* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Pilot_waves_of_de_Broglie
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Planck's law wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
AdS/CFT correspondence wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Pilot waves of de Broglie-Bohm and Gravity waves in the universal matrix The true nature of particles such as electrons, quarks, leptons .... is still a mystery, they tend to evolve into certitude without any additional reasonable argument. Nobody ever reasonably explained how gravity works either, and what about the concept of time ..... ? What are the underlying structures of our universe, and would it explain gravity. A completely new perspective on how string theory works gives us in an insight, in a very elegant way, into the structure and function of our universe. Do not be fooled by the simple introduction, the structure of the reasoning leading to astonishing results that more than likely will encounter resistance and consternation ..... but so be it Page 1 Hoc est proprium intellectualis G. Kinet. Cum in aliis disputationibus scriptorum citanda vel ut. Mailing : Poelstraat 11 3520 ZONHOVEN - BELGIUM - CELL PHONE : 0032498357960 E-mail : [email protected] A SIMPLE QUESTION WITH ASTONISHING CONSEQUENCES Is it even possible for a strings 10-35 cm long to curl up “ UNEXPECTED RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED BY THE PLANCK LENGHT “ NO FANCY MATH REQUIRED T he concept of the meaning “dimension” starts from the zerodimensional point which positioned in an infinite row (line) translates into a first dimension. The minimum number of POINTS to define a straight line is TWO. (a point is an arithmetic given to make position fixing possible, it is not a reality, it is only there to visualize a certain given) If the Planck length being the smallest possible length and the spacing between two of those points equaling that length, makes that straight line the smallest possible. Having defined the smallest possible straight line, what is the smallest possible surface that can be created by those lines ? The most obvious candidate is a square .... but there is a problem !!!! Page 2 Hoc est proprium intellectualis G. Kinet. Cum in aliis disputationibus scriptorum citanda vel ut. Mailing : Poelstraat 11 3520 ZONHOVEN - BELGIUM - CELL PHONE : 0032498357960 E-mail : [email protected] The Planck length being the smallest possible length (lp = 1,616 252(81) × 10−33 m), should make that surface the smallest possible. The diagonal of that smallest surface is longer than one Planck length but smaller than two Planck lengths, and since the Planck length is the smallest meaningful length, fractions of a Planck length don't have meaning, therefore the only logical option when the diagonal is (out of necessity) exactly equal to the Planck length, is to conclude that the square with Planck dimensions, or in other words a Planck area (2.61219415 × 10-70 m2), is in fact a circle, The Planck area is due to the restrictions imposed by the Planck length itself, a circle with a diagonal equal to that Planck length, BUT IS THAT ENTIRELY CORRECT ? STRINGS AND D-BRANES S trange things begin to occur in the world of quantum physics when embroidering on the previous. Is the string and brane theory propagated until now still valid? If cosmic strings and branes are the real underlying structures of the universe, the first task is to determine their real quantum properties, and then to try to deduce the underlying universal structures, lets have a glimpse .... In theories of particle physics based on string theory, the characteristic length scale of strings is typically in the order of the Planck length, so .... Page 3 Hoc est proprium intellectualis G. Kinet. Cum in aliis disputationibus scriptorum citanda vel ut. Mailing : Poelstraat 11 3520 ZONHOVEN - BELGIUM - CELL PHONE : 0032498357960 E-mail : [email protected] Strings are in the order of 10-35 cm long and are therefore a first dimension equivalent. Neumann allowed the end point of a string free movement, Dirichlet constrained its movement to one plane known as a D-brane or Dp-brane, where the “p” stands for the number of spatial dimensions of the plane/manifold. A D0-brane is what we know as a point and a D1-brane would be essentially a string, and a D2-brane is a plane. A D1-brane has one dimension, and is thus a string–like object, D2-branes are objects defined as a space on which end points of a string can be attached The smallest D2-brane conceivable is defined by four D1-branes with Planck dimensions, two by two parallel to each other and therefore spaced by that same Planck length, in fact similar to a Planck area, and will as previously argued .... form a circle. But again there is something strange about this specific D2-brane. As argued before the Planck length is the smallest meaningful length, fractions of a Planck length don't have meaning, The circumference of our D2-brane (a circle) is not a multiple of the Planck length what makes that circle an impossibility, and the question arises if there is a minimum 'true size' to that circle. The solution lies in answering the question “what mathematical figure has a circumference of three times the diagonal of our circle?” (in stead of 3,14 times), the answer is a hexagon. A hexagon com- posed of three D1-branes in stead of four. Page 4 Hoc est proprium intellectualis G. Kinet. Cum in aliis disputationibus scriptorum citanda vel ut. Mailing : Poelstraat 11 3520 ZONHOVEN - BELGIUM - CELL PHONE : 0032498357960 E-mail : [email protected] The smallest D2-brane(s) is (are) NOT a square(s) or (a) circle(s) but is (are) in fact a two dimensional hexagonal(s), a quantum of space, composed of three D1-branes. This also means that (single) closed strings with a diagonal smaller than the Planck lenght can not exist, which makes the assumption that 6 out of the 10 spacetime dimensions in string theory wraped up to a size of 10-35 m, are incorrect. This fundamental particle can be regarded as a bit (0, 1) of information . Back to the drawing tables ? Page 5 Hoc est proprium intellectualis G. Kinet. Cum in aliis disputationibus scriptorum citanda vel ut. Mailing : Poelstraat 11 3520 ZONHOVEN - BELGIUM - CELL PHONE : 0032498357960 E-mail : [email protected] WHERE STRINGS AND BRANES MEET The first dimension in the quantum world are D1-branes. Two nearby D1-branes or strings “may” interact by exchanging a third string or with a nearby third string, they will always tangle together, in such a way that they ultimately form a hexagon, a D2-brane. The second dimension down in the quantum world is composed out of .... D2branes (on which end points of a string can be attached), shaped as hexagonal prisms with Planck length dimensions, bonded together by strings and therefore molded into a two dimensional fabric, a flexible field. “n” layers of this two dimensional field, will transform into a 3D canvas or matrix, the quantum dimension .... from which emerge all the elementary particles. In the second dimension D2-branes are bonded together by strings, but in turn the layers of the two dimensional field that makes up the 3D canvas are also separated by strings. These strings are “open” strings with one or Page 6 Hoc est proprium intellectualis G. Kinet. Cum in aliis disputationibus scriptorum citanda vel ut. Mailing : Poelstraat 11 3520 ZONHOVEN - BELGIUM - CELL PHONE : 0032498357960 E-mail : [email protected] both endpoints on the surface of a D2-brane. They have no fixed point of attachment and (may) slide over the surface(s) of the D2-brane(s). Two hexagonal D2-branes inextricably bonded by one or more strings is (are) in fact a D3-brane(s). The third dimension of the D3-brane is not the height to indicate the third dimension in space, but rather the stacking of n-layers of D2-branes separated by strings. If the Planck length is in fact the smallest possible length(!), it implies that it is impossible at that level to compress the quantum dimension still further, so it is fair to say that the Planck length materialized in the form of a string is a “force” sustaining the 3D canvas/matrix, it is a strong force. Extending throughout the whole of space it prevents space to implode, it acts as force field. Page 7 Hoc est proprium intellectualis G. Kinet. Cum in aliis disputationibus scriptorum citanda vel ut. Mailing : Poelstraat 11 3520 ZONHOVEN - BELGIUM - CELL PHONE : 0032498357960 E-mail : [email protected] A s strings want to contract to minimize their potential energy, the law of conservation of energy prevents them from disappearing, and instead they vibrate/oscillate which makes it possible for the flexible D2-brane field and in turn the 3D canvas/matrix to oscillate/vibrate. In other words branes will never touch one another, it is an endless cycle of near collision, rebound, stretching and near collision over again, waves in an endless ocean .... In that capacity strings act as a weak force. One can argue that our universe is build out of infinitely interconnected tiny dots, almost like a viscous liquid. It is most likely that this interaction of strings with the 2D-brane field and 3D-canvas/matrix is the source of dark energy? The potential energy due to the force of the oscillating strings that attracts the branes to one another is transformed into kinetic energy which is converted into matter. How this works .... “Activated” by (a) vibrating string(s) a D3-brane or space quantum transmits its energy to the next vibrating string(s), which is (are) already vibrating on its (their) own, reinforcing the energy level, to the next D3-brane along the path of least resistance, determined by the origin of the force, its magnitude, and the state of surrounding space. Because string theories are by nature relativistic, adding energy to a string is equivalent to adding mass, by Einstein’s relation E =mc2. Oscillating/vibrating strings and D3-branes/space quanta therefore have mass, reason why starting from the most fundamental state of matter things/objects have mass. The source of the missing dark matter? When energy is transferred from one space quantum to the next this chain of space quanta vibrations/oscillation creates a traveling wave. Page 8 Hoc est proprium intellectualis G. Kinet. Cum in aliis disputationibus scriptorum citanda vel ut. Mailing : Poelstraat 11 3520 ZONHOVEN - BELGIUM - CELL PHONE : 0032498357960 E-mail : [email protected] Traveling waves of space quanta (D3-branes) vibrate/oscillate at specific frequencies which correlates with their source and propagate steadily forward at the speed of light. When two or more complementary traveling waves of (3D-branes) space quanta interact, they form a standing wave. The result of this interaction is mass, a particle. Mass is thus in essence vibrating/oscillating space quanta (D3-branes) giving birth (among other particles) to each of the elementary particles, six quarks and six leptons each with their own unique vibrational signature. On the assumption that a D2 brane equals a bit of information and supposing that an activated D2 brane would be represented by "01 " and an inactive bit as “00”, it is reasonable to assume that the traveling waves or space quanta contain information in such a way that if two complementary traveling waves interact and form a standing wave this would result in an elementary particle with mass ... .. a digital universe? …. Destructive interference is the cause that not all standing waves lead to the formation of a particle. Once a particle is created it will always attempt to regain its original state, back to the matrix. ( ....... A thought comes to mind. Would it be possible to “surf on a wave of space quanta” like a surfer on the waves of the ocean, to explore unknown worlds in the vastness of the universe, .... only time will tell ) Page 9 Hoc est proprium intellectualis G. Kinet. Cum in aliis disputationibus scriptorum citanda vel ut. Mailing : Poelstraat 11 3520 ZONHOVEN - BELGIUM - CELL PHONE : 0032498357960 E-mail : [email protected] A LL OBJECTS HAVE A FORCE THAT ATTRACTS THEM TOWARDS EACH OTHER .... In fact it is all a matter of interaction, once a particle has been created it is heavier than the matrix, it will move in the direction with the least resistance. Why do boats collide on rocky coasts? Waves are the most important reason why a ship drifts towards the coast ..... The 3D-matrix is constantly vibrating and creating its own very large and slow waves, similar to the pilot waves of de Broglie-Bohm. Larger objects are not so heavily influenced by the movement of those waves than smaller objects and it is why seemingly smaller objects are attracted by bigger objects, smaller objects move faster and catch up with the heavier objects and often collide. Gravity of the matrix. Thus the bigger the object, the more the effect of stretching and rebounding affects the surrounding medium, the more gravity has an effect on the smaller objects in the neighborhood. (The Newtonian Idea of gravity deepened) Gravity as a deformation of the space-time continuum, the fabric of the empty space, caused by the presence of a mass but in a different perspective. (Einstein’s idea redirected) The 3D-Matrix waves do not always move in the same direction because the interconnecting strings do not necessarily vibrate at the same rhythm, large parts of the 3D-matrix may therefore exhibit a totally different vibrational pattern. Page 10 Hoc est proprium intellectualis G. Kinet. Cum in aliis disputationibus scriptorum citanda vel ut. Mailing : Poelstraat 11 3520 ZONHOVEN - BELGIUM - CELL PHONE : 0032498357960 E-mail : [email protected] These other patterns are (might be) the reason that large and small objects clump together to form larger objects .... the cradle of the cosmos with its countless number of stars and galaxies. The force of gravity on earth however, is reinforced through a combination of several constituent factors: the universal pressure (the vibrating D3matrix), the weight of the atmosphere, the surrounding medium, heat, the shape of the object ... For example when a stone falls to the ground this universal pressure , the weight of the atmosphere, the medium (air/water, ...), the shape of the object ... plays an important role of how earth’s gravity works. Are there different types of gravity? Certainly not but in certain circumstances gravity can be enhanced or reduced in strength as a result of local conditions. Finally ..... all our scientific knowledge has an insurmountable handicap due to the evolutionary origins of TIME. It is the reason why we are entangled in endless mathematical and philosophical debates and yet extremely limited in understanding the universe. Page 11 Hoc est proprium intellectualis G. Kinet. Cum in aliis disputationibus scriptorum citanda vel ut. Mailing : Poelstraat 11 3520 ZONHOVEN - BELGIUM - CELL PHONE : 0032498357960 E-mail : [email protected] We must understand Loop Quantum Gravity in the absence of a background space-time. TIME THE ELUSIVE FACTOR At the origin of the universe very basic building blocks, already defined in the three-dimensional hexagonal quantum canvas, were transformed into more complex structures and the factor time played no role in this process. The formation of the universe was and still is an ongoing process with faults and successes, which eventually leads to the small and large structures around and above us. There was no need for a time factor in the genesis of the cosmos until the first lump of organic matter responded to its surroundings. The simplest organism ever, a biochemical structure, that drew its energy from the watery environment in which it originated through osmosis, developed over time a very rudimentary electromagnetic radiation sensitive spot which could have been the precursor of a nervous system that enabled these organisms, at a very basic level, to be aware of their surroundings. It is unlikely that that sensitive spot already responded to the wavelengths that we perceive, this probably shifted evolutionary. To enable the interaction between the clear-cut outside world, and the precursor of this nervous system, a suitable “sense organ” had to develop in order to make it possible to translate the number of bits of data derived from the electromagnetic field into manageable information. Page 12 Hoc est proprium intellectualis G. Kinet. Cum in aliis disputationibus scriptorum citanda vel ut. Mailing : Poelstraat 11 3520 ZONHOVEN - BELGIUM - CELL PHONE : 0032498357960 E-mail : [email protected] This very early underdeveloped nervous system was not yet able to effect the correct sequence of these bits which would have resulted in jerky impressions/movements, a succession of small, non- flowing events with much background noise. The solution lay in the development of a kind of filter so that by dividing the incoming data (colored dots in this example) with extremely small spatial separations the input of that same data became much more fluid. The more spatial separation between the receiver and the incoming data the farther away that data (was) is situated. Reduction of data input and interference suppression made it possible to detect and/or identify distinctive points or regions, transforming images into point clouds. These elements, the possibility to translate a number of bits of data derived from the electromagnetic field into manageable information and dividing these data with extremely small spatial separations gave birth to the concept of “depth” which made it possible to visualize the world in three dimension. Page 13 Hoc est proprium intellectualis G. Kinet. Cum in aliis disputationibus scriptorum citanda vel ut. Mailing : Poelstraat 11 3520 ZONHOVEN - BELGIUM - CELL PHONE : 0032498357960 E-mail : [email protected] When at a certain point in evolution this basic life form made its first attempt to explore the environment, it was important to be able to estimate how much effort it would take to go from point A to point B and back .... and each time distance ( = spatial separation between the receiver and the incoming data ) was further subdivided into smaller chunks which gave a more exact idea of the distance to bridge. The more " chunks " the more accurate the measurement, and ultimately these chunks were the forerunner of what became finally known as .... TIME. (“The music is not in the notes, but the silence in between” ~Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart~) Time is an evolutionary given and not something that sprouts out of the big bang or whatever was the beginning of our universe.. There was no need for a time factor in the genesis of the cosmos. Our modern brains are still working on the old principle of reducing data input and suppression of interference in perceiving objects and events at any speed, which often gives us a distorted picture of reality. Page 14 Hoc est proprium intellectualis G. Kinet. Cum in aliis disputationibus scriptorum citanda vel ut. Mailing : Poelstraat 11 3520 ZONHOVEN - BELGIUM - CELL PHONE : 0032498357960 E-mail : [email protected] VERY LIMITED PRELIMINARY C O N C L U S I O NS Time is an evolutionary given. There was no need for a time factor in the creation of the cosmos, but our brains cannot project a world in 3D without it, so one has to wonder whether the world as we perceive and attempt to unravel in mathematical formulas, is the reality. Often I have the impression that in some way ( these) “mathematical formulas” are trying to give us a glance on how our brains function rather than explaining the “reality” that seeps in. The Universe is not, as often claimed a hologram projected from a substrate that exists only in lower dimensions, THE universe is an entity entirely on its own. It is in fact a quantum based matrix with high probability that it is built on a digital basis. Information in the cloud …. ???? It is designed out of “n” layers of a two dimensional field made of the smallest hexagonal D2-branes possible, woven into a 3D canvas or matrix, the cradle of existence, which became a ”perceptible reality” once that first blob of organic matter responded to its surroundings and evolved out of the primordial soup, molding its own three-dimensional image. It does not imply that the universe came into existence at that very moment, it was already there but we were not yet around to marvel on its grandeur. As the origin of particles unravels, dark energy and dark matter moved out of the shadow. At the same time there is that new concept how gravity works, it deepens the Newtonian idea about gravity and at the same time redirects Einstein’s idea of a curved universe. It doesn’t rejects both theories, it only adds new insights on the universal and terrestrial gravity. In physics the definition of a closed string is a string that has no end-points, and therefore is topologically equivalent to a circle, but as proven a single string is unable to curl up and if a “closed string” refers to a single string with the assumption that one of the vibrational modes of a closed string can be identified as the graviton, there is a problem ............ Page 15 Hoc est proprium intellectualis G. Kinet. Cum in aliis disputationibus scriptorum citanda vel ut. Mailing : Poelstraat 11 3520 ZONHOVEN - BELGIUM - CELL PHONE : 0032498357960 E-mail : [email protected]