Download 1186-4375-2-RV

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Ebola virus disease wikipedia , lookup

Rinderpest wikipedia , lookup

Meningococcal disease wikipedia , lookup

Onchocerciasis wikipedia , lookup

West Nile fever wikipedia , lookup

Henipavirus wikipedia , lookup

Sexually transmitted infection wikipedia , lookup

Chagas disease wikipedia , lookup

Chickenpox wikipedia , lookup

Middle East respiratory syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Schistosomiasis wikipedia , lookup

Leptospirosis wikipedia , lookup

Marburg virus disease wikipedia , lookup

Neglected tropical diseases wikipedia , lookup

Visceral leishmaniasis wikipedia , lookup

African trypanosomiasis wikipedia , lookup

Eradication of infectious diseases wikipedia , lookup

Pandemic wikipedia , lookup

Syndemic wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
1
IJA 1186.doc
1
2
REVIEWER’S REPORT
3
General Comments
4
Generally, while the study offers some fairly good information about types of
farmed shrimp diseases in some ‘shrimp growing provinces’ in India, it does very
little to help the reader conceptualize the spread of the diseases and the enormity of
the problem.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
The abstract is dry and tells nothing about where, when and how study was
conducted.
If, on the other hand, the report was intended to only catalogue the diseases of
farmed White Leg Shrimp in India, then the reader ought to, at least, be given the
benefit of the etiology of the diseases.
There is virtually no methodology. The method of study must be clearly spelt out
and for such a study, a description of the study area including maps is appropriate.
17
The pictorial representation of the shrimp diseases may be generally acceptable but
it must be used to illustrate a thorough description. Most of the pictures are,
nonetheless, unsatisfactory.
18
The discussion is generally acceptable.
19
There is no conclusion. The two sentences made almost as part of the discussion
cannot pass for conclusion.
15
16
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
English language has not been succinctly applied in this article and the author is
urged to take note of this during the revision. Colloquial English is not permitted
in scientific writing. Also, such phrases or terms as ‘in a nutshell’ must be avoided
at all cost.
I have attempted to put in some corrections on the main manuscript to serve as a
guide for future revision of the article.
The article, as it stands presently, adds very little or no knowledge to science and
therefore cannot pass for publication in a reputable scientific journal.
2
29
30
Diseases of White Leg Shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei Culture in India
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
*Gunalan B and Soundarapandian P
CAS in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Annamalai University, Parangipettai,
Tamilnadu, India
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
*Corresponding Author : B.Gunalan, Center of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Faculty of
Marine Sciences, Annamalai University, Parangipettai-608 502, Tamil Nadu, India, Tel: (Off):
04144- 243223 and Fax number 04144- 243553, e-mail: [email protected]
3
52
Abstract
53
The knowledge about disease is very much essential to keep the animal in disease free
54
environment. In the present study eight diseases were reported in the culture ponds of L.
55
vannamei including Black gill disease – Andrapradesh, IHHNV-Andrapradesh and Orissa,
56
WMD -Tamilnadu and Andrapradesh, WSSV -Andrapradesh. White gut disease - Tamilnadu and
57
Andrapradesh, Muscle cramp disease- Tamilnadu and Andrapradesh. The symptoms of each
58
disease and their possible cure were also described in details. The outbreak of disease in shrimp
59
culture definitely affects profit, from a farmer’s point of view, and deterioration of flesh quality,
60
from a consumer’s view point . Many diseases are already reported in P. monodon in India,
61
however, no such diseases are reported for L. vannamei a. So study on diseases is very important
62
to create awareness among farmers to prevent the diseases. In a nutshell, farmers should stock
63
healthy disease free seeds, at optimum stocking densities, maintain good water quality and
64
provide nutritious feed for higher survival and growth.
65
Keywords: Litopenaeus vannamei; Black gill disease; White gut disease; IHHNV; Muscle
66
cramp syndrome; White leg shrimp disease; Shrimp culture
67
68
Introduction
69
Shrimp farming is a multi-billion dollar industry contributing a major income to several
70
countries in Asia and South America. The rapid growth of shrimp farming led to an economic
71
boom but, unfortunately, the outbreak of viral diseases has increased the economic risks and
72
slowed the industry’s development (Flegel, 2006). The most important diseases of cultured
73
penaeid shrimp, in terms of economic impact, in Asia, the Indo-Pacific, and the Americas have
4
74
infectious etiologies. Among the infectious diseases of cultured shrimp, certain virus-caused
75
diseases stand out as the most significant. The pandemics due to the penaeid viruses WSSV
76
(White spot Syndrome Virus) and TSV (Taura Syndrome Virus), and to a lesser extent IHHNV
77
(Infectious Hypodermal and Hematopoietic Necrosis Virus) and YHV (Yellow Head Virus),
78
have cost the penaeid shrimp industry billions of dollars in lost crops, jobs and export revenue.
79
The social and economic impacts of the pandemics caused by these pathogens have been
80
profound in countries in which shrimp farming constitutes a significant industry. In the present
81
study some of the common diseases in L. vannamei were recorded all along the state of
82
Andrapradesh, Orissa and Tamilnadu and described in detail.
83
Material and methods
84
During the study period diseased L. vannamei were collected from different shrimp
85
farms located in the state of Andrapradesh, Orissa and Tamilnadu. Whole shrimps were
86
immediately immersed in 95% ethanol in plastic containers. Samples were maintained at 40C
87
until processing.
88
89
Results and Discussion
90
Black gill disease
91
In the present study black gill disease was observed at shrimp farms in Andrapradesh.
92
The black gills disease is very common in penaeid shrimps. It often occurs when there is too
93
much plankton in the water or too much mud on the pond bottom. It is especially a problem in
94
ponds with high population density (over 60 shrimp/m2), insufficient aeration or when the water
5
95
is not changed frequently enough or irregular probiotic application. Before the shrimp appear
96
diseased or start to die its gills turn black.
97
98
99
100
Fig.1 Black gill disease
101
Black gill disease is reasonably easy to cure. If farmer noticed dark-colored gills in some
102
shrimp it is suggested to change the water more often and also provide more aerators. This will
103
usually solve the problem quickly. Addition of lime according to the pH concentration is also
104
recommended. Similar disease was already reported by Lightner and Redman, (1998),
105
MPEDA/NACA (2003), Doughtie and Rao (1983) and Johnson (1995) (Fig 1& 2).
6
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
Fig.2 Black gill disease observed during sampling
IHHNV (Infectious Hypodermal and Hematopoietic Necrosis Virus)
114
In the present study, IHHNV (Infectious Hypodermal and Hematopoietic Necrosis Virus)
115
disease was observed at shrimp farms in Andrapradesh and Orissa. IHHNV is very common in
116
grow out ponds, especially when the postlarvae brought from broodstock that were raised in
117
earthen ponds in Thailand. The white leg shrimps with IHHNV are easy to observe because they
7
118
display a typical clinical signs of a deformed or stunted rostrum (Fig. 3). It might be bent to one
119
side and the body of the shrimp might be crooked. These clinical signs will be apparent after the
120
shrimp have been kept in grow out pond for 30 days.
121
122
Fig.3 IHHNV (Infectious Hypodermal and Hematopoietic Necrosis Virus) affected shrimps
123
In general the deformed shrimp will be seen in only 10-20% of the shrimp population, but
124
if it is very severe, 70-80% will be affected. The diseased shrimp will grow slowly and will have
125
a low survival rate, so the overall yield will be lower. However, the diseased shrimp will not
126
usually die, they will just be weakened. The occurrence of IHHNV is likely to rise in the future
127
as more farmers use post larvae produced from brood stock from local shrimp farms than
8
128
imported ones. Outbreaks of IHHNV can occur at any time of the year. The main risk factor is
129
the source of the shrimp larvae. It is very unlikely that larvae produced from specific pathogen-
130
free parents will get IHHNV.
131
The virus which causes infectious hypodermal and haematopoietic necrosis infects many
132
species of shrimps including P. monodon, P. japonicus, P. stylirostris, P. vannamei,
133
P.semisulcatus, P. occidentalis and P. californiensis. IHHN has reported in central and South
134
America, India, Indonesia, China, Taiwan, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, Hawaii, Guam,
135
French Polynesia, New Caledonia and Israel ( Bondad-Reantaso et al., 2001). The disease IHHN,
136
and later its causative agent, IHHNV, was first described as the cause of acute epizootics and
137
mass mortalities (> 90%) in juvenile and subadult of L. stylirostris farmed in super-intensive
138
raceway systems in Hawaii (Brock et al. 1983; Lightner, 1983, 1988; Lightner et al. 1983,
139
1983a; Brock and Lightner, 1990). Shortly after its discovery in L. stylirostris, the virus was
140
found in L. vannamei being cultured at the same facility in Hawaii and these L. vannamei were
141
shown to be asymptomatic carriers of the virus (Lightner et al, 1983a; Bell and Lightner, 1984).
142
Hence, the economic and production impacts of IHHNV infection in L. vannamei are due to
143
reduced and irregular growth and small sized shrimp at harvest and not elevated mortality. To
144
mitigate this effect, several strategies have been used. With one strategy, selected lines of L.
145
stylirostris, which were not only resistant to IHHN disease, but are also refractory to infection,
146
were developed (Dhar et al., 2001). IHHNV-free lines of L. vannamei were also developed as
147
SPF (specific pathogen-free) lines and these stocks were the first developed in the SPF stock
148
development program (Pruder et al., 1995).
149
White muscle disease
9
150
In the present study WMD (White muscle disease) was observed at shrimp farms in
151
Tamilnadu and Andrapradesh. The epizootic of WMD was first recorded in November 2001 in
152
few hatchery reared PL of M. rosenbergii in Andrapradesh and Tamilnadu states. More than 18
153
cases of WMD in freshwater prawn hatcheries with PL mortalities ranging from 30% to 100%
154
were recorded from November 2001 to December 2002. The first sign related to this disease was
155
the poor feeding (mineral deficiency in water, poor quality feed) and lethargy of the prawns
156
especially during the first 5 days of PL settlement resulting in slow mortality (Fig. 4 &5 )
157
158
Fig.4 White muscle disease in bigger size L. vannamei
10
159
As the morphological and clinical signs of the disease reported by Chen et al. (2001)
160
were similar to the WMD recorded in this study. It is likely that the involvement of
161
162
Fig.5 White muscle disease in small size of L. vannamei
163
The Gram-positive cocci, Lactococcus garvieae in WMD found by those workers could possibly
164
have been a secondary infection. The disease progressively destroyed the abdominal muscular
165
organization of the prawns especially the striated muscles finally leading to mortality. Several
166
authors reported white muscle disease in shrimps and prawns (Chen et al., 1992; Sudhakaran et
167
al, 2006; Ravi et al ., 2009). Besides the above, this white muscle disease also recorded in L.
168
vannamei in the present study.
169
White gut disease (WGD)
170
In the present study white gut disease observed in L. vannamei shrimp farms from
171
Tamilnadu and Andrapradesh. Vibriosis is one of the major disease problems in shellfish and
172
finfish aquaculture. Vibriosis is a bacterial disease responsible for mortality of cultured shrimp
173
worldwide (Lightner and Lewis, 1975; Adams, 1991; Lightner et al., 1992; Lavilla-Pitogo et al.,
11
174
1996; Lavilla-Pitogo et al., 1998; Chen et al., 2000). Vibrio species are widely distributed in
175
culture facilities throughout the world. Vibrio-related infections frequently occur in hatcheries,
176
but epizootics also commonly occur in pond reared shrimp species. Vibriosis is caused by gram-
177
negative bacteria in the family Vibrionaceae. Outbreaks may occur when environmental factors
178
trigger the rapid multiplication of bacteria already tolerated at low levels within shrimp blood
179
(Sizemore and Davis, 1985), or by bacterial penetration of host barriers. The exoskeleton
180
provides an effective physical barrier to pathogens trying to penetrate the external surface of
181
crustaceans, as well as the foregut and hindgut (Fig 7a & b).
182
183
(7 a)
Fig. 7a & b. White gut disease in L. vannamei (7 b)
184
The occurrence of five types of diseases: tail necrosis, shell disease, red disease, loose
185
shell syndrome (LSS) and white gut disease (WGD) is by Vibrio spp. in P. monodon from
186
culture ponds of coastal AndhraPradesh (Jayasree, et al., 2006). Among these, LSS, WGD, and
187
red disease caused mass mortalities in shrimp culture ponds. Six species of Vibrio—V. harveyi,
188
V. parahaemolyticus, V. alginolyticus, V. anguillarum, V. vulnificus and V. splendidus—are
189
associated with the diseased shrimp. The distribution and species composition of luminous
190
bacteria in commercial penaeid shrimp hatcheries were studied by Jawahar Abraham and
12
191
Palaniappan (2004). The observation on the presence of V. harveyi (97.30%) and V. orientalis
192
(2.70%) in shrimp gut contents evinced that the primary source of these bacteria in a shrimp
193
hatchery was the faecal matter from brood stock, possibly at the time of spawning. Mortalities
194
due to vibriosis occur when shrimps are stressed by factors such as: poor water quality,
195
crowding, high water temperature, low DO and low water exchange (Lewis, 1973; Lightner and
196
Lewis, 1975; Brock and Lightner, 1990).
197
Muscle cramp syndrome (MCS)
198
In the present study muscle cramp disease observed in L. vannamei shrimp farms of
199
Tamilnadu and Andrapradesh. The temperature fluctuations affect the muscle of the shrimps.
200
Muscle cramp disease is very common in grow out ponds (Fig.8). It is attributed that less amount
201
of dissolved oxygen leads to mass mortality in ponds (Fig. 9). This is very common in high
202
stocking ponds. Once DO level was reduced leading to stress among the shrimps, finally they
203
will die especially inside and sides of the culture ponds.
204
205
Fig. 8 Muscle cramp syndrome
13
206
207
Fig.9 Mass mortality in the check tray due to dissolved oxygen depletion
208
The seven diseases mentioned above are serious problems for raising white leg shrimp in
209
intensive culture systems. The farmers should have basic knowledge about these diseases and
210
their prevention. If the farmers stock healthy disease free seed and maintain good water quality
211
and provide nutritious feed to get higher survival.
212
References
213
214
Adams, A., 1991, Response of penaeid shrimp to exposure to Vibrio species. Fish Shellfish
Immunol., 1:59–70.
215
216
Bell, T.A., and Lightner, D.V., 1984, IHHN virus: Infectivity and pathogenicity studies in
Penaeus stylirostris and Penaeus vannamei. Aquacult., 38: 185-194.
217
218
219
220
Bondad-Reantaso, M.G., McGladdery, S.E., East I., and subasinghe, R.P., 2001, Asia
diagnostic guide to aquatic animal diseases, FAO fisheries Technical paper No. 402,
Supplement2, food and agriculture Organization, Rome.
14
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
Brock, J.A., Lightner, D.V., and Bell, T.A., 1983, A review of four virus (BP, MBV, BMN,
and IHHNV) diseases of penaeid shrimp with particular reference to clinical
significance, diagnosis and control in shrimp aquaculture. Proceedings of the 71st
International. Council for the Exploration of the Sea, C.M. 1983/Gen: 10/118.Litopenaeus vannamei culture system. Aquacult., 195:81–94.
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
Chen, S.H., Lin, Y.D., Liaw, L.T., and Vang, P.C., 2001, Laclococclis gorvieaf infection in
the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii confirmed by polymerase chain
reaction and 16S rONA sequencing. Dis.Aqrw., Orgnilisllls., 4- 5, 45-52.
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
Doughtie, D.G., and Rao, K.R., 1983, Ultra structural and histological study of degenerative
changes leading to black gills in grass shrimp exposed to a dithiocarbamate biocide J.
Inver. Patho., 41 (1); pp. 33-50.
254
255
Jawahar Abraham, T., and Palaniappan, R., 2004, Distribution of luminous bacteria in semiintensive penaeid shrimp hatcheries of Tamil Nadu, India. Aquacult., 232 (1-4);81-90.
Brock,
J.A., and Lightner, D.V., 1990, Diseases of Crustacea. Diseases caused by
microorganisms. pp. 245-349 in: Diseases of Marine Animals, Vol. III, Kinne O.,
ed.Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Hamburg, Germany.
Chen, F.R., Liu, P.C., and Lee, K.K., 2000, Lethal attribute of serine protease secreted by
Vibrio alginolyticus strains in Kurama Prawn Penaeus japonicus. Zool Naturforsch.,
55:94–99.
Chen, S.N., Chang, P.S., and Kou, G.H., 1992, Infection route and eradication of monodon
baculovirus (MBV) in larval giant tiger prawn, Penaeus monodon. In: Diseases of
cultured penaeid shrimp in Asia and the United States, Fulks W. & Main K.L., eds. The
Oceanic Institute, Honolulu, HI, USA, pp. 177–184.
Dhar, A.K., Roux, M.M., and Klimpel, K.R., 2001, Detection and quantification of infectious
Hypodermal and Hematopoeitic Necrosis virus and White Spot virus in shrimp using
real-time quantitative PCR and SYBR green chemistry. J. Clin. Microbiol., 39: 2835 2845.
Johnson, S.K., 1995, Hand book of shrimp disease. Aquaculture, Department of Wildlife and
fisheries service, Texas A and M University.
15
256
257
258
259
Lavilla-Pitogo, C.R., Leano, E.M., and Paner M.G., 1996, Mortalities of pond-cultured
juvenile shrimp, Penaeus monodon, associated with dominance of luminescent bacteria,
Vibrio harveyi in the rearing environment. SICCPPS book of abstracts, SEAFDEC,
Iloilo City, Philippines. p. 40.
260
261
262
Lavilla-Pitogo, C.R., Leano, E.M., and Paner, M.G., 1998, Mortalities of pond-cultured
juvenile shrimp Penaeus monodon associated with dominance of luminescent vibrios in
the rearing environment. Aquacult., 164:337–349.
263
264
Lewis, D.H., 1973, Response of brown shrimp to infection with Vibrio sp. Proc. World.
Maricult. Soc., 4: 333-338.
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
Lightner, D.V., 1983, Diseases of Cultured Penaeid Shrimp. pp. 289-320, in: CRC Handbook of
Mariculture. Vol. 1. Crustacean Aquacult., J.P. McVey (ed.) CRC Press, Boca aton,
FL, SA.
273
274
Lightner, D.V., and Lewis, D.H., 1975, A septicemic bacterial disease syndrome of penaeid
shrimp. Mar. Fish. Rev., 37(5-6): 25-28.
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
Lightner,
289
290
Lightner, D.V., and Redman, R.M., 1998, Shrimp diseases and current diagnostic methods
Aquacult., 164 (1-4); 201-220.
Lightner, D.V., 1988, Diseases of cultured penaeid shrimp and prawns. pp. 8-127, In: Disease
Diagnosis and Control in North American Marine Aquaculture, C.J. Sindermann &
D.V.Lightner (eds.) Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D.V., Redman, R.M., and Bell, T.A., 1983,
Infectious Hypodermal and
Hematopoietic Necrosis a newly recognized virus disease of penaeid shrimp. J. Invert.
Pathol. 42: 62 -70.
Lightner, D.V., Redman, R.M., Bell, T.A., and Brock, J.A., 1983a, Detection of IHHN virus
in Penaeus stylirostris and P. vannamei imported into Hawaii. J. World Mariculture
Soc., 14: 212-225.
Lightner, D.V., Bell, T.A., Redman, R.M., Mohney, L.L., Natividad, J.M., Rukyani, A.,
and Poernomo, A., 1992, A review of some major diseases of economic significance
in penaeid shrimps/shrimps of the Americas and Indo-Pacific. In: M. Shariff, R.
Subasinghe and J.R. Arthur (eds.) Proceedings 1st Symposium on Diseases in Asian
Aquaculture. Fish Health Section, Asian Fisheries Society, Manila, Philippines. pp. 5780.
16
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
MPEDA/NACA., 2003, Shrimp Health Management Extension Manual. Prepared by the
Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific (NACA) and Marine Products Export
Development Authority (MPEDA), India, in cooperation with the Aquatic Animal
Health Research Institute, Bangkok, Thailand; Siam Natural Resources Ltd., Bangkok,
Thailand; and AusVet Animal Health Services, Australia. Published by the MPEDA,
Cochin, India
Prude, G.D., Brown, C.L., Sweeney, J.N., and Carr W.H., 1995, High health shrimp
systems: seed supply - theory and practice. In: Browdy, C.L., Hopkins, J.S. (Eds.),
Swimming through troubled water, Proceedings of the special session on shrimp
farming, Aquaculture '95. 1-4 February 1995, San Diego. World Aquacult., Society,
Baton Rouge, LA, USA, pp. 40-52
Ravi, M., Nazeer basha, A., Sarathi, M., Rosaidalia, H.H., Sri widada, J., Bonami, J.R., and
Sahul hameed, A.S., 2009, Studies on the occurrence of white tail disease (WTD)
caused by MrNV and XSV in hatchery-reared post-larvae of Penaeus indicus and P.
monodon. Aquacult.
Sizemore, R.K., and Davis, J.W., 1985, Source of Vibrio spp. found in the hemolymph of the
blue crab Callinectes sapidus. J. Invertebr. Pathol., 46:109–110.
Sudhakaran, R., Syed musthaq, S., Haribabu, P., Mukherjee, S.C., Gopal, C., and Sahul
hameed, A.S., 2006, Experimental transmission of Macrobrachium rosenbergii noda
virus (MrNV) and extra small virus (XSV) in three species of marine shrimp (Penaeus
indicus, Penaeus japonicus and Penaeus monodon). Aquacult., 257, 136–141.
Vidal, O. M., Granja, C. B., Aranguren, F., Brock, J. A., and Salazar, M., 2001, A profound
effect of hyperthermia on survival of Litopenaeus vannamei juveniles infected with
white spot syndrome virus. J .World. Aquacult., Soc., 32:364-372.
17