Download Motion Relative to a non-inertial frame

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Routhian mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Jerk (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Force wikipedia , lookup

Classical mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Newton's theorem of revolving orbits wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Four-vector wikipedia , lookup

Minkowski diagram wikipedia , lookup

Special relativity wikipedia , lookup

Inertia wikipedia , lookup

Equations of motion wikipedia , lookup

Velocity-addition formula wikipedia , lookup

Work (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Rigid body dynamics wikipedia , lookup

Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup

Newton's laws of motion wikipedia , lookup

Kinematics wikipedia , lookup

Derivations of the Lorentz transformations wikipedia , lookup

Seismometer wikipedia , lookup

Frame of reference wikipedia , lookup

Mechanics of planar particle motion wikipedia , lookup

Coriolis force wikipedia , lookup

Inertial frame of reference wikipedia , lookup

Centripetal force wikipedia , lookup

Centrifugal force wikipedia , lookup

Fictitious force wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Motion Relative to a Non-Inertial Frame :
Coriolis and Centripetal Acceleration
ASEN 3200
George H. Born
P
Z
z
r
y


R
B
Y
x
A
X
Figure 1. Definition of the
A
B
A
and
B
frame
 inertial frame
 non-inertia frame-accelerating and rotating ( R ,  and   0 )
Assume that we have an inertial frame,
A
, in which Newton’s second law applies. We now
wish to describe the motion of particle P in the non-inertial frame, B .
We wish to determine the equations of motion relative to the B frame using the fact that we
can apply Newton’s 2nd law in the A frame. From figure 1,
  R r
A
Where the notation
A
(1)
  A R  Ar
(2)
( ) means the vector as seen by an observer in the A frame
e.g., A  is the velocity relative to the A frame. We can relate the velocity in the
A frame to that in the B frame by using,
A
r  B r  A B  r .
(3)
1
Where
A
B is the angular velocity of the
B frame as seen by and observer in the
A frame.
Equation (3), known as the velocity rule, can be considered as the definition of the derivation of a
vector relative to a rotating frame. Hence, Eq. (2) can be written
A
  A R  B r  A B  r
(4)
Differentiating Eq. (4) yields
A
A
d B r A 
  A R 
  B  r  A  B  A r
dt
(5)
From the velocity rule we have,
A
B
where
d B r B  A
 r   B B r
dt
r  acceleration of P relative to the
(6)
B frame.
Substituting equation (3) and (6) into equation (5),
A
  B r  A  B r  A   r  A   ( B r  A   r )
  A R
B
B
B
B
(7)
Rearranging terms in equation (7) yields the expression relating accelerations in the two frames,
A
  A   ( A  r )  A   r  B r  2 A B r
  A R
B
B
B
B
(8)
The first three terms on the right side of equation (8) represent the absolute acceleration of a point
fixed in the
Also,
B
r  B r  0 .
2 A B B r  Coriolis acceleration
frame, i.e.,
A
B
 B  ( A  B  r )  centripetal acceleration.
The term A  B  r does not have a specific name.
In order for B to be an inertial frame it is required that
A
  B r
(9)
2
For this to be true, we must have
A
  A   A   0 .
R
B
B
(10)
Equation (10) means that an inertial frame may not be accelerating or rotating relative to any
other inertial frame. However, it may move with constant velocity, i.e. A R  constant.
We now wish to apply equation (8) to the Earth. Assume that the
B
frame is fixed in the Earth
with its origin at the center of mass (cm) of the Earth and the z-axis along the Earth’s spin axis,
the x-axis through the Greenwich meridian (0 longitude) and the y-axis completing a right hand
trial. Hence, x and y lie in the equatorial plane.
Now introduce a frame, C , with its origin coincident with that of the
B frame but which does
not rotate. Hence, its axes are fixed in direction in inertial space with X directed toward the vernal
equinox (the intersection of the equatorial and ecliptic planes), Z along the Earth’s spin axis and
Y completing a right-hand triad. Note that the
C frame is not inertial because lunar-solar
  0 . Even though it is not
perturbations on the Earth result in accelerations of its cm, i.e. A R
truly an inertial frame, C , is referred to as the Earth-Centered Inertial (ECI) frame, while frame
is referred to as the Earth-Centered Fixed (ECF) frame.
We now wish to write the equations of motion of the particle P with respect to the ECI and ECF
frames. Using equation (8), we may write the equations of motion relative to the C (ECI) frame
( A  C  A  C  0 ) as follows
A
  A R  C r .
(11)
By differentiating equation (2), we have
A
  A R  A r .
C
r  A r
Hence,
(12)
and the motion of the P relative to the cm of the Earth is identical as seen in the A or
B frame. From Newton’s Second law we have (see figure 1)
A
 
 Fp
Mp
,
A
   F
R
M
where  is the symbol for the Earth.
3
(13)
B
Equation (13) states that the acceleration of P as seen by an observer in a true inertial frame, A ,
is equal to the sum of the applied forces acting on P divided by its mass, i.e. the force per unit
mass. The free body diagram for the Earth and particle P can be drawn by using Newton’s law of
gravitation to define the applied forces FP and F .
Mp
Mp
r
 Fp  GM p M 
FP
r
,
r3
 F  GM p M 
r
r3
,
M
F
From Eq. (11),
C

r  A   A R
(14)
and substituting equation (13) into (14)
C
r 
 Fp
Mp

 F
M
=  G( M   M p )
r
.
r3
(15)
Because M p  M  we may ignore M p in Eq. (15) and write it as
C
where,
r  GM  r     r
r3
r3
  GM  .
(16)
(17)
Equation (16) is the equation of motion of P relative to the cm of the Earth as seen by an observer
in the C frame, and is identical to its motion as seen by an observer in the A frame.
Next, we wish to write the equations of motion relative to the ECF or B frame.
From Eq. (8),
B
  A   ( A  r )  2 A B r.
r  A   A R
B
B
B
Where we have assumed that A  B  0 for the Earth. Using Eqs. (14) and (16) to obtain
A
  A R , yields the desired results
4
(18)
B
r     r  A  B  ( A  B  r )  2 A  B  B r .
r3
(19)
Note that because the C frame is not rotating,
A
 B C  B .
In Eq. (19), we have moved the centripetal and Coriolis accelerations to the force side of the
equation. In this situation they are referred to as the centripetal and Coriolis apparent forces per
unit mass. Hence, the signs of the centripetal and Coriolis apparent forces per unit mass are
opposite to those of the accelerations. They are referred to as “apparent” forces because they ARE
NOT applied forces and should not appear on a free body diagram. These apparent forces arise
only because we are describing the motion relative to a rotating coordinate frame. In other words,
if we choose to solve the equations of motion in the ECI frame using Eq. (16) and then rotate the
ECI frame coordinates into the ECF frame, we would never directly be aware of or have to deal
with the centripetal or Coriolis forces. Moreover, the results would be identical to solving Eq.
(18) directly to obtain the ECF coordinates.
If we evaluate Eq. (19) in component form using
A
 B  C  B  kˆ
rB  xiˆ  yˆj  zkˆ
B
rB  xiˆ  yˆj  zkˆ ,
where, iˆ, ˆj, kˆ are unit vectors in the
B frame coordinate directions, the result is
  x

 3   2 x  2y 

 x  r

 y
B 
rB   y   3   2 y  2x  .
   r

 z
 z 

 3


r
(20)
Where B rB donates the acceleration of P relative to the B (ECF) frame expressed in the B
frame coordinates.
5
Likewise in the C (ECI) frame coordinates
  X 

 X   r 3 
    Y
C 
rC   Y     3  .
r
 Z    Z 
    
 r 3 
(21)
As just stated, the solutions to Eqs. (20) and (21) are identical if the proper coordinate
transformation is made between the two frames. Assume that we have solved Eq. (21) and we
wish to transform the resulting position and velocity vectors from the ECI to the ECF frame as
shown in Fig. 2.
Z, z
C
P
B
r
y
ĵ
k̂
Y
C

X
iˆ
B
x
Figure 2. Orientation of the ECI , C , and ECF, B frames.
  Greenwich hour angle
   
2
23 56 m 04.09 s
h
= 7.2921158553 x 10-5 rad/s
The transformation of the position vector from the C (ECI) frame to the B (ECF) frame is
given by
 x   cos 
 y    sin 
  
 z   0
sin 
cos 
0
0  X 
0  Y  .
 
1  Z 
6
(22)
Which may be written as
rB  TBC rC .
(23)
 cos 
T   sin 

 0
sin 
cos 
0
C
B
where
0
0 .

1
(24)
We may transform the velocity vector by using the velocity rule
B
rB  TBC

C
r  C  B  r

C
.
(25)
In component form
 X  Y 
 x 
 y   T C  Y  X  .
B 

 
 Z 
 z 


(26)
Equation (25) could also be obtained by differentiating eq. (23), i.e.
B
rB  TBC C rC  TBC rC .
It can be shown that

TBC rC  TBC C  B  r
(27)

(28)
C
where
   sin 

TBC    cos 

0

and
 cos 
  sin 
0
C frame is given by
rC  TCB rB
where
(29)
   , the rotation rate of the Earth.
The transformation from the B frame to the
and
0

0
0
C
(30)

rC  TCB B r  C  B  r
 
TCB  TBC
1
 
 TBC
T
.
7

B
(31)
(32)
Coriolis and Centripetal Force/Acceleration
We now wish to look at the Coriolis and centripetal term in detail. Equation (18), which is
repeated here, is the fundamental equation describing the motion of a particle, P, in the ECF
frame.
B
r 
 Fp
Mp

 F C
  B  ( C  B  r ) 2 C  B  B r
MP
Where we have used Eq. (14) and (15) to replace A  
A
(33)
 with C r .
R
If we only have the particle, P, and the Earth to deal with, we may ignore  F as we did in Eq.
(16). However, when we include the sun, moon and other planets in the system, their force per
unit mass on both P and the Earth must be included. Also, if we include the effects of drag,
gravity anomalies, solar pressure, etc. on P, their forces per unit mass must be included in
 FP
.
MP
In Eq. (33) the Coriolis and centripetal terms are on the force side of the equation. Hence, they
represent “apparent” forces per unit mass. We will now refer to them as the Coriolis force and the
centripetal force and it is understood that these are forces per unit mass and consequently, have
units of acceleration. Let’s examine these forces in detail.
Coriolis Force
The Coriolis force is given by  2C  B B r where B is the ECF and C is the ECI frame. If
P has a velocity vector relative to the ECF frame, which is not parallel to the angular velocity
vector of the ECF frame, P will experience a Coriolis force.
Using the right hand rule, we see that if an observer imagines themselves aligned with the spin
axis and facing in the direction of B r , the Coriolis force will always be to the right of the
observer in the northern hemisphere and to the left of the observer in the southern hemisphere.
Note that in the southern hemisphere the observer will be aligned with the negative spin axis
direction.
Centripental Force
8
The centripental force is given by  C  B  ( C  B  r ) . Assume that the particle P is in the x-z
plane of the ECF frame as shown in Fig. 3. The centripetal force vector, whose magnitude is
 2 r cos  , will always be perpendicular to and directed outward from the spin axis. The only
time the centripetal force will vanish is when P is on the spin axis.
z
P
C
B

j

Fcen   C  B  ( C  B  r )   2 r cos i
r
(34)
where  is the geocentric latitude

x

i
Figure 3. Centripetal Force
Example of Coriolis and centripetal force
Case 1 : P is lying at rest on the surface of a spherical earth.
In this case B r  B r  0 and equation (33) becomes
B
r  0 
 Fp
Mp
C  B  ( C  B  r )
(35)
i.e. the Coriolis force vanishes and there is a balance between the applied forces on P and the
centripetal force. The free body diagram of P showing the applied forces includes the
gravitational attraction of the Earth, Fg , and the reaction force of the Earth, FN , on P.
FN
Fg and FN are given by
MP
Fg
Fg  GM  M P
r
r
  M P 3
3
r
r
FN  force exerted on M P by the Earth
Substituting into Eq. (35)
9
(36)
 
F
r
 N C  B  ( C  B  r )  0 .
3
r
MP
(37)
Hence, FN is given by
r


FN  M p    3  C  B  ( C  B  r )
 r

(38)
Lets look at the centripetal force in Eq. (37)
C
B

P
r

ĵ
r
 2 r cos  iˆ

iˆ
From the figure,
C  B  ( C  B  r )   2 r cos2   r   2 r cos  sin   .
(39)
Hence, Eq. (38) becomes
 

FN  M P ( 2   2 r cos 2  ) r   2 r cos  sin    .
 r

(40)
The weight of the mass M P is the radial component of equation (40).
For example, at the poles the centripetal force vanishes and
FN  M P (

r2
) r .
(41)
While at the equator


FN  M P  2   2 r   r .
r

10
(42)
Evaluating Eqs. (41) and (42) for r=6378 km and   398600
km3
s2
at the poles yields,
FN  9.8M p r Newtons = kg
m
.
s2
at the equator,
FN  9.76M p r Newtons .
Hence, a person who weighted 200 lbs at the North Pole would weigh
9.76
( 200)  199.3 lbs
9.8
on the equator. We have ignored the oblateness of the Earth, which would change these numbers.
Case 2 : Assume that P is in a geostationary orbit. Use Eq. (33) to determine its altitude. Because
the orbit is geostationary it lies in the equator and is fixed in the
B
frame.BTherefore,
r  B r  0 and equation (33) becomes
B
r  0 
 Fp
Mp
C  B  ( C  B  r ) .
(43)
The only force acting on P is the gravitational attraction of the Earth. Hence, Eq. (43) becomes

r
2
 r   2 r r  0 ,
(44)
where  is the angular velocity of the satellite which, for a geostationary satellite, must equal the
rotation rate for the Earth. Solving Eq. (44) for r yields
r3 

km3 / s 2
398600

 2 (7.292  10 5 ) 2 rad 2 / s 2
r  42,164 km.
Geosynchronus altitude is
h = r - R = 42,164 - 6,378 km
h = 35,786 km.
11
Case 3 : Compute the Coriolis and centripetal force per unit mass on a spacecraft in an 822 km.
circular polar orbit as it flies over the equator and the South pole
Assume the spacecraft position vector lies along the x-axis of the
The velocity, C r , relative to the
B (ECF) frame.
C (ECI) frame will be normal to the equator with magnitude
z
C

B
k̂
r 

a
 7.44 km/s.
Hence,
B
r
C
r 
r
ĵ
iˆ
y
C
r  7.44kˆ km/s.
x
However, for the Coriolis force we need the velocity relative to the ECF frame, B r ,i.e.
FCor  2 ( C r    r )
but
 C r  0 .
Hence,
FCor  2  (  r )
 2 2 riˆ
km
(inward along r )
s2
 3.38  10 7 iˆ
The centripetal force per unit mass is
Fcent    (  r )
  2 r iˆ
 1.91  10 7 iˆ
km
(outward along r )
s2
As the spacecraft flies over the South Pole the centripental force will vanish (  r  0) .
In this case C r 
B
r and if we assume that B r is parallel to the x axis, the Coriolis force per
unit mass is
FCor  2  B r iˆ
 2 B r ˆj
12
 1.09  10 3
km
ĵ
s2
(to the left of an observer standing on the South Pole and facing in the velocity direction).
Summary
1. The centripetal force per unit mass will always be normal to the spin axis and directed
outward. The centripetal acceleration will be equal and opposite to the centripetal
acceleration per unit mass.
2. The Coriolis force per unit mass will always be to the right of an observer in the Northern
Hemisphere facing in the velocity direction and aligned with the spin axis. In the Southern
Hemisphere the force will be to the left of the observer.
13