Download CHEST IMAGING SCENARIO Final.pptx

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Radiosurgery wikipedia , lookup

Backscatter X-ray wikipedia , lookup

Radiographer wikipedia , lookup

X-ray wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear medicine wikipedia , lookup

Positron emission tomography wikipedia , lookup

Image-guided radiation therapy wikipedia , lookup

Medical imaging wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
MUSCULOSKELETAL IMAGING:
X-RAY VS ULTRASOUND VS MRI
RAKESH MOHANKUMAR
MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGIST
JOINT DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL IMAGING
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
DISCLOSURE
I HAVE NO FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES TO MAKE PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT MATTER
OF THIS TALK.
OBJECTIVES
  EVALUATE THE USE OF X-RAYS, ULTRASOUND, CT AND MRI IN DIAGNOSIS
OF MUSCULOSKELETAL PATHOLOGY
  ASSESS THE ROLE OF EACH MODALITY IN THE COMMONLY IMAGED JOINTS
  KNEE
  SHOULDER
  HIP
PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY
  MAINSTAY OF BONE AND JOINT
IMAGING, PARTICULARLY IN TRAUMA
  ADVANTAGES
 
FAST
 
INEXPENSIVE
 
READILY AVAILABLE
 
GOOD FOR ASSESSING BONES AND
JOINTS
  DISADVANTAGES
 
USES IONISING RADIATION (X-RAYS)
 
LIMITED INFORMATION REGARDING
SOFT TISSUES
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT)
  ADDS CROSS SECTIONAL IMAGING
CAPABILITY
  REFORMATTING IN OTHER PLANES AND
3D
  BEST FOR BONY CORTEX, OSSEOUS
ANATOMY AND CALCIFICATION
  GOOD AT EVALUATION OF COMMINUTED
FRACTURES TO COMPLEX STRUCTURES
  PELVIS
  CALCANEUS
  WRIST
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT)
  ADDS CROSS SECTIONAL IMAGING
CAPABILITY
  REFORMATTING IN OTHER PLANES AND
3D
  BEST FOR BONY CORTEX, OSSEOUS
ANATOMY AND CALCIFICATION
  GOOD AT EVALUATION OF COMMINUTED
FRACTURES TO COMPLEX STRUCTURES
  PELVIS
  CALCANEUS
  WRIST
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT)
coronal
  ADDS CROSS SECTIONAL IMAGING
CAPABILITY
  REFORMATTING IN OTHER PLANES AND
3D
  BEST FOR BONY CORTEX, OSSEOUS
ANATOMY AND CALCIFICATION
sagittal
  GOOD AT EVALUATION OF COMMINUTED
FRACTURES TO COMPLEX STRUCTURES
  PELVIS
  CALCANEUS
  WRIST
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT)
  ADDS CROSS SECTIONAL IMAGING
CAPABILITY
  REFORMATTING IN OTHER PLANES AND
3D
  BEST FOR BONY CORTEX, OSSEOUS
ANATOMY AND CALCIFICATION
  GOOD AT EVALUATION OF COMMINUTED
FRACTURES TO COMPLEX STRUCTURES
  PELVIS
  CALCANEUS
  WRIST
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT)
DISADVANTAGES
  RADIATION DOSE TO PATIENT
  METAL ARTEFACT
  POOR SOFT TISSUE
CHARACTERIZATION
ULTRASOUND
ADVANTAGES
  READY ACCESSIBILITY
  PORTABILITY
  RELATIVELY QUICK SCAN TIME
  BETTER PATIENT TOLERABILITY
  CONTRALATERAL COMPARISON
Achilles tendon
ULTRASOUND
ADVANTAGES (CONTINUED)
  PERSONAL INTERACTION WITH THE
PATIENT
 
DIRECTED / TARGETED EXAMINATION
SPECIFIC FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL
 
CLINICAL HISTORY
  DYNAMIC IMAGING
 
COMPRESSION OF STRUCTURES
 
MOVEMENT OF A JOINT
  INTERVENTION
 
JOINTS, BURSAE, MASSES
 
INJECTION, ASPIRATION, BIOPSY
IMAGING OF TENDONS
Longitudinal
Transverse
SHOULDER ULTRASOUND: SUPRASPINATUS TENDON
Longitudinal
Full thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon
Transverse
ARTHRITIS SCREENING
VASCULARITY OF A LESION
Glomus tumour
VASCULARITY OF A LESION
SOLID VS CYSTIC
LESION
Nerve sheath
tumour
Baker’s cyst
ULTRASOUND
DISADVANTAGES
  HIGHLY OPERATOR DEPENDENT
  LONG LEARNING CURVE
  PROPER TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE REQUIRED
  PHYSICIAN TIME-INTENSIVE EXAMINATION
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI)
  PATIENT IN A STRONG MAGNETIC FIELD
  MULTIPLANAR IMAGING
  EXCELLENT SOFT TISSUE CONTRAST
  IDEALLY SUITED FOR MSK
  BEST IMAGING MODALITY FOR INTRA-ARTICULAR PATHOLOGY
Coronal
Sagittal
Axial
  Soft tissue contrast and multiplanar imaging help pre-operative assessment of
musculoskeletal tumours
SOFT TISSUE CONTRAST
CT
MRI T1
MRI T2 fat sat
SOFT TISSUE CONTRAST
CT
MRI T1
tumour proximal humerus
  rim of calcification best seen on CT
  soft tissue anatomy best on MR
  tumour best seen on T2 MR image
MRI T2 fat sat
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI)
  DISADVANTAGES
  CONTRAINDICATIONS
 
ORBITAL METALLIC FOREIGN BODIES
 
PACEMAKERS
 
NEUROSTIMULATORY DEVICES
 
CLAUSTROPHOBIA
  1 TRIMESTER THEORETICAL RISK
ST
  ARTEFACTS FROM FERROMAGNETIC OBJECTS
  IMAGING OF OSSEOUS ANATOMY, FRACTURES AND CALCIFICATION LACKING (CT
IS STILL BETTER)
KNEE
TRAUMATIC KNEE PAIN
  X-RAY FIRST MODALITY
  CT
 
TO ASSESS TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURE
SEEN ON X-RAY
 
FOCAL TENDERNESS
 
EFFUSION
 
NON WEIGHT BEAR
  NO FRACTURE, TWISTING INJURY,
EFFUSION: MRI
KNEE
ATRAUMATIC KNEE PAIN
  X-RAY: BEST INITIAL STUDY
  MRI: IF ADDITIONAL IMAGING IS
NECESSARY, AND IF INTERNAL
DERANGEMENT IS SUSPECTED.
KNEE
ULTRASOUND
 
 
ROLE SHOULD BE LIMITED TO SUPERFICIAL
STRUCTURES AND FOR A FOCUSED
CLINICAL QUESTION
 
EXTENSOR MECHANISM
 
COLLATERAL LIGAMENTS (MRI IS STILL
BETTER)
 
JOINT EFFUSION/BAKER’S CYST
 
DISTAL HAMSTRINGS
MENISCI: NON-SPECIFIC AND INCOMPLETE
EVALUATION.
 
 
MRI IS MORE SENSITIVE AND SPECIFIC IN
EVALUATION OF MENISCI
CRUCIATES: CANNOT BE ASSESSED WITH
ULTRASOUND
Patellar tendon
SHOULDER
  X-RAY: BEST INITIAL STUDY
  ULTRASOUND:
 
ROTATOR CUFF
 
LONG HEAD OF BICEPS TENDON
(EXTRA-ARTICULAR)
 
JOINT EFFUSION
 
SUB-ACROMIAL BURSA
 
ACJ
 
INTERVENTION
SHOULDER
  MRI:
 
ALL ABOVE
 
LABRUM
 
ARTICULAR CARTILAGE
 
BONE MARROW
Full thickness
supraspinatus tear
HIP
CHRONIC HIP PAIN
  X-RAY INITIAL DIAGNOSTIC TEST
  USEFUL AS INITIAL INVESTIGATION OF
TRAUMA, ARTHRITIS, IMPINGEMENT
OA
HIP
MRI
  ASSESSMENT OF LABRUM
  SURROUNDING SOFT TISSUES
  OSTEONECROSIS
  OSTEOARTHRITIS: ONLY IF ANOTHER
INVESTIGATION IS CLINICALLY INDICATED
  OSTEOID OSTEOMA: CT IS BETTER
T2FS
HIP
OCCULT HIP FRACTURES
18-85% HIP/PELVIS FRACTURES CAN BE MISSED BY
INITIAL RADIOGRAPHS
MR IMAGING SUPPLANTED SCINTIGRAPHY AS NEXT
IMAGING TEST OF CHOICE
  ELDERLY PATIENTS
  OSTEOPOROSIS
  PAIN WITH MINIMAL TRAUMA
  EQUIVOCAL OR “NORMAL” PLAIN RADIOGRAPHS
T1
STIR
METAL IN MSK MRI
  CHRONIC, IMMOBILE IMPLANTS ARE
NOT A CONTRAINDICATION FOR MRI
 
ARTHROPLASTY
 
ORIF PLATES AND SCREWS
 
EMBEDDED FOREIGN BODY: SHRAPNEL
  CAN PRODUCE ARTEFACT IF SCANNING
THE ADJACENT AREA
METAL ARTEFACT REDUCTION
Without WARP
With WARP
METAL ARTEFACT REDUCTION
CONCLUSION
  EVALUATE THE ROLE OF X-RAY, ULTRASOUND, CT AND MRI
IN MUSCULOSKELETAL PATHOLOGY
  PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY: INITIAL INVESTIGATION OF JOINT
PATHOLOGIES
  CT: BEST FOR OSSEOUS ANATOMY, FRACTURES, CALCIFICATION
  MRI: BEST FOR SOFT TISSUE AND INTRA-ARTICULAR PATHOLOGIES
  US: TENDONS, ARTHRITIS, DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT, INTERVENTION
QUESTIONS?