Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
1.2 Methods SELF REPORTING DATA Why do we carry out psychological research? Where do we begin? Aim Hypothesis - prediction about what is likely to occur This is called an alternative hypothesis Alternative to the null hypothesis Example: When told to queue in a bank, more older people than younger people obey. In pairs, discuss how you could test this hypothesis? Think of the difficulties of recording data when using this example Operationalising variables – making it measurable in practice When told to queue in a bank, more older people (45+) than younger people (under 45) obey. Task 1 Provide 2 alternative hypotheses ensuring they are operationalised Participants who have been trained in a memory improvement strategy will correctly recall more items from a list than participants who have not been trained Why methodology is important Methodology – how psychology is carried out. To ensure that results and conclusions are secure 'Secure'- involves issues (evaluation points generalisability, validity, reliability, objectivity, subjectivity, credibility and ethics.) To obtain 'secure' data methodology should be prepared carefully. 1.2.1 designing and conducting questionnaires and interviews Questionnaires: TASK 2 in pairs discuss the answers to these questions • What type of data can questionnaires gather? • What type of questions can be asked? • How can a questionnaire be completed (I.e. Ways in which the participant can receive the questionnaire) • Why is it a useful method to collect data? • What are the problems with this method? Questionnaires – general points Gather personal data: attitudes, opinions, lifestyles. Any aspect of a person's life Gather a large amount of information from a large sample in a relatively short amount of time Can be administered by post, email, face to face, or online More straight forward questions come first followed by more in-depth questions For ethical reasons – the questionnaire shouldn’t be too long and should not be too personal (i.e. you wouldn’t want someone to become distressed by the questions). Questions should only ask what the researcher really needs to know. Pilot study: Initial study run with a few participants to test the questions and check their clarity and suitability. In light of the pilot, changes can be made. Types of questions You can gather different types of data Quantitative and qualitative questions Quantitative – Information that is or can be converted to numbers Qualitative – information that is non-numerical prose Closed questions Preset fixed answers – respondent much choose the answer that is the closest match to their opinion Forced choice Likert scale: named after Rensis Likert. It follows this format. Strongly disagree to strongly agree. Can also be referred to as ranked scale Rating Scale Rating Scale Task 3 Write out one example for each of the item types given below. Focus on a questionnaire to find out about eating habits of pupils in a school 1. Likert-type 2. Rating scale 3. Open question Closed questions – strengths and weaknesses Strengths Easy and quick to answer. Standard replies (gather quantitative data that is easy to compare and analyse) If repeated it is likely to obtain the same responses (reliable) Weaknesses Forces a choice so may not reflect the respondents true opinions/feelings or thoughts (not valid) Unsure can mean ‘don’t know’ or sometimes ‘yes’ and other times ‘no’. Therefore answers mean different things to different people – not comparable. (no producing valid data) Open-ended questions (open questions) E.g “Can you tell me how happy you feel right now?” “What makes you happy?” These questions allow he respondent to state their attitudes and opinions Answer is left open for the respondent to give their views Strengths Weaknesses Participants are able to give their own opinions and therefore more detailed. They are not forced into specific answers. Richer and more detailed data. Difficult to analyse as all answers may be different and therefore it is difficult to compare answers. Subjective interpretation Also difficult to display results. Data is qualitative so you can’t use numbers to calculate averages or draw tables/charts Questions can be interpreted by respondents. i.e. What does prejudice mean to you? They can explain what it means to them personally and what they really think. More valid as they enable respondents to talk about what they ‘really’ think. Respondents often fail to complete their answers. They take longer and it is more difficult to think of the answer. Task 4 What are the differences between open and closed questions? Open-ended questions Term (i.e. whereas, in contrast, similarly etc.) Closed questions Task 5 Explain, using examples, the difference between closed and open-ended questions (6 marks) To hand in Quantitative and qualitative data Questionnaires can gather both sets of data, as can interviews. This is called a mixed method Some research only used one type of data Quantitative: Involve numbers (percentages, number of yes/no answers) Closed-questions are used to produce quantitative data Qualitative: ideas, opinions and attitudes Open questions produce qualitative data Task 6: Decide whether these are open/closed and what type of data is produced (qualitative or quantitative? How would you describe obedience to authority? Do you agree that everyone should have the same job? Yes or no? Rate on a scare of 0-5 (0=not at all and 5= totally) how much you agree with the statement ‘everybody should have the same job opportunities’. What do you think about people who discriminate against others because of their race? How happy are you? Please rate on a scale from (0 very sad to 5 very happy) Strengths and weaknesses of quantitative data Strength Quickly and easily analysed as averages, percentages and other statistics can be calculated also the data can represented in graphs and tables (efficiently communicated to others) Reliable – controls are put into place; questions are standardised therefore the test can be repeated and provide the same results Objective data – numbers are numbers and therefore not open to interpretation Weakness Data may not be valid as the respondents have a forced choice of answer They may answer it quickly and not check their answers (validity) Respondents may not the tell the truth 1. Social desirability 2. Demand characteristics 3. Response bias * For definitions refer to the next slide Social desirability Tendency to answer in a way that is socially acceptable meaning the data is not valid Demand characteristics Forced questions may hint at the aim of the questionnaire Respondent may want to help the researcher and give them the answers they think they want Or might no want to help in which case they may give different answers Responses lack validity as the are not ‘true’ answers More likely when using quantitative data – with a clear aim and hypothesis there may be clues about what the researcher is investigating. Question construction Language can’t be ambiguous or too technical Questions should not lead or mislead the participants into giving a particular answer Response bias If all the statements are worded favourably or unfavourable the respondents can slip into agreeing or disagreeing with all of them. To resolve this the statements should be reversed or mixed up E.g. Pets make people happy-----------Pets do not make people happy Strengths and weaknesses of using qualitative data Strengths Detailed information which allows in depth analysis. Provides useful understanding More validity than quantitative data as respondents can say what they really think about an issue Weaknesses Data is harder to analyse in order to compare responses. Answers might be different and therefore difficult to categorise and summarise. Data is considered subjective as the meaning found in prose can be open to interpretation Data may be difficult to gather as respondents may be reluctant to give in depth responses. i.e. missing out open-ended questions and answering the yes/no questions instead Task 7 Paragraph - To EXPLAIN the difference between qualitative and quantitative data In your own words define: Social desirability Demand characteristics Response bias Provide an example of a way you can avoid response bias when constructing questions for a questionnaire: Methodological terms covered so far – ensure you understand these Terms about questionnaires: pilot study, Likert-scale questions, ranked scales, personal data, respondent, open questions and closed questions Types of data: qualitative and quantitative Evaluation terms: validity, reliability, objectivity, generalisability, and credibility Terms about bias in studies: social desirability, demand characteristics, response bias Terms to control bias: controls, standardised instructions Pilot study Evaluating questionnaires as a research method We can evaluate questionnaires according to validity Construct validity: the questions must measure what they are supposed to measure Internal validity: no other variables (except the IV) could have caused the effect Ecological validity: uses the respondent's natural setting And results can be generalised to other settings. Predictive validity: results would predict a real life situation and Demand characteristics and social desirability Evaluating questionnaires as a research method Questionnaires can be evaluated by considering reliability If the questionnaire was carried out again, would the same results be found? Closed questions have forced choice answers- reasonably reliable Questionnaires are set out and repeated exactly (standardised) – this is a condition for reliability Open questions allow for opinions to be given- so are less reliable Evaluating questionnaires as a research method Objectivity/subjectivity Objectivity – avoid bias from the researcher’s own opinions and understanding Experimenter/Researcher effects must be controlled for i.e. tone of voice, clothes work or gender Subjectivity is to be avoided When gathering data When analysing data Credibility Data – credible when valid (true to like), reliable (found more than once), generalisable and agree with common sense Task 8 Give one strength and one weakness of questionnaires as a research method (4 marks) 2 marks for strength 2 marks for weakness All A03 - evaluation Sampling Generalisability- results are generalisable, when they come from good sampling that is representative of the target population, so it can be said that what was found is 'true' of all the others who were not in the sample Therefore the sampling technique used plays a very important part in whether we consider results to be generalisable or not. If the sample gathered is not representative because of an over/under-representation of a particular type of participant, a sample bias will occur Sample techniques 1. Random sampling: most likely way of recruiting a representative sample (still possible that it will be unrepresentative as you may randomly pick un an unrepresentative sample) Everyone has an equal chance of being selected Computers – random sequence of numbers (i.e. all members from target population is given a number and then a generator randomly selects numbers) Names in a hat – draw at random Random sampling evaluation Strengths Weaknesses Low bias – everyone has an equal chance of being selected Cannot be certain that the sample is representative of all groups Good generalisability – low bias and more likely to be representative of the target population Difficult to access all he population so that random sampling can take place Sample can be checked mathematically for bias 2. Stratified sampling If the target population has noticeable characteristics that need to be proportionately represented in the sample, stratified sampling can be used. A stratified sample is a mini-reproduction of the population. Before sampling, the population is divided into characteristics of importance for the research. For example, by gender, social class, education level, religion, etc. Then the population is randomly sampled within each category. If 38% of the population is college-educated, then 38% of the sample is randomly selected from the college-educated population. Stratified sampling evaluation Strengths All relevant groups will have at least some representation (good generalisability) It is difficult to know how many of each group is needed in order to represent the target population accurately Limits the numbers of participants needed Relies on researchers knowing all the required groups; forces choice of participants and proportions so can lead to bias by excluding certain people 3. Opportunity sampling This is where you make use of the participants available i.e. investigating passers by on the street Going into a classroom and asking students in the room to complete a questionnaire Limited control over who is recruited. Not everyone in the target population has an equal chance of being selected Opportunity sampling evaluation Strengths Weaknesses More ethical as the researcher can judge if the participants is likely to be upset by the study or if they are too busy They may be a selfselecting group i.e. not working so available in the day Easier and quicker to May not be representative organise – efficient and the so may be a biased sample researcher has more control (low generalisability) 4. Volunteer sampling Advert in a newspaper or poster in the common room Volunteers are self-selecting because they choose to take part Often a certain type of participants may choose to take part which can lead to sample bias Volunteer sample evaluation Strengths Weaknesses Ethical – people volunteer of the own free will Only certain types of people may volunteer – bias. (Low generalisability) More likely to cooperate, which means here may be less social desirability May take a long time to get enough volunteers Task 9 Answer this question--- Task 10 To EVALUATE sampling techniques (8 marks) Homework 4 marks – A01 Describe 4 marks – A02 Evaluate Interviews are different from questionnaires as they involve social interaction. Researchers can ask different types of questions which in turn generate different types of data. ,For example, closed questions provide people with a fixed set of responses, whereas open questions allow people to express what they think in their own words. Sometimes researchers use an interview schedule. This is a set of prepared questions designed to be asked exactly as worded. Interviews schedules have a standardised format which means the same questions are asked to each interviewee in the same order. Quite often interviews will be recorded by the researcher and the data written up as a transcript (a written account of interview questions and answers) which can be analysed at a later date. The language the interviewer uses should be appropriate to the vocabulary of the group of people being studied. For example, the researcher must change the language of questions to match the social background of respondents' age / educational level / social class / ethnicity etc. It should be noted that interviews may not be the best method to use for researching sensitive topics (e.g. truancy in schools, discrimination etc.) as people may feel more comfortable completing a questionnaire in private. Interviews take many forms, some very informal, others more structured. Interviews Page 44-45 Task 11 There are three types of interview. Complete the table below using your textbooks Type of interview Explanation Brief evaluation (strength and weakness) Evaluating the interview method When evaluating this method you can use the issues you already know about (i.e. open/closed questions, qualitative and quantitative data) Strengths Weaknesses Answers can be explained in detail – good method when in depth and detailed data is required The interviewer may influence the data which could result in research bias Valid data- interviewees can used their own words and are not as constrained by the questions as they are in questionnaires Analysis may be subjective and the researcher’s views may influence the analysis (down to interpretation) Comparing questionnaires to interviews Differences between the questionnaire and interview method Task 12 – complete the table Questionnaire Term (i.e. whereas, in contrast, similarly etc.) Interview Ethical considerations Task 13 - Page 55 of e-textbooks Summarise the four main principles Respect Competence Responsibility Integrity What is the difference between the principles and the guidelines? Risk Management There can be risk to participants, researcher and animals if they are sued in a study. There can also be risks to the environment or society. Risk therefore must be managed by looking at the highest risk first, working down to the lowest level of threat. It is about looking at the probability of a threat happening against the consequences. Solutions: Transference of risk – insuring against it happening Mitigation – reducing the risk as far as possible Acceptance – budgeting for the risk BPS: The risk of harm must be no greater that what participants would be exposed to in their ‘normal lifestyle’ Task 14 Task 14 - Why is risk management important when designing a study in psychology? Practice question Many parents complain that their children watch too much TV. Imagine that you have been asked to carry out a questionnaire to see whether teenagers or their parents watch more hours of TV. (a) Write an alternative hypothesis for your survey.(2) (b) (i) Which sample technique would be used in your questionnaire? (1) (ii) Explain why you would use this technique. (2) (c) With reference to your survey into television viewing hours, explain two ethical guidelines that you would need to consider. (4) (d) Provide one reason why a questionnaire may be more preferable than an interview in this situation (1) Analysis of quanitative data LO: To analyse quantitative data including measures of central tendency (mean, median and mode), measures of dispersion (range and standard deviation) and graphs (bar charts and frequency tables) Measures of central tendency Descriptive statistics include measures of central tendency which are mode, median and mean average Data analysed in such a way that it is clearly displayed and understood (tables and graphs) Examples: Mode: The most common score in a set of scores 1 5 7 8 8 12 12 12 15 (mode is 12) Median: The middle score in a set of scores (in order) 1 5 7 8 8 12 12 12 15 – median is 8 1 5 7 8 8 11 13 14 15 20 – median is 9.5 (8+11)/ 2 =9.5 Mean : arithmetical average (adding all the scores in the set and dividing by the numbers of scores in a set) 1 5 7 8 8 11 13 14 15 20 – mean is 10.2 Measure of central tendency How is it measured? Advantages Mean Add up all the numbers and divide by the number of numbers Makes use of the values of Not appropriate for all the data categories Disadvantages Can be unrepresentative if there are extreme values Median Place all values in order from the largest to smallest and select the middle value. Not affected by extreme scores Mode Value that is most common Useful for data in categories e.g. favourite colour Mode = the colour that received the most votes e.g 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 12 mean= 6.86 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 29 mean = 9.42 Not as ‘sensitive’ as the mean because not all values are reflected Not a useful way of describing data when there are several modes. 12 people – yellow 12 people – red 10 people - purple Measures that can be used depending on the data Categories (nominal i.e. Yes/no) Mode Mean Median a Ranking or rating (ordinal i.e. Likert) Interval data (equal intervals between data I.e. height/time) a a a a a Task 15 For each of the following sets of data (a) calculate the mean, (b) calculate the median, (c) calculate the mode 2, 3, 5, 6, 6, 8, 9, 12 ,15, 21, 22 2, 2, 4, 5, 5, 5, 7, 7, 8, 8, 8, 10 2, 3, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 14, 29 Measures of dispersion Calculates the spread of score in a data set Range – The range is a measure of dispersion, found by finding the highest score/number and taking away the lowest score giving the difference between the two. 5 7 8 8 12 12 12 15 – range is 10 (15-5) Influenced by extreme scores so it may not always be useful Doesn’t tell us if the scores are bunched around the mean score or more equally distributed 1 7 8 8 12 12 15 16 55 (55-1 = 49) Measures of dispersion Standard deviation (use page 49 to help you) Measure of how far scores vary from the mean average. The higher the standard deviation, the greater the spread of scores around the mean value Add up the differences squared for all the scores and then divide that number by the number of scores minus 1. Then finally, find the square root and you have the standard deviation Task 16 Using the example on page 50 and the steps 1-5 Calculate the standard deviation for these scores: Score (x) Mean Deviation Squared deviation 6 9 4 8 3 n-1= ? (n: number of scores) Sum of deviations squared: Standard deviation: ______ Summary tables Summary tables represent measures of central tendency and dispersion clearly TASK 17 (Use page 50 to help you) What comments can you make about Table showing the self-rated obedience scores of males and females this data? Males Females Mean obedience rating 4.1 7.4 Median obedience rating 4 7 Mode obedience rating 4 6,7,9 Range of obedience ratings 3 3 Standard deviation 1 1.2 Bar graph Useful to illustrate summary data Bar chars are used to present data from a categorical variable such as the mean, median or mode. Categorical value is placed on the x axis and the height of the bars represent the value of the variable. TASK 18 Sketch a bar graph A bar graph showing the mean self rated obedience scores (from the table on the previous slide) All graphs need titles and ensure for a bar graph you include a space between each bar. Frequency tables A frequency table records the number of times a score is found, rather than the score itself being displayed against each participant Useful as the distribution can be seen in table form. A histogram or frequency graph can be used to display the data Table to show frequency of self rated obedience scores Self reported obedience scores Frequency 1 2 2 5 3 4 4 2 5 3 Histogram/frequency graph This type of graph is used to present the distribution of the scores. Unlike a bar chart, where the bars a separated by a space, the bars on a histogram are joined to represent continuous data rather than categorical data. The values are presented on the x-axis and the height of each bar represents the frequency of the variable TASK 19 Sketch a histogram based on the data in the previous slide Analysis of qualitative data Qualitative data are in the form of comments or opinions, so need to be summarised to make them manageable and clear. This is done by thematic analysis, generating themes from data (i.e. patterns and trends within data) How frequent or central to the text the theme is depends on the opinion of the researcher E.g. finding that most respondents on a questionnaire comment of liking people of the same age. Theme here is age. The researcher then develops these themes into ‘codes’ which represent the categories of themes found. The research will then use the codes to analyse the data gathered and search for instances where it appears in the data This is reviewed and changed until the themes can be stated, supported and used as a summary of the data Analysis of qualitative data Evaluation Analysis of qualitative data is considered to be subjective (down to the interpretation of the researcher which can lead to research bias) and therefore not scientific. Reliability of the data can be checked by using more than one researcher (comparisons can be made) If the data is analysed without preconceptions and is not interpreted (i.e. the respondents ‘meanings’ are recorded then the data can be considered valid.) Validity can be questioned as researchers often do not explain fully how they arrived at the themes. However it does yield very detailed and meaningful information that cannot be gathered with quantitative data. Task 20 – thematic analysis E-book- pg.54 In your own words, explain thematic analysis (2 marks) Explain what is meant by the inductive and deductive approach (4 marks)