* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download SharksSp15 - St. Olaf Pages
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Key Points from Shark Article! Group 1: Lark, Sam, Emily, Erin Ecological Features ● Inhabit all areas of ocean, from fully oceanic to being limited to shallow reefs and continental shelves, and some that transition between the two. ● Life History - Life cycle of growth, sexual maturity, reproduction, and offspring rearing o Slow growers and reproducers. This prevents sharks from recovering quickly from population depletion since they reach sexual maturity late in life, and do not have large numbers of offspring. ● Sharks occupy different levels of the food chain- some are top predators while others are mesopredators ● Generalist feeders- mostly carnivores, but some planktivores ● Because their feeding is not gape-limited, they are often the major or exclusive predators of megafauna Group 2: Eva, Robin, Miles, Thea Figure 2. Global fisheries trends and conservation status of chondrichthyans. Time series refer to landings of sharks, rays and chimeras in thousands of metric tonnes km -2 of shelf area since 1950, until 2007. Red bars=% of species in certain area that are globally assessed as critically endangered (CR), endangered (EN), and vulnerable (VU) Yellow bars=yellow indicates near threatened (NT) status and green the percentage of species assessed as least concern (LC). Green bars= species that are the least concern Transparent bars= species that are assessed data deficient (DD) or that have not been assessed yet n = total species in area , A = number of species assessed ● ● ● ● For the most part, all areas have upward trends, except for China, and areas in Northern Europe... which appear to be pretty constant. Many areas have drops around the 1970’s and 1980’s. In South America, there is a lot of variation between years. In Western Africa, a huge increase in the mid-1990’s. Ferretti et al. Caitlin Coastal Ecosystems (Closest to the shore, no more than 200 m deep): ● Highly accessible, lots of human activity→ exploitation ● High biological productivity ● Been fished since humans lived in coastal regions Demersel Ecosystems (Continental shelf and slopes): ● Home to 90% of elasmobranch species (Sharks, rays, and skates) ● Trawl fishing→ dragging a big net ● Shrimp fisheries with a lot of elasmobranch by-catch ● Fished by bottom trawling since the 1970s Pelagic Ecosystems (Open ocean, deep waters): ● Industrial fishing since the 1950’s ● Long-line fishing for tuna, swordfish, and other large fish ● Known for large amounts of sharks as by-catch (1 shark for every 2 yellowfin) Group 4: Effects on Elasmobranch Mesopredators ● ● ● ● ● Mesopredator: a medium-sized predator which often increases in abundance when large predators decline. Decreases in large sharks usually lead to increases in elasmobranch mesopredators (i.e. dogfish and other small sharks). This is better documented in coastal habitats than in pelagic (open sea) habitats. o Some increases reported in pelagic habitats but effects have also been attributed to: Declines in other open sea apex predators (i.e. tuna) Changes in habitat use, allowing mesopredators to move into waters previously dominated by larger sharks. Elasmobranchs are highly sensitive to fishing, so any increases in fishing would seriously impact mesopredator populations despite their recent increases in abundance. Example: dogfish have increased 20- and 17-fold in the Gulf of Alaska and Prince William Sound, and S. megalops has increased fivefold in Australian waters from ’76–’97. Toby, Gabe, Andrew, Ruth http://www.elasmodiver.com/Spiny%20 Dogfish%20Pictures.htm Group 5: Dani, Evan, Lisa Effects of Shark Exploitation on Marine Mammals and Sea Turtles: ● Decrease of sharks increase range of marine mammals and sea turtles ● Reduced shark predation on juveniles increase marine mammal and sea turtle populations ● Increased population sizes of marine mammals and sea turtles create competition within and between species (trophic cascade) ● Increased population sizes of marine mammals and sea turtles decreases the amount of seagrass left (trophic cascade) ● Marine mammals tend to avoid areas of high predation risk, but sea turtles tend to remain in seagrass beds with high predation risk https://wavemakersrq.wordpress.com/2012/10/08/module-3-the-first-four-kingdoms-part-2-2/ http://animals-pics.com/tag/seals-monk-animal-picture/ Group 6: Jake, Emma, Emilee ● Removal of large sharks results in trophic cascades o Large sharks eat the rays and small sharks, the small sharks then eat the bony fish (see figure on the next slide). ● Large sharks were netted off the coast of South Africa for 50 year ● When large sharks were originally netted, that resulted in an increase in small sharks and a decrease in bony fish ● When small sharks began to succomb to angling pressure, the population of bony fish increased again ● Sharks can also influence other marine ecosystems, such as those that contain seagrass and grazers like turtles and dugongs ● More research needs to be done to determine if this is an isolated effect or if it might be seen in another ecosystem; there simply isn’t much research on non-commercial sharks. Group 7: Lily, Kristen, Amy :Conclusion ● ● ● ● ● ● visibility/public opinion in terms of conservation sensitivity to ecosystem change, even ‘sustainable’ fishing trophic cascade: increase in mesopredators low reproductive rates increase risk wide range mobility makes observation difficult because the ocean is a complex system, it is difficult to discern causes/effects ● similarly, it is difficult to pinpoint the specific effect of fishing