* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lie algebras and Lie groups, Homework 3 solutions
Singular-value decomposition wikipedia , lookup
Eigenvalues and eigenvectors wikipedia , lookup
Matrix calculus wikipedia , lookup
Jordan normal form wikipedia , lookup
Perron–Frobenius theorem wikipedia , lookup
Capelli's identity wikipedia , lookup
Orthogonal matrix wikipedia , lookup
Matrix multiplication wikipedia , lookup
Covariance and contravariance of vectors wikipedia , lookup
Cayley–Hamilton theorem wikipedia , lookup
Exterior algebra wikipedia , lookup
Lie algebras and Lie groups, Homework 3 solutions ————————————————————————– 1. Representations In all the cases we show that ϕ([x, y]) = [ϕ(x), ϕ(y)] where ϕ is the representation. We simply write RV (x)v = x · v, and respectively for w ∈ W . a) ϕ⊕ ≡ RV ⊕ RW , then [ϕ⊕ (x), ϕ⊕ (y)](v ⊕ v) = (ϕ⊕ (x) · ϕ⊕ (y) − ϕ⊕ (y) · ϕ⊕ (x))(v ⊕ w) = x · y · v ⊕ x · y · w − (y · x · v ⊕ y · x · w) = (x · y · v − y · x · v) ⊕ (x · y · w − y · x · w) = [x, y] · v ⊕ [x, y] · w = ϕ⊕ ([x, y])(v ⊕ w) b) ϕ⊗ ≡ RV ⊗ RW , then [ϕ⊗ (x), ϕ⊗ (y)](v ⊗ w) = ϕ⊗ (x)(y · v ⊗ w + v ⊗ y · w)− − ϕ⊗ (y)(x · v ⊗ w + v ⊗ x · w) = x · y · v ⊗ w + y · v ⊗ x · w + x · v ⊗ y · w + v ⊗ x · y · w− −y · x · v ⊗ w − y · v ⊗ x · w − x · v ⊗ y · w − v ⊗ y · x · w = [x, y] · v ⊗ w + v ⊗ [x, y] · w = ϕ⊕ ([x, y])(v ⊗ w) c) Again ϕ⊗ ≡ RV ⊗ RW . The map defined on the sheet is not even linear ϕ⊗ (x + y)(v ⊗ w) = (x + y) · v ⊗ (x + y) · w =x·v⊗x·w+x·v⊗y·w+y·v⊗x·w+y·v⊗y·w 6= x · v ⊗ x · w + y · v ⊗ y · w = (ϕ⊗ (x) + ϕ⊗ (y))(v ⊗ w) , or even simpler ϕ⊗ (ax)(v ⊗ w) = ax · v ⊗ ax · w = a2 (x · v ⊗ x · w) = a2 ϕ⊗ (x)(v ⊗ w) 6= aϕ⊗ (x)(v ⊗ w) if a2 6= a , and, thus, it is no Lie-algebra representation. 2. The complex Lie algebra so(3) a) Let us start with sl(2, C) whose definition in terms of matrices can be given by {A ∈ gl(2, C) | Tr A = 0}. It is 3-dim. and a suitable basis is given by 1 0 0 1 0 0 h= , e= , f= . 0 −1 0 0 1 0 It is now easy to derive [h, e] = 2e , [h, f ] = −2f , [e, f ] = h . Next, let us investigate so(3, C) that can be defined as the matrix algebra {A ∈ gl(3, C) | AT = −A}. An obvious basis is given by 0 0 0 X = 0 0 −1 , 0 1 0 0 0 1 Y = 0 0 0 , −1 0 0 0 −1 0 Z = 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 with easy to derive commutation relations [X, Y ] = Z , [Y, Z] = X , [Z, X] = Y . Let us now define a basis change by H = −2iZ , E = X − iY , and F = −X − iY . In this basis the commutation relations are given by [H, E] = −2i[Z, X − iY ] = −2iY + 2X = 2E [H, F ] = −2i[Z, −X − iY ] = 2iY + 2X = −2F [E, F ] = [X − iY, −X − iY ] = −i[X, Y ] + i[Y, X] = −2iZ = H , which shows that sl(2, C) and so(3, C) are isomorph as Lie-algebras. b) The complexified Lie-algebra su(2)C can be regarded as a Lie algebra over the field C, where scalar multiplication of a ∈ C with g ⊗b ∈ su(2)C is defined via a(g ⊗ b) ≡ g ⊗ (ab) . (1) A possible basis is given by σ̃ i = σ i ⊗ 1, where σ i , i = 1, 2, 3 is a basis of su(2) with commutation relations [σ i , σ j ] = ij k σ k . These are the commutation relations of the Pauli matrices multiplied with √i , and are exactly the same as for X, Y, Z in a). Hence, su(2)C is isomorphic 2 to so(3, C) which is isomorphic to sl(2, C). 3. Lie-algebra automorphisms of sl(n) a) For Ad(A) to be a automorphism, we have to show that (i) for any x ∈ sl(n) also Ad(A)(x) = A−1 xA ∈ sl(n), (ii) that there exist a z ∈ sl(n) s.t. Ad(A)(z) = x, and (iii) that Ad(A)([x, y]) = [Ad(A)(x), Ad(A)(y)] for any two x, y ∈ sl(n). The first condition is ensured by the invariance of Tr under cyclic permutation Tr(A−1 xA) = Tr(AA−1 x) = Tr(x) = 0 . The second one by defining z = AxA−1 which is in sl(n) due to the same fact. For the last condition we can use that the Lie-bracket in matrix representation is given by the commutator: Ad(A)([x, y]) = A−1 (xy − yx)A = A−1 xAA−1 yA − A−1 yAA−1 xA = Ad(A)(x)Ad(A)(y) − Ad(a)(y)Ad(A)(x) = [Ad(A)(x), Ad(A)(y)] b) f (x) := −xT . f is linear and bijective (easy task) and f ([x, y]) = −(xy − yx)T = −(y T xT − xT y T ) = (−xT )(−y T ) − (−y T )(−xT ) = [f (x), f (y)] , which shows that it is a Lie-algebra automorphism. However, for n ≥ 3 this is no inner automorphism: Consider e.g. the element x = diag(1, ..., 1, 1 − n) ∈ sl(n). An inner automorphism must not change the eigenvalues (it is just a basis change) but f (x) = −xT = diag(−1, ..., −1, n − 1) has different eigenvalues than x for n > 2 and hence f is no inner automorphism. 4. The Lie groups U (1), T n and Rn a) Any g ∈ U (1) has a 1d matrix representation g = eiϕ where ϕ ∈ (0, 2π] parametrises a curve in U (1). A generator of the Lie algebra then is 1 ∂eiϕ = 1, i ∂ϕ ϕ=0 (2) which shows that the Lie algebra u(1) is simply R ≡ span{1}. b) A possible choice of curves to construct basis vectors in the tangent space of the unit element in T n are γk (ϕ) = (1, . . . , 1, |{z} eiϕ , 1, . . . , 1)t , k = 1, . . . , n . (3) kth pos. The n corresponding basis elements are given by 1 ∂γk (ϕ) = (0, . . . , 0, |{z} 1 , 0, . . . , 0)t , ek = i ∂ϕ ϕ=0 (4) kth pos. and the Lie algebra is given by Rn = span{ek | k = 1, . . . , n} with the trivial Lie bracket. c) A possible choice of curves to construct basis vectors in the tangent space of the unit element in Vn are γk (ϕ) = (0, . . . , 0, ϕ , 0, . . . , 0)t , |{z} k = 1, . . . , n . (5) kth pos. The n corresponding basis elements are given by ∂γk (ϕ) = (0, . . . , 0, |{z} 1 , 0, . . . , 0)t , ek = ∂ϕ ϕ=0 (6) kth pos. and the Lie algebra is again given by Rn = span{ek | k = 1, . . . , n} with the trivial Lie bracket. The exponential map is simply the identity map. d) The matrices Φ(v) are invertible since 1 .. det(Φ(v)) = det . 0 0 . . . 0 v1 . . . .. .. . . =1 . . . 1 vn ... 0 1 (7) In components we can write Φ(v)ij = δij + vi δn+1,j when we define vn+1 := 0. We then can calculate (Φ(v)Φ(w))ij = X = X Φ(v)ik Φ(w)kj k k δik δkj + vi δn+1,k δkj + δik wk δn+1,j + vi δn+1,k wk δn+1,j | {z } →0 = δij + (vi + wi )δn+1,j = Φ(v + w)ij , which shows that Φ is a group homomorphism. By construction its bijective.