Download The ALABUF chip.

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Flip-flop (electronics) wikipedia , lookup

Scattering parameters wikipedia , lookup

Electronic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Transistor wikipedia , lookup

Control system wikipedia , lookup

Islanding wikipedia , lookup

Negative feedback wikipedia , lookup

Ground loop (electricity) wikipedia , lookup

Tube sound wikipedia , lookup

Dynamic range compression wikipedia , lookup

Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup

Buck converter wikipedia , lookup

Heterodyne wikipedia , lookup

Oscilloscope history wikipedia , lookup

Regenerative circuit wikipedia , lookup

Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup

Integrated circuit wikipedia , lookup

Metadyne wikipedia , lookup

Amplifier wikipedia , lookup

Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Analog-to-digital converter wikipedia , lookup

Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Report on analogue buffer chip (ALABUF) development in 0.25u CMOS technology for
the ALICE Silicon Strip Detector (SSD).
28 March 2002.
V. Gromov ([email protected]), R. Kluit.
ET NIKHEF, Amsterdam.
Abstract.
For the purpose of driving of analog signals from the
on-detector front-end electronics of the ALICE SSD to
the off-detector ADC, an analog buffer chip (ALABUF)
has been designed. The design is performed in 0.25
CMOS technology.
Inputs of the design as well as the design goals
specification to be met are described along with circuit
optimization procedures and detail chip description.
Results on testing of the chips taken from the
experimental batch are presented and compared to the
simulations.
Introduction.
The ALICE SSD detector will be readout by the
HAL25 front-end chip [1]. This chip contains 128
analogue channels with preamps, shapers, sample-andhold circuits, analogue memory and a differential output
buffer. Front-end chips on P-side and N-side of the
detector operating at different potentials will be
connected to an external electronics via decoupling
capacitors [2] (see Fig.1).
The limited space available stipulate for daisy-chain
connection of the front-end chips on each side of the
detector by means of a low-volume low-mass Kapton
cable. To provide connection with off-detector
electronics a 25m long twisted-pair cable is foreseen.
Fig.1. Principal diagram
electronics of ALICE SSD.
of
the
on-detector
To be able to use the same twin-pair cable for readout of front-end chips of both sides an analog
multiplexer is needed. Such a solution let us by factor of
two reduce number of signal wires coming out of the
detector, saving space and diminishing amount of
material inside the detector.
Being transported over 25m long cable, the output
differential signal will be affected by external
disturbances known as pick-up noise. In order to reach
the best signal-to-noise ratio, the signal must be
amplified to the maximum possible value (rail-to-rail of
supply voltages, in principle). Schematic solution of
such an amplifier is extremely power consuming and
hence cannot be implemented in output buffer of a single
front-end chip. A structure with an output buffer shared
over many front-end chips is much more reasonable
solution (see Fig.1). All the more, the buffer could
diminish external disturbances when having a high
common mode suppression capability.
A front-end chip, being intended to drive a long
length cable, suffers from feedback current spikes
coming to high sensitive input. These spikes cause signal
distortion and trigger self-oscillation. Therefore, it is
very reasonable to let a remote buffer drive signals to
off-detector electronics thus providing decoupling for
the front-end chip.
On the basis of the arguments listed above an analog
buffer with multiplexing functionality ought to be
designed and located on the ALICE SSD detector.
Inputs for the analog buffer design.
Operation conditions of ALICE SSD playing
significant role for the analog buffer design are: [3]
. average trigger rate
1kHz
.signal dynamic range
 13MIP (1MIP=22000e).
The analog buffer must not worsen specifications of
the HAL025 front-end chip, which are [1]:
.equivalent noise charge (ENC)  400e
. signal nonlinearity
 1.5% (for  2MIPS in
13MIP range)
.power consumption 14.75mW (for 128 channels)
.read-out rate
10 MHz
.differential output current 250uA/1MIP.
.type of the output signal
STEP
The buffer chip is supposed to be on detector
therefore:
.it must be designed in radiation hard process
.it must provide high common mode signal
suppression.
Characteristic impedance of the Kapton cable as
well as twin-pair cable is 110.
2
Specifications of the analog buffer.
1. Radiation hard technology.
With the use of the 0.25u CMOS process and
additional layout rules the analog buffer design can be
made with acceptable sensitivity for radiation damages
[4].
2. Linearity.
Nonlinearity of the analog buffer should be better
than linearity of HAL25 i.e. 1.5% for 2MIPS in
13MIP range.
3. Dynamic range.
CMOS devices of the process are able to stand
maximum 2.5V, therefore power supply voltage cannot
exceed this value. Output signal dynamic range of the
analog buffer is enclosed within the power supply range
and should approach the range with reasonable
increasing of its power consumption. We expect to get at
least 2V output dynamic range within the required
nonlinearity tolerance.
4. Differential gain.
The needed differential gain is a ratio of output
signal dynamic range over input signal dynamic range as
follows
Gain=2V/(250uA/MIP 13MIP 110)  5.6
5. Intrinsic electronic noise.
Electronic noise of the analog buffer adds to the total
noise 4% when its noise level (standard deviation) 5
times lower than that of HAL25. Thus equivalent noise
charge of the analog buffer must lower than 80e
(0.5mV RMS at the output).
4. Common mode signal suppression factor.
The common mode signal suppression factor is
determined by mismatch of the components in layout of
the chip. It seems to be possible to reach value better
than 1%.
P 153us/1000ms = 12chips 14.75mW/chip 10%,
this equation gives the value are looking for:
P  115mW,
I=P/2.5V=46mA.
7. Differential output offset.
The differential output offset occurs due to
mismatch of supposed to be identical transistors. We
intend to keep it (standard deviation of distribution of
the offsets) within 15mV.
The circuit.
Principal diagram of the analog buffer board is given
in Fig.2. Reference voltage sources (Vref_P-side and
Vref_N-side) provide bias voltages for the current
outputs of the front-end chips of each side. Load
resistors (55) convert the output current into voltage
with proper termination of the Kapton cable. The
capacitors (C, C1, C2, C3) decouple operating bias of
the inputs of the analog buffer.
The analog multiplexer connects inputs of the
differential amplifier to one of the board terminals (IN Pside or IN N-side). In between readout cycles, right sides
of the decoupling capacitors are connected to a reference
voltage (Vref) to avoid any voltage drift during this quiet
state.
A fully complementary differential amplifier and an
output stage form the operational amplifier (OPAMP).
An external feedback circuit determines operational
properties of OPAMP.
The inputs and the outputs of the OPAMP are selfbiased to the Vref value (1/2 the supply voltage) by
means of common mode feedback.
In order to ensure oscillation-free behavior, Miller
compensation capacitors (Cm, Cm1) have been
implemented in output stage.
5. Settling time.
Input signal for the analog buffer is a step, which
must be settled to its nominal value within 100ns
(1/read-out rate). Precision of the settling must be a few
times better than the nonlinearity tolerance i.e.  0.3%
6. Power consumption.
To be able to estimate allowable level of power
consumption we should take into account that an analog
buffer must be in ON-state just during the time when the
12 front-end chips are being readout. This event occurs
at each coming trigger i.e. every 1mS in average
(1/trigger rate). Time we need to read-out 12 chips is
12 128channels 100ns/channel = 153us.
Let us consider an analog buffer adding 10% to
power consumption of attached 12 front-end chips:
Fig.2. Principal diagram of the analog buffer board.
3
The ALABUF chip.
Top schematic of the ALABUF chip is given in
Appendix 1. The chip consists of two analog buffers
with common enable control (BufEnable) and external
voltage reference (Vref) terminals.
Signals at terminals Sel1A, Sel1B Sel2A, Sel2B are
steering analog multiplexers for both channels. In our
application the control signals are ac-connected to the
outside. For the bias reason a special receiver circuit
(CMOS_AC_in) with dc-hysteresis has been used (see
Appendix 2).
Detail schematics of all the components used
throughout are given in Appendix 3-10.
Layout of the ALABUF chip is plotted in Appendix
11.
For the chip bond pads assignment and applied
signals specification look in Table5 (Appendix 12).
Table 1 shows main specifications of the ALABUF
chip taken from the test results.
Table1.
Number of channels
Nominal readout rate
Current consumption from
power supply
Current consumption from
reference voltage source
Single power supply (VDD)
Output dynamic range (at 1%
nonlinearity level)
Differential gain
Input referred noise
Nonlinearity (within the
specified dynamic range)
Settling time
Common mode suppression
factor
Specifications.
2
10MHz
91mA (ON state)
10.4mA (OFF state)
140uA
2.5V
1.85V
means that analog switches related nonlinearity is
limited to 1% as long as the variations are 100 time
lower than input impedance of the OPAMP.

Transimpedance (R_ON)
-180mV
+180mV
10
Input signal, V
Fig.3. Transimpedance of the analog switches
as a function of input signal.
2. The output stage.
In this application we intend to reach the maximum
swing of the output signal. Therefore the generalamplifier configuration (GA) is the most appropriate
solution for our output stage [5]. In this configuration
drains of the transistors (see Fig.4) could sweep in the
full power supply range with the deduction of saturation
voltage drops of upper and lower transistors i.e. Vsat M14
up to (2.5 - Vsat M15). The outputs of the stage have been
biased to 1/2 VDD (1.25V) value to be able to equally
drift in any direction.
5.66
68uV RMS (60e)
1%
20ns
0.7%
The design.
1. Analog miltiplexer design.
The analog multiplexer is formed by a set of analog
switches (see Appendix 8) capable to connect input bond
pads to either the OPAMP inputs or to a reference
voltage (Vref). Zero-voltage threshold transistors
constitute the analog switches. Signal size dependant
transimpedance (R_ON) of the transistors adds to the
input impedance of the OPAMP (1K) altering the overall
gain and causing nonlinearity. We have chosen
dimensions of the transistors in such a way that
variations of theirs R_ON are confined to 10 within
specified input dynamic range (180mV) (see Fig.3). It
Fig.4. Schematics of the output stage.
For the best efficiency we would prefer to choose
the quiescent current Iquies (current coming through the
transistors when differential signal at the inputs is zero)
to be much lower than the maximum load current (see
Fig.5) i.e
Iload max >> Iquies. (Class-AB).
4
In this case the circuit consumes a little current if
there is no differential input signal or it is quite small
(Class-AB operation) [5]. On the other hand Class-AB
operation has a few drawbacks. First, schematic solution
of the Class-AB biasing is a subject to design. But the
most significant is that the frequency compensation
becomes very tricky to conduct. As long as current
through output transistors and hence transconductance
(gm) turn out very much dependant on the input signal
size. That influences frequency poles position (as it will
be shown later), thus results in different Phase Margins
for small and large signals.
+Iload
max
Quiescent current, Iquies.
+Iloadmax
Nch –transistor
current
Pch –transistor
current
f2( x )
f3( x )
f2( x )
f3( x )
0
Load current (Iload)
Quiescent current, Iquies.
54
x
+1.25V
Pch –transistor
current
f( x )
f1( x )
f( x )
f1( x )
Load current (Iload)
54
x
+1.25V
Input differential signal
input+ - input-
Input differential signal
input+ - input-
Fig.6. The output stage. Class-A operation. The currents
as a function of the input differential signal.
Nch –transistor
current
0
0
-Iloadmax
4
-Iloadmax
Fig.5. The output stage. Class-AB operation. The
currents as a function of the input differential signal.
Output sweep range and the quiescent current
depend on dimensions of the output stage transistors (see
Fig.7).
By using large transistors (p-channel ones with
W=424.9u, L=0.28u and n-channel ones W=171.3u,
L=0.28u) we reach sweep range of 2.2V while the
current consumption is still within specification limit (2
Iquies. = 43.64ma).
We diminish the quiescent current by factor of two
and loose 300mV of the sweep range by scaling down
the transistors in two times (see Fig.7).
Operation in Class-A (quiescent current is roughly
equal to maximum load current (see Fig.6)) does not
give any problems with frequency compensation.
outputs+
Iload max  Iquies. (Class-A)
For
Class-A
operation
the
transistor
transconductance (gm) is much higher than that in ClassAB (quiescent current is larger). It is not changing
considerably due to the signal size variations, providing
stability of the related frequency poles and good
bandwidth properties (see frequency compensation
section below in this report).
We expect to meet specification requirement on
current consumption with the output stage operating in
Class-A at the same time avoiding all the problems just
mentioned.
Pch tran. 424.9u/0.28u
Nch tran. 171.3u/0.28u
Iquies. = 21.82ma
Pch tran. 212.5u/0.28u
Nch tran. 85.65u/0.28u
Iquies. = 10.9ma
2.2V
1.9V
outputsInput differential signal, V
input+ - input-
Fig.7. DC-sweep of the output stage.
Equivalent small-signal circuit of the output stage is
given in Fig.8 where
gm – CMOS transistor tranconductance,
gds – CMOS transistor output conductance,
Cgd – gate-to-drain capacitance,
5
Cgs – gate-to-source capacitance,
Cdsub – drain-to-substrate capacitance.
Differential gain of the circuit at low frequencies is:
(gm15+gm14)/(gds15+gds14+1/(0.5 110)) =
= 4.5.
For the differential signal frequency pole at the
output of the circuit is almost entirely determined by the
load resistance (110) and the load parasitic capacitance
(we expect 2x10pf at the worse case) since the related
values of the transistors are much lower (drain
capacitances of the transistors are 2x572fF and their
output conductances are 2x3.2mS). Thus, the roll-off
frequency is:
fos-3dbdif= {2 [Cpar + Cdtot15+Cdtot14)]/
[gds15+gds14+1/(0.5 110]}-1 = 325.5MHz
Gosdsdif =
A differential amplifier constitutes input stage of the
OPAMP (see Fig.9). It has fully complementary
structure with identical transistors. The same bias current
(Id) flows for corresponding transistors from upper (pchannel transistors) and lower parts (n-channel
transistors). In order to keep identical value of
transconductance (gm), p-channel transistors must be 3
wider than n-channel ones.
Fig.8. Equivalent small-signal circuit of the output
stage.
The circuit does not respond to common mode
signal in the same way as it does for differential one.
That is due to the fact that both outputs swing
synchronously without driving current through the load
resistor (R_load). The load resistor becomes “invisible”
for the outputs.
The common mode gain at low frequencies is as
follows:
Gosdscom = (gm15+gm14)/(gds15+gds14) = 28.2.
The roll-off frequency for the common mode signal
is :
fos-3dbcom = {2 [Cpar + Cdtot15+Cdtot14)]/
[gds15+gds14]}-1 = 49.7MHz
Such a common mode response behavior does not
have negative influence on the circuit performance.
3. The differential amplifier.
Fig.9. Schematics of the differential amplifier.
On the base of mismatch consideration we can
specify size of the transistors. The mismatch of the
differential pairs transistors (M803 vs M19, M814 vs
M21) give an offset between the differential outputs.
The standard deviation of mismatches in the inputs
voltages is:
(Vin)= {[(Vinpch)]2 + [(Vinnch)]2}1/2, where
(Vinnch) is standard deviation in mismatches of
input voltages for n-channel transistors (M803 vs M19),
(Vinpch) is standard deviation in mismatches of
input voltages for p-channel transistors (M814 vs M21).
6
In turn the deviations could be expressed as:
(Vinnch)={[MnV/(WL)1/2]2+(Id/8Kn) [MnK/(WL)1/2]}1/2
(3.1) ,
where
W, L are effective width and length of the transistors,
Id is drain current,
MnV,MnK ,Kn are constant of the process.
gout = gdsM20/M7 + gdsM27/M26 =21.5 mS is output
impedance of the differential amplifier,
gdsM20/M7 = (gds7gds20)/(gm20+gds7+gds20) = 10.4uS
is output impedance of cascode pair (M20/M7),
gdsM27/M26=(gds26ds27)/(gm27+gds27+gds26) =11.1uS
output impedance of cascode pair (M27/M26),
Differential input voltage mismatch as a function of
the width of the transistors is plotted in Fig.10
(transistor’s length is taken 0.320µm). Contribution to
the overall mismatch on the part of p-channel transistors
is much lower in comparison to that of n-transistors
because of the 3 times larger area (see Fig.10). The
smaller the width of the transistor the bigger the
mismatch is. For the value of the width of 27µm we
reach 3mV differential input mismatch.
Overall mismatch
0.01
Mismatch between
n-channel
transistors
Mismatch between
p-channel
transistors
0.008
Gn( w  I0 )
Differential
input Gp( w  I0 )
w  I0 )
mismatch,G(V
0.004
0.006
Fig.11. Equivalent small-signal circuit of the
differentiall amplifier.
3mV
0.002
1.032 10
3
0
1
0
10
20
Width of the transistors, µm
30
40
w
27 µm
Fig.10 Differential input voltage mismatch as a
function of width of the transistors (L=0.320µm).
The first item prevails in formula (3.1) therefore the
mismatch is almost independent on drain current. That
let us vary the drain current optimizing other
specifications of the design.
Mismatch of the feedback resistors (see Appendix
7) comes up in a non-zero differential output response to
a common input signal. For the chosen type of the
resistors (polycilicon) and their dimensions, 3 matching
tolerance is:
MM = (Sa2(W+L) + Ma2/WL)1/2 ,where
W, L are width and length of the resistors,
Sa, Ma are constants of the process.
We have chosen dimensions of the resistors (1kΩ is
15.14µm/3µm) in such a way to keep the mismatch at
1.3% level. That gives 4.7% of the output differential
response to a common mode input signal and further
converts in common mode rejection factor as low as
below 1% (differential gain is 5.6).
Equivalent small-signal circuit of the differential
amplifier is given in Fig.11, where
50
50
Differential gain of the differential amplifier at low
frequencies is:
Gdadsdif = (gm19+gm21)/(gout2) = 50dB
Drain capacitors (Cdtot27+Cdtot20) (see Fig. 11) in
sum with gate capacitors of the output stage (see Fig.8)
determine frequency pole together with the output
impedance of the differential amplifier. The roll-off
frequency of the pole is:
fda-3dbdiff = {2 [(Cgs15+Cgs14+Cdtot27+Cdtot20) +
(Cgd15+Cgd14+Cm)]/ [gout]}-1 =
= 1.3MHz
(3.2)
Gosdsdif
4. Frequency response of the Analog buffer.
Overall frequency response of the Analog buffer
contains both poles just mentioned. Since roll-off
frequency of second pole (fda-3dbdiff =1.3MHz) is much
lower than that of the first pole (fos-3dbdif =325.5MHz) it is
dominant in the overall transfer function. Mutual
position of the poles in frequency domain determines
stability performance of the analog buffer.
In principle, a two poles operational amplifier with
a feedback can fall into self-oscillation. The analog
buffer turns to be oscillation free when phase difference
between signal at the gate of the differential amplifier
and the signal coming to the same point from the
7
feedback side is less than 360 till amplitude gain is
higher that unity (known as Phase Margin) (see Fig.12).
Figure 12 shows that without special measures
Phase Margin of the analog buffer is 61.6.
frequency is 660MHz, whereas with the capacitor it goes
down to 358MHz (see Fig.14). Taking into account that
differential gain must be 5.6, the cut-off frequency in the
close feedback configuration becomes 50MHz
(358MHz/5.6) and full settling time is 20ns
(1/64MHz) (see Fig.15).
Phase
Cm=0fF
Amplitude
Cm=946fF
Unity gain line
Unity gain
frequency is
660MHz, Cm=0fF
Phase margin=61.6
Unity gain frequency is
358MHz, Cm=946fF
Fig.12. Differential feedback. Open loop characteristics.
Difference between signal at the gate of the differential
amplifier and the signal coming to the same point from the
feedback side. Cm=0fF. Phase Margin is 61.6.
To improve the value we used Miller compensation
method [5]. In out design the MIMCAP capacitor
(Cm=946fF) has been added to the output stage to
provide local negative feedback. The feedback shifts the
dominant pole further in low frequency region (see 3.2)
and another pole to the high frequencies. By means of
that the poles have been split in frequency domain and
Phase Margin becomes 85.3 (see Fig.12).
Fig.14. Differential Open loop gain of the analog buffer
as a function of frequency.
Settling time 20ns
OutP
OutN
Ch3\\
Cut-off
frequency
50.7MHz
InP
InN
InN
Phase
OutN
Ch3\\
Amplitude
Fig.15. Closed loop configuration of the analog buffer.
Differential transient response and frequency response.
Phase margin=83.5
Unity gain line
Fig.13. Differential feedback. Open loop characteristics.
Difference between signal at the gate of the differential
amplifier and the signal coming to the same point from the
feedback side. Cm=946fF. Phase Margin is 83.5 .
On the other hand such a correction leads to
degradation of the speed performance of the analog
buffer. Without the Miller capacitor open loop unity gain
Common mode signal is suppressed at the output of
the buffer by factor of –0.85 in wide frequency band
(cut-off frequency is 202MHz) (see Fig.16).
8
InN, InP
Cut-off
frequency
202 MHz
Phase
Amplitude
OutN,
OutP
Phase margin=74
Unity gain line
Fig.16. Closed loop configuration of the analog buffer.
Common mode transient response and frequency response.
5. Common mode feedback.
Inputs of the analog buffer are AC-coupled to the
front-end electronics. Feedback circuit delivers DC-bias
to the inputs from outputs of the buffer (see Fig.17). In
order to keep the outputs at the middle of dynamic range
(+1.25) we employed common mode feedback.
Fig.18. Common mode feedback. Open loop
characteristics. Difference between signal at the gates
of M1012 and M987 and the signal coming to the same
point from the feedback side. Phase Margin is 74.
Test results.
Recently we have received ALABUF chips from the
multi-project submission (MWP6 2001/Q4). Results of
the testing are presented further.
1. Power consumption.
The ALABUF chip current consumption is:
measurements
simulations
VDD bus
91mA (ON state)
90.7mA (ON state)
(+2.5V)
10.4mA (OFF state)
10.3mA (OFF state)
Vref bus
140µA
168µA
(+1.25V)
3. Linearity and dynamic range.
Experimental set-up used to measure linearity and
dynamic range is given in Fig.19.
Fig.17. Schematic solution for the common mode
feedback.
The common mode feedback has sufficient Phase
margin (74) that keeps the circuit far away from
oscillation break-down (see Fig.18).
Fig.19. Experimental set-up to measure linearity and
dynamic range.
For one chip the characteristics were measured
minutely and for the other just in a few points (see Fig
20).
9
Output differential
signal,
OutP-OutN
mV
2.04V
5.6 (InP-InN)
Chip#2, channel 2B
5.66 (InP-InN)
OutP-OutN
Chip#2, channel 1B

361mV
Input differential signal, InP-InN, mV
Fig.22. Simulations of linearity and dynamic range of the
ALABUF chips.
Linearity
[OutP-OutN5.66*(InP-InN)]/
[5.66*(InP-InN)]
Chip#1 …Chip#11
-1%
Input differential signal, InP-InN, mV

 
Fig.20. Measurements of linearity and dynamic range of
the ALABUF chips.
-1%
361mV
Input differential signal, InP-InN, mV
+1%
Linearity
[OutP-OutN5.66*(InP-InN)]/
[5.66*(InP-InN)]
-1%
1% level
1.85V




Output differential signal, OutP-OutN, mV
Fig.21. Linearity curve for the measured channels
(1A,2A) of chip#1.
The measurements show dynamic range at the level
of 1.85V (see Fig.21) within 1% nonlinearity, whereas
simulations give value of 2.04V (see Fig.22, 23)
Fig.23. SPICE simulations. Linearity curve.
Diversity in differential gain between the tested
chips is hardly visible within precision of the
measurements (0.5%).
3. Differential transient response and settling time.
Measured differential transient response is given in
Fig.24 and 25. Thanks to sufficient phase margin (83.5)
there no overshoots or undershoots noticeable. Settling
time is 20ns as it the simulations predicted (see Fig. 25).
10
4. Common mode transient response.
The measured common mode response is plotted in
Fig.27. The leading edge of the outputs is very steep
(5ns) therefore the settling is a bit distorted by
nonideal tracing on the test board (see Fig.27). Such a
fast settling is an evidence that the common mode
suppression is valid in the wide frequency band (cut-off
frequency is 200MHz). Unfortunately, due to lack of
the balance between the probes, it is not possible to
measure mismatch between the outputs precisely.
Merely we can give the estimation that differential
response to a common mode GainCM signal is below 4%
(for nine chips out of ten). That yields common mode
rejection factor (CMRF)
CMRF= GainCM/GainDIFF  4% /5.6  0.7%
OutP, Ch4
InP, Ch1
InN, Ch2
OutN, Ch3
Fig.24. Measurements. Differential transient response of
the ALABUF chip.
Settling time 20ns
InP=InN, Ch2
OutP, Ch4
OutP, Ch4
OutN, Ch3
InP, Ch1
Nonideality of the
test board
OutN-OutN, Math
InN, Ch2
OutN, Ch3
Fig.25. Measurements. Differential transient response of
the ALABUF chip.
Fig.27. Measurements. Ttransient response to a common
mode signal of the ALABUF chip.
In simulation the common mode response looks very
similar to the measured one but without mismatch
between the outputs (see Fig 28).
InP=InN
OutP
InP
OutP=OutN
InN
OutN
Fig.26. SPICE Simulations.
response of the ALABUF chip
Differential
transient
Fig.28. Simulations. Transient response to a common
mode signal of the ALABUF chip.
11
5. Intrinsic electronic noise.
Electronic noise of the analog buffer have been
measured by MATH facilities of the digital scope as
follows:
Noise = (Noise2 - Noise2)1/2 = 385V RMS, where
Noise - noise at the scope without the buffer
Noise - total noise at the scope.
Consider the full dynamic range is 1.85V (13 MIPS)
and 1MIP is 22000e, the intrinsic noise is
Noise = 2.7 10-3 MIP = 60e.
6. Differential output offset.
Values of voltage difference between the outputs of
the ALABUF chip at quiescent state have been measured
over 20 channels (10 chips). The values are given in
Table 2. Due to insufficiency of the data we are not
capable to derive statistic parameters. The only
conclusion could be drawn is that standard deviation is
about 7mV and mean value is close to zero.
Table 2. Differential output offsets.
Chip number
Channel number
Differential
offset value
1
1
-7mV
2
-10mV
2
1
+6.7mV
2
+1.4mV
3
1
-5.2mV
2
-3.5mV
4
1
-14.5mV
2
-14.4mV
6
1
-3.2mV
2
+7.2mV
7
1
+5.2mV
2
-5.9mV
8
1
-10.1mV
2
5mV
9
1
-2.9mV
2
+16.4mV
10
1
-3.6mV
2
-7.6mV
11
1
+3.3mV
2
-16mV
7. Common mode output offset.
The common mode output offset characterizes selfbiasing performance of the circuit. The performance is
sensitive to the shift and spread of the transistors
parameters. The testing shows that for all the chips the
common mode bias is shifted down to  1.227V (instead
of 1.25V) (see Table 3). Besides, we notice spread the
values in range 7mV.
Table3. Common mode output offsets.
Chip number Channel number
Differential
offset value
1
1
1.228V
2
1.224V
2
1
1.227V
2
1.235V
3
1
1.225V
2
1.224V
4
1
1.223V
2
1.222V
6
1
1.228V
2
1.232V
7
1
1.229V
2
1.229V
8
1
1.221V
2
1.234V
9
1
1.221V
2
1.222V
10
1
1.212V
2
1.221V
11
1
1.229V
2
1.226V
8. Testing of the control circuit.
As it was already described above in this report, the
ALABUF chip has a set of functionalities which are to
be controlled.
Figure 29 demonstrates how Enable-Disable
function works. The chip does not show up outputs when
BufEnable control goes to ground level. Transition time
is less that 100ns.
BufEnable
Disabling
Enabling
OutP
OutN
Fig.29. Testing of Enable-Disable functionality of
the ALABUF chip.
12
Operation of the channel selection functionality is
shown in Fig.30. The output signal are there if the Sel2A
is ON (the Sel2A signal is AC-coupled to the chip).
Transition takes less than 100ns.
The _ResetAC signal sets the signal at the Sel2A
pad of the chip to certain state (OFF). This functionality
allows to ensure the state right after switching power on
the chip. Transition occurs within 100ns (see Fig.32).
Out2P
Out2P
Out2N
Out2N
The channel
is selected
The channel
is unselected
_ResetAC
The channel
is selected
The channel is
reset
_ResetAC
Sel2A
Fig.30. Testing of the channel selection functionality of
the ALABUF chip.
Figure 31 shows selection functionality when both
Sel2A and Sel2B signals are coming simultaneously.
Transition takes less than 100ns.
Out2P
Out2N
Sel2B
The channel
is selected
The channel
is unselected
Sel2A
Fig.31. Testing of the channel selection functionality of
the ALABUF chip. Sel2A and Sel2B are coming
simultaneously.
Sel2A outside
the chip
Sel2A inside
the chip
Fig.32. Testing of the _ResetAC functionality of the
ALABUF chip.
13
Conclusion
We have designed and successfully tested analog
buffer chip (ALABUF) with multiplexing, disabling and
reset functionalities for the ALICE SSD detector. The
chip is implemented in 0.25 CMOS process. Testing
results show good agreement with simulations. The
following specifications have been disclosed (see Table
4).
Table4.
Specifications.
Number of channels
2
Nominal readout rate
10MHz
Current consumption from
91ma (ON state)
power supply
10.4ma (OFF state)
Current consumption from
140uA
reference voltage source
Single power supply (VDD)
2.5V
Output dynamic range (at 1%
1.85V
nonlinearity level)
Differential gain
5.66
Input referred noise
60e
Nonlinearity (within the
1%
specified dynamic range)
Settling time
20ns
Common mode suppression
0.7%
factor
Differential offsets
7mV
Common mode offsets
-23mV7mV
Enable-to-disable transition
100ns
time
Selected-to-unselected
100ns
transition time
Reset transition time
100ns
In the forthcoming submission we foresee to design
on-chip reference source and modify schematics of the
enabling functionality with the purpose to diminish the
leakage current (140 uA).
References.
[1] D. Bonnet et al, The Hal25 Front-End Chip for
the ALICE Silicon Strip Detectors, 7th Workshop on
Electronics for LHC Experiments, CERN 2001-005,
CERN/LHCC/2001-034, pp. 76-80, 22 Oktober 2001.
[2] R. Kluit et al, Design of ladder EndCap
electronics for the ALICE ITS SSD, 7th Workshop on
Electronics for LHC Experiments, CERN 2001-005,
CERN/LHCC/2001-034, pp. 47-51, 22 Oktober 2001.
[3] ALICE collaboration, Technical Design Report
of the Inner Tracking System (ITS), CERN/LHCC 99-12,
ALICE TDR 4 , pp.175-199, 18 June 1999.
[4] P.Jarron, A.Paccagnella, 3rd RD49 Status Report
Study of the Radiation Tolerance of ICs for LHC, LEB
Status Report/RD49, CERN/LHCC 2000-003, 13
January 2000.
[5]
Johan
H.Huijsing,
OPERATIONAL
AMPLIFIERS. Theory and Design, KLUWER
ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS, 2 Oktober 2000.
14
Appendix 1.
Top schematic of the ALABUF chip.
15
Appendix 2.
Schematics of the CMOS_AC_ In block.
Appendix 3.
Schematics of the IB1 block (digital input pad).
.
16
Appendix 4.
Schematics of the oiinv block (inverter).
Appendix 5.
Schematics of the E_INV2 (inverter).
Appendix 5.
Schematics of the AnaPadProt block (analoque input/output pad).
17
Appendix 6.
Schematics of the Half_of_the_new_buffer block.
18
Appendix 7.
Schematics of the new_buffer_connected block.
19
Appendix 8.
Schematics of the switches block (analog multiplexer).
Appendix 9.
Schematics of the S2Dtx_0 block (singl- to-differential converter).
Appendix 10.
Schematics of the invtx_0 block (inverter).
20
Appendix 11.
Layout of the ALABUF chip .
21
Appendix 12.
Table5.
Bond pads assignment and applied signal specification of the ALABUF chip .
Number
of the pad
1
2
Name of the
pad
Vref
In2BN
Type
Function
analog
analog
3
In2BP
analog
reference voltage
negative input of channel#2
(controlled by analog switch B)
positive input of channel#2
(controlled by analog switch B)
4
In2AN
analog
5
In2AP
analog
6
7
8
vdd!
gnd!
Sel2A
9
Way of
coupling
DC
AC
AC
negative input of channel#2
(controlled by analog switch A)
positive input of channel#2
(controlled by analog switch A)
AC
analog
analog
digital
supply voltage
ground
control of analog switch A of
channel #2
DC
DC
AC
Sel2B
digital
control of analog switch B of
channel #2
AC
10
Out2N
analog
Negative output of channel #2
DC/AC
11
Out2P
analog
Positive output of channel #2
DC/AC
12
13
BufEnable
_ResetAC
digital
digital
DC
DC
14
Out1P
analog
enable control
reset of the controls of all the
analog switches
Positive output of channel #1
DC/AC
15
Out1N
analog
Negative output of channel #1
DC/AC
16
Sel1B
digital
control of analog switch B of
channel #1
AC
17
Sel1A
digital
control of analog switch A of
channel #1
AC
18
19
20
gnd
vdd
In1AP
analog
analog
analog
ground
supply voltage
positive input of channel#1
(controlled by analog switch A)
DC
DC
AC
AC
Nominal
value/tolerance
1.25V/50mV
differentially
(In2BP-In2BN)
360mv (linear
range).
Operating
point=1.25V
differentially
(In2AP-In2AN)
360mv (linear
range)
Operating
point=1.25V
2.5V100mV
0V
leading edge of
transition from
2.5V to 0V
leading edge of
transition from
2.5V to 0V
Operating
point=1.25V
Operating
point=1.25V
2.5V
2.5V
Operating
point=1.25V
Operating
point=1.25V
leading edge of
transition from
2.5V to 0V
leading edge of
transition from
2.5V to 0V
0V
2.5V100mV
differentially
(In1AP-In1AN)
22
21
In1AN
analog
negative input of channel#1
(controlled by analog switch A)
AC
22
In1BP
analog
AC
23
In1BN
analog
positive input of channel#1
(controlled by analog switch B
negative input of channel#1
(controlled by analog switch B
24
gnd
analog
ground
DC
AC
360mv (linear
range)
Operating
point=1.25V
differentially
(In1BP-In1BN)
360mv (linear
range)
Operating
point=1.25V
0V