* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Phosphines - U of L Class Index
Cluster chemistry wikipedia , lookup
Jahn–Teller effect wikipedia , lookup
Metalloprotein wikipedia , lookup
Evolution of metal ions in biological systems wikipedia , lookup
Hydroformylation wikipedia , lookup
Metal carbonyl wikipedia , lookup
Spin crossover wikipedia , lookup
Stability constants of complexes wikipedia , lookup
Phosphines :PR3 • - very important ligands - σ-donors - π-acceptors For years, it was assumed that π-backdonation occurred from the metal into empty d-orbitals on phosphorus. • Actually: π-backdonation occurs into MOs formed by combination of two d-orbitals on phosphorus and the σ* orbitals involved in P-R bonding. P + • P σ* orbitals d-orbitals P P + acceptor MOs P P Each acceptor MO has 2 lobes (similar to a d-orbital) but is antibonding with respect to the P-R bond • As the amount of π-backdonation increases, the length of P-R increases. This can be observed in the crystal structures of phosphine complexes - eCoI Et3P CoII PEt3 Et3P Average Co-P 221.8 pm 223.0 pm Average P-C 184.6 pm 182.9 pm • PEt3 A huge variety of phosphines have been prepared, many of which are commercially available. One can just choose a phosphine with the desired steric (size) and electronic properties (σ-donation/π-acceptance). • The size of ligands (not just phosphines) can be measured using the concept of a cone angle (Chadwick A. Tolman, Chem. Rev., 1977, 313). - TM-P distance fixed at 228 pm to standardize the cone angle (θ). M θ P - The cone encompases the van der Waals radii of the outermost atoms of the ligand. 228 pm • Cone angles measured by crystallography (although TM-P bond distance fixed at 228 pm) • Electronic properties measured by IR and electrochemistry – ν(CO) and E1/2 for oxidation or reduction measured for a large series of carbonyl phosphine complexes with different PR3 (e.g. [Ni(CO)3(PR3)] or [CpFeMe(CO)(PR3)]) x-axis = cone angle (θ) y-axis = ν(CO) for [Ni(CO)3L] [φ = old fashioned abbreviation for phenyl] Typical Ligands – 2 (Phosphines) - Bite angles for bidentate ligands Xantphos DPPM t-Bu Ph2P P βn PPh2 P OC βn = bite angle = ligand-metalligand angle for bidentate ligands O H Rh M t-Bu PPh3 β = 72 o small bite angle Ph2P H Rh PPh2 OC PPh3 β = 111 o = large bite angle Bite angle can have a profound effect on the rate and selectivity of metal catalyzed reactions Reviews: (1) P. C. J. Kamer, P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, Wide Bite Angle Diphosphines: Xantphos Ligands in Transition Metal Complexes and Catalysis, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 895-904; (2) Z. Freixa, P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, Bite angle effects in diphosphine metal catalysis: steric or electronic?, Dalton Trans., 2003, 1890-1901; (3) P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, Ligand Bite Angle Effects in Metal-catalyzed C-C bond formation, Chem. Rev., 2000, 2741-2769. Phosphines/Arsines in early TM and lanthanide chemistry • PR3 excellent ligands for soft late transition metals • PR3 typically NOT v. suitable to form complexes with hard early TMs (PR3 > PAr3) • AsR3 even worse, and early TM SbR3 or BiR3 complexes unknown • NPh3 useless as a ligand for early or late TMs (terrible donor), NMe3 OK for early TMs Ph2P N Me3Si AsPh2 Ph2P [CpTiCl3] N AsPh2 Ti Cl Cl [PdCl2(NCPh)2] •Route to early/late heterobimetallics Ph2P N R. G. Cavell (U of A), OM, 1991, 539 Ti Pd Cl Cl AsPh2 Cl Cl 2. xs TMS-Cl •Hard/Soft donor combination M. D. Fryzuk (UBC), OM, 2005, 1112 •Rare early TM (Ti, Zr, Hf) arsine complexes G. Reid (U Southampton), DT, 2004, 3005 & EJIC, 2001, 2927