* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Slides
Modal logic wikipedia , lookup
Structure (mathematical logic) wikipedia , lookup
History of logic wikipedia , lookup
Foundations of mathematics wikipedia , lookup
Turing's proof wikipedia , lookup
Gödel's incompleteness theorems wikipedia , lookup
Model theory wikipedia , lookup
Georg Cantor's first set theory article wikipedia , lookup
Combinatory logic wikipedia , lookup
Propositional formula wikipedia , lookup
Quantum logic wikipedia , lookup
Law of thought wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical logic wikipedia , lookup
Natural deduction wikipedia , lookup
Sequent calculus wikipedia , lookup
Boolean satisfiability problem wikipedia , lookup
Intuitionistic logic wikipedia , lookup
Propositional calculus wikipedia , lookup
Curry–Howard correspondence wikipedia , lookup
A framework for eager encoding Daniel Kroening Ofer Strichman ETH, Switzerland Technion, Israel (Executive summary) (submitted to: Formal Aspects of Computing) 1  A generic framework for reducing decidable logics to propositional logic (beyond NP).  Instantiating the framework for a specific logic L, requires a deductive system for L that meets several criteria.  Linear arithmetic, EUF, arrays etc all have it. 2  A proof rule:  A proof step: (Rule, Antecedent, Proposition)  Definition (Proof-step Constraint): let A1…Ak be the Antecedents and p the Proposition of step. Then: Boolean encoding 3  A proof P =(s1,…, sn) is a set of Proof Steps,   …in which the Antecedence relation is acyclic The Proof Constraint c(P) induced by P is the conjunction of the constraints induced by its steps: P C(P) 4  Propositional skeleton:  Theorem 1: For every formula  and any sound proof P,  is satisfiable ) sk Æ c(P) is satisfiable. 5 Complete proofs  Definition (Complete proofs): A proof P is called complete with respect to  if 6 Sufficient condition for completeness #1    Notation: A – assumption, B – a proposition. denotes: P proves B from A. Let  be an unsatisfiable formula Theorem 2: A proof P is complete with respect to  if for every full assignment  TL(): Theory Literals corresponding to  Not constructive! 7  Projection of a variable x: a set of proof steps that eliminate x and maintains satisfiability.  Strong projection of a variable x: a projection of x that maintains : The projected consequences from each minimal unsatisfiable core of literals is unsatisfiable. 8 Example – strong projection Consider the formula U2 U1 Now strongly project x1: Both sub-formulas are unsatisfiable and do not contain x1. 9  Let C be a conjunction of ’s literals. A proof construction procedure: eliminate all variables in C through strong projection.  Theorem 3: The constructed proof is ‘complete’ for .  10  Goal: for a given logic L,     Find a strong projection procedure. Construct P Generate c(P) Check sk Æ c(P) 11 Example: Disjunctive Linear Arithmetic [S02] e1 e2 e3 e4 C : x1 - x2 < 0, x1 - x3 < 0, -x1 + 2x3 + x2 < 0, -x3 < -1 e5 2x3 < 0, e6 x3 + x2 < 0 A proof P by (Strong) projection: x1: e1  e3  e5 e2  e3  e6 x3: e4  e5  false 4. Solve ’ = sk Æ c(P) 12 What now ?   It is left to show a strong projection method for each logic we are interested in integrating. Current eager procedures are far too wasteful. Need to find better ones. 13