* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Changing Pluto`s Status as a Planet - e
Survey
Document related concepts
Sample-return mission wikipedia , lookup
Exploration of Jupiter wikipedia , lookup
Scattered disc wikipedia , lookup
Planet Nine wikipedia , lookup
Kuiper belt wikipedia , lookup
New Horizons wikipedia , lookup
Near-Earth object wikipedia , lookup
Naming of moons wikipedia , lookup
History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup
Space: 1889 wikipedia , lookup
Eris (dwarf planet) wikipedia , lookup
Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup
Late Heavy Bombardment wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
The Gravitation and the Waltz of the Planets 333 Changing Pluto’s Status as a Planet SUPPLEMENT WHAT DO YOU THINK? luto has been removed from the pantheon of planets and relegated to the status of a “dwarf planet,” leaving eight surviving planets. While this change requires everyone to re-learn the number of planets, it places Pluto into a new category that will eventually help astronomers better understand all the types of bodies that orbit the Sun. Changing categories in astronomy is not new. Imagine that the year is 1780. Six planets are known: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. Now move ahead a year: Uranus has just been discovered, requiring people to learn that there are seven planets, not six. Fast forward nineteen years. It is New Year’s Day, 1801 and the Swiss/Italian amateur astronomer Giuseppe Piazzi discovers the eighth planet, which he named Ceres (Figure 1). It is located between Mars and Jupiter. In the following year, German astronomer H. Wilhelm Olbers discovers the ninth planet, Pallas, in the same region of the solar system. The discovery of Pallas is followed within five years by the discovery of planets ten and eleven, Juno by German astronomer Karl Harding and Vesta (Figure 2) by Olbers. These bodies also orbit between Mars and Jupiter. P 1 How elliptical is Pluto’s orbit compared to the orbits of the other traditional planets? Compared to the orbits of asteroids? 22 How big is Pluto compared to the Earth? Compared to our Moon? 3 Should Pluto should be considered a “planet?” FIGURE 2 Asteroid Vesta, between Mars and Jupiter. Credit: Ben Zellner (Georgia Southern Univ.), Peter Thomas (Cornell Univ.) and NASA. The fifth such body, Astraea, was discovered between Mars and Jupiter in 1845 by amateur German astronomer Karl Hencke. It was significantly smaller than any previously-discovered planet, as were all but one1 of the next 18 planets discovered by 1852. Furthermore, all these smaller FIGURE 1 Ceres, the largest asteroid in orbit between Mars and Jupiter. Credit: NASA, ESA, J. Parker (Southwest Research Institute), P. Thomas (Cornell University), L. McFadden (University of Maryland, College Park), and M. Mutchler and Z. Levay (STScI). 1 The one exception was giant Neptune, discovered in 1847 out beyond Uranus. 1 3332 SU P P L E M E N T bodies were located in the same general region of the solar system, between Mars and Jupiter. Seeing a physically meaningful pattern emerging, some journals began listing the bodies smaller than Vesta (namely, Astraea and all the subsequently-discovered small bodies) as asteroids, or equivalently, minor planets or planetoids. The first two names are still in common use today. Prior to 1855, the sizes of Ceres, Pallas, Juno, and Vesta had been grossly over-estimated. In that year, another measurement scheme was used that actually underestimated their sizes. Based on these smaller sizes, these four bodies were added to the list of asteroids, leaving eight planets: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. The categorizing served to support the idea that the smaller objects, the asteroids, are fundamentally different than the eight planets 2. INSIGHT INTO SCIENCE Putting similar objects in the same category or classification is often the first step to understanding how they formed and how they evolve. The process of classification and subsequent explanation occurs in every realm of science. It has yielded insights into: the evolution of life, properties of different chemical elements, the formation and evolution of stars, and geological processes on Earth, among many other things. As the other properties of objects like Pluto become better known, theories that explain their formation and distribution will be developed and tested by observations and computer simulations. 1 2 Modern observational techniques have finally established the sizes of the four largest asteroids as being between the original and their 1855 sizes. Nevertheless, they are all very small compared to even the smallest of the eight planets, Mercury. Indeed, the largest of the asteroids, Ceres, is only a quarter the diameter of our Moon. Zoom ahead to 1930. In that year Pluto is discovered by American astronomer Clyde Tombaugh. It was then at the edge of the known solar system with an orbit that sometimes took it closer to the Sun than Neptune. Indeed, Pluto’s orbit is much more elliptical than that of the eight planets, but similar to the ellipticities of many asteroid orbits. Unlike the asteroids, however, it is not located between Mars and Jupiter. Its size was decidedly unusual, too. With a diameter 18 percent that of Earth, just less than half that of Mercury, just two thirds that of our Moon, and 2 We honestly don’t yet know all the differences between planets and asteroids or between the various asteroids. FIGURE 3 Pluto and its moon Charon. Credit: Dr. R. Albrecht, ESA/ESO Space Telescope European Coordinating Facility; NASA. just four times that of Ceres, Pluto didn’t fit well as a planet or as an asteroid. It was grouped with the eight planets, despite debate about whether it was more like them or like the ever-growing number of known asteroids. While asteroids continued to be discovered throughout the twentieth century, the status of Pluto as a planet unthreatened until 1978, when Pluto was discovered to have a moon, Charon (Figure 3), almost as large as it was (2300 km for Pluto versus 1190 km diameter for Charon). For comparison, the Earth and our Moon, which are the next most-similar pair of planet and moon, have diameters of 12,800 km and 3500 km, respectively. Pluto and Charon are a pair of nearly-equal mass bodies orbiting each other, which is unique in the solar system. The status of Pluto as a planet came into further question as similar-sized bodies such as Sedna and Eris were discovered in the same remote area of the solar system. Over a hundred thousand asteroids and bodies orbiting beyond Neptune have now been identified. Their sizes and locations suggest that they are all quite different from eight of the nine traditional planets, the exception being Pluto. Pluto’s size is more similar to the larger asteroids than to any planet and its orbit is more similar to those of other objects orbiting beyond Neptune than to the orbit of any other planet. Pluto has finally been reclassified to better reflect these connections. This was done in the summer of 2006 at a meeting of the International Astronomical Union, the group charged with classifying and naming objects in space. That meeting was filled with tension, as numerous competing definitions of planets and other solar system objects were proposed and rejected. In the end, the following definitions were adopted: A planet is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its own gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (i.e., the object is nearly spherical), and (c) it has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit (of smaller bodies). Changing Pluto’s Status as a Planet 333 3 While (a) is self-explanatory, (b) and (c) deserve some explanation. If an object has its shape because of the electromagnetic bonds between its atoms, then it can have essentially any shape. Rocks look like rocks, potatoes look like potatoes, and you and I look as we do because of such bonding. However, if an object has enough mass, then the gravitational attraction between its particles are strong enough to reshape the body, pulling down high places and pushing up low ones, until the object becomes nearly spherical. The resulting balance between the force of gravity pulling inward and the pressure created by the matter pressing on itself pushing outward is called hydrostatic equilibrium.There are about three dozen objects in the solar system that meet this criterion, including Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, our Moon, the asteroid Ceres, several moons of each of the large planets, Pluto’s moon Charon, and several of the Pluto-like objects orbiting beyond Neptune that have been discovered, including Sedna and Eris. Conversely, there are over a hundred thousand objects in the solar system that look more like potatoes than anything else. These include most of the moons and asteroids, plus all the comets. The third condition on being a planet, (c) above, means that the object must also have enough gravitational attraction to pull onto itself, or to fling far away, the myriad smaller pieces of debris that orbited in its neighborhood. The inner eight planets satisfy all three criteria, but observations reveal numerous other objects still in Pluto’s vicinity. That body does not have enough gravitational attraction to clear its surrounding area and so by the new criteria for planets, Pluto is not one. Nevertheless, Pluto and numerous other objects are still in the solar system, so they need to be classified. Because we know very little about the chemical compositions of these bodies (including Pluto), we don’t yet know if they are a single group of objects or several distinct classes of objects. For example, some of them may be composed mostly of rock and metal, while other may be mostly rock and ice; some may have sheaths of ice, while others have rocky surfaces. Until such details are known, all the other spherical objects orbiting the Sun that have not cleared their neighborhood in space of debris and that are not satellites3 of other bodies are classified as dwarf planets. Pluto is a dwarf planet, but its moon Charon is not since Charon orbits the slightly larger body, Pluto. The asteroid Ceres is now a dwarf planet (Figure 4). Finally, the panoply of non-satellite, non-spherical objects in the solar system are called small solar-system bodies. Neither this name nor dwarf planets is very satisfying. FIGURE 4 the smallest planet, with Pluto, now classified a “dwarf planet.” Scales of the solar system. All these bodies are presented to scale. The two insets compare the size of Mercury, 3 i.e., moons. Credit: International Astronomical Union/NASA. 333 4 SU P P L E M E N T INSIGHT INTO SCIENCE 3 Reasonable People Can Disagree. While most astronomers believe that Pluto is better grouped with similar-sized objects like Sedna and Eris, some astronomers believe that Pluto, Sedna, and Eris should be considered as planets, rather than as the largest of the dwarf planets. As discussed in the chapter, names assigned to groups of objects often help provide insight into how they form and develop. Future observations of all the objects in the solar system will tell whether Pluto and similar bodies are more like the present eight planets or more like the larger of the bodies traditionally called asteroids, with which they have now been grouped. The four inner planets, Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars, are much smaller than the four outer planets, so it is easy to confuse the inner “terrestrial” planets with “dwarf” planets. Just as the name planetoid was dropped in favor of asteroid, the two names, dwarf planets and small solar-system bodies, may eventually be changed to better reflect the objects they represent. As has occurred several times since the eighteenth century, people now have to go through the uncomfortable process of learning new names for old astronomical objects. Clearly, changing Pluto’s designation to “dwarf planet (134340) Pluto” does not change it physical properties. Indeed, astronomers hope that the new designations are on the way to better representing Pluto’s properties, along with the properties of the other small objects orbiting the Sun. While the renaming will be confusing for a while, it will eventually help clarify our perception of the solar system. WHAT DID YOU THINK? 1 How elliptical is Pluto’s orbit compared to those of the other traditional planets? Pluto’s orbit is much more elliptical than those of the eight other traditional planets. Compared to the orbits of asteroids? Pluto’s orbit is similar in ellipticity to that of many asteroids (as well as more distant objects, like Sedna and Eris). 2 How big is Pluto compared to the Earth? Pluto has 18% the diameter of the Earth. Compared to our Moon? Pluto is only two thirds the diameter of our Moon 3 Should Pluto should be considered a “planet?” Because it is more similar to smaller bodies, many astronomers find it more instructive to classify Pluto as a “dwarf planet,” along with such bodies as Ceres, Sedna, and Eris.