Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Using Fisheries-Focused Ecosystem Models to Assess the Benefits of Chesapeake Bay TMDLs Howard Townsend, Ph.D. Modeling and Analysis Team Lead NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office Tom Ihde, Ph.D. Fisheries/Ecosystem Modeler NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office/Versar, Inc. Objective To work collaboratively with EPA water quality modelers and economists to understand the linkages between Chesapeake Bay water quality and fisheries, so that economists can assess the benefits of TMDL regulations to fisheries production in the Chesapeake. 2 Plan to accomplish objectives • For different TMDL scenarios, use nutrient outputs of the EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Eutrophication Model Suite to drive fisheries-focused ecosystem models: – Chesapeake Atlantis Model (CAM) – Chesapeake Bay Fisheries Ecosystem Model (CBFEM) • Use ecosystem model outputs – biomass and catch of key species – to inform economic surveys and models • Work iteratively with economists to provide outputs as needed for different stages of benefits assessment (i.e., focus groups, stated preference surveys, economic models) 3 The Chesapeake Atlantis Model (CAM) A Holistic Ecosystem Model Incorporating: Biological environment Physical environment Primary production Trophic interactions Recruitment relationships Age structure Size structure Life History Geology Chemistry Circulation & currents Temperature Salinity Water clarity Climate variability Fisheries Multiple sectors Gears Seasons Spatially explicit Nutrient Inputs Currency is Nitrogen NH3 NO2 Si D.O 4 The Chesapeake Bay Fisheries Ecosystem Model (CBFEM) A Fisheries Food-Web Model Incorporating: Biological environment Physical environment Primary production forcing Trophic interactions Recruitment relationships Age structure Forcing functions Mediation functions Temperature Salinity Fisheries Nutrient Inputs Multiple sectors Spatially explicit Currency is Biomass Relative changes in nutrients to force primary production 5 Why use ecosystem models? • Ecosystem interactions are complex – Responses to management actions may be non-linear – Ecosystem models help to keep track of tradeoffs in resource management decisions 6 Why use multiple ecosystem models? • Using multiple models is a standard approach for dealing with uncertainty in model parameters and structure • Models can have complementary strengths 7 Model Complementarities CAM • More realism – Direct coupling of water quality and fisheries food webs – Spatially resolved • Slower run time – Few runs – No long-term projections CBFEM • Less realism – Forcing and mediation functions to connect WQ and fish – Not currently spatially resolved • Quicker run time – Sensitivity analysis – Climate projections 8 Modeled Fisheries Stocks for Outputs • • • • • • Oysters Striped bass Menhaden Blue crab Alosines Catfish: Blue, White, Channel & Flathead • • • • • • • • • • • • Atlantic croaker Black drum Bluefish Butterfish "Panfish" Reef associated fish Sandbar shark Smooth dogfish Spiny dogfish Summer flounder Weakfish White perch 9 NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office – Ecosystem Modeling Team Example Outputs – Tradeoffs Hypothetical Striped Bass 7 Habitat 6 Menhaden 5 4 3 2 EBFM Alosines 1 0 Socioeconomic Blue Crab $ Oysters Least Stringent Scenario Partial TMDL goals met 100% TMDL goals met Status quo 10 For Illustrative Purposes Only -- Not Based on Actual Modeling Results FY12 Milestones • Quarter 1 – Generate initial CBFEM outputs for TMDL scenarios for use in focus group questions – 4 TMDL scenarios: status quo (least improvement), moderate improvement, high level improvement, maximum improvement (all WIPs met) • Quarter 2 – Incorporate forcing and mediation functions in CBFEM, provide revised outputs for stated preference surveys • Quarter 3 – Biomass output from CAM • Quarter 4 – Incorporate key fisheries in CAM and begin linking to economic models 11 EwE Example Forcing and mediation functions: hypoxia Ecological group Species Response Mobile, Pelagic predators Striped Bass Habitat squeeze Mobile, Pelagic forage fish Menhaden Refuge or Predation Less mobile, benthic invertebrates Blue Crabs Jubilees Sessile, benthic invertebrates Oysters Direct Mortality Potential Ecosystem Interrupter Sea Nettles and Ctenophores Release 12 Forcing and mediation functions: habitat Ecological group Species Response Mobile, Pelagic predators Striped Bass Juvenile mortality Mobile, Pelagic forage fish Menhaden Juvenile mortality Less mobile, benthic invertebrates Blue Crabs Juvenile mortality Sessile, benthic invertebrates Oysters N/A Potential Ecosystem Interrupter Sea Nettles and Ctenophores N/A 13 Summary • Providing ecological and fisheries information to assess benefits of TMDLs to fisheries • By linking water quality model output to fisheries-focused ecosystem models • Using two complementary modeling systems (CAM and CBFEM) • CBFEM will be used to provide info for focus groups and survey during this year. • CAM will be ready for use next year. 14 For more info contact: Howard Townsend [email protected] Tom Ihde [email protected]