* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Seminar 7: CENTRAL FORCE PROBLEM Problem 26 A particle of
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Plateau principle wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical descriptions of the electromagnetic field wikipedia , lookup
Inverse problem wikipedia , lookup
Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector wikipedia , lookup
Computational fluid dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Perturbation theory wikipedia , lookup
Navier–Stokes equations wikipedia , lookup
Computational electromagnetics wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Seminar 7: CENTRAL FORCE PROBLEM Problem 26 A particle of mass m is attracted to a force center by a force which varies inversely as the cube of its distance from the center. Solve the equations of motion for the orbits and discuss how the nature of the orbits depends on the parameters of the system. Solution From Lecture 2, we already know the equations of motion for a particle in the presence of an arbitrary central force f (r). These equations are as follows: ( m(r̈ − rθ̇2 ) = f (r) d mr2 θ̇ = 0. dt (1) The second equation has the first integral, mr2 θ̇ = l, (2) which is the angular momentum of the particle about the origin since it can be represented as a product l = r · mrθ̇ ≡ r · mvθ , (3) where vθ is the angular velocity of the particle. For the force f =− kr , r4 (4) the first of Eqs. (1.1) is k , r3 or, by substituting θ̇ expressed in terms of l in accordance with Eq. (1.3), m(r̈ − rθ̇2 ) = − k l2 mk l2 + = mr̈ − mr̈ − 1− 2 3 3 3 mr r mr l (5) ! = 0. (6) We know that r = r(θ), and that this equation can be essentially simplified if we change this variable letting r= 1 . u l mr2 = (7) Indeed, then we have θ̇ = ṙ = d 1 dt u lu2 m 2 lu = − u12 du θ̇ = − u12 du = − ml du dθ dθ m dθ 2 2 2 2 2 d du r̈ = − ml dθ = − ml ddθu2 θ̇ = − ml ddθu2 lum = − ml 2 u2 ddθu2 . dt (8) With these transformations, Eq. (6) becomes mk l2 d2 u l2 u3 1− 2 −m 2 u2 2 − m dθ m l or ! = 0, mk d2 u + 1 − 2 u = 0. 2 dθ l (9) ! (10) As we see, this is the linear homogeneous differential equation of the second order. The form of its solution depends critically on the relation between the parameters involved. Namely, if l2 > mk, this solution is (11) "s 1 u = cos r0 # mk 1 − 2 (θ − θ0 ) , l (12) where (r0 , θ0 ) is a point on the orbit. In the opposite case, when l2 < mk, (13) the form of solution is changed to 1 u = cosh r0 "s # mk − 1 (θ − θ0 ) . l2 (14) The corresponding equations for the orbits are !#−1 s " r = r0 cos and mk 1 − 2 (θ − θ0 ) l s " r = r0 cosh , (15) !#−1 mk − 1 (θ − θ0 ) l2 , (16) respectively. Problem 27 Consider a particle of mass m moving in a plane under a central force f (r) = − k k0 + . r2 r3 (17) Find the equation for the orbit in the polar coordinates (r, θ), assuming that k > 0 and l2 > −mk 0 , where l is the orbital angular momentum. Solution The force (17) differs from the one given by Eq. (4) in the preceeding problem by the presence of the inverse-square term. Hence the equation of motion (6) is modified to l2 mk 0 mr̈ − 1 + mr3 l2 ! + k = 0, r2 (18) or, with the use of the transformations (8), d2 u mk 0 mk + 1 + u= 2 . 2 2 dθ l l ! (19) Opposite to our previous case [see: Eq. (10)], Eq. (19) contains in its r.h.s. the driving term mk . l2 This term is constant, and hence an obvious particular solution of the inhomogeneous Eq.(19) is also constant, mk mk 0 u= 2 1+ 2 l l ! mk . l2 + mk 0 = (20) This particular solution must be add to the general solution of the corresponding homogeneous equation, mk 0 d2 u + 1 + u = 0. dθ2 l2 ! (21) where l2 > −mk 0 ,by assumption. Therefore we may write the solution of this equation in the form given by Eq. (12), that is s u = A cos ! mk 0 1 + 2 (θ − θ0 ) , l (22) The general solution of the inhomogeneous equation (19) is thus s ! mk 0 mk 1 + 2 (θ − θ0 ) + 2 , l l + mk 0 u = A cos (23) where A and θ0 are constants. By a suitable choice of coordinates, θ0 can be put to zero, and hence the equation for the orbit can be written as 1 r= q A cos mk0 l2 1+ θ + mk , (24) l2 +mk0 or r= 1 h q C 1 + ε cos i , (25) l2 + mk 0 . mk (26) 1+ mk0 l2 θ where C and e are new constants, C= mk l2 + mk 0 ε=A To understand the character of this orbit, let first consider a particular case, when k 0 = 0. Then Eq. (25) becomes 1 , C(1 + ε cos θ) r= (27) where mk l2 . (28) , ε = A l2 mk We already met with this orbit in our Lectures [see: Eq. (4.125) in Lecture Notes], C= and we know that this orbit is an ellipse with one of the foci at the origin of the plane polar coordinates and with the eccentricity ε. Indeed, you know that an ellipse is defined as the curve traced by a particle moving so that the sum of its distances from two fixed points F, F 0 is constant. These points are the foci of the ellipse. Using the notation indicated in Figure (it will be demonstrated during Seminar), we have r0 + r = 2a, (29) where a is a half the largest diameter (major axis) of the ellipse. In terms of the polar coordinates with center at the focus F and with the negative x-axis through the focus F 0 , the cosine law gives r02 = r2 + 4a2 ε2 + 4raε cos θ, (30) where aε is the distance from the center of the ellipse to the focus. Combining Eqs. (29) and (30), we find r= a(1 − ε2 ) . (1 + ε cos θ) (31) Comparing this equation with our orbit given by Eq. (27), we see that these expressions are identical, if C= 1 . a(1 − ε2 ) (32) But this is really the case because for the perihelion point θ = 0 we have [see Figure 3.38] r = a − aε = a(1 − ε), (33) while Eq. (27) with θ = 0 reduces to r= 1 , C(1 + ε) (34) Therefore a(1 − ε) = 1 , C(1 + ε) (35) which yields C= 1 , a(1 − ε2 ) (36) that is the expression for C given by the standard equation (32). Note that the constant A which determines the eccentricity ε according to Eq. (28) remains unknown: it can be found from the formal solution of the equations of motion or from the energy consideration but not from the differential equations for the orbit which we used in our problem. Now it is not difficult to guess that if the constant k 0 is not zero but small enough, the orbit will be a modified ellipse whose perihelion will be shifted a little from its conventional value given by Eq. (33). If necessary, this shift can be easily calculated from the equation of orbit with k 0 6= 0, that is, Eq. (25). This problem is in no way only of academic interest. Say, it can be shown that under the influence of the Earth attraction Mercury moves in the force F =− GM m α − 3, 2 r r (37) where α is a positive constant, that is, just in the force of the type, given by Eq. (17).