Download Quantum Mechanics

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup

Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup

James Franck wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup

Electron wikipedia , lookup

Ionization wikipedia , lookup

Matter wave wikipedia , lookup

Auger electron spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup

X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup

Rutherford backscattering spectrometry wikipedia , lookup

Atom wikipedia , lookup

Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup

Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Tight binding wikipedia , lookup

Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Bohr model wikipedia , lookup

Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Advanced Higher Physics
Introduction to Quantum Mechanics
History

Phenomena observed in early 20th century did
not follow ‘classical’ physical laws

New theories were developed to account for
these phenomena

Starting point taken as atomic structure
Atomic Models 1 - Ancients

‘Atom’ is derived from Greek ~
 ‘a’ meaning ‘not’ (like prefix un-)
 ‘tom’ meaning ‘cut’

Greek philosophers thought that atoms were
the smallest possible things, and therefore
indivisible – ‘unable to be cut’

This theory was widely accepted to be true
until the late 19th century
Atomic Models 2 - Thomson

1897 – Thomson’s
discovery of electron
leads to ‘Plum
Pudding’ model

Large positive mass
with randomly
arranged negative
charges
Atomic Models 3 - Rutherford

1909 - Scattering
experiment not
consistent with
Thomson model

Rutherford
postulated nucleus
containing positive
charges with
electrons in orbits
like planets
Atomic Models 3 (cont.)

Later work lead to
the discovery of

The proton
(Rutherford -1919)

The neutron
(Chadwick – 1932)
Atomic Models 4 - Bohr

Rutherford model still unable to explain
spectral lines associated with emission of light
from atoms
Atomic Models 4 (cont.)
Bohr’s model has electrons in orbit around a
central nucleus, but allows only certain orbits
for electrons.
 For stable orbit, angular momentum must be a
multiple of h / 2π
 Angular momentum
of electrons is
quantised

nh
mvr 
2
n, is order of electron
level
Atomic Models 4 (cont.)


Reasons for electron
stability related to De
Broglie wavelength
n=6
Treating the orbit of an electron as a continuous
wave, the path length (2πr) must be equal to a whole
number of wavelengths
i.e.
nλ = 2πr
Graphical Representation
Atomic Models 4 (cont.)

From De Broglie equation,

Combining with,
n  2r
nh

 2r
mv
nh

 mvr
2
nh
 mvr 
2
h

mv
Atomic Models 4 (cont.)

Angular momentum of electron in any
orbit is always a multiple of h / 2π

This quantum of angular momentum is
often expressed as ħ (‘h bar’),
where
ħ = h / 2π

Scholar Bohr Hydrogen Atom demo
Energy Levels

For any quantum number, n, there exists a
single orbit with a specific angular momentum,
L = mvr, and energy, E, which can be
calculated.

Each quantum number, n, relates to an
electron energy level, En, in the atom.

When electrons move between energy levels
they either absorb energy (excite) or emit
energy (de-excite)
Spectral Lines 1

When an electron gains
energy, by absorbing a
photon, it rises to a higher
energy level (excitation)

When an electron loses
energy, by emitting a photon,
it falls to a lower energy level
(de-excitation)
Spectral Lines 2

Hydrogen has a number of groups or
series of line spectra, each for transitions
to the same lower energy level.

Scholar Hydrogen emission demo