Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
J. gen. Virol. (1989), 70, 2887-2895. Printed in Great Britain 2887 Key words: avian influenza virus/lyrnphocytes/macrophage Virulent Avian Influenza A Viruses: Their Effect on Avian Lymphocytes and Macrophages in vivo and in vitro By H A N A V A N C A M P E N , * B E R N A R D C. E A S T E R D A Y AND V I R G I N I A S. H I N S H A W Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of WisconsinMadison, 2015 Linden Drive West, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A. (Accepted 9 July 1989) SUMMARY To investigate the pathogenesis of virulent avian influenza A viruses, the effect of A/turkey/Ont/7732/66 (H5N9) (Ty/Ont), A/tern/South Africa/1961 (H5N3) (Tern/S.A.) and A/chicken/Pennsylvania/1370/83 (H5N2) (Ck/Penn) on avian lymphoid cell populations was examined in vivo. Previous studies have shown that infection of chickens with Ty/Ont resulted in the extensive destruction of lymphoid tissues. In this study, other virulent avian H5 influenza viruses, Tern/S.A. or Ck/Penn, had little or no effect on lymphoid tissues of infected chickens. Therefore the effect of Ty/Ont on lymphoid tissue is a specific activity of this virus only and not of other virulent avian H5 influenza strains. To examine the role of viral replication in the destruction of lymphocytes, in vitro cultures of avian macrophages and lymphocytes were inoculated with Ty/Ont. Macrophages supported the synthesis of viral proteins whereas lymphocytes produced small, but detectable amounts of viral protein; however, infectious virus was not produced by either cell type. Furthermore inoculation of chicken spleen cells with Ty/Ont in vivo and in vitro had a profound effect on the proliferative response of lymphocytes to concanavalin A. These results suggest that Ty/Ont infects macrophages as well as lymphocytes in the chicken, and the effects of the virus on both cell types may well contribute to lymphoid necrosis. INTRODUCTION Virulent strains of avian influenza A viruses have caused severe losses to the poultry industry both in mortality and in costs of eradication (Kawaoka et al., 1984). The mechanisms by which these virulent strains cause disease and death of their hosts is not clear. In particular, the specific cells involved in viral replication and the mechanisms by which these viruses injure these cells have not been defined. Previous in vivo studies indicated that the virulent avian influenza virus, A/turkey/Ont/7732/66 (H5N9) (Ty/Ont) has a pronounced and specific effect on the lymphoid cell populations of its avian host (Van Campen et al., 1989). Inoculation of chickens with Ty/Ont resulted in the destruction of lymphocytes in both blood and tissues which was accompanied by high viral titres in these same tissues. Viral antigen was found in discrete, round cells within areas of lymphoid necrosis, suggesting that Ty/Ont replicates in cells present in lymphoid tissues and that viral replication is related to tissue destruction. The first portion of this study was undertaken to determine whether the destructive effect of Ty/Ont on lymphoid tissues was also a characteristic of other virulent avian H5 influenza A viruses. In previous reports describing the histopathological changes in chickens infected with virulent influenza A viruses, foci of lymphoid necrosis in the spleen were found in a small proportion of chickens inoculated with A/tern/South Africa/1961 (Tern/S.A.) (Uys & Becker, 1967), whereas necrosis of lymphoid tissue was not characteristic of A/chicken/Pennsylvania/1370/83 (Ck/Penn) infection (Acland et al., 1984). Specific cell populations involved in 0000-9006 © 1989 SGM Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Fri, 12 May 2017 10:03:14 2888 H. VAN CAMPEN, B. C. EASTERDAY AND V. S. HINSHAW t h e r e p l i c a t i o n o f t h e s e v i r u l e n t s t r a i n s o f i n f l u e n z a v i r u s w e r e n o t i d e n t i f i e d in e i t h e r case. I n t h i s study, l y m p h o i d tissues f r o m c h i c k e n s i n o c u l a t e d w i t h T e r n / S . A . or C k / P e n n w e r e e x a m i n e d for t h e p r e s e n c e o f v i r a l a n t i g e n . T h e effects o f T y / O n t o n l y m p h o i d cell p o p u l a t i o n s were e x a m i n e d in vitro to d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r v i r a l r e p l i c a t i o n w a s i n v o l v e d in t h e i r d e s t r u c t i o n . S p l e n i c l y m p h o c y t e a n d a d h e r e n t cell c u l t u r e s i n o c u l a t e d in vitro w e r e a s s a y e d for t h e p r o d u c t i o n o f v i r a l p r o t e i n s a n d i n f e c t i o u s virus. F u r t h e r m o r e , t h e effects o f T y / O n t o n t h e p r o l i f e r a t i v e r e s p o n s e o f l y m p h o c y t e s w e r e d e t e r m i n e d . T h e results suggest t h a t t h e n e c r o s i s o f l y m p h o i d tissues o b s e r v e d in vivo m a y result f r o m i n f e c t i o n o f m a c r o p h a g e s as well as l y m p h o c y t e s , b y T y / O n t . METHODS Chickens. White Leghorn chickens were obtained from a closed flock serologically negative for influenza and Newcastle disease virus. Viruses. The viruses were obtained from the virus repository at the School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison. All viruses were grown in embryonated chicken eggs; after 2 days at 35 °C, allantoic fluid was harvested and stored at - 70 °C. The virus, Ty/Ont, was from the first egg passage of virus isolated from the lung of an infected turkey. The virus, Ck/Penn, was kindly provided by J. Pearson, National Veterinary Services Laboratory, Ames, Iowa, U.S.A. The studies with Ck/Penn were conducted in a P3 containment laboratory at the School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Infection study. Ten chickens were inoculated with l03 EIDso of Tern/S.A. and four chickens were inoculated with 107.5 EIDs0 of Ck/Penn, intratracheally. The chickens were killed at 12 h (Tern/S.A.) or 24 h (Ck/Penn) intervals, necropsied and examined for gross lesions. Samples of trachea, thymus, skeletal muscle, spleen, liver, pancreas, duodenum, caecum, bursa, kidney, lung and air sac, heart, brain, and bone marrow were collected and fixed in 10~ buffered formalin for standard histopathological examination and for immunoperoxidase staining. Tissues placed into 10~ buffered formalin were processed and embedded in paraffin within 48 h of collection. Sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin for examination by light microscopy or stained using the immunoperoxidase technique described below. Cellpreparation and in vitro infection ofcetls. Chickens were killed by cervical dislocation and their spleens were aseptically removed and placed in a plastic Petri dish containing minimal essential medium (MEM) (Gibco) supplemented with 10~ bovine serum albumin (BSA), penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin.(100 ~tg/ml) and 2 mM-L-glutamine. The capsule was removed from the spleen and the minced tissue was passed through a tissue sieve (Bellco Glass). For preparation of lymphocytes, 4 ml aliquots of the resulting cell suspension were centrifuged at 60g for 15 min in 12 x 75 mm polypropylene tubes (Becton-Dickinson). The supernatants containing > 9 5 ~ lymphocytes were collected and the ceils were washed twice by centrifugation at 400 g for 10 min and resuspension in fresh media. To remove adherent cells, the suspension was passed through a sterile nylon wool column, incubated for 1 h at 39.5 °C and eluted with prewarmed medium (Schaefer et al., 1985). Spleen cells used for lymphocyte proliferation assays were obtained in the same manner except that adherent cells were not removed by passage over the nylon wool column. Cultures were enriched for adherent cells by allowing the spleen cell suspensions to adhere to 100 x 20 mm plastic Petri dishes (Becton-Dickinson) or two-chambered slides (Miles Laboratories) for 4 h at 39-5 °C. Nonadherent cells were removed by vigorous washing with prewarmed medium and the remaining adherent cells were cultured with fresh medium at 39.5 °C. Cultures of lymphocytes were inoculated with 0.1 or 10 EIDso/cell of Ty/Ont in 15 ml polypropylene centrifuge tubes (Costar) for 30 min. Cells were washed twice in medium by centrifugation, resuspended and incubated at 39.5 °C with 5 × 105 cells/ml in 50 ml flasks (Costar) and incubated for 48 h. One ml aliquots were removed ~/t timed intervals and centrifuged at 400 g for 8 min, and the supernatants were saved for virus titration. Four additional 200 ~tl aliquots were cytocentrifuged onto glass slides (Shandon Southern Instruments), fixed in methanol :acetone (1:1) at - 2 0 °C for 5 min and stored at - 2 0 °C for immunoperoxidase staining. Adherent cells cultured in Petri dishes were inoculated with 108.4 EID5o Ty/Ont and incubated for 45 min at 39-5 °C. The dishes were rinsed three times with medium and incubated at 39.5 °C with 5 ml fresh medium. All media were removed at timed intervals for virus titration and replaced by fresh media. Virus titration. To determine titres of infectious virus in the spleens of inoculated chickens, tissues were weighed and then disrupted with a Stomacher (Tekmar Company). Suspensions and supernatants from inoculated cell cultures were titrated in embryonated chicken eggs as previously described (Hinshaw et al., 1978). After 48 h at 35 °C, virus in allantoic fluid was detected by haemagglutination with chicken erythrocytes. Infectious centre assay. To provide lymphocyte and adherent cell cultures infected in vivo, a chicken was inoculated intratracheally with 9.5 x 103 p.f.u./0-5 ml BHIB, killed 24 h post-infection (p.i.) and the spleen was Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Fri, 12 May 2017 10:03:14 Pathogenesis of virulent avian influenza 2889 removed. Lymphocytes were cultured in suspension at 1 x 107 cells/ml. Adherent cells were prepared in six-well tissue culture plates. Aliquots of lymphocytes or the adherent cells from one well were removed at timed intervals, diluted and inoculated onto confluent monolayers of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. After incubation at 37 °C for 30 min, the cells were overlaid with agar containing trypsin (1 lag/ml), incubated for 48 h, and then overlaid with agar containing neutral red. Plaques were counted after 24 h. lmmunoperoxidase staining. Paraffin-embedded tissues were deparaffinized through a xylene and ethanol series. Cytocentrifuged slides and two-chambered slides fixed in methanol:acetone (1:1) were stained directly. Viral antigen was detected using the ABC avidin-biotin-immunoperoxidase staining technique (ABC Kit, Vector Laboratories) and a monoclonal antibody (MAb) to the viral nucleoprotein (NP) prepared in this laboratory. T lymphocytes were identified using a MAb to the avian T3 surface molecule kindly provided by Drs Chen-lo Chen and Max D. Cooper (Chen et al., 1986). Cells bearing surface Ia molecules were detected using the MAb CIa-1 (Fisher Scientific). Radioimmunoprecipitation (RIP). Virus-inoculated cultures of lymphocytes or adherent cells were incubated in methionine-free medium with 10~ BSA supplemented with 0.1 mCi of [35S]methionine for 8 h at 39.5 °C. Cell lysates were prepared and radioimmunoprecipitation was performed using MAbs to the NP and H5 haemagglutinin (HA) of Ty/Ont prepared in our laboratory. Precipitated antigens were separated using 10 ~oSDSPAGE (Laemmli, 1970) and examined by autoradiography. In situ hybridization. The probe used in these procedures is a BamHl restriction enzyme fragment of the NP clone, pSP56/501m, from A/PR/8/34 which was generously provided by Drs M. Krystal and P. Palese, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, U.S.A. An RNA probe labelled with [35S]UTP was prepared from this fragment in a 50 lal volume containing 40 mM-Tris-HC1 pH 7.5, 6 mM-MgC12, 2 mM-spermidine, 10 mMdithiothreitol, 0-5 mM each of ATP, CTP and GTP, 2 lag DNA, 6 laM-UTP, 2'5 laM-[3sS]UTP and 10 units of SP6 RNA polymerase. In situ hybridization was performed on paraffin-embedded tissue sections as described by Haase (1987) with the following modifications. Treatments to permeabilize tissue sections with digitonin, to remove RNA with ribonucleases A and T1, and to post-fix dsDNA with paraformaldehyde were eliminated. The hybridization solution contained 50~ deionized formamide, 0-6 M-NaCI, 10 mM-Tris-HC1 pH 7.4, l mM-EDTA, 50 lag/ml calf thymus DNA and 50 lag/ml yeast RNA in 1 x Denhardt's solution. The sections were pretreated with hybridization solution for 2 to 4 h at 37 °C, then incubated with the probe in the same solution, supplemented with 0.1 ~ Triton X-100 for 72 h. Slides were washed four times for 30 rain with 1 mM-EDTA and 0.1 ~ Triton X100 in 2 x SSC buffer, then washed once for 30 min in 50~ deionized formamide, 0.6 M-NaC1, 10 mM-Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 1 mM-EDTA. Slides were then washed twice in SSC for 45 rain, followed by four washes for 30 rain in 0.6 M-NaCI, 10 mM-Tris-HC1 pH 7.4, 1 mM-EDTA. Sections were dehydrated in 70~ and 95 ~oethanol with 0.3 Mammonium acetate, air-dried, coated with emulsion (Ilford) and stored at 4 °C for 1 week. The slides were developed for 8 min, rinsed, fixed for 15 rain, rinsed for 30 min and counterstained with haematoxylin. Characterization of adherent cells. Adherent cells on two-chambered slides were fixed in citrate-acetonemethanol fixative and analysed for ct-naphthyl acetate esterase activity using a Histozyme kit 90-1A (Sigma). Adherent ceils fixed in acetone-methanol were stained with Diff-Quik (American Scientific Products) and examined for phagocytosis of erythrocytes by light microscopy. Immunoperoxidase staining using the MAb CIa-1 was performed as described above. Proliferation assay. Spleen cell cultures were inoculated with 1, 10 and 100 EIDs0/cell of Ty/Ont, or with uninfected allantoic fluid and incubated for 45 min at 39.5 °C. Five x l0 s cells in 100 lal of culture medium were placed into wells of 96-well U-bottomed tissue cultures plates (Costar). Six wells were prepared with 100 p.1 of medium or medium supplemented with 10 lag/ml of concanavalin A (Con A; Sigma) and then incubated for 43 h. Wells were pulsed with 0.5 laCi of [3H]thymidine (New England Nuclear) in 5 lal of medium, cultured for an additional 5 h and cells were harvested onto glass fibre filters using a PhD cell harvester (Cambridge Technology Company). Incorporated radioactivity (c.p.m.) was counted in a scintillation medium (WestChem). RESULTS Effect of virulent avian influenza H5 viruses on the lymphoid tissues of chickens T o d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r the destructive effect of T y / O n t o n a v i a n l y m p h o i d tissues was characteristic o f o t h e r v i r u l e n t strains o f influenza virus, we e x a m i n e d tissues o f c h i c k e n s i n f e c t e d w i t h t w o o t h e r v i r u l e n t a v i a n H 5 viruses, T e r n / S . A . and C k / P e n n . In c o n t r a s t to the e x t e n s i v e l y m p h o i d necrosis o b s e r v e d in c h i c k e n s i n o c u l a t e d w i t h T y / O n t (Van C a m p e n et al., 1989), only three o f 10 c h i c k e n s i n o c u l a t e d w i t h T e r n / S . A . d e m o n s t r a t e d i n v o l v e m e n t o f the spleen, limited to a few focal areas o f h e t e r o p h i l i c infiltrates a n d l y m p h o i d necrosis. F o u r birds i n o c u l a t e d w i t h C k / P e n n did n o t d e v e l o p l y m p h o i d necrosis in any o r g a n e x a m i n e d . F i n d i n g s of m y o c a r d i t i s and encephalitis in c h i c k e n s i n o c u l a t e d w i t h T e r n / S . A . a n d p a n c r e a t i t i s and Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Fri, 12 May 2017 10:03:14 2890 (a) H. VAN CAMPEN, B. C. EASTERDAY AND V. S. HINSHAW (b) Fig. 1. (a) Immunoperoxidasestaining of the spleen from a chicken infected with Ty/Ont. The brown stain localized the viral nucleoprotein in discrete, round cells in a section of spleen. (/7) Immunoperoxidase staining of a section of spleen from a chicken infected with Tern/S.A. The viral antigen represented by the brown colour is detected in endothelial cells of an arteriole. Bar marker represents 50 ktm. myocarditis in chickens inoculated with Ck/Penn were consistent with previous reports (Acland et al., 1984; Uys & Becker, 1967). Thus the destructive effect of Ty/Ont on lymphoid tissues is characteristic of this particular influenza A virus, but not of other virulent H5 viruses. To correlate the differences in the tissue damage caused by these H5 viruses with their replication in different cell types, sections of spleen were examined for the presence of viral antigen by immunoperoxidase staining. In spleens from Ty/Ont-infected chickens, viral antigen was localized to discrete, round cells in areas of necrosis (Fig. 1 a). With Tern/S.A., viral antigen was present in endothelial cells of vessels throughout the spleen, as well as in cells in areas of necrosis (Fig. 1 b). In contrast viral antigen was rarely detected in the spleens of chickens infected with Ck/Penn and, when seen, was restricted to the endothelial cells. Therefore virulent avian influenza viruses infect and replicate in different cell types in vivo. The presence of viral antigen in lymphoid cells is characteristic only of the highly virulent Ty/Ont and not of these other virulent H5 viruses. Infectious virus production by lymphocytes and adherent cells The results of histopathological studies suggested that the destruction of lymphoid tissue in Ty/Ont-infected chickens was due to productive, lytic infection of cells found in lymphoid tissue (Van Campen et al., 1989). To determine the specific cells involved, avian spleen cells were separated into lymphocytes and adherent cells. The latter were characterized further: cultures of adherent cells from the spleens contained large cells with abundant cytoplasm and cytoplasmic processes, which stained positively for non-specific esterase activity and phagocytized erythrocytes (data not shown). Based on immunoperoxidase staining, these cells possessed the Ia Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Fri, 12 May 2017 10:03:14 Pathogenesis of virulent avian influenza 1 2 3 2891 4 HAO HAl HA2 Fig. 2. Autoradiographof immunoprecipitates fromcultures of Ty/Ont-inoculatedadherent cells (lanes 1 and 2) and lymphocytes(lanes 3 and 4). At 1 h p.i., cells were labelled with [3sS]methionine for 6 h. Cell lysates were reacted with MAbs to the nucleoprotein (NP) (lanes 1 and 3) or to the H5 haemagglutinin (HA) (lanes 2 and 4), and the immunoprecipitated proteins were resolved by SDSPAGE. The locationof the NP, HA0 and the subunits HA1 and HA2 are indicated on the left margin. The Mr values of the electrophoretic markers are indicated alongthe right margin. The largest band in the adherent cell lysatesprecipitated with MAb to NP and may represent an NP-polymerasecomplex. antigen of macrophages, but not the T3 antigen of T lymphocytes. These adherent cells shared many characteristics with macrophages and are, hereafter, designated as such. To determine whether splenic lymphocytes or macrophages could support productive infection with Ty/Ont, cultures of these cells were inoculated in vitro and assayed for infectious virus. Titres of virus in the supernatants decreased over 48 h incubation, indicating that infectious virus was not produced in either lymphocyte or macrophage cultures (results not shown). In infectious centre assays, virus was detected in both macrophages and lymphocytes from the inoculated chicken, indicating that these cells were infected in vivo. The number of infectious centres decreased over 48 h in culture; thus, these cells did not produce infectious virus in vitro (results not shown). We recognized that our culture conditions might be inappropriate for productive infection, so we examined a variety of different factors for their effect on virus production, including media, serum source, incubation temperature, cell concentration and prior activation of lymphocytes with mitogen. The cell cultures still failed to produce infectious virus. In vitro production of viral proteins in lymphocytes compared to macrophages To determine whether viral proteins were produced in vitro, the lymphocyte and macrophage cultures were inoculated with Ty/Ont and assayed for viral antigen by immunoperoxidase staining; lymphocytes, including T lymphocytes identified by immunoperoxidase staining for Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Fri, 12 May 2017 10:03:14 2892 H. VAN CAMPEN, B. C. EASTERDAY AND V. S. HINSHAW Fig. 3. Detection of viral RNA by in situ hybridization in a large cell within the white pulp of a spleen from a chicken 60 h p.i. with Ty/Ont. A [35S]UTP-labelled RNA probe to the viral NP gene was used. Bar marker represents 50 Ixm. the T3 molecule, did not stain for viral antigen (results not shown). In contrast, viral antigen was found in the cytoplasm of macrophages inoculated with Ty/Ont. The staining was not due to phagocytosed virus since macrophages inoculated with inactivated virus failed to stain (results not shown). RIP of cell lysates with MAbs to the H5 HA and NP, shown in Fig. 2, indicated that infected macrophages produced these viral proteins. Furthermore, the HA molecules produced in macrophages were cleaved into HA1 and HA2 subunits (Fig. 2); such cleavage of the HA is a characteristic of virulent avian influenza viruses and a prerequisite to their infectivity (Klenk et al., 1975; Lazarowitz & Choppin, 1975). A small amount of viral NP, but no HA, was detected in cell lysates of lymphocyte cultures, indicating either a low level of viral protein synthesis or synthesis in a small subpopulation of these cells. We cannot exclude the possibility that the NP may have been synthesized in a few contaminating macrophages. In the RIP of lymphocyte cultures, additional bands were seen (Fig. 2) and their origin, that is, cellular or viral, is not known; their precipitation appears to be non-specific as they are precipitated by both MAbs. These results indicate that in vitro cultures of macrophages and lymphocytes synthesize viral proteins, although no infectious virus particles are produced. Production of viral RNA in lymphocytes and macrophages To detect the presence of viral RNA, lymphocyte and macrophage cultures were inoculated with Ty/Ont and examined by in situ hybridization. Viral RNA was detected in macrophages, but not in lymphocytes (not shown). In sections of spleen from Ty/Ont-inoculated chickens, viral RNA was also detected in a small number of large cells in the areas of lymphoid necrosis (Fig. 3). These cells appeared to be macrophages on the basis of their size and distribution. Thus viral RNA was evident in macrophages in vivo and in vitro. Effect of Ty/Ont on the in vitro proliferation of Con A-stimulated lymphocytes To determine whether Ty/Ont affects avian lymphocyte function, cultured spleen cells were inoculated with different doses of Ty/Ont and then compared for their ability to proliferate in response to the T lymphocyte mitogen, Con A. The proliferative response of lymphocytes as Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Fri, 12 May 2017 10:03:14 2893 Pathogenesis o f virulent avian influenza Table 1. Con A stimulation of chicken spleen cells inoculated with Ty/Ont or fl-propiolactoneinactivated virus [3H]Thymidineincorporation (c.p.m.) t" Virus Ty/Ont Ty/Ont + Con A Inactivated Ty/Ont Inactivated Ty/Ont + Con A h Uninfected control • 1 Dose of virus (EIDso/cell) ~" 10 294 + 124" 61398 __+25795 296 +_ 93 405 +_ 96 100247 + 11130 441 + 138 486 _+ 106 93756 _+ 14274 350 + 58 58287 4-_ 35083 120666 _+ 21979 116435 + 10468 100 174 _ 74 607 + i86 184 _ 75 152 + 68 * Average of six replicate wells + s,D. measured by the incorporation of[3H]thymidine (Table 1) did not increase with increasing doses of virus alone, indicating that Ty/Ont, itself, was not mitogenic. In the presence of Con A, doses of 1 and 10 EIDs0 per cell of Ty/Ont resulted in marked enhancement of the response compared to that of the uninfected controls, The enhancement appeared to be synergistic, being greater than the sum of the responses to virus or to mitogen alone. A clearly different effect was found with cells inoculated with the highest dose of Ty/Ont, i.e, 100 EIDso per cell resulted in severe inhibition of the proliferative response of these cells to Con A compared to the uninfected control. Addition of fl-propiolactone-inactivated virus to cell cultures gave similar results indicating that replication was not necessary for enhancement or for inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation in response to mitogen. To determine whether spleen cells infected in vivo were similarly affected, chickens were inoculated intratracheally with 103 EIDso of Ty/Ont, then killed at 12, 24 and 48 h later; the titre of infectious virus per g of spleen was 0, 2-5 x 105 and 3-2 x 106 EID5o respectively. The spleen cells from inoculated chickens were assayed for their ability to respond to Con A. The proliferative responses of cells (mean + s,E,~, of six replicate cells) harvested 12 h (30712 + 3913 c.p.m.) and 24 h (95253 + 14786 c.p.m,) p.i. were markedly stimulated compared to the uninfected control (8120_+ 1312 c.p.m.). In contrast, the response of cells 48 h p.i. (431 _+104 c.p.m.) was severely depressed, Thus, the proliferative response of avian lymphocytes inoculated with Ty/Ont in vivo behaved in a manner similar to cells inoculated in vitro. Low doses of Ty/Ont appeared to activate lymphocytes and to enhance their ability to respond to mitogen, whereas high doses of Ty/Ont depressed the mitogenic response. DISCUSSION Destruction of lymphoid tissues by Ty/Ont is a characteristic of infection with this highly virulent avian influenza virus and not of other virulent avian H5 viruses, Tern/S.A. or Ck/Penn. These three strains vary in the cell type(s) in which viral antigen is found, indicating that they infect and replicate in different cell types. The resulting differences in the type and degree of tissue damage may explain the variable manifestations of disease associated with these viruses (Easterday & Beard, 1984). Our findings indicate that the pathogenesis of virulent avian influenza viruses is likely to involve more than one mechanism; therefore, conclusions drawn from investigations of one strain may not be applicable to others. Previous in vivo studies (Van Campen et al., 1989) suggested that the destruction of lymphoid tissues in chickens infected with Ty/Ont was the result of lytic and productive infection of lymphocytes. Our in vitro experiments indicate that splenic macrophages, as well as lymphocytes, are infected by this virus and support the synthesis of viral proteins. Free infectious virus is not produced by either cell type in vitro; the reason for this is not yet clear. In situ hybridization detected viral RNA in macrophages infected with Ty/Ont both in vivo and in vitro, emphasizing the importance of the macrophage in the viral infection. Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Fri, 12 May 2017 10:03:14 2894 H. VAN CAMPEN, B. C. EASTERDAY AND V. S. HINSHAW The striking feature of infection with Ty/Ont is the destruction of lymphoid tissues. This could occur by virus infection that results in killing lymphocytes and macrophages present in large numbers in the spleen; however, processes other than viral replication might be involved. In investigating this possibility, we found that Ty/Ont affected the in vitro response of avian lymphocytes to mitogen in a dose-dependent manner. Possible explanations for the enhanced response with low doses of Ty/Ont include the release of lymphocyte-activating factors by macrophages, direct activation o f lymphocytes or a direct mitogenic effect of influenza virus on lymphocytes. W e favour the first possibility, i.e. that infected macrophages release soluble factors that activate adjacent lymphocytes and enhance their ability to respond to mitogen. In support of this, h u m a n macrophages produce intedeukin-I (Roberts et aL, 1986) in response to influenza A virus; therefore avian macrophages may produce interleukin-1 and other cytokines in response to Ty/Ont. Direct activation of lymphocytes by Ty/Ont cannot be excluded since they a p p e a r to be infected by the virus; however, studies by Roberts (1982) suggest that effects of influenza A viruses on lymphocyte proliferation are macrophage-dependent. It is unlikely that Ty/Ont has a direct mitogenic effect as has been demonstrated for viruses of the H2, H3 and H6 subtypes for murine B lymphocytes (Poumbourios et al., 1987) because addition of Ty/Ont alone did not increase the proliferation of the lymphocytes. The highest dose of Ty/Ont resulted in a profound inhibition of the lymphocyte response to mitogen. This inhibition of function m a y reflect a decrease in the viability of the lymphocytes, as well as direct inhibition of lymphocyte function. The destruction of lymphocytes in vivo and decreased viability of lymphocytes and macrophages observed in vitro suggest that Ty/Ont affects the viability of these cells. Influenza A viruses are reported to be toxic as a result of abortive infections of non-permissive cells (Mims, 1960; Rodgers & Mims, 1981). The observed inhibition with Ty/Ont cannot be fully explained by abortive infection of the lymphocytes, as a decrease response to Con A also occurred with inactivated virus. W e speculate that Ty/Ont infection of macrophages m a y well affect the viability of lymphocytes. Macrophages exposed to influenza virus release toxic substances, such as oxygen radicals (Oda et al., 1989), lysosomal contents or soluble factors, such as tumour necrosis factor (Beutler et al., 1986). Therefore the lymphoid necrosis observed in vivo m a y be due to the release of deleterious factors by infected macrophages, as well as to viral replication. F u r t h e r investigation of the interaction between influenza viruses and target cells, such as lymphocytes and macrophages, may help us understand the effects of other acute viral infections on lymphoid tissues. The authors thank Drs Chen-lo Chen and Max D. Cooper, Tumor Institute, University of Alabama for providing the monoclonal antibody to the avian T3 molecule. We appreciate the technical assistance of M. S. Sheerar, T. Ruffalo and N. Dybdahl-Sissoko and the helpful discussions with A. Haase, A. Palmenberg, M. S. Philpott and C. Hioe. This work was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture Biotechnology Grant 86-CRCR- 1-2194, Special Grant CRSR-2-3159 and Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station WIS3101, and was presented in part of the American Association of Avian Pathology Meeting in July 1988. REFERENCES ACLAND,H. M., SILVERMAN-BACHIN,L. A. & ECKROADE,R. J. (1984). Lesions in broiler and layer chickens in an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus infection. Veterinary Pathology 21, 564-569. BEUTLER, B., KROCHIN, N., MILSARK, I. W., GOLDBERG, A. & CERAMI, A. (1986). Induction ofcachectin (tumor necrosis factor) synthesis by influenza virus: deficient production by endotoxin-resistant (C3H/HEJ) macrophages. Clinical Research 34, 491A. CHEN,C-L., AGER,L. L., GARLAND,G. L. & COOPER,U. D. (1986). Identification of a T3/T cell receptor complex in chickens. Journal of Experimental Medicine 164, 375-380. EASTERDAY,a. C. &BEARD,C. W. (1984). Avian influenza. In Diseases of Poultry, 8th edn., pp. 482-496. Edited by M. S. Hofstad, H. J. Barnes, B. W. Calnek, W. M. Reid & A. W. Yoder, Jr. Ames: Iowa State University Press. HAASE,A. T. (1987). Analysis of viral infections by in situ hybridization. In In situ Hybridization, Application to "Neurobiology. Edited by K. L. Valentino, J. H. Eberwine & J. D. Barchas. New York: Oxford University Press. HINSHAW,V. S., WEBSTER,R. G. &TURNER,B. (1978). Novel influenza A viruses isolated from Canadian feral ducks: including strains antigenically related to swine influenza (HswlN1) viruses. Journal of General Virology 41, 115-127. Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Fri, 12 May 2017 10:03:14 Pathogenesis of virulent avian influenza 2895 KAWAOKA,Y., NAEVE,C. W. & WEBSTER,g. G. (1984). IS virulence of H5N2 influenza viruses in chickens associated with loss of carbohydrate from the hemagglutinin? Virology 139, 303-316. KLENK, H.-D., ROTT, R., ORLICH, M. & BLODORN, J. (1975). Activation of influenza A viruses by trypsin treatment. Virology 68, 426-439. LAEMML1, U. K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, London 227, 680-685. LAZ~a~OWITZ, S. G. & CHOPPIN, P. W. (1975). Enhancement of the infectivity of influenza A and B viruses by proteolytic cleavage of the hemagglutinin polypeptide. Virology 68, 440-454. MIMS,C. A. (1960). An analysis of the toxicity for mice of influenza virus. I. Intracerebral toxicity. British Journalof Experimental Pathology 41, 586-592. ODA,T., AKAIKE,Y., HAMAMOTO,T., SUZUKI,F., HIRANO,T. & MAEDA,H. (1989). Oxygen radicals in influenza-induced pathogenesis and treatment with pyran polymer-conjugated SOD. Science 244, 974-976. POUMBOURIOS,P., ANDERS,E. M., SCALZO, A. A., WHITE, D. O., HAMPSON,A. W. & JACKSON,D. C. (1987). Direct role of viral hemagglutinin in B cell mitogenesis by influenza viruses. Journal of Virology 61, 214-217. ROBERTS, N. J., JR (1982). Different effects of influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, and Sendai virus on human lymphocytes and macrophages. Infection and Immunity 35, 1142-1146. ROBERTS, N. J., JR, PRILL, A. H. & MANN,T. N. (1986). Interleukin 1 and interleukin 1 inhibitor production by human macrophages exposed to influenza virus or respiratory syncytial virus. Journal of Experimental Medicine 163, 511-519. RODGERS, B. & MIMS,C. A. (1981). Interaction of influenza virus with mouse macrophages. Infection and Immunity 31, 751-757. SCHAEFER,A. E., SCAFURI,A. R., FREDERICKSE,T. L. & GILMOUR,D. G. (1985). Strong suppression of monocytes of T cell mitogenesis in chicken peripheral blood leukocytes. Journal of Immunology 135, 1652-1660. uYs, c. J. & BECKER,W. B. (1967). Experimental infection of chickens with influenza A/Tern/South Africa/1961 and Chicken/Scotland/1959 viruses. Journal of Comparative Pathology 77, 167-173. VAN CAMPEN, H., EASTERDAY,B. C. & HINSHAW, V. S. (1989). Destruction of lymphocytes by a virulent avian influenza A virus. Journal of General Virology 70, 467-472. (Received 10 April 1989) Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 88.99.165.207 On: Fri, 12 May 2017 10:03:14