* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Solar System: ground-based
Rare Earth hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Spitzer Space Telescope wikipedia , lookup
Astrobiology wikipedia , lookup
Planets beyond Neptune wikipedia , lookup
Star formation wikipedia , lookup
Planets in astrology wikipedia , lookup
Extraterrestrial life wikipedia , lookup
Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup
Late Heavy Bombardment wikipedia , lookup
Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
James Webb Space Telescope wikipedia , lookup
Dwarf planet wikipedia , lookup
History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup
Exoplanetology wikipedia , lookup
Definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
IAU definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Directed panspermia wikipedia , lookup
Accretion disk wikipedia , lookup
Planetary habitability wikipedia , lookup
Exo-planets: ground-based • How common are giant planets? What is the distribution of their orbits? – 3.6m HARPS: long-term radial velocity monitoring of large samples to 1 m/s => Saturns out to ~5 AU – VLT-AO/OWL: Direct imaging of giant planets; complement to JWST NIRCAM/MIRI direct detection – VLTI (10 mas)/ALMA (100 mas): astrometry => >10 MEarth out to large AU; complement to GAIA, which can observe much larger sample but for shorter period Ewine van Dishoeck, ESO-ESA coordination meeting, September 15 2003, Garcching Planetary search methods Perryman 2000 Planetary search methods - HARPS 1 m/s => > Saturn out to 5 AU with 10 yr monitoring - VLTI 10 mas => > 10 MEarth in terrestrial planet forming zone Perryman 2000 Giant planets (cont’d) • How do giant planets affect terrestrial planet formation? Inward migration, ejection of remnant planetesimals, pumping up of i,e – Link ground-based giant planet systems with space-based searches for Earth-like planets? • Free-floating/isolated exo-planets and brown dwarfs => formation from disk or fragmenting cloud? – VLT/JWST searches in/near star-forming regions (younger objects have larger luminosities) Giant planets (cont’d) • Planetary atmospheres: composition => thermal properties, mass, age – VLT, OWL => high-res spectra; complements JWST NIR, MIRI spectrophotometry and low-res spectra Ground-based spectrum of nearest T dwarf Need space to observe critical H2O and CH4 bands Scholz et al. 2003 Model exo-planetary atmospheres Note change in mid-infrared spectral features with age Based on Burrows et al. 1997 Exo-earths with OWL • Sun is ~1010 times brighter than Earth at VIS – concentrate light as much as possible – make separation as large as possible both D and Strehl must be very large • OWL would see – Earth-like planets in HZ out to 30pc – cold Jupiters out to Pleiades (120pc) and beyond – hot Jupiters further out (but resolution) D=100m just enough for this (sensitivity D4 ! ) • Spectroscopy – Exo-biospheres? Gilmozzi 2003 Solar system @10 pc OWL 100m J Band 80% Strehl 104 sec 0.4’’ seeing O.1’’ Jupiter @5AU Earth @1AU Gilmozzi 2003 Why are exo-planetary systems different from our own? Theory Simulation G. Bryden The answer lies in the past, during the time when the star and its planets are being assembled Need spatially resolved images at mid-IR and mm Formation of planetary systems Massive gas-rich disks Planet building phase Tenuous debris disks M(gas + dust)=0.01 Msun t=few Myr gas + dust interstellar M(dust)<1 Mearth t>10 Myr dust produced in situ - Time scale for gas and dust dissipation? => Jovian planet formation timescale - Time scale for dust settling and grain growth? - Planet formation mechanism: core accretion vs. disk instability - Physical structure disks (T, n, v, ….)? - Chemical evolution gas + dust Synergy ground-based facilities Dutrey et al. 2000 Example: Vega debris disk Dust trapped in resonances due to unseen planet with few MJup? Simulation PdB 1mm data What ALMA and JWST are expected to see… Wilner et al. 2002 star Synergy between ground and space • SIRTF/Herschel/submm bolometer arrays will detect (largely unresolved) mid- and far-infrared excesses around hundreds of stars of different age, luminosity, evolution stage, … • ALMA and JWST-MIRI will have the sensitivity to detect and image dust in disks down to lunar masses at subarcsec resolution (down to 1 AU) out to distances of 300 pc • VLTI-MIDI will be able to image the hot dust within few AU in brightest systems • Herschel will provide peak luminosity and spectral energy distribution • Complete spectroscopy 1 mm to 3 mm of both gas and dust by combined VLT/JWST/Herschel/ALMA data in brighter systems • GAIA essential to obtain accurate distances for analysis and statistics Disks around brown dwarfs Example of synergy between facilities Herschel Disk BD VLT ALMA 10s 1hr Natta & Testi 2001 -Brown dwarf with VLT -Peak disk luminosity with Herschel (unresolved except in nearest objects) -Mass + image cold dust and gas with ALMA -Image warm gas with VLTI Pathways to life? Based on Ehrenfreund & Charnley 2000 Search for building blocks of pre-biotic molecules Links between disks and comets - Pre-biotic gas-phase molecules in disks with ALMA - Ices in disks with VLT/JWST/OWL - Silicates, organic refractory material with VLT/JWST/OWL Silicates in disk: mid-IR CO ice in disk: IR Organics in protostars: mm Malfait et al. 1998 Thi et al 2002 Cazaux et al. 2003 ALMA and JWST: perfect complement • 0.3 - 7 mm • 0.015 – few arcsec • Thousands of lines by hundreds of gasphase molecules • CO as cold mass tracer • Cold dust (10-100 K) • 1 - 28 mm • 0.03 – 1 arcsec • Major gas and solidstate species; PAHs; atomic lines • Direct observation (warm) H2 • Warm dust (60-1000 K)