Survey							
                            
		                
		                * Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Chronic Pain Management Beverly Pearce-Smith, MD Clinical Assistant Professor Department of Anesthesiology UPMC-McKeesport Hospital July 2008 IASP Definition of Pain “Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage.” Acute vs Chronic Pain Characteristic Acute Pain Chronic Pain Cause Generally known Often unknown Duration of pain Short, well-characterized Persists after healing, 3 months Treatment approach Resolution of underlying cause, usually self-limited Underlying cause and pain disorder; outcome is often pain control, not cure What is Acute Pain?       Physiologic response to tissue damage Warning signals damage/danger Helps locate problem source Has biologic value as a symptom Responds to traditional medical model Life temporarily disrupted (self limiting) What is Chronic Pain?   Chronic pain is persistent or recurrent pain, lasting beyond the usual course of acute illness or injury, or more than 3 6 months, and adversely affecting the patient’s well-being Pain that continues when it should not What is Chronic Pain?       Difficult to diagnose & perplexing to treat Subjective personal experience Cannot be measured except by behavior May originate from a physical source but slowly it “out-shouts” and becomes the disease It has no biologic value as a symptom Life permanently disrupted (relentless) Domains of Chronic Pain Quality of Life Physical functioning Ability to perform activities of daily living Work Recreation Psychological Morbidity Depression Anxiety, anger Sleep disturbances Loss of self-esteem Social Consequences  Marital/family relations  Intimacy/sexual activity  Social isolation Socioeconomic Consequences  Healthcare costs  Disability  Lost workdays Nociceptive vs Neuropathic Pain Nociceptive Pain Mixed Type Caused by activity in neural pathways in response to potentially tissue-damaging stimuli Caused by a combination of both primary injury and secondary effects Neuropathic Pain Initiated or caused by primary lesion or dysfunction in the nervous system CRPS* Postoperative pain Arthritis Mechanical low back pain Sickle cell crisis Sports/exercise injuries *Complex regional pain syndrome Postherpetic neuralgia Trigeminal neuralgia Neuropathic low back pain Central poststroke pain Distal polyneuropathy (eg, diabetic, HIV) Possible Descriptions of Neuropathic Pain  Sensations           numbness tingling burning paresthetic paroxysmal lancinating electriclike raw skin shooting deep, dull, bonelike ache  Signs/Symptoms   allodynia: pain from a stimulus that does not normally evoke pain  thermal  mechanical hyperalgesia: exaggerated response to a normally painful stimulus Physiology of Pain Perception Injury  Transduction  Transmission  Modulation  Perception  Interpretation  Behavior Brain Descending Pathway Peripheral Nerve Dorsal Root Ganglion Ascending Pathways C-Fiber A-beta Fiber A-delta Fiber 10 Dorsal Horn Spinal Cord Adapted with permission from WebMD Scientific American® Medicine. Pathophysiology of Neuropathic Pain        Chemical excitation of nonnociceptors Recruitment of nerves outside of site of injury Excitotoxicity Sodium channels Ectopic discharge Deafferentation Central sensitization    maintained by peripheral input Sympathetic involvement Antidromic neurogenic inflammation Multiple Pathophysiologies May Be Involved in Neuropathic Pain     More than one mechanism of action likely involved Neuropathic pain may result from abnormal peripheral nerve function and neural processing of impulses due to abnormal neuronal receptor and mediator activity Combination of medications may be needed to manage pain: topicals, anticonvulsants, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and opioids In the future, ability to determine the relationship between the pathophysiology and symptoms/signs may help target therapy Neuropathic Pain  “Pain initiated or caused by a primary lesion or dysfunction in the nervous system” Merskey & Bogduk 1994      Central & peripheral sites Acute & chronic pain states CRPS I: consequent of acute, often minor trauma CRPS II: consequence of nerve injury Sympathetically maintained Pain (SMP) or independent of the SNS Neuropathic Pain     Burning, stabbing, paraesthesia, allodynia, hyperalgesia Threshold for activation of injured 1o afferents is lowered Ectopic discharges may arise from the injury site or the DRG o  2 to changes in Na+ channel expression Central Sensitisation in the cord o  2 to peripheral inputs o  2 to central changes   Reduced inhibition Functional (neurotransmitter) & anatomical (sprouting) changes in Aβ fibres  tactile allodynia (pain induced by light touch) Acute Neuropathic Pain  Acute causes   Acute neuropathic pain = 1-3%     iatrogenic, traumatic, inflammatory, infective Based on cases referred to an acute pain service Majority still present at 12 months May be a risk factor for chronic pain Prompt diagnosis & Rx may prevent chronic pain Examples of Acute NP      Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Spinal Cord Injury Pain Peripheral nerve injury Post-surgical (eg thoracotomy, mastectomy) NEUROPATHIC PAIN LESION IN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM      EXPERIENCED IN PARTS OF BODY THAT APPEAR NORMAL CHRONIC SEVERE RESISTANT TO OVER THE COUNTER ANALGESICS AGGRAVATED BY ALLODYNIA Chronic Pain Syndromes        Neuralgias Causalgia Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (aka: RSD Hyperesthesias Myofascial pain syndromes Hemiagnosia Phantom limb pain COMMON TYPES OF NEUROPATHIC PAIN PERIPHERAL • Polyradioculopathy • Alcoholic polyneuropathy • Entrapment neuropathies (carpal tunnel) • Nerve compression by tumor • Diabetic neuropathy • Phantom limb pain • Postherpetic neuralgia • Trigeminal neuralgia CENTRAL  Compressive myelopathy from spinal stenosis  HIV myelopathy  MS  Parkinson disease  Post ischemic myelopathy  Poststroke pain  Posttraumatic spinalcord injury CLINICAL EVALUATION OF PTS WITH SUSPECTED NEUROPATHIC PAIN    HISTORY- pain intensity (0 to 10), sensory descriptors, temporal variation, functional impact, attempted treatments, alcohol PHYSICAL- gross motor, DTRs, skin, sensory-light touch, pin prick, vibration, dynamic /thermal allodynia, hyperalgesia, tinel`s SPECIAL TESTS- CT, MRI, EMG, nerve conduction, clinical biochemistry NEUROPATHIC PAIN   SPONTANEOUS- CONTINOUS OR INTERMITTENT -Burning, Shooting, Shock-like STIMULUS EVOKED- ALLODYNIA AND HYPERALGESIA -Extension of allodynia above and below the originally affected dermatomes is a feature of central sensitization. Neuropathic pain arises following nerve injury or dysfunction Gilron, I. et al. CMAJ 2006;175:265-275 Copyright ©2006 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors PATHOPHYSIOLOGY  PERIPHERAL MECHANISMS Peripheral nerve injury 1. Sensitization by spontaneous activity by neuron, lowered threshold for activation, increased response to given stimulus. 2. Formation of ectopic neuronal pacemakers along nerve and increased expression of sodium channels and voltage gated calcium channels. (α 2 delta subunit- where gabapentin acts) 3. Adjacent demyelinated axons can have abnormal electrical connections channels and increased neuronal excitability. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY CENTRAL MECHANISMS 1. 2. 3. 4. Sustained painful stimuli results in spinal sensitization (neurons within dorsal horn) Increased spontaneous activity of dorsal horn neurons, reduced activation thresholds and enhanced responsiveness to synaptic inputs. Expansion of receptive fields, death of inhibitory interneurons (intrinsic modulatory systems). Central sensitization mediated by NMDA receptors that further release excitatory amino acids and neuropeptides. Sprouting of sympathetic efferents into neuromas and dorsal root and ganglion cells. Pain Treatment Continuum Most invasive Least invasive Continuum not related to efficacy Psychological/physical approaches Topical medications Systemic medications* Interventional techniques* *Consider referral if previous treatments were unsuccessful. Nonpharmacologic Options     Biofeedback Relaxation therapy Physical and occupational therapy Cognitive/behavioral strategies    meditation; guided imagery Acupuncture Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation Pharmacologic Treatment Options  Classes of agents with efficacy demonstrated in multiple, randomized, controlled trials for neuropathic pain      topical analgesics (capsaicin, lidocaine patch 5%) anticonvulsants (gabapentin, lamotrigine, pregabalin) antidepressants (nortriptyline, desipramine) opioids (oxycodone, tramadol) Consider safety and tolerability when initiating treatment FDA-Approved Treatments for Neuropathic Pain  Carbamazepine   Duloxetine   postherpetic neuralgia Lidocaine Patch 5%   peripheral diabetic neuropathy Gabapentin   trigeminal neuralgia postherpetic neuralgia Pregabalin*   peripheral diabetic neuropathy postherpetic neuralgia *Availability pending based upon controlled substance scheduling by the DEA. Pharmacologic Agents Affect Pain Differently BRAIN CNS PNS Peripheral Sensitization Descending Modulation Spinal Cord Dorsal Horn Local Anesthetics Topical Analgesics Anticonvulsants Tricyclic Antidepressants Opioids Anticonvulsants Opioids Tricyclic/SNRI Antidepressants Central Sensitization Anticonvulsants Opioids NMDA-Receptor Antagonists Tricyclic/SNRI Antidepressants Anticonvulsant Drugs for Neuropathic Pain Disorders  Postherpetic neuralgia    gabapentin* pregabalin * Diabetic neuropathy       carbamazepine phenytoin gabapentin lamotrigine pregabalin * *Approved by FDA for this use. HIV = human immunodeficiency virus. HIV-associated neuropathy   Trigeminal neuralgia     lamotrigine carbamazepine* lamotrigine oxcarbazepine Central poststroke pain  lamotrigine Gabapentin in Neuropathic Pain Disorders     FDA approved for postherpetic neuralgia Anticonvulsant: uncertain mechanism Limited intestinal absorption Usually well tolerated; serious adverse effects rare    dizziness and sedation can occur No significant drug interactions Peak time: 2 to 3 h; elimination half- *Not approved by FDA for this use. Gabapentin     Action:  NT release from hyper-excited neurones  variable oral absorption, no interactions, completely renally excreted Indication:  Protective analgesia  Neuropathic pain treatment (NNT = 4.7) SE: sedation, dizziness, ataxia, tremor  NNH minor = 4, NNH major =12-18  COST! Doses:  Pre-op: 600-1200mg (1-2 hours pre-op)  Post-op “prophylaxis”: 100-300mg TDS (? 2 weeks)  Post-op “treatment”: 100-900mg TDS (usu 300-600mg tds) Dahl JB, Mathiesen O, Moiniche S. ‘Protective premedication’: an option with gabapentin and related drugs? A review of gabapentin and pregabalin in the treatment of post-operative pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 1130—1136 Hurley RW, Cohen SP, Williams KA, Rowlingson AJ, Wu CL. The Analgesic Effects of Perioperative Gabapentin on Postoperative Pain: A Meta-Analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006;31:237-247. Pregabalin     Very similar to gabapentin More reliable oral absorption Slightly different side effect profile Doses: 75-300mg BD Other Anticonvulsants   Effective (NNT 2-3) but less “user friendly” Most have uncommon but serious SE (eg. aplastic anaemia, hepatotoxicity, StevensJohnson syndrome etc)   NNH minor = 3, NNH major = 16 - 24 Consider    Carbamazepine 100mg BD ( to 400mg bd/tds) Valproate 200mg BD ( to 1000-2000mg/d) Phenytoin 100mg nocte ( to 500mg/d) Finnerup NB, Otto M, McQuay HJ, Jensen TS, Sindrup SH. Algorithm for neuropathic pain treatment: An evidence based proposal. Pain 118 (2005) 289–305 Topical vs Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems Topical (lidocaine patch 5%) Peripheral tissue activity Applied directly over painful site Insignificant serum levels Systemic side effects unlikely Transdermal (fentanyl patch) Systemic activity Applied away from painful site Serum levels necessary Systemic side effects Lidocaine Patch 5%   Lidocaine 5% in pliable patch Up to 3 patches applied once daily directly over painful site     Efficacy demonstrated in 3 randomized controlled trials on postherpetic neuralgia Drug interactions and systemic side effects unlikely    12 h on, 12 h off (FDA-approved label) recently published data indicate 4 patches (18–24 h) safe most common side effect: application-site sensitivity Clinically insignificant serum lidocaine levels Mechanical barrier decreases allodynia Lidocaine Action: Na+ channel block Indication: peripheral NP, ? others     Useful IV or topical (NNT = 4.4) No reliable oral equivalent (mexiletine NNT = 10) SE: similar rates to placebo for sedation, N/V, pruritis etc   CNS toxicity at plasma levels > 5 mcg/ml Dose: IV 1-2 mg/kg/hr (??duration)   Patches available in USA, ?EMLA here Challapalli V, Tremont-Lukats IW, McNicol ED, Lau J, Carr DB. Systemic administration of local anesthetic agents to relieve neuropathic pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 4. Ketamine     Action: NMDA receptor antagonist  ‘anti-hyperalgesic', 'anti-allodynic' and 'toleranceprotective' agent Indication: Protective analgesia, NP treatment, opioidtolerant patients SE: Dysphoria, nightmares, “psychedelic” effects Dose: Low doses usually well tolerated  Intra-op: 0.5mg/kg bolus then 0.25-0.5 mg/kg/hr (beware prolonged recovery)  Post-op: 0.1-0.2 mg/kg/hr (?duration) Himmelseher S, Durieux ME. Ketamine for Perioperative Pain Management. Anesthesiology 2005; 102:211–20 Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and Faculty of Pain Medicine. Acute Pain Management: Scientific Evidence, 2nd Ed. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, Melbourne, Australia, 2005; 143-144 Principles of Opioid Therapy for Neuropathic Pain        Opioids should be titrated for therapeutic efficacy versus AEs Fixed-dose regimens generally preferred over prn regimens Document treatment plan and outcomes Consider use of opioid written care agreement Opioids can be effective in neuropathic pain Most opioid AEs controlled with appropriate specific management (eg, prophylactic bowel regimen, use of stimulants) Understand distinction between addiction, tolerance, physical dependence, and pseudoaddiction Opioids    A select group of pain patients benefits from opioids, with resultant pain reduction and improved physical and psychological functioning They have minimal side effects & show increased activity levels & less pain Other patients do poorly with opioids, experiencing tolerance and side effects, especially with escalating doses Distinguishing Dependence, Tolerance, and Addiction     Physical dependence: withdrawal syndrome arises if drug discontinued, dose substantially reduced, or antagonist administered Tolerance: greater amount of drug needed to maintain therapeutic effect, or loss of effect over time Pseudoaddiction: behavior suggestive of addiction; caused by undertreatment of pain Addiction (psychological dependence): psychiatric disorder characterized by continued compulsive use of substance despite harm Opioids Action:  NT release,  cell excitability Indications: Any NP     Oxycodone, morphine (NNT = 2.5) Tramadol (NNT = 3.9) SE: usual, and ?OIH Doses: usual     ? Stay below 100-200mg/d PO Morphine equivalent (ie. 30-60mg/d IV) ? methadone & buprenorphine less hyperalgesic Finnerup NB, Otto M, McQuay HJ, Jensen TS, Sindrup SH. Algorithm for neuropathic pain treatment: An evidence based proposal. Pain 118 (2005) 289–305 Antidepressants in Neuropathic Pain Disorders*    Multiple mechanisms of action Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses demonstrate benefit of tricyclic antidepressants (especially amitriptyline, nortriptyline, desipramine) for postherpetic neuralgia and diabetic neuropathy Onset of analgesia variable    analgesic effects independent of antidepressant activity Improvements in insomnia, anxiety, depression Desipramine and nortriptyline have fewer adverse effects *Not approved by FDA for this use. Tricyclic Antidepressants: Adverse Effects  Commonly reported AEs (generally anticholinergic):          blurred vision cognitive changes constipation dry mouth orthostatic hypotension sedation sexual dysfunction tachycardia urinary retention AEs = adverse effects. Fewest AEs Most AEs  Desipramine  Nortriptyline  Imipramine  Doxepin  Amitriptyline Tricyclic Antidepressants   Action: Mixed ( 5-HT &/ Norad at synapse) Indication:  All NP treatment (except SCI, PLP, HIV)    PHN prevention: 50%  if used for 90days SE: dizzy, sedation, anticholinergic   NNT: overall = 3.1, central = 4.0, periph = 2.3 NNH minor = 5, NNH major = 16 Doses   Amitriptylline 10-25mg nocte, max 100mg Nortriptylline (?less sedating) same doses Finnerup NB, Otto M, McQuay HJ, Jensen TS, Sindrup SH. Algorithm for neuropathic pain treatment: An evidence based proposal. Pain 118 (2005) 289–305 Venlafaxine   Action: SNRI Indication:    SE: sedation/insomnia, ataxia, BP, nausea   mastectomy pain prophylaxis, peripheral NP treatment (NNT=5.5) NNH major = not significant Doses   Protective 75mg/d (pre-op then for 2wks) Treatment: 37.5-375mg/d Reuben SS, Makari-Judson G, Lurie SD. Evaluation of efficacy of the perioperative administration of venlafaxine XR in the prevention of postmastectomy pain syndrome. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004; 27: 133-39. Calcitonin Action: uncertain Indication: PLP, CRPS, ?other NP SE: N/V, flushing, dizzy, allergy     Skin prick test advised Dose: 100 IU in 100ml saline over 1hr    Pre-treat with anti-emetics Repeat daily for 3 days Visser EJ. A review of calcitonin and its use in the treatment of acute pain. Acute Pain 2005;7 :185-189. Interventional Treatments for Neuropathic Pain  Neural blockade   Neurolytic techniques    alcohol or phenol neurolysis pulse radio frequency Stimulatory techniques    sympathetic blocks for CRPS-I and II (reflex sympathetic dystrophy and causalgia) spinal cord stimulation peripheral nerve stimulation Medication pumps CRPS = complex regional pain syndrome. Summary of Advances in Treatments for Neuropathic Pain*         Botulinum toxin: low back pain Lidocaine patch 5%: low back pain, osteoarthritis, diabetic and HIV-related neuropathy, with gabapentin CR oxycodone: diabetic neuropathy Gabapentin: HIV-related neuropathy, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, others Levetiracetam: neuropathic pain and migraine Oxcarbazepine: neuropathic pain; diabetic neuropathy Bupropion: neuropathic pain Transdermal fentanyl: low back pain *Applications not approved by FDA. CURRENT MANAGEMENT      NON PHARMACOLOGIC EXERCISE TENS PENS GRADED MOTOR IMAGERY CBT World Health Organization (WHO) Analgesic Ladder. INTERVENTIONAL PAIN MANAGEMENT   Epidural or Perineural injections of local anesthetics or cortico steroids. Implantations of epidural and intrathecal drug delivery systems.  Neural ablative procedures.  Insertion of spinal cord stimulators.  Sympathetic nerve blocks. Treatment Goals - I  Reduce and manage pain        Decreased subjective pain reports Decreased objective evidence of disease Optimize medication use Increase function & productivity Restore life activities Increase psychological wellness Reduce level of disability Treatment Goals - II         Stop cure seeking Reduce unnecessary health care Prevent iatrogenic complications Improve self-sufficiency Achieve medical stabilization Prevent relapse / recidivism Minimize costs - maintain quality Return to gainful employment Chronic Pain Evaluations    Comprehensive multidisciplinary evaluations offers a means of developing an appropriate treatment plan This can help identify factors which may prolong complaints of pain and disability despite traditional medical care Such an evaluation can also identify who would benefit from a more structured and intensive functional restoration program Measuring Opioid Usefulness  Each individual with chronic pain should be viewed as unique and the ultimate outcome of the use of opioid medication must be viewed in terms of    Pain relief Objective gains (function or increased activity) Does taking an opioid allow the person to be happier and do more things without unacceptable side effects or do the medications only create more problems and no observable change in activity level? Adjunctive Treatment Modalities         Joint, bursal & trigger point injections Botulinum toxin injections Nerve root and sympathetic blocks Peripheral and plexus blocks Facet and medial branch injections Lidocaine infusions Epidurals Neuroablative techniques   Chemical, Thermal, & Surgical Neuromodulation  Spinal cord stimulators & Implanted spinal pumps Physical & Occupational Therapy  Active        Improved body mechanics Spine stabilization Stretching & strengthening Aerobic conditioning Aquatics therapy Work hardening Self-directed fitness program Psychological Approaches  Non-drug pain management skills        Anxiety & depression reduction Biofeedback, relaxation training, stress reduction skills, mindfulness meditation, & hypnosis Cognitive restructuring Improve coping skills Learn activity pacing Habit reversal Maintenance and relapse prevention Functional Restoration          Locus of control issues Timely and accurate diagnosis Assessment of psychosocial strengths and weaknesses including analysis of support system Evaluation of physical and functional capacity Treatment planning and functional goal setting for return to life and work activities Active physical rehabilitation Cognitive behavioral treatment Patient and family education Frequent assessment of compliance and progress Facial Nerves and Pain  Trigeminal nerve   Largest of 12 cranial nerves Three major branches  Ophthalmic nerve   Maxillary nerve   Sensory information (tactile, thermoception, nociception, proprioception) from green areas, nasal mucosa,and frontal sinuses sensory information from pink areas, nasal mucosa, palate, ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses Mandibular nerve   Sensory input from yellow areas, floor of the mouth, and anterior 2/3 of tongue Motor control of muscles involved in biting, chewing, and swallowing 61 Neural Mechanisms of Pain  Gate Control Theory   62 Melzack and Wall (1965) Perception of pain mediated by a “gate” located in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord L-fibers mediating tactile perception (A-a and A-b) + Central Control + closes - SG- gate PAIN T cell SG+ + + opens gate S-fibers mediating pain perception (Ad and C) + Experimental Evidence for the Gate   63 Selective inactivation of Lfibers results in greater pain perception from noxious stimuli (Price, Hi, and Dubner, 1977) Phantom Limb Pain may result from reduced L-fiber input (Melzack, 1970) L-fibers mediating tactile perception (A-a and A-b) + Central Control + closes - SG- gate PAIN T cell SG+ + + opens gate S-fibers mediating pain perception (Ad and C) + Endorphins and Pain    64 Endorphins: neurotransmitters that act as endogenous (naturally-occurring) morphine-like substances Endorphins bind to same receptor sites in brain stem as opiates SPA works best when endorphin sites are stimulated— may release endorphins into the nervous system (Hosubuchi et al., 1977) Endorphins and Pain    65 Concentration of endorphins is generally less for people suffering from chronic pain (Akil et al., 1978) Opiate inhibitors (e.g., naloxone) decrease the analgesic effects of acupuncture, SPA, and placebos Stress-induced analgesia may result from increased release of endorphins during stress Nociceptors in Skin Epidermi s Dermis Free Nerve Endings Pain Pathways  Lots of effort to id neural pathways  Found distinct categories of nerve fibres    A δ : mylinated, carry rapidly sharp pains (2030 ms-1) C : unmylinated, carry slowly burning pain (0.5-2 ms-1) Hence, short sharp, then delayed slow pain Associated Area of Brain Fibres pass signals up spinal cord as electrical impulses then onto the thalamus Thalamus relays messages to cortex Proved difficult to id. specific area of the cortex that produce pain Gate Control Theory (Melzack & Wall, 1965) A gate in the substantia gelatinosa of the dorsal horn can be open or closed, blocking pain information. The gate can be closed by descending signals from the brain, or by the balance of activity in A-beta fibres (large myelinated) and C fibres (small non-myelinated)  A-beta fibres produce touch sensations  C fibres produce dull diffuse pain. Greater activity in A-beta fibres closes the gate, greater activity in C fibres opens it.  Other factors influencing the gate include  Attention  Emotional & Cognitive factors  Physical factors Some forms of analgesia, e.g. TENS & acupuncture, might be accommodated within gate control theory. Gate Control Theory - Melzack & Hall (1965) Experience Pain Perception Emotion Behaviour Tissue damage Gate – amplifies or attenuates signal Opening & Closing the Gate Factor Physical Emotional Behavioural (Cognitive) Opens Closes injury agitation anxiety stress frustration depression tension rumination boredom medication relaxation optimism happiness enjoyable activities complex tasks distraction social interaction Problems for Gate Control Theory     Evidence for propsed moderators, but no physical evidence of gate Still organic basis for pain (phantom limb?) Not truly integrative re: psyche & soma Still improvement on stimulus-response paradigm Subsequent Pain Theories  Reflect trends in general psychology  Fordyce (1976) - pain as behaviour  Reinforcement contingencies  +ve reinforcement (e.g. attention / affection for pain behaviours)  -ve reinforcement (e.g. avoid unpleasant events such as work, school)  Recently, growth in cognitive behaviour models Fear-Avoidance Theory      (-ve) appraisals (catastrophising) → fear of pain (illness cognitions) & re-injury Fear of pain → avoidance of potentially painful events (illness behaviour) Little opportunity to disconfirm beliefs Avoidance → disuse syndrome & ↑ p (mood problems) Disuse leads to ↑ p (painful experience) Treatments  Mirror pain theories  Medical (especially acute pain)   Non-anti-inflammatory non-steroid (paracetamol)  Anti-inflammatory non-steroids (eg ibprofen)  Opioids (eg morphine) Psychological  Behavioural initially  Mostly cognitive behavioural now Treatment of Chronic Pain    Surgical procedures to block the transmission of pain from the peripheral nervous system to the brain. Synovectomy – Removing membranes that become inflamed in arthritic joints. Spinal fusion – joins two or more adjacent vertebrae to treat chronic back pain. Psychological Pain Control Methods    Biofeedback – provides biophysiological feedback to patient about some bodily process the patient is unaware of (e.g., forehead muscle tension). Relaxation – systematic relaxation of the large muscle groups. Hypnosis – relaxation + suggestion + distraction + altering the meaning of pain. Psychological Pain Methods  Acupuncture – not sure how it works. Could include:      Counter-irritation – may close the spinal gating mechanism in pain perception. Expectancy Reduced anxiety from belief that it will work. Distraction Trigger release of endorphins Phantom Limb pain      Affects the majority of amputees For most the sensation fades, but a minority experience lasting discomfort. Theories  Neuroma  Deafferented spinal neurons Melzack (1992) Neuromatrix innate linkage between sensation, emotion and self-recognition. Merzenich (1998) Cortical remapping & unmasking Ramachandran (1992) phantom leg sensations often referred from the chest, phantom arm sensations from the face. Phantom limb pain: during amputation under general anesthesia the spinal cord can still “experience” the insult produced by the surgical procedure and central sensitization occurs. To try to prevent it, local infiltration of anesthetics in the site of surgery. But studies show also rearrangement of cortical circuits (cortical region of the missing limb receives afferents from other site of the skin) Phantom Pain intensity as a function of Cortical Reorganization. Analgesia Peripheral via prostaglandin synthesis inhibition (e.g. Asprin) Central via receptors for endogenous opioids. Bind to receptors in the periaqueductal gray, which activate descending serotoninergic fibres. These inhibit pain transmission Endogenous opioids also underlie some psychological influences. Naloxone blocks both TENS and placebo analgesia PAIN TREATMENT CONTINUUM Diagnosis Oral Medications PT, Exercise, Rehabilitation Behavioral Medicine Corrective Surgery Therapeutic Nerve Blocks Oral Opiates Implantable Pain Management Devices Neurostimulation Intrathecal Pumps Neuroablation Multi-Disciplinary Pain Program Models   Pain Consultation Team Multidisciplinary Programs    Multidisciplinary Outpatient Programs Multidisciplinary Inpatient Programs Pain Service Pain Consultation Team   Multidisciplinary group Provides consultation services only  not ongoing treatment Consultation Team Referral Anesthesiology Neurology Psychology Pharmacy Nursing Recommendation Multidisciplinary Clinics    Comprised of 2 or more disciplines Goal is to provide coordinated and more comprehensive care to patients for more complex chronic pain problems 3 general subtypes    Psychoeducational clinic (mild and motivating) Problem-based clinic (e.g. headache, LBP, FM) Comprehensive multidisciplinary clinic  Inpatient or outpatient Chronic Pain Disciplines and Roles (Core) Anesthesiology – nerve blocks Kinesiotherapy – pool therapy; activity Neurology – eval. treatment Nursing – patient care Physical Medicine – exercise; modalities Physical Therapy – exercise; modalities Psychology – eval. and treatment Occupational Therapy – UE eval and treatment Vocational Rehab – job eval and training •Rheumatoid and Osteo-arthritis •Back pain •Menstrual Pain •Labour Pain •Peripheral Nerve Injuries •Shingles •Headache and Migraine •Cancer Pain •Trigeminal Neuralgia •Phantom Limb Pain •Sports Injuries •Sciatica •Aching Joints •Post Operative Pain •Muscular Pain •Whiplash and Neck Injury and many others Mechanistic Approach To Pain Therapy Modify Expression Anxiolytics Decrease Inflammatory Response NSAIDs, Local Anesthetics, Steroids Decrease Conduction Gabapentin, Carbamazepine, Local Anesthetics, Opioids Increase Inhibition TCA’s, SSRI’s, Clonidine Prevent Centralization COX 2, Opioids, Ketamine, a-2 Agonists. Summary   Chronic neuropathic pain is a disease, not a symptom “Rational” polypharmacy is often necessary   Treatment goals include:     combining peripheral and central nervous system agents enhances pain relief balancing efficacy, safety, and tolerability reducing baseline pain and pain exacerbations improving function and QOL New agents and new uses for existing agents offer additional treatment options Further Reading    Rosenzweig et al. cover pain in the second half of chapter eight. Horne, S. & Munafo, M. (1997). Pain, theory, research and intervention. Oxford University Press Wall, P. & Melzack, R. (1988). The challenge of Pain. Penguin. REFERENCES      Review Neuropathic pain: a practical guide for the clinician ; Ian Gilron, C. Peter N. Watson, Catherine M. Cahill and Dwight E. Moulin Dworkin RH, Backonja M, Rowbotham MC, et al. Advances in neuropathic pain. Arch Neurol 2003;60:1524-34. Gilron I, Bailey JM, Tu D, et al. Morphine, gabapentin, or their combination for neuropathic pain. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1324-34. Stephen Macres, Understanding Neuropathic Pain Eisenberg E, McNicol ED, Carr DB. Efficacy and safety of opioid agonists in the treatment of neuropathic pain of nonmalignant origin. JAMA 2005;293:304352. The end Next slide