Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Data and Method Data were collected from the CNSN datacenter through AutoDRM. YKA is a small aperture (20 km) array with 20 array elements distributed along two perpendicular lines. Interstation spacing is 2.5 km. The short-period, vertical instruments record frequencies around 1 Hz. YKA was designed to detect high-frequency P-waves from underground nuclear explosions and is therefore well suited for the detection of high-frequency scattered waves. For this study we selected 21 events from the catalog that show clear precursors (Figure 3). Traces were individually inspected and obviously faulty traces were discarded. We apply a bandpass filter with cutoff frequencies of 0.5 Hz and 1.4 Hz. Figure 4 shows a data example of an mb=5.7 event at 41 km depth in the Talaud islands region (D=100.14). Note the increase of energy in a beamtrace for PP slowness (Figure 5) indicating a scattering origin for the precursors. Precursors with varying slownesses are clearly visible in a 4th-Root Vespagram of this event (Figure 6). -30 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 B YKA array elements -20 Precursors P P-coda A Precursors A 410 P P 210 P 10 B 9 Slowness [s/deg] PKiKP B 1 1.0 PP 7 7 6 6 5 PP P 210 P 8 2 4 5 Pdiff 4 4 3 3 2 0.8 0.6 Power PP 10 9 8 Pdiff 50 s PP 1 3 0.4 0.2 1 0 300 0 25 Time [ s ] 50 PKKP PP 1400 PKP 1200 PKiKP 800 ScP 600 PcP Pdiff PP 20 40 80 100 120 Distance (deg) 140 160 Figure 1: Result of a "stacking stack" algorithm for data from the short-period Yellowknife array (YKA) [Rost, Thorne and Garnero, 2005]. Shown in this traveltime-like display are Nth-Root stacks from ~1400 events recorded at YKA. The PP precursor energy in the 90 to 110 deg distance range is clearly visible. No reflections from the major upper mantle discontinuities are visible in these stacks and the precursory energy is likely produced by scattering along the path. 50 PdP 60 Pd P 10 20 30 0 0 -1 -4 60 40 70 0 -1 -6 0 30 0 -2 P 20 40 50 830 - 930 km 1930 - 2030 km 2030 - 2130 km PP C D E F P time Figure 2: Sketch of raypaths (left) and locations of P, PP and potential precursors in slowness-time space (right). P and PP show a strong slowness difference of some s/deg and traveltime differences of some hundred seconds (top panel). Precursors from mid point reflections (e.g. underside reflections off the 410 and 670) will show slownesses comparable with PP (center panel). Their slowness decreases slightly for deeper reflectors. In contrast, asymmetric reflections show a much smaller slowness than PP, but a larger slowness than P (lower panel). Their traveltime, slowness (and horizontal incidence angle backazimuth) can be used to map the source of the reflection Conclusions PP precursors contain information about Earth structure besides what can be resolved from upper mantle discontinuity structure. n Using array methods it is possible to extract this information of the precursor wavefield to resolve fine-scale Earth structure. n This experiment using YKA data shows evidence for scattering from small-scale heterogeneities in the oceanic lithosphere. n Additionally, many deep scatterers can be found mainly beneath the Mariana and Tonga-Fiji subduction zones. n Deep scatterers have a high correlation to the location of high seismic velocitites from tomographic models. n These scatterers form a sheet-like structure that projects to the surface location of the subduction zones. n Using P*P we are able to confirm that subducted oceanic crust can penetrate into the mantle to depths of at least 1000 km. n 3D raytracing through tomographic models can further improve the mapped location of the scatterers. n Estimates of impedance contrast for the reflectors are difficult at present due to the requirement of full 3D synthetic seismograms (reflector planes can vary in all 3 directions in space) at large distances up to ~2Hz frequency. n 1000 750 2000 PP Du -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 B DT P* P -3 δVS [%] time 70 P*P Figure 9: Depth slices through the tomography model by Ritsema [Ritsema and van Heijst, 2002]. Each depth slice also includes the detected scatterers (reflectors) marked as black crosses (yellow for the uppermost mantle for better visibility) for the appropriate depth. The scatterer locations at depths larger than 400 km show a very good correlation with fast velocities down to depths of 1000 km. These scatterer locations are located beneath the Mariana and Tonga-Fiji subduction zones. The two reflectors at large depths (2100 km) in the southern Pacific might sample the edge of the slow anomaly in the central Pacific. Precursors from 2 events define these points. Energy detected from shallow depths is most likely related to scattering in the oceanic lithosphere and the uppermost oceanic mantle. This is similar to the earlier work from the 1960s and 1970s. The energy mapping the deep scatterers could be reflected off the oceanic crust transported to these depths by subduction. This is the first time that PP asymmetric precursors can be connected to the mapping of subduction zones. -4 P 60 120 source 0 10 110 Figure 7: Example waveforms of PP and its precusors for event shown in Figure 4. Shown are beam traces calculated for the measured slowness and backazimuth. Traces are numbered according to precursor numbers in Figure 4. The bottom trace shows the beam trace for PP. The reflections show different polarities, but deeper reflectors generally show inverse polarity to PP. 4 2 200 0 6 100 P* 730 - 830 km time 120 10 s i 660 - 730 km P 110 or s r u ec r p P 600 - 660 km 500 90 PP 500 - 600 km Reflector Depth [ km] 100 reflection PC1 d=805 km array 10 90 dQ PP 80 PC2 d=27 km Figure 8: Schematic of the backtracing algorithm used to locate the origin of the scattered energy. The precursors generally show slowness and backazimuth different from PP. From the array a ray is traced through a 1D-Earth model using the measured slowness and backazimuth. Traveltimes for each point along this path are also calculated. The possible reflector must be located somewhere along this ray. For each point along this path, starting at the surface reflection point, rays are traced back to the source. Traveltime is calculated for the complete path from source to virtual reflector to array until the measured PP-precursor differential traveltime is fit. The resulting best fitting point is defined by latitude, longitude and depth in the 1D Earth model and represents the most likely origin of the scattered energy. 70 80 1000 We use the frequency-wavenumber analysis (fk-analysis) to determine the full slowness vector (slowness and backazimuth) of the precursors. Short time windows (typical 4-6s) are chosen for the fk-analysis. We also measure the differential travel time between precursor and PP. Many of the precursors show rather impulsive onsets (Figure 7). We estimate the differential travel time uncertainty to be 1s. Using a backtracing algorithm it is possible to locate the likely origin of the precursors (Figure 8). We fit all three measurements (slowness, backazimuth and traveltime) and find the likely reflector by raytracing through a 1D Earth model (IASP91). We assume that the energy is P scattered to P (P*P). We also tested variations such as S*P and PP*P or P*PP, but these combinations did not fit the measurements and we can exclude them from our analysis. PC3 d=604 km 400 - 500 km PP 60 8 1600 400 PC4 d=91 km SKKP 50 0 Pdiff 75 Figure 6: Example 4th-Root vespagram (slant-stack) calculated for event shown in Figure 4. Shown is energy as function of time and slowness (incidence angle). A Full time window from Pdiff to PKiKP. Arrival times and appropriate slownesses (for PREM ) are marked. B Zoom into precursor time window. Four precursors were detected for this event (marked as yellow stars). They generally show smaller slownesses than PP (but larger than P). For reference the slowness and traveltime for the underside reflection from the 210-km discontinuity is also given. The close arrival time of the two phases around precursor 3 poses a problem for the fk-analysis since it measures the average slowness of the phases. Figure 5: A Beam trace for PP slowness and theoretical backazimuth. Arrival times for Pdiff , PP and PKiKP are marked. Note the increase of energy ~40 s before PP. B Envelope of the trace shown in A. The increase of energy seems to consist of some discrete arrivals in a higher energy background. 40 0 -1 1800 0.0 30 120 Time [ s ] 2000 20 110 100 s 200 12 10 100 100 300 - 400 km A 90 0 0 The precursor wavefield to PP, a P-wave once reflected at the free surface between source and receiver, contains information about the structure of the upper mantle. Underside reflections of PP (and SS) beneath the mid-reflection point off the upper mantle discontinuities have been extensively used to map topography on the discontinuities and to infer temperature and composition of the mantle. However, additional precursory arrivals that are not related to reflections off the global discontinuities can be detected in short-period recordings (Figure 1). These precursors can be easily detected in the 95 to 110 deg distance range due to the velocity structure of the upper mantle [King, Haddon and Husebye , 1975]. These arrivals show slownesses strongly different from PP (several s/deg), therefore excluding symmetric underside reflections as their origin (Figure 2). It has been proposed earlier that this energy originates from asymmetric scattering of PP energy in the upper mantle [Wright and Muirhead, 1969; Wright, 1972; King, Haddon and Husebye, 1975]. Here, we study earthquakes from the SW Pacific and Indonesia recorded at the Canadian, short-period Yellowknife array (YKA), that show similar precursors as described in the earlier work (Figure 3-6). Using a frequency-wavenumber analysis we are able to measure the full slowness vector of the precursory energy (Figure 7). Using this information we can trace the energy back to the likely position of the scatterer or reflector (Figure 8) by fitting slowness (u), backazimuth (Q) and differential traveltime (DT) with respect to PP. We find that many of the precursors can be explained by scattering in or just below the oceanic lithosphere in the Pacific (Figure 9). Nonetheless, more than half of the scatterer positions are located at depths larger than 300 km and show strong correlation to detected fast regions in seismic tomography (Figure 9 and 11). It is likely that the PP precursors originate from reflections off the former oceanic crust transported to depths of up to 1000 km due to subduction beneath the Mariana and Tonga-Fiji subduction zone (Figure 10). 80 1 200 - 300 km Ehime University Introduction / Overview Precursors 2 PKiKP 100 - 200 km slowness -10 100 s DI41A-1254 0 - 100 km slowness 0 PKiKP UC Santa Cruz slowness 10 PP http://geophysics.asu.edu -2 0 20 Pdiff 3Geodynamics Research Center, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan -2 0 30 2Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz CA, USA -2 0 40 1Dept. of Geological Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ, USA Slowness (sec/deg) 50 We detected 116 precursors from the 21 events. 110 of these allowed a successful backtracing to its orign, while 6 precursor measurement were rejected and could not be traced back to a P*P scattering location. More than half of the scatterers can be mapped to depths larger than 400 km. Scatterers in the uppermost mantle are likely related to scattering in the oceanic lithosphere or shallow upper mantle. The deep scatterers show a high correlation to fast seismic velocities from tomographic images (Figure 9 and 11). The reflectors form sheetlike structures beneath two subduction zones (Figure 10). The reflectors beneath the Tonga-Fiji and the Mariana subduction zone can be found to depths of 1000 km, thus indicating the penetration of these slabs into the lower mantle. Previous studies in the Mariana region show evidence for mid mantle structure at depths of 1100 to 1500 km to the north-east of our study area (Figure 12). Sebastian Rost1, Edward J. Garnero1, Allen McNamara1, Quentin Williams2 and Dapeng Zhao3 Time (sec) YKA A YKA Array elements 60 Figure 3: Dataset for this study. Earthquakes from the SW Pacific and Tonga-Fiji (red stars) are recorded at the small aperture (20km), short-period (1Hz), Canadian Yellowknife array (YKA - blue triangle). PP raypaths (thin gray lines) and PP midpoint reflection points (black circles) are also shown. For orientation, the plate boundaries are shown as thin black lines. 21 events are used with epicentral distances from 95 to 105 deg and depths from 10 to 60 km. Their magnitudes range from mb = 5.5 to 6.6. Figure 4: Data example for event on 02 Apr 1996, h=41km, D=100.14 deg. Recordings from all available YKA elements are shown. Data were filtered with a bandpass with cut-off frequencies of 0.5 and 1.4 Hz. A P to PKiKP time window that includes PP and its precursors. B Zoom into the PP precursors time window is shown in the lower panel, showing the coherency of the arrivals in the precursors wavefield. No underside reflection energy from the 210- and 410-km discontinuities is observed in these data (traveltimes for these phases are given for reference). Results Detection of subducted lithosphere in the midmantle from asymmetric PP precursors Figure 11: Vertical cross section through the Ritsema tomography model in the Mariana vicinity. The location of the cross section is shown in the globe insert. Blue colors denote high seimic -4 -2 0 2 4 velocities, and red δVS [%] colors low seismic velocities relative to a 1D Earth model. The line shows the 0.7% isocontour. Red circles show the location of the detected reflectors (depths > 400 km) in this region projected onto the cross section. References Figure 10: Perspective view of the distribution of scatterers (see also computer demonstration). Box includes the mantle (from 0 to 2891 km). Shown on top is topography for reference. The depth of the scatterers is colored according to depth. A View from South to North (West is on the left hand side). Viewpoint elevation is approximately 15 deg. B View from North to South (West on the right hand side). C View from West to East (North on the left hand side). D View from East to West with negative (-15deg) viewpoint elevation. E View from above (North to the top; West to the left). Sources are shown as circles (depth color-coded). Circle diameter shows event magnitude. F View from below (South is at top and west to the left). Two main deep groups of scatterers can be detected in close proximity to the Mariana and Tonga-Fiji subduction zones. The correlation of these deep scatterers to fast seismic velocities can be better seen in Figure 9. The shallow scatterers do not show any geographic coherency and are most likely related to small-scale heterogeneity in the oceanic lithosphere. The scatterer locations are generally off great circle path and within a distance of 25 deg from the sources. Only a few receiver side scatterers have been found. The Mariana group is in close proximity to detections of heterogeneities in the mid mantle as shown in Figure 12. 30 20 10 120 130 0 200 140 600 1000 1400 Reflector Depth 150 1800 km Figure 12: Zoom into the Mariana vicinity. Reflectors from P*P are shown as squares colored according to depth. Slab positions in the upper mantle (RUM-model) are shown as lines. Earlier work finds evidence for structure in the mid mantle east of this region. Symbols: stars - Niu et al (2003); circle - Castle and Creager (1999); diamond - Kruger (2001); hexagon: Kaneshima and Helffrich (1998); triangle - Kaneshima and Helffrich (2003). These locations are all deeper than the scatterers of this study. Castle, J.C. and K.C. Creager (CC99), A steeply dipping discontinuity in the lower mantle beneath Izu Bonin, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 7279-7292, 1999. Kruger, F. et al. (K01), Mid mantle scatterers near the Mariana slab deteted with a double array method, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 667-670, 2001. Kaneshima, S. and G. Helffrich (KH98), Detection of lower mantle scatterers northeast of the Mariana subduction zone using short-period array data, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 4825-4838, 1998. Kaneshima, S. and G. Helffrich (KH03), Subparallel dipping heterogeneities in the mid-lower mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 108, doi:10.1029/2001JB001596, 2003. King, D.W., R.A.W. Haddon and E.S. Husebye, Precursors to PP, Phy. Earth Planet. Int., 10, 103-127, 1975 Niu, F. H. Kawakatsu and Y. Fukao (N03), Seismic evidence for a chemical heterogeneity in the midmantle" A strong and slightly dipping seismic reflector beneath the Mariana subduction zone, J. Geophys. Res., 108, doi:10.1029/2002JB002384, 2003 Ritsema, J. and H.J. van Heijst, New constraints on the P velocity structure of the mantle from P, PP and PKPab. Geophys. J. Int., 149, 482-489, 2002. Rost, S. M. Thorne, and E.J. Garnero, Imaging the short-period wavefield using stacked Stacks, in preparation, 2005. Wright, C., Array studies of seismic waves arriving between P and PP in the distance range 90 to 115 deg, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 62, 385-400, 1972. Wright, C. and K.J. Muirhead, Longitudinal waves from the Novaya Zemlyz nuclear explosion of October 27, 1966, recorded at the Warramunga array, J. Geophys. Res., 74, 2034-2047, 1969.