Download Classic Paper 2 - Computer Science

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Human-Computer Interaction Institute wikipedia , lookup

Computer vision wikipedia , lookup

Technological singularity wikipedia , lookup

Artificial intelligence in video games wikipedia , lookup

Human–computer interaction wikipedia , lookup

Herbert A. Simon wikipedia , lookup

AI winter wikipedia , lookup

Intelligence explosion wikipedia , lookup

Existential risk from artificial general intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Ethics of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Embodied cognitive science wikipedia , lookup

History of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Philosophy of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Title: Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Search
Author: Allen Newell and Herbert A. Simon
Summary/Hook:
In this paper Allen Newell and Herbert A. Simon talk about how to go about the development of
artificial intelligence. They explain throughout the paper how to go about creating artificial intelligence
(AI) and what it must have to be AI. This paper got them the Turing award in 1975 due to its
importance in the field of computer science and their advanced view on how to go about AI. Also
through this they developed an argument for the symbol system hypothesis.
Knowledge Relating to the Cognitive Science Learning Outcomes:
1. Symbol Systems
Symbols lie at the root of intelligent action, which is, of course, the primary topic of artificial
intelligence. For that matter, it is a primary question for all of computer science. For all information is
processed by computers in the service of ends, and we measure the intelligence of a system by its
ability to achieve stated ends in the face of variations, difficulties and complexities posed by the task
environment.
2. Symbol Systems
A physical symbol system is an instance of a universal machine. Thus the symbol system hypothesis
implies that intelligence will be realized by a universal computer. However, the hypothesis goes far
beyond the argument, often made on general grounds of physical determinism, that any computation
that is realizable can be realized by a universal machine, provided that it is specified.
3. Formal Systems and Theories of Computation
Logic, and by incorporation all of mathematics, was a game played with meaningless tokens according
to certain purely syntactic rules. All meaning had been purged. One had a mechanical, though
permissive (we would now say non-deterministic), system about which various things could be proved.
4. Consciousness and Controversies
The symbol system hypothesis implies that the symbolic behavior of man arises because he has the
characteristics of a physical symbol system. Hence, the results of efforts to model human behavior with
symbol systems become an important part of the evidence for the hypothesis, and research in artificial
intelligence goes on in close collaboration with research in information processing psychology, as it is
usually called.
5. Consciousness and Controversies
First, neither behaviorism nor Gestalt theory has demonstrated, or even shown how to demonstrate, that
the explanatory mechanisms it postulates are sufficient to account for intelligent behavior in complex
tasks. Second, neither theory has been formulated with anything like the specificity of artificial
programs. As a matter of fact, the alternative theories are sufficiently vague so that it is not terribly
difficult to give them information processing interpretations, and thereby assimilate them to the symbol
system hypothesis.