Download Lysosomal storage diseases

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Fetal origins hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Transmission (medicine) wikipedia , lookup

Infection wikipedia , lookup

Prenatal testing wikipedia , lookup

Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Race and health wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup

Syndemic wikipedia , lookup

Disease wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Multiple sclerosis research wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Lysosomal storage diseases
Lysosomal storage diseases
Annick Raas‐Rothschild, MD
Pediatrician medical Geneticist
Pediatrician‐medical Geneticist
Institute of Genetics; director
Meir medical Center;Kfar Saba [email protected]
What are Lysosomes ?
Christian De Duve:
from Christmas 1949
to the Nobel p
price (1965)
(
)
Claude’s technique of separating the components of cells by spinning them in a centrifuge, he noticed q
p
g
p
y p
g
g ,
that the cells’ release of an enzyme called acid phosphatase increased in proportion
to the amount of damage done to the cells during centrifugation.
De Duve reasoned that the acid phosphatase was enclosed within the cell in some kind of membranous envelope that formed a self‐contained organelle. membranous
envelope that formed a self‐contained organelle
He calculated the probable size of this organelle, christened it the lysosome, and later identified it in electron microscope
pictures. De Duve’s discovery
y of
f lysosomes
y
answered the q
question of
f how the
powerful enzymes used by cells to digest nutrients are kept separate
from other cell components.
Endocytosis
Exocytosis
ER
Autophagy
Lysosome
Lysosomes and LROs are involved in: cholesterol homeostasis,
homeostasis plasma
membrane repair, bone and tissue remodelling, pathogen defense, cell
death and cell signaling
Classification
• Ch
Characteristic
t i ti of
f the
th defective
d f ti enzyme or protein
t i
• Nature of the accumulated substrate
oSphingolipidosis
oMPS
oOligosaccharidosis
oOligosaccharidosis& glycoproteinosis
oDefect of integral
membranes proteins
p
oOthers
Futerman AH et al, Nature reviews, 2004
This Classification is not always accurate
• Lipids and sugars accumulation
– Mucolipidosis II/III:
• Alpha-Beta subunit gene defect- Gamma
subunit gene defect
– Mucolipidosis IV:
• Mucolipin membrane protein calcium chanel
• Sphingomyelin accumulation:
– Niemann Pick A-B: sphingomyelinase defect
– Niemann Pick C:
• Cholesterol transporter NPC1
• Cholesterol binding protein NPC2
We diagnose what we know
Gaucher
1 i 5 7000 li bi th
1 in 5‐7000 live births
Why is an accurate diagnosis important ?
•Accurate counseling
•Recurrence risk
•Prenatal
Prenatal diagnosis
•Patient prognosis
•Support
pp
group
g
p
•Specific treatment
Accumulating substrate
b
1882
MD clinical description
1934
1950/1960
Genes
G
Gene therapy
h
Mid‐1980
Deficient enzyme; Enzyme replacement th
therapy
1990s onwards
Cellular basis of the diseases
• Enzyme deficiency • Substrate accumulation
Substrate accumulation
• Cell damage and dysfunction g
y
• Organ dysfunction Medical Tools
DIAGNOSIS
Think
Data: Ask -Listen -Examine
Population
p
Ashkenazi Child with hyperacusis:
T Sachs
Tay
S h
Jewish Yemenite patient with neurodegeneration:
M t h
Metachromatic
ti leukodystrophy
l k d t
h
Screening of mutations for LSD
•
•
•
•
•
G
h disease
di
Gaucher
:
Mucolipidosis
p
IV:
Niemann Pick A :
MLD:
Krabbe Disease:
A hk
iJ
Ashkenazi
Jews 1/15
Ashkenazi Jews 1/100
Ashkenazi Jews 1/90
Yemenite Jews : 1/50
Djabel el Mokaber 1/12
Ask & Listen
ASK
Family
y history
y
Pedigree
Inheritance
listen
Family History of XX-Linked disorder
•Hunter disease
•Fabry disease
•Danon disease
PEDIATRICS Volume 121, February 2008
Family history:
autosomal recessive &
Population history
1/30
2/3
1/4
1/1800
Examine –
Look
Patient
Clinical examination
Dysmorphology
•Age of first symptom
•Evolution of of the
di
disease
Clinical
n cal symptoms
•Cl
Diagnosis
A difficult task
• Genetic Heterogeneity:
–One
One phenotype – many genes
• Mucolipidosis
p
III:
–alpha-beta subunit gene
–gamma subunit gene
Phenotype heterogeneity
• One
O enzyme – one gene- many phenotypes
h
• Gaucher type I non neuronopathic
• Gaucher type II neuronopathic
• Gaucher type III neuronopathic
How to Recognize an affected patient?
A 14‐year‐old Hunter Syndrome Patient With a 7‐year‐old Height Age
Photographs courtesy of Joseph Muenzer, MD, PhD, Chapel Hill, NC.
Why
y Can we Easily
y miss
the affected patient?
•
•
•
•
•
•
Variability
V
i bilit of
f th
the dis
diseases
s s
> 50 different LSDiseases
M l i
Multisystemic
i & complex
l di
diseases
Progressive diseases
High index of suspicion is needed
We do not always remember these diseases
Variable diseases Mild Form of MPS II
Severe Form of MPS II
• Insidious onset
• Normal intelligence
V i bl life
lif expectancy
t
• Variable
(some to 50s)
• Onset by 2 to 4 years of age
• Impaired intelligence
Impaired intelligence
• Life expectancy 10 to 15 years
A Progressive Disease
1 year- 3 years
Recurrent
ear infections
rhinorrhea
Respiratory
p
y
infections
Inguinal hernia
4 years
Enlarged
Tonsils
T nsils
5 years
Tonsillectomy
Anesthesia
6 years
DIAGNOSIS
Not all the patients have the characteristic
features at a young age
• Phenotype not usually evident at birth
• Heterogeneous
H
presentation
• Significant eventual loss of mobility
and functional independence
• Bone
B
d
dysplasia
l i
• Joint stiffness
ff
and restriction
• Short stature
• Hernia
H
i
• Hepatosplenomegaly
• And more....
The Laboratory Tools
• Identification of the chemical nature of
mp
accumulating
m
g as a result of
f
compounds
the enzyme deficiency:
– Urine MPS – Oligosaccharides
– Quantitative\ qualitative
Morphologic studies
– Em:
E fibroblastsf b bl
rectall biopsy
b
Membranous
lamellar cytoplasmic
bodies (lipids) +
Granulated material
( Water-soluble)
Renal pathology in Fabry disease.
disease
Control Filipin
p Staining
g
Affected Filipin:
Isolated from
Streptomyces filipensis
Binds to cholesterol
• Demonstration of a specific enzyme
deficiency
– LeukocytesL k
t
serum
m
• BUT
– Leukocytes + Serum: Mucolipidosis II –
III
– Fibroblasts: Niemann Pick C
• Gene Mutation analysis:
– Carriers identification
– Prenatal Diagnosis
g
on fetal DNA
– Preimplantation genetic diagnosis
Definitive diagnosis
• Mutation analysis:
– Identify carrier in the family
– Prenatal diagnosis
– Preimplantation genetic diagnosis
The benefice of a correct diagnosis
• Accurate counseling
• Recurrence risk
• PREVENTION:
• Prenatal diagnosis
• Preimplantation
Genetic Diagnosis
The benefice of a correct diagnosis
g
•Stop unnecessary testing
•Patient prognosis
•Support
Supp rt group
r up
•Proper
Proper follow up for complications
preventions and symptomatic therapy
•Specific treatment as early as possible
Diagnosis as Early as possible
Early Therapy
6 months 5 years PEDIATRICS Volume 121, February 2008
9 years 30 years The enzyme replacement therapy concept
(ERT era)
S
Substrate
b t t
x
Product
Defective
lysosomal
hydrolase
ERT
First proof of concept
1974: Roscoe Brady (NIH)
Large dose of mannose terminated
acid beta glucosidase (Placenta,
CHO):
Adapted from Futerman AH . Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004 :5:554-65.
Enzyme Replacement Therapy
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Gaucher: Glucocerebrosidase
Fabry: alpha galactosidase
Pompe:alpha glucosidase
Hurler : alpha-L
p
iduronidase
Hunter : iduronate II sulfatase
Ni m
Niemann
Pi k type
Pick
t p B: acid
id sphyngomyelinase
sph
m li s
y ((MPS VI):arylsufatase
) y
Maroteaux-Lamy
MPS IV :trial
……..
What can we expect ?
• Change the disease natural history
• Increases life expectancy
• Improvement of systemic abnormalities
BUT
Still depends on the type MPS, mutation
Clinical severity
Age of the patient at diagnosis
Neurological involvement
Disadvantages
•
•
•
•
Price
Once a week intravenous infusion 0.5 mg/kg
Does not cross the blood brain barrier
Bone disease
Substrate Inhibition:
Inhibition Concept
Normal
synthesis
degradation
Enzyme
Replacement
synthesis degradation
Substrate
Inhibition
synthesis degradation
EGF
EGFR
GENISTEIN
Cell membrane EGFR‐TK
X
Decreased D
d efficiency of GAG y
production Activation of tyrosine kinases
X
Proteins phosphorylation
X
Signaling pathways X
X
Nucleus Expression of genes Coding for enzymes involved in GAG
Synthesis Chaperones therapy p
py
LSDs: rare diseases ?
• A
Awareness is
i k
key f
for di
diagnosis
i
• Communication with the laboratories are
essential
• Prevention of disease complications
• Specific therapies are available we
need to diagnose as soon as possible
• Genetic prenatal\preimplantation
d
diagnosis
is feasible
f
bl d
diagnosis is needed
d d
to permit the choice for the families
‫תודה‬
M dill
Mordillo