Download lecture 18 ch 20 coevolution and mutualism

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup

Storage effect wikipedia , lookup

Introduced species wikipedia , lookup

Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup

Island restoration wikipedia , lookup

Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup

Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup

Bifrenaria wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup

Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup

Coevolution wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
LECTURE 17 CH 20 COEVOLUTION AND MUTUALISM
Types of pairwise interspecific interactions
Mutualism (+/+)
Predation (+/-)
Competition (-/-)
Commensalism (+/0)
Amensalism (-/0)
Fluidity in type of relationship
Coevolution
Interacting species evolve in response to each other
Traits of each species affect fitness of other species
Traits have genetic basis
May be mutualistic or antagonistic
Strict coevolution
Limited to pair of species
Specialized response
May be rare and limited to very strong interactions
Diffuse coevolution
Response to many other species
Generalized response
Symbioses
Intimate, often obligatory association of two species
Usually involving coevolution
May be parasitic or mutualistic
Gene-for-gene concept and evolutionary ‘arms race’
Occurs in plant-pathogen and host-parasite systems
Based on single gene conferring resistance to host or virulence to pathogen
Back and forth selection between genotype of host and genotype of pathogen
Interaction escalates as more and more traits are added
Can reach equilibrium stage of endemic disease
Requires pathogen/parasite to need host not to die for transmission
Evidence for coevolution
Inference from closely related herbivores feeding on closely related plants
Suggests long evolutionary history of interaction
Based on parallel phylogenetic relationships
Experimentation
Circumstantial evidence
e.g. character displacement of competing species when in sympatry but not
when in allopatry; infer that competition drives coevolution
Mutualism
Two species specialized to perform positive function for each other
Trophic: partners complement food/nutrients for each other
Defensive: species receive food and/or shelter in return for defending against
natural enemies
Dispersive: animal vectors move pollen or seeds in return for food rewards
Pollination examples
Seed dispersal examples
Mixed systems
Yucca and its pollinator moth acting as both mutualist and seed predator
When is it coevolution?
Preadaptation: some adaptations present before establishment of mutualism
Some adaptations occur in close relatives that are not mutualists
Constraints on evolution of strict mutualism
Community diversity diffuses selection from single species.
Changes in species’ ranges or disturbance change selection over time.
Genetic complexities cause uneven rates of evolution between mutualists.