Download 52 nanoparticle - Science Advances

RESEARCH ARTICLE
NANOMATERIALS
Structural patterns at all scales in a nonmetallic
chiral Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle
2015 © The Authors, some rights reserved;
exclusive licensee American Association for
the Advancement of Science. Distributed
under a Creative Commons Attribution
NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).
10.1126/sciadv.1500045
Chenjie Zeng,1 Yuxiang Chen,1 Kristin Kirschbaum,2 Kannatassen Appavoo,3
Matthew Y. Sfeir,3 Rongchao Jin1*
INTRODUCTION
The atomic structure of nanoparticles is of paramount importance
because many applications (such as catalysis and biomedicine) and
fundamental studies of quantum size effect in ultrasmall nanoparticles require structural details at the atomic level (1–3). Thus, significant research efforts have been put forth to uncover the structure
of nanoparticles (4–7). Among the different types of nanoparticles,
gold nanoparticles protected by thiolate ligands (–SR) serve as a
paradigm system and constitute an important platform for nanotechnology. Novel nanomaterials with different functionalities are created through manipulating the surface structure of gold nanoparticles
(8–11). In recent years, great advances have been made in controlling
the quality of thiolate-protected gold nanoparticles (5, 6, 12, 13), and
the syntheses of such nanoparticles have reached atomic precision,
with a series of reported magic sizes ranging from tens to hundreds
of gold atoms (7, 14–16). Such advances have led to total structure
determination of a few magic-sized nanoparticles by x-ray crystallography (3, 6, 17–19). The crystal structures provide valuable
information on the structural construction and evolution rules in
the gold nanoparticles with dozens of gold atoms, and also shed light
on the structure of the gold-thiolate interface, which had been sought
for decades (20). However, since the first report of the Au102(p-MBA)44
structure (where p-MBA = SPh-p-COOH) (6), it still remains a daunting
task to elucidate even larger structures of gold nanoparticles—which are
critically important to understand the growth pattern, surface structural
ordering, and the emergence of metallic properties.
Here, we report the hitherto largest crystallographic structure of a
chiral gold nanoparticle having 133 gold atoms and 52 surface-protecting
thiolate ligands. The Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle (where R = SPh-p-But
and the same hereafter) exhibits aesthetic orderings from the gold
kernel to the Au-S interface to the carbon tails of thiolates, with a kaleidoscope of patterns at the atomic, molecular, and ensemble scales:
(i) the gold kernel follows a shell-by-shell growth pattern, forming a
1
Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
43606, USA. 3Center for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory,
Upton, NY 11973, USA.
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
2
Zeng et al. Sci. Adv. 2015;1:e1500045
20 March 2015
quasi-spherical Au107 kernel comprising a Au55 two-shelled icosahedron and a third Au52 transition shell; (ii) the gold-thiolate interface
exhibits a helical “stripe” pattern in which the S–Au–S motifs stack
into ladders in the curved space; (iii) the carbon tails of thiolates further form “swirl” patterns that are different from the underlying S–
Au–S stripe patterns; (iv) the ensemble packing of nanoparticles
gives rise to a triclinic single crystal.
The icosahedron-based gold kernel illustrates shell-by-shell
growth at the atomic scale and constitutes a smaller counterpart of
the 20-fold twinned icosahedral gold nanoparticle observed under
an electron microscope (21). The resolved –S–Au–S– helical stripes
provide the first crystallographic proof for the formation of selfassembled monolayer (SAM) structures on the curved surface of
nanoparticles (10) and offer clues to the SAMs on flat surfaces
(22). The –S–Au–S– helical stripes, together with carbon-tail swirls
on the spherical gold kernel, also illustrate the unique patterning in
the curved space, reminiscent of the twist of ropes, capsids of viruses,
and the “hairy ball theorem” (10, 23–25). These self-assembled
hierarchical patterns in the chiral Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle have not
been observed in the previously reported gold nanoparticle structures,
which were not large enough to support the extended patterning
structures. The observed structural features in Au133(SR)52 demonstrate nature’s patterning strategies in fabricating large and robust
nanostructures. The Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle can be viewed as a
transitional state in geometric structure from small nanoclusters
toward large nanoparticles.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The magic-sized Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle was obtained via a thermal
reaction of molecularly pure Au144(SCH2CH2Ph)60 nanoparticles (26)
with excess 4-tert-butylbenzenethiol at 80°C for 4 days (see Supplementary Materials for details). The Au133(SR)52 nanoparticles crystallized
in space group P1; the final anisotropic (Au and S atoms) refinement
converged at R1 = 8.65% for the observed data (tables S2 to S4).
Figure 1 shows the total structure of an enantiomer of the Au133(SR)52
nanoparticle and packing of the racemic pair in the crystal. The diameter
1 of 6
Downloaded from http://advances.sciencemag.org/ on May 6, 2017
Structural ordering is widely present in molecules and materials. However, the organization of molecules on the
curved surface of nanoparticles is still the least understood owing to the major limitations of the current surface
characterization tools. By the merits of x-ray crystallography, we reveal the structural ordering at all scales in a super
robust 133–gold atom nanoparticle protected by 52 thiolate ligands, which is manifested in self-assembled hierarchical patterns starting from the metal core to the interfacial –S–Au–S– ladder-like helical “stripes” and further to
the “swirls” of carbon tails. These complex surface patterns have not been observed in the smaller nanoparticles.
We further demonstrate that the Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle exhibits nonmetallic features in optical and electron dynamics measurements. Our work uncovers the elegant self-organization strategies in assembling a highly robust nanoparticle and provides a conceptual advance in scientific understanding of pattern structures.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
(expected m/z = 11,729.77, deviation: 0.13); that is, the nanoparticle’s intrinsic charge is zero.
The 133 gold atoms in the nanoparticle are distributed in four shells, that is, one central atom with successive shells of 12, 42, 52, and 26 gold atoms (Fig. 2, A
to D). The central atom and the first shell form a 13atom icosahedron (Fig. 2A), which is enclosed by a second 42-atom icosahedral shell (Fig. 2B, gray), forming
the 55-atom Mackay icosahedron (Au55-MI) (27). The
Au55-MI can be viewed as 20 tetrahedral units joined
together with a common vertex (that is, the center) through
sharing three adjacent facets. The gold atoms in each tetrahedral unit are assembled in a layered a-b-c manner
(Fig. 2, E and F, green-pink-gray), that is, cubic closepacking. This is indeed the first observation of the icosahedral Au55 motif, which has long been sought since
Schmid et al. reported phosphine-protected Au55 nanoparticles in 1981 (28).
The third shell serves as a transition layer between the
Au55-MI and the surface layer and is largely dictated by
the surface. This shell is constructed through capping the
20 exposed triangular (111) facets of Au55-MI (Fig. 2C),
with 16 facets each capped by three gold atoms in an a-bc-b manner (Fig. 2E, capping atoms highlighted in cyan)
B
and the remaining four facets each capped by only one
gold atom in an a-b-c-a manner (Fig. 2F, capping atom
in blue), hence totaling 52 gold atoms in this third
shell. The 52 gold atoms actually provide the “footholds” for the 52 thiolate ligands. Overall, the 107 gold
atoms in the first three shells constitute a nearly perfect
sphere with a diameter of 14 Å (atomic-center-to-center
distance). The Au-Au bond lengths between successive
shells (that is, radial bonds) and within each shell (that
is, transverse bonds) are listed in table S1. The radial
bonds (r) are shorter than the transverse bonds (a); for
example, the average bond length between the central
gold atom and the first shell is r = 2.760 ± 0.008 Å,
whereas the bond length within the first icosahedral
shell is a = 2.920 ± 0.035 Å. Their ratio (that is, 2.760/
2.920 = 0.945) closely matches the geometry requirement
(r = 0.95a) of an icosahedron.
The fourth gold shell contains 26 gold atoms, which
combine with 52 thiolate ligands to form the surface of
the Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle (Fig. 2D). The surface gold
atoms and thiolates are organized into 26 –S–Au–S– staFig. 1. Total structure of chiral Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle characterized by x-ray ple motifs. The 52 thiolates terminate the 52 gold atoms
crystallography. (A) An enantiomer of the chiral Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle. Magenta: of the third shell in a one-on-one manner (Fig. 2G), that
gold; yellow: sulfur; gray: carbon; white: hydrogen. (B) Ensemble packing of Au133(SR)52 is, 26 (staples) × 2 (footholds per staple) = 52 sites. The
nanoparticles in P1 space group. The left- and right-handed enantiomers are indicated in
surface-protecting monomeric staples require that the
magenta and green.
underlying foothold Au-Au distance (4.872 ± 0.377 Å)
of the entire nanoparticle (including the ligand shell) is ~3.0 nm, roughly matches with the span of the staple, that is, twice the Au(staple)-S
with the metal core diameter being ~1.7 nm. The Au133(SR)52 nano- bond length (2 × 2.319 ± 0.023 Å). Together, the Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle is charge-neutral, evidenced by electrospray ionization mass particle can be divided into [Au1-Au12-Au42-Au52][Au(SR)2]26.
spectrometry analysis; thus, cesium acetate was added to form posiThe monomeric staples (–S–Au–S–) are self-assembled into aestively charged cesium adducts of the Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle (15). thetic “helical stripes” on the spherical surface of the Au107 kernel
Two strong peaks at mass/charge ratio (m/z) = 17,528.3 and (Fig. 3). Each stripe comprises six staples that are parallel to each
11,729.9 are observed (fig. S1), corresponding to [Au133(SR)52 + 2Cs]2+ other and form a ladder-like helix with a width of ~4.9 Å (Fig. 3, A
(expected m/z = 17,528.20, deviation: 0.1) and [Au133(SR)52 + 3Cs]3+ and C). The four helices emanate from one pole of the globular
A
20 March 2015
2 of 6
Downloaded from http://advances.sciencemag.org/ on May 6, 2017
Zeng et al. Sci. Adv. 2015;1:e1500045
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Au107 kernel and coil up like a four-stranded rope (24) and converge at the other pole (Fig. 3, B and C). The clockwise and anticlockwise rotations of the four helices give rise to chirality in the
Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle (that is, the left- and right-handed isomer
pair in the unit cell; Figs. 1B and 3D). Such a self-organized helical
–S–Au–S– stripe pattern on the surface of a nanoparticle is remarkable. It provides the first crystallographic evidence that highly
ordered patterns of staple motifs can form on the extended curved
surface of nanoparticles. This is in contrast to the smaller Au102(pMBA)44 structure (6), in which the –S–Au–S– motifs do not form
such an ensemble pattern. It is worth noting that rectangular
stripes (rather than helical stripes) were previously observed on flat
gold film by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) (22). Also,
Jackson et al. reported ripple-like stripe domains on mixed-thiolate
monolayer–protected gold nanoparticles through STM analysis (10, 29).
The crystallographically characterized helical stripe patterns of –S–Au–S–
motifs provide more insight into those systems.
Resolving every thiolate ligand by x-ray crystallography allows
us to further examine the arrangement of the Ph-p-But carbon tails
on the spherical surface. Surprisingly, the carbon tails do not adopt
the same helical stripe pattern as that of the underlying –S–Au–S–
motifs; that is, the orientation of carbon tails do not follow the allcis or all-trans conformation in each –S–Au–S– stripe. Instead, the
tails tend to self-organize into multiple swirls in accord with the
spherical surface of the nanoparticle (Fig. 4A), and each swirl consists of four rotatively arranged phenyl rings (Fig. 4B). Such a twisted
arrangement of phenyl rings in Au133(SR)52 is in contrast with the
preferred parallel stacking of phenyl rings of p-MBA (that is, SPhp-COOH) ligands in Au102(p-MBA)44 (6). The swirly arrangement
of phenyl rings can be attributed to the combined effects of spherical surface and bulky tert-butyl substituents and is a more compact
packing mode compared to the parallel stacking of phenyl rings. It
Zeng et al. Sci. Adv. 2015;1:e1500045
20 March 2015
is worth noting that self-assembly of carbon tails of the ligands on
the Au133 surface also induces chirality (Fig. 4A), but the chiral pattern is different from that formed by the –S–Au–S– motifs (that is,
swirls versus helices). The surface patterns of both the helical ladders of –S–Au–S– motifs and the swirly distribution of carbon tails
destroy the perfect symmetry of the spherical gold kernel and may
act as specific reaction sites for functionalization (10, 30).
The extraordinary stability of the Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle is
largely attributed to its highly ordered geometric structure. The hierarchical patterning from the inner gold core to the surface ligand
shell minimizes the internal stress of the nanoparticle. Furthermore, the proper arrangement of the staple motifs and carbon tails
provides full protection of the Au133 nanoparticle’s surface from
attack by excess thiols or other chemicals. In terms of the electronic
factor, the Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle has 81 valance electrons (that
is, 133 − 52 = 81), which is an odd number and does not match
with the superatom series (for example, 2, 8, 18, 58, 92…). As the
size of nanoparticles increases and the spacing between the electronic orbitals decreases, the geometric effect will contribute more
to the stability of nanoparticles than the electronic effect (7).
To probe whether the Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle is in the metallic
state, we performed ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption and
femtosecond transient optical measurements. The Au133(SR)52 nanoparticles exhibit a highly structured UV-vis spectrum with absorption bands at 336, 421, 503, and 712 nm (Fig. 5A), being
distinctly different from the single plasmon band (for example, at
~520 nm) of metallic-state spherical nanoparticles. Thus, Au133(SR)52
nanoparticles are nonmetallic in nature, which is further supported
by femtosecond broadband transient absorption measurements. Upon
photoexcitation above the optical gap, we observe three primary transient optical features (Fig. 5B), including a net bleach near 500 nm
and two net positive features of excited-state absorption at ~580 and
3 of 6
Downloaded from http://advances.sciencemag.org/ on May 6, 2017
Fig. 2. The four-shell structure of Au133(SR)52. (A to D) The first icosahedral shell with 12 Au atoms (pink) (A); second icosahedral shell with 42 Au atoms
(gray) (B); third shell with 52 Au atoms (blue and cyan) (C); fourth shell with 26 Au atoms (orange) and 52 sulfur atoms (yellow) (D). (E) Layered a-b-c-b
packing of Au atoms in a tetrahedral unit of an icosahedron; total of 16 such units. (F) a-b-c-a packing of atoms; total of four such units. (G)
Monomeric –SR–Au–SR– motifs clamping on the third shell gold atoms. Carbon groups are omitted for clarity.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
640 nm (Fig. 5B, lower panel). The bleach at 500 nm correlates to
the ground-state transition at 503 nm observed in Fig. 5A. The other
ground-state transition observed at 712 nm is superimposed on the
excited-state absorption features such that no net negative signal
can be seen. These overlapping contributions cannot be rigorously separated (for example, using global analysis) because identical
kinetics are observed at all wavelengths in our data set. This is illustrated in the right panel of Fig. 5B, where decay kinetics at each
Fig. 4. Chiral self-assembly of the carbon tails of the SPh-p-But ligands. (A) The rotative arrangement of phenyl rings results in the formation of
fourfold swirls. (B) Carbon-tail swirls on the square unit; top: left-handed isomer; bottom: right-handed isomer. Yellow: sulfur.
Zeng et al. Sci. Adv. 2015;1:e1500045
20 March 2015
4 of 6
Downloaded from http://advances.sciencemag.org/ on May 6, 2017
Fig. 3. Self-assembled –S–Au–S– helical stripes on the spherical Au107 kernel. (A and B) Side views. (C and D) Top views. The two chiral isomers
are shown in (D). Each stripe is composed of six monomeric staples stacked into a ladder-like helical structure. Yellow: sulfur; orange/red/blue/green:
gold in the helices; purple: gold in the independent monomeric staples.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
of the three primary transient features can be globally fit with just
two time constants (~2.8 and ~30 ps). The absence of more complex spectral dynamics suggests that a single electronic configuration is responsible for all of the resolvable transient features.
This is in contrast with the expected dynamics for a metallic-state
nanoparticle (31, 32).
All of the observed relaxation dynamics are independent of laser
fluence, in sharp contrast to metallic noble metal nanoparticles (33).
Normalized kinetic traces measured at either the bleach (500 nm) or
the excited-state absorption features (580 nm, Fig. 5C) can be superimposed over an absorbed fluence range of 12 to 192 mJ/cm2. Both
the faster (~2.8 ps) and slower components (~30 ps) of the biexponential decay are found to be independent of pump fluence and
pump wavelength (Fig. 5D). These results significantly differ from
the traditional carrier relaxation processes in metallic-state nanoparticles, where carrier cooling is described by the two-temperature
model (31, 33). Within this model, the rate of thermal equilibration
between the electronic and lattice subsystems is described by a conZeng et al. Sci. Adv. 2015;1:e1500045
20 March 2015
stant electron-phonon coupling term, such that an increase of the
electronic temperature (at high laser fluence) results in a longer relaxation time. Together, our results suggest that despite its relatively large
size, the unique structure of the Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle delays the
onset of metallic behavior.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
Supplementary material for this article is available at http://advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/
full/1/2/e1500045/DC1
Materials and Methods
Fig. S1. Electrospray ionization mass spectrum of Au133(SR)52 nanoparticles.
Table S1. Au-Au bond lengths in the Au107 kernel.
Table S2. Sample and crystal data for Au133.
Table S3. Data collection and structure refinement for Au133.
Table S4. Atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic atomic displacement parameters (Å2)
for Au133.
5 of 6
Downloaded from http://advances.sciencemag.org/ on May 6, 2017
Fig. 5. Optical properties of Au133(SR)52 nanoparticles. (A) The dashed lines represent peak positions extracted from fitting to a series of inhomogeneously broadened transitions and a nonresonant scatter background. (B) Image plot of transient absorption data with optical pumping at
420 nm, along with representative kinetics (absolute value) at wavelengths corresponding to the dashed lines in the image plot (right panel) and transient
spectra (bottom panel) at 1 ps. (C and D) Normalized decay kinetics as a function of laser fluence with 500-nm pump pulses (C) and extracted values of the
rate constant for the faster decay component of a two-exponential fit showing the fluence independence of the carrier dynamics (D).
RESEARCH ARTICLE
REFERENCES AND NOTES
Zeng et al. Sci. Adv. 2015;1:e1500045
20 March 2015
Acknowledgments: We thank T. Li for early trials on the crystal structure of Au133, Z. Zhou for
assistance in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analysis, and K. J. Lambright for assistance with the crystallographic experiment. Funding: This work was supported by the Air Force
Office of Scientific Research under AFOSR award no. FA9550-11-1-9999 (FA9550-11-1-0147) and
the Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Awards Program. Transient optical measurements were
carried out at the Centre for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, which
is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under contract
no. DE-AC02-98CH10886. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no
competing financial interests.
Submitted 13 January 2015
Accepted 20 January 2015
Published 20 March 2015
10.1126/sciadv.1500045
Citation: C. Zeng, Y. Chen, K. Kirschbaum, K. Appavoo, M. Y. Sfeir, R. Jin, Structural patterns at
all scales in a nonmetallic chiral Au133(SR)52 nanoparticle. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500045 (2015).
6 of 6
Downloaded from http://advances.sciencemag.org/ on May 6, 2017
1. M. Behrens, F. Studt, I. Kasatkin, S. Kühl, M. Hävecker, F. Abild-Pedersen, S. Zander, F. Girgsdies,
P. Kurr, B. L. Kniep, M. Tovar, R. W. Fischer, J. K. Nørskov, R. Schlögl, The active site of methanol
synthesis over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 industrial catalysts. Science 336, 893–897 (2012).
2. N. L. Rosi, D. A. Giljohann, C. S. Thaxton, A. K. Lytton-Jean, M. S. Han, C. A. Mirkin,
Oligonucleotide-modified gold nanoparticles for intracellular gene regulation. Science
312, 1027–1030 (2006).
3. M. Zhu, C. M. Aikens, F. J. Hollander, G. C. Schatz, R. Jin, Correlating the crystal structure of a
thiol-protected Au25 cluster and optical properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 5883–5885 (2008).
4. S. Billinge, I. Levin, The problem with determining atomic structure at the nanoscale. Science
316, 561–565 (2007).
5. H. Qian, M. Zhu, Z. Wu, R. Jin, Quantum sized gold nanoclusters with atomic precision.
Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 1470–1479 (2012).
6. P. D. Jadzinsky, G. Calero, C. J. Ackerson, D. A. Bushnell, R. D. Kornberg, Structure of a thiol
monolayer-protected gold nanoparticle at 1.1 A resolution. Science 318, 430–433 (2007).
7. H. Qian, Y. Zhu, R. Jin, Atomically precise gold nanocrystal molecules with surface plasmon
resonance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 696–700 (2012).
8. C. A. Mirkin, R. L. Letsinger, R. C. Mucic, J. J. Storhoff, A DNA-based method for rationally
assembling nanoparticles into macroscopic materials. Nature 382, 607–609 (1996).
9. W. A. Lopes, H. M. Jaeger, Hierarchical self-assembly of metal nanostructures on diblock
copolymer scaffolds. Nature 414, 735–738 (2001).
10. G. A. Devries, M. Brunnbauer, Y. Hu, A. M. Jackson, B. Long, B. T. Neltner, O. Uzun, B. H. Wunsch,
F. Stellacci, Divalent metal nanoparticles. Science 315, 358–361 (2007).
11. F. Manea, F. B. Houillon, L. Pasquato, P. Scrimin, Nanozymes: Gold-nanoparticle-based
transphosphorylation catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 43, 6165–6169 (2004).
12. R. B. Wyrwas, M. M. Alvarez, J. T. Khoury, R. C. Price, T. G. Schaaff, R. L. Whetten, The colours
of nanometric gold. Eur. Phys. J. D 43, 91–95 (2007).
13. N. K. Chaki, Y. Negishi, H. Tsunoyama, Y. Shichibu, T. Tsukuda, Ubiquitous 8 and 29 kDa
gold:alkanethiolate cluster compounds: Mass-spectrometric determination of molecular
formulas and structural implications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 8608–8610 (2008).
14. Y. Negishi, K. Nobusada, T. Tsukuda, Glutathione-protected gold clusters revisited: Bridging the gap between gold(I)-thiolate complexes and thiolate-protected gold nanocrystals.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 5261–5270 (2005).
15. C. Zeng, Y. Chen, G. Li, R. Jin, Magic size Au64(S-c-C6H11)32 nanocluster protected by cyclohexanethiolate. Chem. Mater. 26, 2635–2641 (2014).
16. Y. Song, J. Zhong, S. Yang, S. Wang, T. Cao, J. Zhang, P. Li, D. Hu, Y. Pei, M. Zhu, Crystal structure of Au25(SePh)18 nanoclusters and insights into their electronic, optical and catalytic properties. Nanoscale, 6, 13977–13985 (2013).
17. M. W. Heaven, A. Dass, P. S. White, K. M. Holt, R. W. Murray, Crystal structure of the gold
nanoparticle [N(C8H17)4][Au25(SCH2CH2Ph)18]. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3754–3755 (2008).
18. C. Zeng, C. Liu, Y. Chen, N. L. Rosi, R. Jin, Gold-thiolate ring as a protecting motif in the Au20(SR)16
nanocluster and implications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 11922–11925 (2014).
19. C. Zeng, H. Qian, T. Li, G. Li, N. L. Rosi, B. Yoon, R. N. Barnett, R. L. Whetten, U. Landman, R. Jin,
Total structure and electronic properties of the gold nanocrystal Au36(SR)24. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. Engl. 51, 13114–13118 (2012).
20. R. L. Whetten, R. C. Price, Chemistry. Nano-golden order. Science 318, 407–408 (2007).
21. M. R. Langille, J. Zhang, M. L. Personick, S. Y. Li, C. A. Mirkin, Stepwise evolution of spherical
seeds into 20-fold twinned icosahedra. Science 337, 954–957 (2012).
22. O. Voznyy, J. J. Dubowski, J. T. Yates, P. Maksymovych, The role of gold adatoms and stereochemistry in self-assembly of methylthiolate on Au(111). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 12989–12993
(2009).
23. P. Ball, The Self-Made Tapestry: Pattern Formation in Nature (Oxford University Press, Oxford,
2001).
24. I. R. Bruss, G. M. Grason, Non-Euclidean geometry of twisted filament bundle packing.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 10781–10786 (2012).
25. J. M. Grimes, J. N. Burroughs, P. Gouet, J. M. Diprose, R. Malby, S. Ziéntara, P. P. Mertens,
D. I. Stuart, The atomic structure of the bluetongue virus core. Nature 395, 470–478 (1998).
26. H. Qian, R. Jin, Controlling nanoparticles with atomic precision: The case of Au144(SCH2CH2Ph)60.
Nano Lett. 9, 4083–4087 (2009).
27. A. Mackay, A dense non-crystallographic packing of equal spheres. Acta Cryst. 15, 916–918
(1962).
28. G. Schmid, R. Pfeil, R. Boese, F. Bandermann, S. Meyer, G. H. M. Calis, J. W. A. van der Velden,
Au55[P(C6H5)3]12CI6—Ein Goldcluster ungewöhnlicher Größe. Chem. Ber. 114, 3634–3642 (1981).
29. A. M. Jackson, J. W. Myerson, F. Stellacci, Spontaneous assembly of subnanometre-ordered domains in the ligand shell of monolayer-protected nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 3, 330–336 (2004).
30. C. L. Heinecke, T. W. Ni, S. Malola, V. Mäkinen, O. A. Wong, H. Häkkinen, C. J. Ackerson,
Structural and theoretical basis for ligand exchange on thiolate monolayer protected gold
nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 13316–13322 (2012).
31. C. Yi, M. A. Tofanelli, C. J. Ackerson, K. L. Knappenberger, Optical properties and electronic
energy relaxation of metallic Au144(SR)60 nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 18222–18228
(2013).
32. S. Malola, L. Lehtovaara, J. Enkovaara, H. Häkkinen, Birth of the localized surface plasmon
resonance in monolayer-protected gold nanoclusters. ACS Nano 7, 10263–10270 (2013).
33. J. H. Hodak, A. Henglein, G. V. Hartland, Electron-phonon coupling dynamics in very small
(between 2 and 8 nm diameter) Au nanoparticles. J. Chem. Phys. 112, 5942 (2000).
Structural patterns at all scales in a nonmetallic chiral Au133
(SR)52 nanoparticle
Chenjie Zeng, Yuxiang Chen, Kristin Kirschbaum, Kannatassen
Appavoo, Matthew Y. Sfeir and Rongchao Jin (March 20, 2015)
Sci Adv 2015, 1:.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500045
This article is publisher under a Creative Commons license. The specific license under which
this article is published is noted on the first page.
For articles published under CC BY licenses, you may freely distribute, adapt, or reuse the
article, including for commercial purposes, provided you give proper attribution.
The following resources related to this article are available online at
http://advances.sciencemag.org. (This information is current as of May 6, 2017):
Updated information and services, including high-resolution figures, can be found in the
online version of this article at:
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/2/e1500045.full
Supporting Online Material can be found at:
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2015/03/18/1.2.e1500045.DC1
This article cites 32 articles, 9 of which you can access for free at:
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/2/e1500045#BIBL
Science Advances (ISSN 2375-2548) publishes new articles weekly. The journal is
published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1200 New
York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. Copyright is held by the Authors unless stated
otherwise. AAAS is the exclusive licensee. The title Science Advances is a registered
trademark of AAAS
Downloaded from http://advances.sciencemag.org/ on May 6, 2017
For articles published under CC BY-NC licenses, you may distribute, adapt, or reuse the article
for non-commerical purposes. Commercial use requires prior permission from the American
Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). You may request permission by clicking
here.