Download Dominant Negative Inhibition in Prion Protein

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Cooperative binding wikipedia , lookup

Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup

Prion wikipedia , lookup

Surround optical-fiber immunoassay wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Identifying Critical Sites for
PrPC-PrPSc Interaction Through
Dominant-Negative Inhibition
Arla M.A. Mistica
Senior Honors Project
Undergraduate Research Day
April 21, 2012
Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy
Prion Diseases
 Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (Humans)
 Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE; Cattle)
 Scrapie (Sheep)
 Chronic Wasting Disease (Cervids)
Source: Acquired, Familial & Sporadic
Universally fatal and there is no treatment
What is a prion?
Prion: Abnormally-folded Prion Protein (PrP)
C
 PrP : normal cellular isoform
Sc
 PrP : Infectious isoform
Enigma: Despite its lack of genetic material
 High Infectivity
 Various Strains
Jacquemot et al., J Virol 2005
Daggett’s Model (Spiral model)
Replication of Prion (PrPSc)
Endogenous PrPC
Interaction between PrPC
and PrPSc
Spontaneous
generation of PrPSc
Conversion of mutant
PrPC to PrPSc
Inoculation of PrPSc
Conversion of PrPC to PrPSc
Accumulation of PrPSc
The conversion of PrPC to PrPSc is still not completely
understood.
PrPSc-PrPC or PrPSc-PrPSc Interaction
• Structures of PrPSc is stable in Oligomers
 PrPSc-PrPSc interaction
• Strain-specific structures are inherited with High fidelity
 PrPC-PrPSc interaction
Investigation into PrP-PrP interactions are important
Dominant-Negative Inhibition
• When a conversion-incompetent PrP (incPrP) co-exists
with a conversion-competent PrP, the former inhibit the
conversion of the latter.
• Efficiencies of the inhibition varies between incPrPs
• Due to variation in Binding affinity of incPrPs to PrPSc?
PrPC
PrPC
PrPSC
PrPSC
PrPSC
incPrP
Hypothesis
If efficiency of dominant-negative inhibition depends
on binding affinity of inPrP to PrPSc, the region
necessary for PrPC-PrPSc interaction can be identified by
making a series of Internal-deletion mutants and
evaluating their inhibitory effects.
(3F4)MoPrP
MoPrP
Δ159
Δ159-163
Δ159-167
Δ159-171
Δ159-175
-YRYPNQVYYRPVDQYSNQNNFVHD-YRYPN VYYRPVDQYSNQNNFVHD-YRYPN
PVDQYSNQNNFVHD-YRYPN
YSNQNNFVHD-YRYPN
NNFVHD-YRYPN
HD-- ---
--- ------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methods
• Create Internal-deletion PrPs (ΔPrPs) by site-directed
mutagenesis
• Amplify the plasmids encoding ΔPrPs in competent
cells and purify the plasmids
• Transfect the plasmids to scrapie-infected cultured
cells (Co-express conversion-competent PrP with
ΔPrP).
• Harvest, SDS-PAGE & immunoblot to evaluate
dominant-negative inhibition
Transfection to cultured cells
Expression of mutant PrPs
Results
Results
• ∆PrPs showed insolubility to detergent & mildly proteaseresistant unlike wild-type PrP
4% Sarcosyl
Non-infected
Sup
Pellet
4H11 (Endogenous Wild-type PrP)
Chymotrypsin
concentration (µg/ml)
0 1
∆159
2 4
8
∆159
∆159-175
∆159
∆159-175
∆159
∆159-175
∆159
∆159-175
4% Sarcosyl
Sc-Infected
Non-infected
Sup
Pellet Sup
Pellet
3F4 (Transfected ∆PrPs)
∆159-175
0 1 2 4 8
These findings suggests that ∆PrPs might be different from wildtype PrP but there was no difference among ∆PrPs.
Results
Co-transfected (3F4)MoPrP with the Internal-deletion mutants and observed
the levels of (3F4)PrPSc
∆159-175
∆159-171
∆159-164
∆159-163
∆159-162
∆159
∆159-175
Film
Vector
*There was a leak in “Δ-164”
∆159-171
∆159-164
∆159-163
∆159-162
∆159
Vector
PK-resistant core
(3F4)MoPrP+
∆159 and ∆159-162 showed most efficient inhibition and the
inhibitory effects were reduced as the deletions were
extended
Discussion
• Reproducible differences between ∆PrPs in efficiencies
of dominant-negative inhibition were observed
• The differences suggests that the loop region between
the second beta strand and the second alpha helix
might be important for efficient inhibition
• This supports the point of view that the loop region is
important for propagation of prion/PrPSc
(3F4)MoPrP
MoPrP
Δ159
Δ159-163
Δ159-167
Δ159-171
Δ159-175
-YRYPNQVYYRPVDQYSNQNNFVHD-YRYPN VYYRPVDQYSNQNNFVHD-YRYPN
PVDQYSNQNNFVHD-YRYPN
YSNQNNFVHD-YRYPN
NNFVHD-YRYPN
HD-- ---
--- ------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To be continued….
• Isolation of the critical amino acids that are absolutely needed
for binding (proteins following the B-sheet)
• Finding efficient incPrPs that can bind to PrPSc effectively may
be used therapeutically by the inhibition of PrPC to PrPSc
conversion.
Acknowledgments
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Prof. Hermann Schatzl
Dr. Yuzuru Taguchi
Dr. Sabine Gilch
Missy Stuart
Fawn Pickard
Ted John
Leah Kyle
Xiaotang Du
Shaihla Khan
Lauren Millet
• Honors Program
• Rick Matlock