Download The need for Ecosystem-Based Management

Biodiversity 5(3): 9-15, 2004.
The Coastal Temperate Rainforests of Canada:
The need for Ecosystem-Based Management
habitat for several endemic taxa, including an unusual
white form of black bear – the Kermode or Spirit bear
(Ursus americanus kermodei). Although largely
restricted to a few islands, the Spirit Bear is iconic of
the entire region, which is popularly known as Great
Bear Rainforest due to the abundance of the Spirit bears
as well as other bears of great size (including grizzlies
over a thousand pounds; Ursus arctos L.). Less
conspicuous species of lichen, fungi and soil
invertebrates comprise the majority of biota (Pojar
2003) and are critical for the maintenance of globally
unique ecological processes such as the cycling of
marine-derived nutrients distributed inland by migrating
salmon and other anadromous fish (i.e., species that
spend part of their life cycle migrating from the sea to
fresh water to spawn). Grizzly bears, other carnivores,
and scavengers including Eagles (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus L.) and Ravens (Corvus corax L.) carry
large quantities of dead fish into the adjacent riparian
forests each summer and fall – as much as 100 m upland
of the streams, rivers and lakes where salmon spawn
and die (T. Reimchen, personal communication 2002;
Bilby et al. 2003). By tracking the distribution of the
stable nitrogen isotope N15, which is prevalent in the
bodies of migrating fish, scientists have detected a
signature of this fertilizer effect in mosses, herbs,
shrubs, insects, birds and the tree rings of mature trees
(Gende et al, 2002; Hocking and Reimchen 2002; Bilby
et al. 2003). This research indicates that the high species
richness, productivity, and growth of riparian
rainforests may depend upon the annual nutrient subsidy
provided by migrating salmon, whose carcasses enrich
F.M. Moola, D. Martin, B. Wareham,
J. Calof, C. Burda, and P. Grames
David Suzuki Foundation,
2211 West 4th Avenue,
Vancouver B.C.,
Canada, V6K 4S2
[email protected]
Abstract. The Central and North Coast and Haida
Gwaii/Queen Charlotte Islands regions of British
Columbia (B.C.) contain the world’s largest
remaining areas of intact coastal temperate
rainforest. The region has been the focus of intense
conflict among environmentalists, forestry
companies, First Nations and other interests over
the management of these high conservation value old
growth forests. Recently completed land use planning
processes have recommended increasing protection
and improving forest practices on the rest of the
landbase to more environmentally responsible
methods defined by the guiding principles of
Ecosystem Based Management (EBM). Based on an
audit of logging plans (silvicultural prescriptions)
approved between January 15, 2002 and February
24, 2003, The David Suzuki Foundation recently
assessed current logging practices in the region.
While forestry companies are not legally obliged to
use the recommended EBM standards at this time,
our assessment underscores how current logging
practices fail to meet agreed-upon EBM standards.
Firstly, clearcutting remains the dominant method
of logging and where alternative methods have been
attempted, in-block retention levels are low.
Secondly, little effort has been demonstrated that
would protect small fish–bearing streams (including
salmonid bearing streams) or their tributaries within
managed forest stands.
A Kermode,
or “spirit bear,” eating
a salmon
(Photo credit: Ian
McAllister/Raincoast
Conservation
Society).
INTRODUCTION
A globally significant region at risk. The coastal
temperate rainforests of British Columbia’s central and
north coast and outer archipelago of Pacific islands
(Haida Gwaii/Queen Charlotte Islands) are globally
significant, owing to the predominance of intact old–
growth forests consisting of trees of immense size and
longevity (Ricketts et al. 1999). These forests sustain
some of the world’s largest remaining wild pacific
salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) runs, intact predator–prey
systems regulated by large carnivores, and they are
B
I
O
D
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
5
(
3
)
2 0 0 4
9
an otherwise nutrient
poor habitat (Gende
et al. 2002). It is as
though migrating salmon and other anadromous species extend
the roots of these
rainforests far into
the Pacific Ocean.
Great Bear
Rainforest—Spiller
Channel.
(Unless otherwise
noted all photos
provided courtesy of
the David Suzuki
Foundation).
Unlike comparable
temperate rainforests
to the south (e.g.,
Vancouver Island),
the inaccessibility of
the region, rugged
topography, and high
labor costs have
spared many forested
valleys from being
logged to date. The
most recent data indicate that about 9%
of the total forested
landbase of the region has been logged
thus far, almost exclusively by large-scale clearcutting (Martin, unpublished
results). Even though most of the remaining forested
land base is severely constrained to further logging (Pojar
et al. 1999), most of the unprotected, biologically rich
valley-bottom old growth forests have already been
logged or are under cutting rights to several major
forestry companies and First Nations. Furthermore,
pressures from industrial forestry across the region are
increasing as timber resources have been exhausted
elsewhere in the province and new technologies, such as
helicopter logging, provide access to old-growth timber
once thought to be out of the reach of commercial
interests (e.g., steep forested slopes). The productive
valley bottoms and adjacent mid-slopes targeted by
industry are also where most of the critical areas for
biodiversity occur (Jeo et al.1999). For example, a
recent report published by the David Suzuki Foundation
(Martin et al. 2004) found that 70.1 % of the areas
deemed most feasible for timber harvesting (i.e., the
Timber Harvesting Landbase, THLB) include the most
biologically valuable areas on the Central Coast - areas
of considerable intactness and high aggregate conservation value (Rumsey et al. 2004). As the THLB spatially
defines those locales that are most accessible to logging
and where the biggest and most valuable trees are found,
it may indicate pending threats to an area from future
forest development. McCrory et al. (2003) found a
relatively high overlap between keystone ecosystems
(i.e., systems with an ecological impact disproportionately large relative to their abundance; Pojar
10
T
R
O
P
I
C
A
L
C
2003), such as black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus
sitkensis R.) old growth deer winter range, and
commercial forest interests on the Central Coast. Owing
to the high timber values associated with deer winter
range, McCrory et al. (2003) predicted that as much as
82 % of this keystone ecosystem type in unprotected areas
could be lost within 100 years if current logging rates
prevail. As the abundance of old growth deer winter
range is a limiting factor for Black-tailed Deer
populations, reductions in this threatened habitat type are
likely to have serious cascading effects on trophic
relationships of which deer are a critical component
(competition, herbivory, predation), most significantly
predator–prey interactions involving gray wolves (Canis
lupus L.) and other apex predators.
SEEKING A SOLUTION
While recent comprehensive assessments of
biodiversity values in the Great Bear Rainforest and
Haida Gwaii confirm an ecological imperative for
conservation, it is also a region perceived by industry
and government as a frontier with immense potential
for economic exploitation through not only industrial
forestry, but mining, aquaculture and offshore oil and
gas development. Furthermore, the area contains the
traditional territories of numerous First Nations,
which hold legally recognized rights and title interests
over the landbase and its resources, including timber.
Definition of these rights is the subject of ongoing
negotiations and legal proceedings. Thus it is not
surprising that management and use of these
rainforests has been the focus of intense debate,
including international protest by conservationists and
some First Nations. Nevertheless, on April 4, 2001 under the glare of television cameras and the din of
native drumming - the British Columbia government
and eight First Nations whose traditional territories
encompass the region, signed a landmark agreement,
the General Protocol Agreement, to protect some areas
and explore options for radically altering forestry
practices. At the same time, the B.C. government
announced an interim landuse plan for the Central
Coast (Central Coast Land and Resource Plan;
CCLRMP) that recommended specific areas for
protection and reiterated a similar commitment to
explore options for changing forest management on
the rest of the landscape. These two agreements
signaled a high level of commitment to increasing
protection beyond the status quo and represented an
unprecedented opportunity to define options for
realizing more sustainable logging and land-use
practices on the unprotected landscape, under the
guiding principles of Ecosystem Based Management
(EBM). Informed by science, recommendations to
the B.C. government for the designation of protected
areas and EBM were developed through multistakeholder negotiations at land use planning tables.
O
N
S
E
R
V
A
N
C
Y
salmon streams and their tributaries within managed
stands. The full assessments (Martin et al. 2003, 2004)
can be found at: www.canadianrainforests.org.
Final protected area designations and the prescription
for EBM are now dependent on the outcome of further
negotiations between individual First Nations and the
B.C. Government. Recently completed (June 2004)
multi-stakeholder land use planning processes for the
Central and North Coast Districts recommended
protection for 21–24 % of the landbase (including
existing parks), in which logging, mining, and
hydroelectric development are prohibited, but other
uses, such as hunting and traditional harvesting by
First Nations are permitted. An additional 11–12 %
of both districts are recommended for protection under
the designation of “biodiversity areas,” which prohibit
logging, but remain open to mining, tourism
development, road building and various forms of
commercial recreation. The sport hunting of apex
carnivores, such as grizzly bears, will be permitted
throughout the region except for a few small grizzly
bear management zones where hunting is temporarily
prohibited (Gilbert et al. 2004). Wolves and Blackphased Black Bears (i.e., not Spirit bears; U.
americanus) can be hunted throughout the region,
consistent with current government policy for the
entire province.
METHODS
Ninety-six percent of forestland in British Columbia is
publicly owned and is managed almost exclusively by
the provincial government (Canadian Forest Service
2003). Before a company can log a forest on public
land in the province it must provide the government
with detailed information on how and where areas will
be harvested and eventually re-forested. Companies
provide this information in a document called a
Silvicultural Prescription (SP). Under current forestry
regulations, SPs must be approved by government
before any cutting can take place and the company is
legally required to carry out their logging practices
exactly according to the plan. The management details
included in SPs can be used to assess stand-level
impacts of forestry on biodiversity. This information
includes whether the forest will be clearcut or not, the
forest cover retained after logging as retention, the size
of the cutblock, and whether small fish streams
(including salmonid systems) or their tributaries will
be protected from the direct effects of logging (e.g.,
cutting of riparian areas).
While the negotiated land use plans recommended a
significant increase in the total area for protection, they
have been criticized by conservation biologists who
question their conservation efficacy in terms of the size
and spatial configuration (Gilbert et al. 2004; Martin
et al. 2004), representation of ecosystems (e.g., rare
forest types) (Wells et al. 2003), inclusion of optimal
habitat for focal species (particularly large carnivores)
(Gonzales et al, 2003; Martin et al, 2004; Paquet et al.
2004), and degree of protection from all ecologically
damaging human activities (e.g., sport hunting, mining
and road building) (Gilbert et al. 2004). Collectively,
the weaknesses in formal protection provide a strong
ecological incentive for the cautious management of
the surrounding matrix landscape under EBM. But
despite the $3 million that was spent on developing
EBM with the assistance of an independent science
panel (Coast Information Team - www.cit.org), the
land-use tables adopted few prescriptive elements of
EBM, thus deferring the prescriptive details and
implementation of EBM to Government, forestry
companies and First Nations.
This paper presents a review of 185 SPs that were
approved by the BC government between January 15,
2002 and February 24, 2003 on the North and Central
Coast, Queen Charlotte (Haida Gwaii), and the
southern portion of the Kalum Forest Districts. A
previously published assessment examined 227
cutblocks approved between April 4, 2001 and January
3
4
The David Suzuki Foundation has assessed all logging
that has occurred outside of current and proposed
protected areas in the Great Bear Rainforest and Haida
Gwaii since the April 1st 2001 Agreement was signed
(Martin et al. 2003, 2004). Although we used a suite of
stand and landscape-level indicators in our logging
reviews, this paper presents only those findings related
to the amount of clearcutting, retention levels within
cutblocks and degree of protection offered to small
B
I
O
D
I
V
E
R
S
I
2
1
T
Y
5
(
3
)
2 0 0 4
11
Map of the study area
showing forest
districts.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Prevalence of clearcutting
This photo (top) shows
that the trees removed
(the stumps in the
foreground) are much
larger than the trees left
behind. It also shows
that the trees left
behind are being
severely impacted by
windthrow.
The stand is the basic unit of forest management and
for some species the effects of logging occur directly
at this level (Roberts and Gilliam 1995).This is
especially true for species that are sensitive to the direct
impacts of disturbance (e.g., saprophytic and
mycorrhizal vascular plants (Schoonmaker and McKee
1988) and/or recover slowly during secondary
succession (e.g., epiphytic lichens) ( Price and
Hochachka 2001). In an effort to maintain or “lifeboat” biodiversity within logged areas, the independent
CIT science panel recommended that retention-based
logging methods should be used to harvest trees rather
than clearcutting. The panel suggested that a minimum
of 15 % of the basal area of the pre-disturbance stand
should be left standing in logged areas, though much
higher levels would be necessary (up to 70 %) in
landscapes or watersheds with higher ecological values
(e.g., high quality fish habitat). Retention based logging
has numerous ecological benefits for species over
conventional clearcutting methods. These include:
z
Providing structural legacies of old growth habitat
within regenerating stands (e.g. large standing dead
trees, downed decaying logs).
z
Providing some assemblage of old growth forest
cover to enhance connectivity within managed stands
and watersheds.
z
Moderating sudden changes in microclimatic and
other environmental conditions following canopy
removal.
Despite the ecological imperatives against conventional
clearcutting, we found that it remains the most common
method of logging on the coast (57 % of cutblocks) and
where alternative logging methods have been attempted,
retention levels are below the 15% minimum threshold
Weyerhaeuser logging
block, Haida Gwaii
(bottom).
Chart 1
Figures
on opposite page:
West Fraser logging
block, Kalum Forest
District (top).
Western Forest
Products logging block
(middle) (showing a
logging-related
landslide), Central
Coast Forest District.
(Photo credit: Ian
McAllister/Raincoast
Conservation Society).
This photo (bottom)
graphically depicts 33
stream segments that
do not not have
protective streamside
buffers. West Fraser
logging block, Kalum
Forest District.
15, 2003 (Martin et al. 2003) in the same area. SPs
were obtained through the Freedom of Information
Act. Both reviews covered a total area of
approximately 11 million ha, along the Northwest
Pacific coast from the Alaskan border south to Knight
Inlet and from the summits of the coastal ranges west
to the outer archipelago of Haida Gwaii/Queen
Charlotte Islands (see Map). Within this large area,
approximately 6 - 12 % of the landbase contains
commercial forests available for timber harvesting
(Rumsey et al. 2004). While forestry companies were
not obliged to use EBM standards during the review
period, our assessment shows how far current logging
practices are from EBM standards recommended by
the CIT science panel. A detailed description of the
methods used to analyze the SPs is available in the
appendix of the full reports (Martin et al. 2003, 2004)
and can be obtained at www.canadianrainforests.org.
12
T
R
O
P
I
C
A
L
C
O
N
S
E
R
V
A
N
C
Y
The paucity of data
on the habitat requirements of most
temperate rainforest
species, particularly
non-vertebrate taxa,
complicates efforts
to set prescriptive
EBM thresholds at
the stand scale. Nevertheless, the data
that is available
suggests that increases in forest canopy
retention provide
area-weighted benefits in terms of
the abundance, diversity and composition of pre-disturbance species within logged areas. A
recent unpublished
review (Moola 2003)
suggests that with
higher in-block retention both the
abundance and richness of late-seral
species remains
much more similar
to pre-disturbance
levels (Beese and
Bryant 1999) and
species are less susceptible to local extinction after harvesting (Sullivan
and Sullivan 2001).
Similarly, at the
community level,
ecosystems exhibit
a much greater
stability in composition after harvesting when a greater amount of retention
is retained within logged areas (Deal 2001). The greater
stability in composition is expressed as both a higher
ability of ecosystems to withstand (high resistance) or
recover (high resilience) from logging disturbance over
time.
recommend by the CIT science panel (see Chart 1). The
complete or near total removal of the forest canopy by
clearcutting does not provide adequate habitat in the form
of late-seral structure on site, nor does it maintain the
environmental conditions necessary to preserve late-seral
species during the open-phase of stand development
(Moola and Vasseur 2003).
A sere is a series of ecological communities formed in
ecological succession. Late-seral species across widely
disparate taxonomic groups exhibit significant reductions
in abundance when the majority of the forest canopy is
removed at one time (Beese and Bryant 1999; Deal 2001).
The most sensitive species to clearcutting include: a)
species limited in their dispersal abilities (e.g., flightless
arthropods, mycorrhizal fungi, amphibians); b) species
with low reproductive potential (e.g., understory herbs,
canopy arthropods) and c) species dependent upon forest
interiors (e.g., leafy liverworts, epiphytic lichens). While
most representative species of these groups are not
regionally rare or currently threatened, their dependency
upon late-seral microhabitats (e.g., downed decayed
wood), as well as their life-history (e.g.,low growth and
reproduction rates) predisposes them to extirpation after
clearcutting and can preclude their recovery to predisturbance levels of abundance within typical rotation
periods (Halpern 1989; Moola and Vasseur 2003). For
example, clonal migration rates of less than 5 cm/yr have
been reported from a wide variety of late-successional
understory herbs in coastal rainforests of the Pacific
Northwest (Antos and Zobel 1984; Lezberg et al. 1999).
Dispersal of new genotypes in many late-seral plants is
similarly restricted by the absence of morphological
adaptations or vectors that can facilitate long-distance
dispersal of seeds. Although little is known about the
sexual migration rates of late-seral plants in managed
coastal rainforest landscapes, studies in other temperate
forests have found that most species have a low capacity
for long-distance migration as seeds are dispersed only
short distances from the parent plant (Hermy et al. 1999).
These include plants whose seeds are dispersed by gravity
or are ballistically disseminated over very short distances
(Meier et al. 1995). The diaspores of many other forest
species are distributed by animal vectors that are
themselves dispersal limited, restricting the range at
which deforested areas can be recolonized (Meier et al.,
1995). For example, invertebrate vectors such as ants
(myrmecochores, e.g. Viola spp.) (Meier et al. 1995) and
frugivorous slugs (endozoochores, e.g. Ariolimax
columbianus Gould) (Gervais et al. 1998) have restricted
home ranges. Slugs in western Washington traveled
between 5 m and 15 m daily, but the total area covered
amounted to only a few square meters (Richter 1976).
Despite their restricted ranges at the patch scale, slugs
play a major role in plant dispersal and nutrient cycling
(Meier et al. 1995; Gervais et al, 1998).
B
I
O
D
I
V
E
R
S
I
Lack of protection for small
salmon streams and their tributaries
Due to their disproportionate influence on trophic
structure, function and diversity, salmon are a keystone
species in coastal temperate rainforests (Jeo et al, 1999;
Gende et al, 2002). Salmon perform a critical role in
T
Y
5
(
3
)
2 0 0 4
13
lity of salmon habitat (Slaney et al. 1996; Jeo et al,
1999).
Unlike other jurisdictions in the Pacific Northwest,
legislation in British Columbia (Forest Practices Code
and the recently introduced Forest and Range Practices
Act) does not mandate protection of streamside forests
(through buffers or riparian corridors) on small fishbearing streams (including salmonid systems; class S4)
or their tributaries (classes S5 and S6). In contrast,
the CIT independent science panel recommended a
minimum buffer of one-and-a-half standard tree heights
for streams and other riparian features that contribute
to high quality fish habitat, including small occupied
channels and their tributaries. Because buffers alone
will not ensure the maintenance of key riparian
functions in managed forests the science panel also
recommend that between 30-70% of managed
watersheds should be protected from incremental loss
of old growth forest cover from logging.
Chart 2 . Of the 185 sites we examined, 99% of small salmon
streams (class S4) flowing through cutblocks lacked a full
protective buffer (see Chart 2). Of these impacted streams, 42%
were logged completely to their banks. Although 57% of stream
segments were provided with partially logged buffers, riparian
areas still remain at risk from the falling and hauling of cut trees
through stream reaches, which is not prohibited under current
legislation. Only 1% of small salmon streams were provided
with full riparian protection in the form of an unlogged buffer.
Pacific Salmon (top)
(Courtesy of U.S.
Fish and Wildlife
Service, creator
Timothy Knepp).
Biologists with
Chinook Salmon.
(bottom) (Courtesy of
U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service).
CONCLUSION
the ecosystem both as an important food source for
numerous terrestrial predators and scavengers and as
an upstream vector in the distribution of marine-derived
nutrients in both aquatic and terrestrial communities
(Gende et al, 2002). Salmon are also particularly
sensitive to habitat disturbance from forest
development, including logging within or near occupied
channels or within smaller source tributaries (Slaney
et al, 1996). The logging of the riparian area around
small fish-bearing streams or their tributaries can cause
considerable damage to the bottoms and banks of these
streams, thus potentially impacting salmon populations.
This damage can
arise from the
landing of cut trees
into and/or the
dragging of cut
logs through stream
reaches. When riparian areas are logged, erosion and
the deposition of
sediment and debris
(dead wood, gravel
and mud) can limit
the movement of
fish and choke
spawning areas.
Removal of riparian vegetation can
also negatively impact nutrient inputs, flow regime,
and water temperatures that influence the qua-
14
T
R
O
P
I
C
A
L
The temperate rainforests of British Columbia’s north
Pacific coast and outer archipelago (Great Bear
Rainforest and Haida Gwaii) present one of the last
opportunities worldwide to conserve wildlands that still
support viable populations of all native species (including
large carnivores), that maintain ecological and
evolutionary processes within their natural range of
variability, and that comprise the full suite of
representative ecosystems (e.g., old growth forests) in
their natural state (Noss 2000). However, the results of
recent multi-stakeholder planning processes fail to offer
enough area for conservation and suffer from serious
flaws that may undermine the long-term ability to
maintain these and other conservation attributes of critical
importance. Of particular concern is the fact that
completed landuse plans leave the most important habitat
for key focal species, such as Grizzly Bears and Salmon,
outside of formally designated protected areas (Martin
et al. 2004, Paquet et al. 2004). We are in agreement
with many conservation biologists who firmly believe
that core protected areas are the “cornerstone of
conservation” (pg. 197, Noss 2000). Hence, the
identified problems in the protected areas (Gonzales et
al. 2003, Martin et al. 2004, Paquet et al. 2004) need to
be remedied. For this to happen, the following must
occur:
Identification and protection of buffer zones and
corridors (Noss 2000).
Expansion of protected areas that are too small to
maintain viable populations of wide-ranging
carnivores such as Grizzly Bears or Coastal Wolves
(Gilbert et al. 2004, Martin et al. 2004).
Legal protection of wide-ranging carnivores from
all ecologically damaging human activities,
z
z
z
C
O
N
S
E
R
V
A
N
C
Y
Lezberg, A.L., J. Antos, and C.B. Halpern. 1999. Belowground traits
of herbaceous species in young coniferous forests of the Olympic
Peninsula, Washington. Canadian Journal of Botany 77:936-943.
Martin, D., F.M. Moola, B. Wareham, J. Calof, C. Burda, and P.
Grames. 2004. Canada’s Rainforests: 2004 Status Report. David
Suzuki Foundation, Vancouver. [Available at http://
www.canadianrainforests.org]
Martin, D., F. M. Moola, B. Wareham, A. O’Carrol, C. Burda, I.
McAllister, and P. Grames. 2003. Clearcutting Canada’s
Rainforests: 2003 Status Report. David Suzuki Foundation,
Raincoast Conservation Society, Forest Watch of B.C., Vancouver.
[Available at http://www.canadianrainforests.org]
McCrory, W.P., P. Paquet, and B. Cross. 2003. Assessing conservation
values for gray wolf and Sitka deer - B.C. central coast rainforest.
Valhalla Wilderness Society, New Denver. [Available at http://
www.savespiritbear.org]
Meier, A.J., S. Power, Bratton, and D.C. Duffy. 1995. Possible
ecological mechanisms for loss of vernal-herb diversity in logged
eastern deciduous forests. Ecological Applications 5:935-946.
Moola, F. M. 2003. Effectiveness of life-boating late seral species in
green-tree retention harvests: a review, David Suzuki Foundation,
Vancouver. 5 pp.
Moola, F. M., and L. Vasseur. 2003. Recovery of late-seral vascular
plants in a chronosequence of post-clearcut forest stands in coastal
Nova Scotia, Canada. Plant Ecology 172:183 - 197.
Noss, R. 2000. Maintaining the ecological integrity of landscapes and
ecoregions. Pages 191 - 208 in D. Pimentel, L. Westra, and R.
Noss (Eds). Ecological integrity: integrating environment,
conservation and health. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Paquet, P., C. T. Darimont, R. J. Nelson, and K. Bennett. 2004. A
critical examination of protection for key wildlife and salmon
habitats under proposed British Columbia Central Coast Land and
Resource Management Plan. Raincoast Conservation Society,
Victoria. [Available at http://www.raincoast.org]
Pojar, J. 2003. Biodiversity of the CIT region. Coast Information Team,
Vancouver. [Available at http://www.citbc.org]
Pojar, J., C. Rowan, A. MacKinnon, D. Coates, and P. LePage. 1999.
Silvicultural options in the Central Coast: a report prepared for the
Central Coast Land and Resource Management Plan. [Available
at http://www.citbc.org]
Price, K., and G. Hochachka. 2001. Epiphytic lichen abundance: effects
of stand age and composition in coastal British Columbia.
Ecological Applications 11:904-913.
Richter, K. O. 1976. Aspects of nutrient cycling by Ariolimax
columbianus (Mollusca: Arionidae) in Pacific Northwest forests.
Pedobiologia 19:60-79.
Ricketts, T.H., E. Dinerstein,, D.M. Olson, C.J. Loucks, W.
Eichbaum, D. DellaSala,, K. Kavanagh, P. Hedao, , P.T.
Hurley, K.M. Carney, R. Abell, and S. Walters. 1999.
Terrestrial ecoregions of North America: A conservation
assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC., pp. 485.
Roberts, M. R., and F. S. Gilliam. 1995. Patterns and mechanisms of
plant diversity in forested ecosystems: implications for forest
management. Ecological Applications 5:969-977.
Rumsey, C., J. Adron, K. Ciruna, T. Curtis, Z. Ferdana, T.D.
Hamilton, K. Heinemeyer, P. Iachetti, R. M. Jeo, G. Kaiser,
D. Narver, R. Noss, D. Sizemore, A. Tautz, R. Tingey, and K.
Vance-Borland. 2004. An ecosystem spatial analysis for Haida
Gwaii, Central Coast and North Coast British Columbia. Coast
Information Team, Victoria. [Available at http://www.citbc.org]
Schoonmaker, P., and A. McKee. 1988. Species composition and
diversity during secondary succession of coniferous forests in the
western Cascade Mountains of Oregon. Forest Science 34:960979.
Slaney, T. L., K. D. Hyatt, T. G. Northcote, and R. J. Fielden. 1996.
Status of anadromous and trout in British Columbia and Yukon.
Fisheries 21:20 - 32.
Sullivan, T.P., and D.S . Sullivan. 2001. Influence of variable retention
harvests on forest ecosystems. II. Diversity and population
dynamics of small mammals. Journal of Applied Ecology. 38, 1234
- 1252.
Wells, R. W., F. L. Bunnell, D. Hagg, and G. Sutherland. 2003.
Evaluating ecological representation within differing planning
objectives for the central coast of British Columbia. Canadian
Journal of Forest Research 33:2141 - 2150.
particularly an end to sport hunting within protected
areas (Gilbert et al. 2004, Paquet et al. 2004).
However, as we may never have enough area in
protection to achieve these conservation goals,
protected areas need to be complimented by the
conservative management of the surrounding landscape
(Noss 2000). Progress towards this conservation
objective can be achieved through the implementation
of EBM outside of formally designated protected areas.
Our analysis of current industrial forestry activities in
the Great Bear Rainforest and Haida Gwaii shows that
this is not yet happening at the scale at which logging
directly occurs (i.e., the stand scale).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
The authors would like to thank Dorothy Bartoszewski,
Panos Grames, Dave Taylor and Jean Kavanagh who
contributed to the full study (Martin et al. 2004).
Numerous other individuals and organizations assisted
with funding, field work, data analysis and reviews. The
list of names can be found at www.canadianrainforests.org.
REFERENCES
Antos, J. A., and D. B. Zobel. 1984. Ecological implications of
belowground morphology of nine coniferous forest herbs. Bot. Gaz.
145:508-517.
Beese, W.J., and A.A. Bryant. 1999. Effect of alternative silvicultural
systems on vegetation and bird communities in coastal montane
forests of British Columbia, Canada. Forest Ecology and
Management. 115, 231 - 242.
Bilby, R.E., E.W. Beach, B.R. Fransen, J.K. Walter, and P.A. Bisson.
2003. Transfer of nutrients from spawning salmon to riparian
vegetation of western Washington. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 132:733
- 745.
Canadian Forest Service, C. F. 2003. State of Canada’s forests: 2002 2003. Cat. Fo1-6/2003E, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa.
Deal, R.L. 2001. The effects of partial cutting on forest plant communities
of western hemlock - Sitka spruce stands in southeast Alaska.
Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 31, 2067-2079.
Gende, S.M., R.T. Edwards, M.F. Willson, and M.S. Wipfli. 2002.
Pacific salmon in aquatic and terretrial ecosystems. BioScience
52:917 - 926.
Gervais, J. A., A. Traveset, and M.F. Wilson. 1998. The potential for
seed dispersal by the Banana Slug (Ariolimax columbianus).
American Midland Naturalist 140:103-110.
Gilbert, B., L. Craighead, B. Horejsi, P. Paquet, and W. P. McCrory.
2004. Scientific criteria for evaluation and establishment of grizzly
bear management areas in British Columbia. Panel of independent
scientists. Victoria. [Available at http://www.raincoast.org]
Gonzales, E. K., P. Arcese, R. Schulz, and F. L. Bunnell. 2003.
Strategic reserve design in the central coast of British Columbia:
integrating ecological and industrial goals. Canadian Journal of
Forest Research 33:2139 - 2150.
Halpern, C. B. 1989. Early successional patterns of forest species:
interactions of life history traits and disturbance. Ecology 70:704720.
Hermy, M., O. Honnay, L. Firbank, and C. Grashof-Bokdam. 1999.
An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant
species of Europe and the implications for forest conservation.
Biological Conservation 91:9-22.
Hocking, M.D., and T.E. Reimchen. 2002. Salmon-derived nitrogen
in terrestrial invertebrates from coniferous forests of the Pacific
Northwest. BMC Ecology 2:1 - 14.
Jeo, R.M., M.K. Sanjayan, and D. Sizemore. 1999. A conservation
area design for the Central Coast Region of British Columbia,
Canada. Round River Conservation Studies, Salt Lake City.
[Available at http://www.savethegreatbear.org/CAD/index2.htm]
B
I
O
D
I
V
E
R
S
I
Received: 7 August 2004 ; Accepted: 1 3 August 2004
T
Y
5
(
3
)
2 0 0 4
15