* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download stability of infection patterns with time, the case of infectious
Survey
Document related concepts
Herpes simplex virus wikipedia , lookup
Diagnosis of HIV/AIDS wikipedia , lookup
Marburg virus disease wikipedia , lookup
Middle East respiratory syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Trichinosis wikipedia , lookup
West Nile fever wikipedia , lookup
Henipavirus wikipedia , lookup
Schistosomiasis wikipedia , lookup
Dirofilaria immitis wikipedia , lookup
Sarcocystis wikipedia , lookup
Coccidioidomycosis wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis C wikipedia , lookup
Human cytomegalovirus wikipedia , lookup
Neonatal infection wikipedia , lookup
Oesophagostomum wikipedia , lookup
Hospital-acquired infection wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
STABILITY OF INFECTION PATTERNS WITH TIME, THE CASE OF INFECTIOUS PANCREATIC NECROSIS VIRUS IN SCOTTISH FARMED SALMON Alexander G Murray and Rob S Raynard, FRS Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen AB11 9DB UK Method Is IPNV Persistent or Transient? Infectious pancreatic necrosis virus is widespread and increasing in Scottish salmon farms (90% marine sites) Sort sample from each site into pairs (e.g. 1&2, 1&3 and 2&3) Is a sample taken 1 or 2 years ago a good indicator of a sites current infection status? Is infection persistent (or repeated) or transient? Divide pairs into two sets: I. earlier sample +ve or II. earlier sample –ve Sort lists by time T between earlier and later sample If transient then: the high prevalence indicates very high transmission rates samples rapidly lose their information value for infection control controls should be targeted above site level Find probability of +ve versus T for list I Multilevel logistic regression model used to account for inter-regional (i) and inter-annual (j) variation Repeat for list II P(IT) = Logit(aij + bijIn(T+1)) A X B A 0% Time 1 Probability of positive result Probability infected 100% 0.9 0.8 0.7 F+ 0.6 >95% F- 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 <95% F+ F- 0 0 1 How to identify persistence 2 3 4 Years since earlier sample taken Results from freshwater: incomplete convergence = some persistence Ratio of conditional probabilities P(I+T|I+0)/P(I+T|I-0) Theory A. Pathogen persists, or repeatedly infects the same site, even after prolonged period sites that tested +ve are more likely to still test +ve than are formerly -ve sites Theory B. Pathogen is transient an infects sites at random, formerly -ve sites are just as likely as former +ve sites to test +ve after T (converging on regional average) 1 Probability of positive result What is the probability that +ve site will test +ve, relative to the probability that a site that tested -ve will test +ve after a given time? 0.9 >95% M- M+ 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 <95% M+ 0.4 M- 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 1 2 3 4 Years since earlier sample taken Results from marine sites: infection convergence = dynamic Conclusion IPNV infection does not persist on marine sites for periods of >2 years: Infection is transient. This may reflect harvesting and fallowing cycle after 18 months. Some freshwater sites show response to infection history several years later: infection is persistent