* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Experiment Title
Spark-gap transmitter wikipedia , lookup
Utility frequency wikipedia , lookup
Power engineering wikipedia , lookup
Power inverter wikipedia , lookup
Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup
Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup
Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Electric motor wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Electric machine wikipedia , lookup
Distribution management system wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Dynamometer wikipedia , lookup
Brushed DC electric motor wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Induction motor wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
Induction Machines & Variable Frequency Drives Introduction The objectives of laboratory 3 are threefold: Understand the relationship between starting voltage, in-rush current, and run up time for an induction machine. The concept is to limit in-rush current to avoid negative consequences of large currents while providing a quick start to steady state time. Investigate the limitations of constant frequency control. Elucidate the advantages of variable voltage/frequency control. Analysis PART I. REDUCED VOLTAGE STARTING TO LIMIT STARTING CURRENT Lab Data 20 % 30 % 40 % 46Vl-l 69Vl-l 92Vl-l 7.4A 11.4A 16A 4.5sec 1.6sec 0.9sec No load speed 1720 1772 1783 50% 115Vl-l 19.6A 0.6sec 1788 applied voltage (% of Vrated) No load voltage inrush current run up time(sec) 1) Argue possible advantages and disadvantages of Induction machines over Dc machines. Advantages: Induction machines can move faster. Disadvantages: Speeds are not as easily controlled as in DC machines. 2) (i) Plot the inrush current in A units vs. voltage in V units, and estimate the full-voltage inrush current. Estimate of full voltage is 40.37A (ii) Explain why we did not carried out this test at 100% voltage. Power is proportional to the square of the current and since the current is rising with increasing applied voltage, we could have high power consequences such as thermal degradation of the components. (iii) But, why would we want to apply as high voltage as possible at the start-up? At the start up we need a high voltage so we can increase the slip so that the motor gets spinning quicker. This is shown by decrease in ramp up time as the stator voltages increase. 3) (i) Does the inrush current depend on the load torque? Explain why. Inrush current is independent of the torque because it is proportional only to the applied voltage at the start. Geurts/Wabiszewski/Sanfilippo (ii) Does the run-up time change depending on the applied voltage? Explain why. 2 Yes, it deceases with increasing voltage. The reason the run-up time decreases when the voltage increases is because the voltage causes the motor to spin faster and therefore reduces the runup time. (iii) Does the run-up time vary depending on the load torque? No, it depends on applied voltage. 4) Plot the input impedance (Zin) vs. slip (s) over the range of 0 to 1 Zin = V/I Slip = (rated speed – no load speed)/rated speed Impedence vs. Slip 6.3 6.2 Impedence (ohm) 6.1 6.0 5.9 5.8 -1.000 -0.800 -0.600 -0.400 -0.200 5.7 0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600 0.800 1.000 Slip 5) Explain why no-load speeds from the lab data vary depending on the stator voltages (Vs-an). In the lab when more voltage is applied, the magnitude of the current vector increases. PART II. MEASURING MOTOR CHARACTERISTICS UNDER CONSTANT 60 HZ VOLTAGE EXCITATION Lab Data motor torque (N•m) 0 -2.0 shaft speed (rpm) 230 V 184 V 138 V 1794 1795 1791 1784 1788 1770 stator current Is (Amp) 230 V 184 V 138 V 2.9 2.3 1.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 Geurts/Wabiszewski/Sanfilippo 1) -4.0 1781 1770 1746 3.3 3.1 3.1 -5.0 1777 1764 1733 3.5 3.3 3.6 3 (i) Plot the motor torque vs. shaft speed curves for the various voltages on the same plot. Torque vs. Speed 6 5 Torque (Nm) 4 230 V 184 V 3 138 V 2 1 0 1720 1730 1740 1750 1760 1770 1780 1790 1800 Speed (rpm) (ii) What is the relation between motor torque and shaft speed at the given voltage? They are inversely proportional, as torque goes up, speed goes down. (iii) What is the relation between voltage and shaft speed under the given torque? They are proportional, as voltage goes down, speed goes down (iv) Do the (ii) and (iii) make sense to you, compare your results to Figure 2 in the lab handout? Make brief comments. Looking at the fan load line, as you follow it up from zero, you can see that as the percent of maximum voltage increases, the speed increases. Similarly, it can be seen that the torque will go down in this same fashion. 1) plot. (i) Plot the motor torque vs. stator current (Is) curves of all voltage levels on the same Geurts/Wabiszewski/Sanfilippo 4 Torque vs. Current 6 5 Torque (Nm) 4 230 V 3 184 V 138 V 2 1 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Current (A) (ii) Calculate the slip (s) at V=230V and V=138V. Slip (s) Motor Torque (Nm) V =230V V=138V 0 0.50 0.50 -2 0.50 0.51 -4 0.51 0.52 -5 0.51 0.52 (iii) As you can see from (ii), slip more rapidly rises at lower voltage in order to increase the motor torque. Describe why IM with lower voltage supply needs to boost the slip in order to increase the torque? At a lower voltage, there is less current, which leads to less torque production. Therefore the slip must be boosted or increased to increase the torque production. Geurts/Wabiszewski/Sanfilippo 5 PART III. MEASURING MOTOR CHARACTERISTICS UNDER VARIABLE VOLTAGE FREQUENCY EXCITATION (CONSTANT TORQUE CONTROL) Lab Data shaft speed nr mech motor torque 0 Nm Vs-an one cycle period excitation frequency fe 1500rpm 185.2 V 19.96 ms 50.07 Hz 1000 125.1 V 29.95 ms 33.38 Hz 500 61.8 V 60.15 ms 16.70 Hz 0 7.5 V Inf ms 0 Hz shaft speed nr mech motor torque -2.5 Nm Vs-an 1500rpm one cycle period excitation frequency fe 184 V 20.22 ms 49.45 Hz 1000 122.2 V 30.20 ms 33.10 Hz 500 59.3 V 61.40 ms 16.40 Hz 0 5.3 V Inf ms 0 Hz shaft speed nr mech motor torque -5 Nm Vs-an one cycle period excitation frequency fe 1500rpm 182.8 V 20.22 ms 49.44 Hz 1000 120.0 V 30.46 ms 32.82 Hz 500 57.4 V 62.46 ms 16.13 Hz 0 7.1 V Inf ms 0 Hz Geurts/Wabiszewski/Sanfilippo 6 1) (i) Plot the shaft speed (n r mech) vs. stator voltage (Vs-an) for all motor torque levels on the same plot, and briefly comment on the relation between n r mech and Vs-an. Shaft Speed vs. Stator Voltage 1600 1400 Shaft Speed (rpm) 1200 1000 0 Nm 800 2.5 Nm `` 5 Nm 600 400 200 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Stator Voltage (V) Shaft speed and stator voltage are positively associated and fairly linear. Linear fits have been calculated for all torque levels and are as follows: T=0 Nm Shaft Speed [rpm] = 8.3762[rpm/V]*(Stator Voltage)[V] - 44.898[rpm] T= 2.5 Nm Shaft Speed [rpm] = 8.3379[rpm/V]*(Stator Voltage)[V] - 22.919[rpm] T= 5 Nm Shaft Speed [rpm] = 8.4563[rpm/V]*(Stator Voltage)[V] - 26.502[rpm] Additionally, all data series display a similar slope and a slight leftward shift as torque increases. (ii) Estimate the required stator voltages to keep the steady state motor speed constant to 750 rpm at the motor torque of 0Nm, 2.5Nm and 5Nm, respectively. Geurts/Wabiszewski/Sanfilippo 7 We may estimate this value by rearranging the linear equations developed in the last question. shaft A V B V shaft B A where A is the slope of the graph and B is the y-intercept. Motor Torque (Nm) 0.0 Estimated Vs-an (V) 94.9 2.5 92.7 5.0 91.8 2(i) The voltage control approach introduced in Part 2 is not capable of allowing the speed of the induction motor to become slower than the speed at the peak torque. (approx. 1200 rpm as is shown in Fig.2 of the lab handout). However, the control method of this part enables one to maintain the induction motor at any speed from 0 to 1500 rpm. Explain what makes it possible to attain this wider controllable speed range. The voltage control approach only allows for movement up or down the torque vs. shaft speed curve at a speed where the torque peak will occur (constant speed). This happens as a result of only controlling the magnitude of voltage and not the frequency at which it may activate the rotor in the induction motor (ie, the separation between the current and magnetic field vector). The motor is essentially locked into a certain speed where the voltage (ie power) necessary is a function of where the torque peak occurs for a curve of constant power. However, by having control of frequency, one is able to specify the rate at which the current vector leads the magnetic field vector. This is essentially analogous to moving left or right on a curve of constant voltage/power on the shaft speed vs. torque curve. Geurts/Wabiszewski/Sanfilippo 2(ii)For the torque at 0Nm and -2.5Nm divide the voltage by the excitation frequency at each shaft speed (ie: Vs-an/fe). Why do you think that this ratio is almost constant for a given motor torque (hint: what does V/f represent from Faraday’s law). Torque [Nm] 0 -2.5 -5 Shaft Speed [rpm] Stator Voltage [V] 1500 1000 500 0 1500 1000 500 0 1500 1000 500 0 185.2 125.1 61.8 7.5 184 122.2 59.3 5.3 182.8 120 57.4 7.1 Excitation Frequency [Hz] 50.07 33.38 16.7 0 49.45 33.1 16.4 0 49.44 32.82 16.13 0 8 Vst/fe [V/Hz] 3.70 3.75 3.70 inf 3.72 3.69 3.62 inf 3.70 3.66 3.56 inf The idea behind the relationship between Vst and fe is that more voltage is present with an increase in excitation frequency due to an increase in the angle between the current and magnetic field vectors. Conclusion Lab 3 introduced the concept of balancing input voltage or power with the need to have a small run-up time. Increasing the voltage or power provided to the motor decreases this run-up time but may also result in higher initial currents that are harmful to the induction machine. The lab also presented the shortcomings of speed/torque regulation with a fixed frequency. A promising alternative seemed to be a variance of the input frequency for a given torque value. This method seems all the more plausible with the ubiquity of cheap, reliable, and almost instantaneous controllers on the market. It allows for simultaneous voltage and speed control without locking in one particular speed related to a given load.