing of Trees
in Boulevard Medians
45
National Pride
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
46
Lombardy Poplar
Boston Commons, ca. 1750
47
Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington
Ca. 1800
1865
48
National Pride
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
49
WangFuJing Shopping District - Beijing
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
50
Factors contributing to the variation
in Urban Forest Species Diversity
1. Climate
2. Tree Species Richness of Local Biome
3. History
4. Expert Advise
5. Spiritual/Psychological Values
6. Availability of Planting Stock
7. Epidemics of Insects and Disease
8. Public Popularity
51
Expert Advise
1. Arborist’s Experience with Trees
2. Maintenance costs
3. Safety
52
53
Number of Recommended Species for San Francisco
Number of
Organization
Recommended Species
Friends of the Urban Forest (2007)
54
San Francisco Department of Urban Forestry (1998)
200
54
Maintenance Problems influencing Tree Selection
Tree Debris
Sidewalk and Curb Damage
Frequent Pruning Requirements
Safety
55
Tree Debris
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Bishop Ranch Business Park
56
Trees Planted at
Bishop Ranch Business Park
Black locust
Callery pear
Canary Island pine
Chinese pistache
Coast live oak
Cork oak
Crape myrtle
Deodar cedar
Evergreen ash
Hollywood juniper
Honey locust
Italian stone pine
Lombardy poplar
London plane
Redwood
Tulip tree
Gledista triacanthos
Pyrus calleryana
Pinus canariensis
Pistacia chinensis
Quercus agrifolia
Quercus suber
Lagerstroemia indica
Cedrus deodara
Fraxinus uhdei
Juniperus chinensis
Robinia pseudoacacia
Pinus pinea
Populus nigra ‘italica’
Platanus x acerifolia
Sequoia sempervirens
Liriodendron tulipfera
57
Trees not Planted at
Bishop Ranch Business Park
Cherry
Crabapple
Gingko
Strawberry Tree
Mulberry
Prunus spp.
Malus spp.
Gingko biloba
Arbutus unedo
Morus spp.
58
Messy Tree Fruit
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
59
Sidewalk and Curb Damage
60
Frequent Pruning Requirements
London Plane Tree
Evergreen Ash
Chinese Elm
61
Expert Advise on Planting under Power Lines
62
Space for Trees
30’
20’
63
Recommended Number of Species (<25’ tall)
City
“SafeTree” Other Authorities
Seattle
32
86 (Jacobson, 1989)
Los Angeles
18
61 (Perry, 1989)
Jacksonville
6
39 (Nelson, 2003)
64
Safety Considerations for Trees
in Traffic Circles and Medians
Traffic Circles - Berkeley, CA
“No oak trees or other species
characterized by having strong
wood”
Medians - Palo Alto, CA
“No trees in medians less than
4’wide”
“No trees that will reach reach
a diameter greater than 12”
ten years after planting”
65
Tree Debris and Safety
Sweetgum
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Tulip Tree
66
Chinese Elm and Branch Failure
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
67
Factors contributing to the variation
in Urban Forest Species Diversity
1. Climate
2. Tree Species Richness of Local Biome
3. History
4. Expert Advise
5. Spiritual/Psychological Values
6. Availability of Planting Stock
7. Epidemics of Insects and Disease
8. Public Popularity
68
Spiritual/Psychological Value of Trees
Religious Symbolism of Trees
Feng Shui
Early Childhood Environment
69
Trees Common to Cemeteries
San Francisco
Oakland
London
70
World’s Most Common Cemetery Trees
71
Cities in which trees with religious symbolism are
commonly used as street trees
City
Bangkok
New Delhi
Singapore
Hong Kong
Dubai
Tree
Bo Tree
Neem Tree
Bo Tree
Bo Tree
Ghaf tree
Scientific Name
Ficus religiosa
Azadirachta indica
Ficus religiosa
Ficus religiosa
Prosopis cineraria
72
Bo Tree
Nepal
73
Bo Tree
Bangkok
74
75
Feng Shui
Tree Placement:
Locate trees so they do not block
the flow of energy through the house.
Avoid tree placement in front of
doors and windows.
Trees to be Avoided
1. Trees that grow downward
• Weeping willow
• California pepper tree
2. Trees with sharp pointed leaves
• Holly
• Santa Lucia fir
3. Trees with thorns
• Honey locust
• Silk cotton tree
76
Psychological Importance of Trees
77
Early Childhood Environment Hypothesis
Clare Cooper Marcus
78
Danville, CA
79
Preferred Species of Homeowners in Danville, CA
(Wortheim, 1973)
Childhood Region
Northeast
Species Planted
Sugar Maple
Birch
Southeast
Southern Magnolia
Sweetgum
Central Rocky Mountains
Blue Spruce
Grand Fir
Southwest
Cottonwood
Yellow pine
California
Redwood
Coast Live Oak
80
Factors contributing to the variation
in Urban Forest Species Diversity
1. Climate
2. Tree Species Richness of Local Biome
3. History
4. Expert Advise
5. Spiritual/Psychological Values
6. Availability of Planting Stock
7. Epidemics of Insects and Disease
8. Public Popularity
81
Tree Nursery
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
From: reenurseries.us
82
South Lake Tahoe
Summer Cabin
Year Round Residence
83
South Lake Tahoe Nursery
84
Tree Species occurring around
Summer Cabins before 1950
Tree Type
Conifer
Hardwoods
Number of Species
6
3
Percent
67
33
Trees offered for sale in Lake Tahoe Basin
in 1995
Tree Type
Conifer
Hardwoods
Number of Species
30
80
Percent
27
73
85
Factors contributing to the variation
in Urban Forest Species Diversity
1. Climate
2. Tree Species Richness of Local Biome
3. History
4. Expert Advise
5. Spiritual/Psychological Values
6. Availability of Planting Stock
7. Epidemics of Insects and Disease
8. Public Popularity
86
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
American Elm - Dutch Elm
Angsana - Angsana Wilt Disease
Green Ash - Emerald Ash Borer
Horse Chestnut - Bleeding Canker Disease;
Leaf Miner Moth
87
Factors contributing to the variation
in Urban Forest Species Diversity
1. Climate
2. Tree Species Richness of Local Biome
3. History
4. Expert Advise
5. Spiritual/Psychological Values
6. Availability of Planting Stock
7. Epidemics of Insects and Disease
8. Public Popularity
88
Trends in Species Planting - Tokyo
From: Cheng and McBride, 2000
89
Maintenance and Preference:
Age Structure of Sweetgum and California Pepper Tree
Menlo
Park,
California
Menlo Park, CA 1975
10010080100-
Age Structure of Sweetgum and California Pepper Tree
Sweetgum
Age Structure of
Sweetgum
and1975
California
Pepper Tree
Menlo
Park, CA
California Pepper
Menlo Park, CA 1975
Sweetgum
Sweetgum
California Pepper
California Pepper
80% 6080-
California Pepper
1975
1905
% 60% 4060402040-
1925
20200-191945
0-19
0-19
Sweetgum
20-39
20-39
20-39
1885
40-59
60-79
Age
40-59
60-79
40-59 Age 60-79
Age
80-99
80-99
80-99
100-120
100-120
100-120
90
Trends in Species Diversity
91
Trends in Tree Diversity
Cities w ith street trees freq uencie s of 50 percen t or greater
Biom e
City
Species
Decid uous For est
Lond on
Lond on Plane Tree
67
Par is
Lond on Plane tr ee
67
Jacks onville
Live Oak
70
Laur el O ak
50
Moscow
Co m mo n Lim e
83
Beijing
Jap ane se Pago da T ree
56
Stoc kho lm
Co m mo n Lim e
50
Bu eno s Aires
Gr een Ash
67
Teh ra n
Or ien tal Pl ane Tree
54
Lhasa
Chin ese Wh ite Poplar
67
Co nife r For est
Mixed De cid uou sCo ni ferous Forest
Gr assland
H ighl and
Freq uen cy
92
Species Richness in American vs. European Cities
American Cities
City
European Cities
Species Richness*
New York 2.4
City
London
Species Richness*
1.5
Los Angeles
2.5
Athens
2.2
Seattle
2.2
Stockholm
1.2
Phoenix
4.0
Cairo
1.1
Average
2.8
Average
1.5
* Average number of street tree species in 25 sample plots
Sample plot 300’ long, trees on both sides of the street recorded
93
Consequences of Trends in Diversity
1. Risk of Disease or Insect Epidemics
2. Risk of Widespread Mortality due to Abiotic Factors
3. Homogenization of Urban Forest Aesthetics
94
Risk of Disease or Insect Epidemics
Ames, Iowa - 1969
Ames, Iowa - 1970
95
Risk of Widespread Mortality due to Abiotic Factors
96
Global Climate Change
San Francisco
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Average Maximun Temperature* = 69o F
Extreme Maximum Temperature = 97o F
Tijuana
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Average Maximun Temperature* = 75o F
Extreme Maximum Temperature = 108o F
* July Temperature
97
Global Climate Change
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Redding
Average Maximun Temperature* = 98o F
Extreme Maximum Temperature = 118o F
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Palm Springs
Average Maximun Temperature* = 108o F
Extreme Maximum Temperature = 123o F
98
Aesthetics of the Urban Forest
99
Lack of Aesthetic Variety
Moscow
London
Beijing
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Common Lime = 83%
Pagoda Tree = 56%
London Plane = 67%
100
Urban Forest Diversity
Recommendations
101
Recommendations
Barker (1975): Species = 5%
Grey and Deneke (1986): Species 10-15%
Moll (1989): Genus = 10%; Species = 5%
Santamour (1990): Family = 30%; Genus = 20%; Species = 10%
Miller and Miller (1991): Proven Species = 10%
Richards (1993): No numerical limits on proven species;
Diversity of size classes more important
Raupp et al. (2006): Diversify in response to known pest problems
(e.g., Emerald Ash Borer, Asian Longhorn Beetle)
102
“Urban foresters should take steps now to diversify the types
of trees that are planted in cities to avoid catastrophic tree
losses or massive and expensive tree protection programs.”
Michael J. Raupp, Anne Buckelew Cumming, and Erin C, Raupp, 2006
103
End
104
Most Frequently Encountered Street Trees
in Survey of 33 Cities
Common Name
Scientific Name
1. London Plane Tree
Platanus x acerifolia
2. Rowan
Sorbus aucuparia
3. Common Lime
Tilia europea
4. Canary Island Date palm
Pheonix canariensis
5. Norway Maple
Acer platanoides
6. Honey Locust
Gleditsia triacanthos
7. Jacaranda
Jacaranda mimosaefolia
8. Angsana
Pterocarpus indicus
9. Carolina poplar
Populus x canadensis
10, Silver Birch
Betula pendula
105
Trees offered for sale in Tahoe City
and South Lake Tahoe in 1995
Species (and cultivars)
Total
Hardwoods
Conifers
Number
110
80
30
106
107