Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Perception of symbiotic lipo-chitooligosaccharides and chitooligosaccharides by plants John A Smith1 and Eric Dupont2 1LRSV, Université de Toulouse-CNRS, Castanet-Tolosan, France; 2LIPM, INRACNRS, Castanet-Tolosan, France. Lipo-chitooligosaccharide (LCO) signal molecules were first identified as secreted by rhizobial bacteria and essential for establishment of the root nodule symbiosis in many legumes. More recently the arbuscular mycorhizal (AM) fungus Rhizophagus irregularis was shown to secrete LCOs1, and short chain chitooligosaccharides (COs)2. In contrast to the rhizobial LCOs, the exact role of fungal LCOs and COs in symbiosis is not yet known, but their application on different plant species induces molecular and developmental responses. We aim to better understand the roles of these fungal molecules by identifying their plant receptors through a combination of biochemical and reverse genetic approaches. Proteins encoded by the Lysin-Motif Receptor-Like Kinase (LysM-RLK) and Lysin-Motif Receptor-Like Protein (LysM-RLP) multigenic families are candidates to be LCO and CO receptors. We have chosen the dicotyledonous Solanaceae tomato and the monocotyledonous Poaceae Brachypodium distachyon for reverse genetics. We have also analyzed biochemical functions of LysM-RLK/Ps from these and additional non-legume plant species. We are using Virus Induced Gene Silencing to screen for Solanaceae LysM-RLK/Ps playing major roles in the AM symbiosis. Similarly, B. distachyon lines mutated in LysM-RLK/Ps are being collected and analyzed for responses to LCOs and COs, and for their abilities to establish the AM symbiosis. We have shown that a tomato LysMRLK is required for colonization by R. Irregularis. LCO binding assays showed that various LysM-RLKs have affinity for LCOs, and differences found between species suggest diverse sensitivities to LCOs between plants. 1Maillet et al. (2011) Nature 469: 58-63, Genre et al. (2013) 2Genre et al. (2013) New Phytol 198: 190-202