Download Revised APL manuscript suplementary 23-06-2016

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Electromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup

Matter wave wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Supplementary Material for "Role of shear induced diffusion in acoustophoretic focusing of
dense suspensions"
S. Karthick, A. K. Sen*
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai-600036, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
In this supplementary material we show that the acoustic secondary radiation forces are negligible compare to acoustic
primary radiation forces.
Secondary radiation force.-The secondary radiation force 1 acting on small particles can be expressed as,
(πœŒπ‘œ βˆ’πœŒπ‘ )2 (3π‘π‘œπ‘  2 πœƒβˆ’1)
πΉπ‘Žπ‘π‘  = 4πœ‹π‘Ž6 [
6πœŒπ‘œ 𝑑 4
𝑣 2 (𝑧) βˆ’
(2πœ‹π‘“)2 𝜌0 (𝛽0 βˆ’π›½π‘ )2
9𝑑 2
𝑝2 (𝑧)]
(S1)
where d is the inter-particle distance, 𝑓 is frequency of the wave, ΞΈ is the angle between the centerline of the particle pair
and the direction of the wave propagation, 𝛽𝑝 = 1/πœŒπ‘ 𝑐𝑝2 is the compressibility of particle, π›½π‘œ = 1/πœŒπ‘œ π‘π‘œ2 is the
compressibility of medium, v(z) is the particle velocity amplitude, and p(z) is the acoustic pressure amplitude, v(z) is
maximum at pressure node (centre of the channel) and zero at pressure antinode (walls). Maximum velocity amplitude is
equal to √4πΈπ‘Žπ‘ β„πœŒπ‘œ 2. For highly concentrated RBC suspensions, the distance between two cells d approaches diameter of
cell 2π‘Ž so the velocity dependent term (1st term in eqn. 3) dominates the pressure dependent term (2nd term in eqn. 3), so
the later can be neglected. Now, by using eqn. 3, we estimate that the maximum secondary radiation force acting between
two RBCs which are in contact is Eac= 20.1 J/m3 is 0.88 pN (repulsive) along the wave direction and -0.44 pN (attractive)
perpendicular to the wave direction. By using eqn. 1, the maximum primary acoustic radiation force on the RBC is
estimated to be 4.0 pN at 20.1 J/m3. In order to estimate the primary and secondary forces, the RBC and plasma properties
are taken as follows3: πœŒπ‘ = 1100 π‘˜π‘”/π‘š3 , 𝛽𝑝 = 3.31 × 10βˆ’10 π‘ƒπ‘Ž βˆ’1 , πœŒπ‘ = 1025 π‘˜π‘”/π‘š3 and co = 1530 π‘š/𝑠. The mean
radius of the RBCs is taken as π‘Ž = 2.8 πœ‡π‘š from the average volume of erythrocytes4 90 fL. In suspensions, only particles
in the neighbourhood mainly contribute towards the secondary force on an individual particle (since πΉπ‘Žπ‘π‘  ~1⁄𝑑 4 ). If a
particle is located well within a dense suspension, the repulsive or attractive forces due to the neighbouring particles on
all sides of the particles cancel each other so asymmetry is required to create non-zero secondary force on the particles
present in a suspension5. Since only the particles present at the boundary of the suspensions will experience a non-zero
force, and the secondary force is estimated to be a small fraction (~10%) of the primary acoustic radiation force, we
neglect secondary radiation force in our analysis.
The material properties of polystyrene particles and 22.5% aqueous glycerol solution are only used to calculate the energy
density, which are given as follows: radius of the polystyrene beads π‘Ž = 5 πœ‡π‘š, density of polystyrene beads πœŒπ‘ =
1050 π‘˜π‘”/π‘š3 , density of 22.5% aqueous glycerol solution 𝜌0 = 1050 π‘˜π‘”/π‘š3 , compressibility of polystyrene beads
1/πœŒπ‘ 𝑐𝑝2 = 2.16 × 10βˆ’10 π‘ƒπ‘Ž βˆ’1 , velocity of sound in 22.5% aqueous glycerol solution π‘π‘œ = 1590 π‘š/𝑠 and viscosity of
22.5% aqueous glycerol solution πœ‚π‘“ = 0.0017 π‘ƒπ‘Žπ‘ 3,6.
References:
1
M. Groschl, ACUSTICA 84, 432 (1998).
2
P.B. Muller, R. Barnkob, P. Augustsson, T. Laurell, M. Rossi, and M. A.G., Phys. Rev. E 023006, 1 (2013).
3
D. Hartono, Y. Liu, L. Tan, Y. Sherlene, and L. Lanry, Lab Chip 4072 (2011).
4
C.E. Mclaren, G.M. Brittenham, and V. Hasselblad, Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 252, H857 (1987).
5
G.T. Silva and H. Bruus, Phys. Rev. E 063007, 1 (2014).
6
J.B. Segur and H.E. Oberstar, Ind. Eng. Chem. 43, 2117 (1951).