Download Inflammatory Pain Models

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Appendicitis wikipedia , lookup

Osteochondritis dissecans wikipedia , lookup

Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Tennis elbow wikipedia , lookup

Arthritis wikipedia , lookup

Psychoneuroimmunology wikipedia , lookup

Rheumatoid arthritis wikipedia , lookup

Ankylosing spondylitis wikipedia , lookup

Multiple sclerosis signs and symptoms wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Pain Models: Ra.onale, tes.ng and interpreta.on Inflammatory Pain Models Kathryn M Albers, PhD Professor Department of Neurobiology Pain and Inflamma=on – recogni=on of neural-­‐immune interac=ons Aulus Cornelius Celsus (~25 BC-­‐50 BC) is credited with recording the cardinal signs of inflamma=on: dolor (pain), calor (warmth), tumor (swelling) rubor (redness and hyperaemia). De Medicina Why study inflammatory pain •  Adequate pain relief for chronic pain due to inflammatory condi=ons is lacking. •  Exis=ng therapies (NSAIDs, opiates) may be limited in scope and have dose-­‐limi=ng side effects. •  Iden=fica=on of inflammatory mediators, their temporal and spa=al ac=on and their rela=on to abnormal pain states remains unclear. What is Inflammatory Pain? •  Pain associated with =ssue injury and inflamma=on (arthri=s, pancrea==s, coli=s, cys==s), autoimmune disease or exposure to irrita=ng agents. •  Occurs in response to release of inflammatory mediators from injured =ssue that ac=vate and sensi=ze the nocicep=ve system…. •  Causing hyperalgesia and allodynia, heat, redness, swelling of =ssue and loss of func=on. Physiological pain-­‐ acute response to noxious s=muli Marchand, Perretti and McMahon. 2005. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6:521. Inflammatory pain – =ssue damage ac=vates local and infiltra=ng immune cells. Genera=on of Inflammatory Pain PAMPs/DAMPs activate toll-­‐
like receptor signaling Immune/glial cells produce algogens (ATP, bradykinin, growth factors, cytokines, lipids, serotonin, PGs) that sensi=ze nerve terminals. Ellis and Bennett. 2013 British J of Anaesthesia 111:26. Aberrant ac=vity of nociceptor neurons also drive inflamma=on through an=dromic axon reflexes that release neuropep=des at terminals. Chiu et al., (2012). Nature Neurosci 15:1063. Purpose of Inflammatory Pain Models •  To understand chronic pain mechanisms at molecular, cellular, electrophysiological and anatomical levels. •  To understand pathophysiological mechanisms that underlie pain in acute and chronic condi=ons. •  To allow preclinical evalua=on of poten=al analgesics and therapeu=c approaches (viral vector, siRNA, cogni=ve, surgical) for blocking pain. Measure of Inflammatory Pain •  Outcomes: measure of responses to applied s=muli; thermal, mechanical, chemical. •  Endpoints: behavioral  escape behavior, withdrawal reflex, vocaliza=on, all without =ssue damage. Assays include: – 
– 
– 
– 
– 
Hargreaves method Hot plate Tail flick Von Frey filaments Grip force/strength assays Nocicep=ve tests: (Hargreaves) From Barrot (2012). Tests and models of nociception and pain in rodents. Neuroscience 211:39. Inflammatory Pain Models should: •  Elicit a localized inflammatory reac=on in response to a noxious chemical or surgery that provokes =ssue irrita=on –  Carrageenan, CFA, zymosan, capsaicin, bee venom, formalin, mustard oil •  Produce behavioral sensi=vity, primarily on treated side •  Tissue swelling, redness and infiltra=on of immune cells, dependent on challenge/model. •  Mimic the human inflammatory experience. Chemical/irritant induced inflamma=on models Cutaneous system Carrageenan injec=on •  Sulfated polysaccharides from seaweed. •  Originally developed to test activity of NSAIDs (Winter, Risley and Nuss, 1962) •  Light anesthesia; Inject test compd (e.g., analgesic) 2h post hind paw injection •  Produces thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia/allodynia for hours to days post injection (unless repeat injections) Peak effect 3-­‐7h post injection •  Strengths –  Short lived but strong effect on behavioral response –  Alters T cell-­‐mediated immune response, edema (due to prostacyclin-­‐mediated vasodilata=on) and effects are NSAID sensi=ve. •  Weaknesses -­‐  High dose (1 mg/IP) is immunosuppressive (block an=body produc=on, kills macrophages) -­‐  Toxic to liver/kidney -­‐  Promotes tumor growth. -­‐ Relevance to human chronic pain? Complete Freund’s Adjuvant (CFA or FCA) •  Suspension of heat-­‐killed Mycobacterium butyricum or Mycobacterium tuberculosum in mineral oil diluted 1:1 with PBS. •  Dual syringe used to make emulsion for injection. –  Use 3-­‐way stopcock between 2 syringes to emulsify Complete Freund’s Adjuvant cont. •  Produces thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia and edema for days – weeks post injection. Zhang & Ren. (2011). Animal Models of Pain, Neuromethods 49:23. •  Dose dependent action Increased hindpaw Decreased thermal diameter withdrawal latency •  Activates immune system; robust in`iltration of immune cells in tissue. •  Minimal reduction in weight, normal motor/
grooming/open `ield exploratory behavior. Strengths •  Single injec=on effects changes in =ssue and behavior out to 5-­‐6 days in mouse. •  Repeated injec=on prolongs effect •  Obvious =ssue swelling and immune cell (macrophage, PMNs) infiltra=on •  Responsive to NSAID/prednisolone treatment Weaknesses •  Reliability and reproducibility, par=cularly in mouse •  Variable response less so in some strains (DBA/1, C57BL/6) Zymosan •  Beta-­‐glucan – glucose polymer from cell wall of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae & Candida albicans). •  Self resolving model of acute inflamma=on •  Intraplantar injec=on of zymosan produces dose-­‐ and =me-­‐dependent hyperalgesia. •  24h thermal hyperalgesia; 3d mechanical Zymosan cont., Belichard et al (2000) Immunopharmacology. •  Has associated edema/inflamma=on. •  Use in cutaneous (Meller & Gebhart, 1997), visceral, muscle and nerve models Zymosan an=gens ac=vate macrophages via Dec=n-­‐1 receptor. Zymosan induces immune responses that are dec=n-­‐1 and TLR2-­‐dependent. Dec=n-­‐1 binds, internalizes glucan, media=ng produc=on of ROS and NF-­‐kB ac=va=on  pro-­‐inflammatory cytokine/ chemokine produc=on. Strengths -­‐ Zymosan acts as a PAMP. -­‐ Produces thermal and mech hyperalgesia -­‐ Produces spontaneous pain behaviors (30-­‐45 min dura=on) -­‐ Applicable to chronic pain condi=ons Candida infec=on •  Pain secondary to infec=on is suspected to underlie idiopathic chronic pain condi=ons, i.e., urogenital (vulvodynia, endometriosis, prosta==s), inters==al cys==s, and IBS. •  Repeated or extended C. albicans (or zymosan) infec=on in mouse  inflammatory response and persistent mechanical sensi=vity of vulva. Sci Transl Med 2011 3:101. Formalin test •  Protein cross-­‐linking agent. •  Ac=vates TRPA1 ion channel •  Considered a short-­‐term inflammatory pain model. Interphase depression 2: licking, biting, shaking 1: elevation 0: no elevation Tonic, in`lammatory phase (partly dependent on 1st phase) Strengths –  Fast ac=ng –  Produces spontaneous pain behaviors –  Used to study analgesics, e.g., opioids suppress both phases, NSAIDs only effec=ve in 2nd phase Weaknesses –  Poor reliability and reproducibility in producing thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia. –  Typically without edema –  Relevance of phasic response to human chronic pain condi=ons Capsaicin •  Ac=vates TRPV1 receptors •  Model of neurogenic inflamma=on, produces hyperalgesia, allodynia and neurogenic inflamma=on •  Primary site of injec=on plus flare zone involvement •  Decreases heat and mechanical latencies in a dose-­‐dependent manner Strengths –  Allows mechanis=c studies of TRPV1, primary afferent signaling, desensi=za=on, neurogenic inflamma=on…. –  Produces central changes in dorsal horn neurons, glia Weaknesses –  Complex biology – not specific to pain neurons –  Neurotoxin –  An=-­‐tumor ac=on –  An=-­‐inflammatory ac=on?? •  Fernandes et al (2012) TRPV1 dele=on enhances local inflamma=on and accelerates the onset of systemic inflammatory response syndrome. J Immunol 188:5741. Ren and Dubner, 1999. ILAR J 40:111. Cutaneous injec=on of individual or mixed algogens: Growth factors – NGF, TNF Bradykinin, histamine, leukotrienes Cytokines Prostaglandins Serotonin Substance P Muscle/Joint Pain •  Deep =ssue is a major site of injury, inflamma=on (e.g., rheumatoid arthri=s) and degenera=ve disease (osteo arthri=s). •  In contrast to cutaneous, the major sensa=on from deep =ssue is pain; dull, aching and poorly localized. •  Myosi=s, twis=ng, hipng or compression of muscle/
joint (ligaments and fibrous capsule) evokes pain. •  Low back pain, fibromyalgia and myofascial pain are considered muscle pain disorders. Muscle afferents •  Fiber types –  Group Ia, II – proprioceptors (muscle spindle) –  Group III –thinly myelinated Ad fibers –  Group IV -­‐ unmyelinated C fibers •  III and IV respond to metabolite (chemosensi=ve), thermo-­‐ and mechano s=muli. •  Innervate vasculature of muscle, CT stroma Models of Muscle Inflamma=on •  Carrageenan injec=on into gastrocnemius muscle produces pain, inflamma=on, reduced grip strength. •  Mustard oil injec=on into deep masseter or tongue muscle of the rat. •  CFA injec=on into masseter produces persistent inflamma=on (and c-­‐fos). •  Injec=on of immune modulators (IL6, TNF, PGs, BK) or metabolites (ATP, lactate, protons). Muscle pain models cont., •  Repeated injec=ons of pH4 saline. Causes mech allodynia without inflamma=on. •  Exercise induced – Exercise plus acid, e.g., pH 5 saline injec=ons with 2h wheel running. •  Prolonged ischemia (15-­‐60 min) Kehl and Fairbanks. (2003)31:188. Zhang and Ren Models of inflammatory disease states of the joints Neugebauer et al., 2007. Techniques for assessing knee joint pain in arthri=s. Molecular Pain. Gregory et al., (2012) A review of transla=onal animal models for knee osteoarthri=s. Arthri=s doi:10.1155/2012/764621. Arthri=s – a prevalent, chronic disease; leading cause of disability. OA – most common form of arthri=s. Car=lage on the ends of bones wears away, overgrowth of bone. Movement/weight bearing pain is defining feature of OA. RA-­‐ autoimmune disease, inflamma=on of joint connec=ve =ssues (i.e., synovial membrane). Pain, swelling and joint erosion over =me. Pain improves with movement. Gout – uric acid crystal accumula=on in joints Models of osteoarthri=s disease •  Spontaneous/strain speci`ic (ColA21 KO mouse; Dunkin-­‐
Hartley guinea pig ) •  Chemical induction •  intra-­‐articular injection of papain or monosodium iodoacetate (MIA); inhibits chrondrocyte metabolism. •  Injection of collagenase to damage ligaments and tendons. •  Surgical induction •  Meniscextomy combined with cut of collateral and/or cruciate ligaments femur tibia Models of acute inflammatory OA •  Injec=on of kaolin(clay)/carrageenan into knee joint –  Produces a use-­‐dependent monoarthri=s within hours, car=lage damage, synovial inflamma=on. Persists for weeks. –  Pathological, behavioral, electrophysiological changes, persists for weeks –  Used in mouse, rat, cat, non-­‐human primates •  Carrageenan alone – milder phenotype OA models cont., •  Zymosan – acute vascular permeability, edema, neutrophil infiltra=on. Persists for weeks leading to synovi=s (macrophage, lymphocytes), fibrovascular =ssue. •  CFA into knee – single or repeated injec=on. Monoarthri=s with synovial hypertrophy, neutrophils, erosion of car=lage and bone. •  CFA tail injec=on induces polyarthri=s/systemic disease and is not a good model for pain assessment. Gout models •  Injec=on of monosodium urate crystals dissolved in saline •  Uric acid in mineral oil •  Knee joint inflamma=on within 2-­‐3h that resolves aqer 3-­‐7 days. Summary of knee joint pain models Gregory et al., (2012) A review of transla=onal animal models for knee osteoarthri=s. Arthri=s doi:10.1155/2012/764621. Measure of knee joint pain Indirect -­‐ weight bearing – sta=c and dynamic -­‐ foot posture, gait analysis -­‐ spontaneous mobility – uses telemetry or ac=vity box -­‐ sensi=vity to mechanical or thermal s=muli on foot
of affected side Direct -­‐ sensi=vity to mechanical (compression) or thermal s=muli -­‐ knee extension angle measures -­‐ vocaliza=on evoked by knee s=mula=on OA Model and Drug Development •  An=-­‐NGF Does not alter CFA-­‐
induced histopathology of knee joint… Or CFA-­‐induced hypervasculariza=on Ghilardi et al (2012) Arthritis and Rheumatism. 64:2223. An=-­‐ngf does reduce CFA-­‐induced sprou=ng of sensory and sympathe=c fibers And reduces pain-­‐related behaviors Anti-­‐NGF (Tanezumab) relieves OA pain experience while walking in a dose dependent manner. Which inflammatory pain model is best? Depends on: •  The ques=on being asked: –  Mechanis=c –  Tissue/disease specific –  Therapeu=c •  If effect being study (e.g., new therapeu=c) targets acute or chronic pain. Does drug have acute affect or require days of treatment? •  Pathophysiology – =ssue dependence; cutaneous, muscle, joints, visceral. •  Cost and feasibility •  Ul=mate transla=on of findings to clinic