Download PDF

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Augsburger Puppenkiste wikipedia , lookup

Theater (structure) wikipedia , lookup

Theatre wikipedia , lookup

English Renaissance theatre wikipedia , lookup

Medieval theatre wikipedia , lookup

Theatre of France wikipedia , lookup

Antitheatricality wikipedia , lookup

Theatre of the Oppressed wikipedia , lookup

Meta-reference wikipedia , lookup

Actor wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Who’s Watching Who? Theatre Censorship in East Germany and Beyond.
Schools Materials © University of Edinburgh
DRAMA TEACHING MATERIALS: THE ACTOR
AND THE FALL OF THE BERLIN WALL.
On 6 October 1989, in East Germany, the members of Dresden’s leading theatre came on
stage at the end of the evening performance. They held hands, trembling, as the lead actor
stepped forward and declared:
We are stepping out of our roles. The situation in our country forces us to.
A country that cannot hold on to its young people is endangering its future.
The leadership of a state that does not speak to its people has no credibility.
A party leadership that has ceased to examine the practicability of its principles
Is condemned to decline.
A nation that was forced to remain silent is beginning to become violent.
The truth must come to light. We have invested our work in this country. We will not let our
country be destroyed.
We are using this platform to make the following demands:
1. We have a right to information
2. We have a right to dialogue
3. We have a right to independent thought and creativity
4. We have a right to pluralistic thinking
5. We have a right to disagree
6. We have a right to freedom of travel
7. We have a right to examine the leadership of the state
8. We have a right to think new thoughts
9. We have a right to intervene.
We are using this platform to declare our duty:
1. We have the duty to demand that lies and rose-tinted reports disappear from our media
2. We have the duty to insist on a dialogue between the people and the leadership of the party
and state
3. We have the duty to demand that both we and the state apparatus conduct this dialogue
without violence
4. We have the duty to define the word socialism in such a way that it once again becomes an
acceptable ideal for our people
5. We have the duty to demand of the leadership of our state and party that they work to
regain the trust of the population.
This statement announced a shift from theatrical dissent to political opposition. Read more
at: http://www.blogs.hss.ed.ac.uk/whos-watching-who/tales-archive/theatre-fall-berlin-wall/.
1
Who’s Watching Who? Theatre Censorship in East Germany and Beyond.
Schools Materials © University of Edinburgh
November 1989
Just under a month later, theatre practitioners played a key role in a demonstration on
Alexanderplatz in East Berlin. Held on 4th November, this was the largest mass
demonstration in the GDR’s history.
Image: Ulrich Mühe (best known from The Lives of Others) und Johanna Schall (Bertolt Brecht’s
granddaughter!) at the Alexanderplatz demonstration, East Berlin, 4 November 1989. Source: BArch Bild 1831989-1104-034 / Hubert Link.
2
Who’s Watching Who? Theatre Censorship in East Germany and Beyond.
Schools Materials © University of Edinburgh
Activities
1) Read the text on page 1 carefully and, in groups of two to three, try to imagine life in the
state against which the authors are protesting. What conflicts might arise out of this
situation for actors dedicated to artistic exploration but employed by state theatres?
In these groups, improvise a situation in the daily life of an actor that would reflect the
conditions that might prompt you to write such a protest.
2) This text was delivered on stage every night from 4 October 1989 by the actors of the
Staatsschauspiel in Dresden, after the evening’s performance had ended. They would step
out of the roles they had been playing in order to do so.
Imagine that you are stepping out of a theatrical role to deliver this protest speech to a
theatre audience. Think in particular of the differences you would have to make to your
physical presence on the stage and how you would speak directly to an audience.
3) The image on the previous page depicts the actors Ulrich Mühe and Johanna Schall
(Bertolt Brecht’s granddaughter!) at a demonstration held in Berlin on 4 November 1989,
which was attended by over half a million demonstrators.
In pairs, devise how you would deliver this protest speech to an audience on this scale. You
would be standing on a platform and speaking into a microphone, so your movement would
be severely restricted. Think about how you might need to adapt your performance
according to the reactions of your listeners.
4) Imagine that this speech provides you with the text for a short play. Try to perform this
play to a theatre audience, considering in particular how you would divide the text between
actors and how you might generate some form of plot unfolding between the actors.
Sources
Protest read by the Ensemble of the Staatsschauspiel Dresden every night as of 4 October
1989. For the original German, see Angela Kuberski, ed., Wir treten aus unseren Rollen
heraus: Dokumente des Aufbruchs Herbst ’89, Theaterarbeit in der DDR, 19 (Berlin:
Zentrum für Theaterdokumentation und –information, 1990), p. 39.
The additional text on pages 1 and 2 of this handout is adapted from a more detailed text
by
Dr
Laura
Bradley,
University
of
Edinburgh,
available
at
http://www.blogs.hss.ed.ac.uk/whos-watching-who/tales-archive/theatre-fall-berlin-wall/.
3