Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Aquatic Connectivity in the Southwest Yvette Paroz Southwestern Region Fisheries Program Leader Mark Reihle, Deschutes NF USFS Fisheries & Aquatic Resources 155 National Forests & Grasslands, 193 Million Acres 220,000 Miles of Fishable Streams • Strongholds for ESA-listed and Sensitive aquatic species currently and under various climate change scenarios • FS manages habitat for 62% of ESA-listed fish and 79% of ESA-listed freshwater mussels and clams • Many watersheds suffer from legacy impacts and need largescale habitat restoration Problem Statement • Issues for aquatic connectivity in the Southwest are different from those areas with anadromous species. • Many types of species use riparian and stream corridors for movement. Problem Statement • For aquatic species, streams are the ONLY route they can use to move between habitats. • These same corridors are also used by non-native species. • Suitable habitat may not be present in all stream segments. Habitat Fragmentation • Habitat Fragmentation is an issue for many aquatic species depending on their life history and reasons for fragmentation. • Lack of connectivity has been a listing factor for several southwest fish species including Colorado Pikeminnow, Razorback Sucker, Rio Grande Silvery Minnow, Pecos Bluntnose Shiner, & others… Rio Grande Silvery Minnow- Dams, Modified Habitat and Dry Stream Road-Stream Crossing Legacy on USFS Lands • 375,000 miles of road inventoried • 50,000 road crossing structures inventoried • 60%-90% of culverts are impassable to fish species at some flow state • Stream Connectivity is an aquatic population resiliency, climate change resiliency and flood resiliency issue • Stream damage from undersize or poor culvert placement. • However, some culverts have protected streams from non-native invasion. Poor Habitat Can Limit Connectivity • Lack of resting or hiding cover, thermal barriers, water quality, stream drying. • Legacy and current effects from mining, timber, roads, channel modification, grazing. • Effects from catastrophic fires and flooding at a large scale. Roads and other management activities affect the ability of aquatic and riparian species to move through habitats. Stream Temperature Major connectivity factor for salmonids. USFS Nationwide Focus on Aquatic Connectivity • In terms of providing resiliency to climate change, restoring aquatic connectivity is one of the top conservation actions nationwide. • 2015 - A Milestone Year in Reconnecting Aquatic Habitat: Our Agency’s 1,000th culvert removed or upgraded for AOP with Legacy Roads & Trails Funding. Incorporation of Aquatic Connectivity in Restoration Projects and Road Networks • • • Right Size Culverts Stream Simulation Design or Other Techniques Lots of resources for technical assistance – – – – – – USFS example - National Stream & Aquatic Ecology Center “Stream Team” Bureau of Reclamation BLM USFWS Partners/NGOs also have resources Non-Native Species are a Major Factor Limiting Aquatic Connectivity in the Southwest Need for Connectivity for SW Species • Resilience to Climate Change • Maintenance of all life history attributes. • Genetic diversity. • Resilience to catastrophic events. What Can We Do • Strive for functional riparian and stream systems. – Shade – Hydrologic Function – Cover for Riparian Species Instream Habitat • Provide diverse instream habitat. • Provides areas for resting and feeding for all age classes. Instream Habitat Restoration also includes • Removal/Control of Nonnative Species • Restoration & Preservation of Native Aquatic Species – Representation/Redundancy/Resiliency How Much is Enough? Think Big….it may be possible. • Whitewater Baldy Fire >300,000 acres. Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout Costilla Creek – Native Fish and Habitat Restoration • Upon completion, this project will restore RGCT and the native fish community to over 150 miles of stream habitat, 25 lakes, and Costilla Reservoir in the Rio Costilla watershed. • Opportunities for adfluvial life history expression for Rio Grande Cutthroat trout. Costilla Creek – Native Fish and Habitat Restoration • Partnering projects include large scale meadow restoration and other watershed projects in Comanche Creek. • Diverse group of partners – Genetic Diversity - Gila Native Fish Example Genetic Effects 2012 2011 2013 • Genetic methods – 9-10 msat loci per species • Genetic metrics – AR, HE, HO: Genetic diversity – NeD: # of breeders – NeV: ∆ allele frequencies – FST: Genetic structure 2010 2011 = Fire 2012 2013 2014 = Sample event 2015 Potential Demographic Impacts of Wildfire Gila Fish Example – From T. Pilger (UNM) # of Breeders Diversity (Heterozygosity & Allelic Richness) • Think about multiple scales of connectivity. • What do we know about the life histories in the suite of species in your areas. • Can areas be bigger if we work in multiple jurisdictions? • How do we balance between connectivity and non-native species? • What are possible solutions where historic conditions are altered – possibly beyond the likely ability to restore it? Take Home Questions ?