Download Top driven asymmetric mantle convection

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Cimmeria (continent) wikipedia , lookup

Baltic Shield wikipedia , lookup

Supercontinent wikipedia , lookup

Abyssal plain wikipedia , lookup

Post-glacial rebound wikipedia , lookup

Oceanic trench wikipedia , lookup

Plate tectonics wikipedia , lookup

Large igneous province wikipedia , lookup

Mantle plume wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Top driven asymmetric mantle convection
Carlo Doglioni^ & Don L. Anderson*
^Sapienza University, Rome
*Caltech, Pasadena
Abstract
The role of the decoupling in the low-velocity zone is crucial for understanding the
mechanisms governing plate tectonics and mantle convection. Mantle convection
models fail to integrate plate kinematics and thermodynamics of the mantle. We
computed the volume of the plates lost along subduction zones, which is about 306
km3/yr (±15). Mass balance predicts that slabs are compensated by broad passive
upwellings beneath oceans, mainly at oceanic ridges and backarc basins. These may
correspond to the broad low wavespeed regions found in the upper mantle by
tomography. However, W-directed slabs enter the mantle more than 3 times faster
(232 km3/yr ±15) than the opposite E- or NE-directed subduction zones (74 km3/yr
±15). This is consistent with the westward drift of the outer shell relative to the
underlying mantle, which accounts for the steep dip of W-directed slabs, and the
asymmetry between the flanks of oceanic ridges, and the directions of ridge
migration. The larger recycling volumes along W-directed subduction zones implies i)
asymmetry of the cooling of the underlying mantle and ii) it constrains the “easterly”
directed component of the upwelling replacement mantle. In this model, mantle
convection is tuned by polarized decoupling of the advecting and shearing upper
boundary layer. Return mantle flow can be envisaged as a result of passive volume
balance rather than as a thermal buoyancy driven upwelling.