* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Water ice lines around super-Jovian planets and Implications for
Copernican heliocentrism wikipedia , lookup
Kepler (spacecraft) wikipedia , lookup
Circumstellar habitable zone wikipedia , lookup
History of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Astronomical unit wikipedia , lookup
Planets beyond Neptune wikipedia , lookup
Solar System wikipedia , lookup
Extraterrestrial skies wikipedia , lookup
Geocentric model wikipedia , lookup
Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Directed panspermia wikipedia , lookup
IAU definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Rare Earth hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Astrobiology wikipedia , lookup
Planetary system wikipedia , lookup
Definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems wikipedia , lookup
Nebular hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Galilean moons wikipedia , lookup
Exoplanetology wikipedia , lookup
Naming of moons wikipedia , lookup
History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup
Planetary habitability wikipedia , lookup
Late Heavy Bombardment wikipedia , lookup
Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup
1408.6164 1403.5839 Water ice lines around super-Jovian planets and Implications for giant moons René Heller In collaboration with Ralph Pudritz (McMaster University, CAN) Rory Barnes (University of Washington, USA) Simon Albrecht (Århus University, DK) the content of this talk has been modified to comply with publication embargos 1408.6164 1403.5839 Why bother about moons? They tell us about the fine structure of planet formation. (1) Earth and Moon formed after a giant collision (Hartmann & Davis 1975). (2) The Galilean moons constrain the late stages in Jupiter’s accretion disk (Canup & Ward 2006). (3) The tilt of Uranian moon system suggests multiple giant impacts on the young Uranus (Morbidelli+ 2012). (4) Neptune captured Triton from a minor body binary (Agnor & Hamilton 2006). Moons could outnumber planets in the stellar HZs (Heller & Barnes 2014). René Heller 1408.6164 Why bother about exomoons? 1403.5839 They could be detectable with Kepler and Plato 2.0. • The “Hunt for Exomoons with Kepler” (Kipping et al. 2012) searches TTV and TDV of transiting planets. René Heller 1408.6164 Why bother about exomoons? 1403.5839 They could be detectable with Kepler and Plato 2.0. • Ganymede-sized moons can be detected by Kepler and Plato 2.0 (Heller 2014). Saturn-sized exoplanet with moon transiting a 0.57 R⨀ star Kepler light curve compared to models Stellar Brightness [%] detrended Kepler data no moon Ganymede-sized moon slope indicates an exomoon Time around mid-transit [hours] René Heller Downlo in of b Pictoris in the fall of 2009. The data do not show such a source (fig. S2). On the contrary, the =1408.6164 al source position in fall 2009 is compatible with the ar, projected position in November 2003 if the source w- is gravitationally bound to the star (see below). Based on the system age, distance, and ne A CRIRES-like spectrograph at E-ELT can determine nd apparent brightness of the companion, the widely used Baraffe et al.via (23)the evolutionary models ar, orbital motion Rossiter-McLaughlin effect. ky predict a mass of ~9 T 3 Jupiter masses (MJup). Why bother about exomoons? rons) with the VLT/NaCo instrument in November 2003 beta Pic b mages of the comparison star HR2435 to estimate and ts are obtained when using angular differential imaging (Lagrange et al. 2010, NaCo @ VLT) 1403.5839 a moon’s sense of (Heller & Albrecht 2014, submitted) René Heller 1408.6164 Can giant planets form giant moons? 1403.5839 We trace H2O ice lines in accretion disks around super-Jovian planets (Heller & Pudritz 2014, submitted). • 2D semi-analytical model in vertical hydrostatic balance (based on Canup & Ward 2006; Makalkin & Dorofeeva 2014; Machida+ 2008; Mordasini 2013) FIGURE UNDER PUBLICATION EMBARGO • rotationally symmetric circumplanetary disk with (1) planetary irradiation (2) viscous heating (3) accretional heating (4) heating from the ambient stellar nebula René Heller 1408.6164 1403.5839 H2O ice lines around accreting super-Jovians FIGURE UNDER PUBLICATION EMBARGO M13 = Mordasini (2013) — Thanks Christoph! René Heller 1408.6164 1403.5839 René Heller 1408.6164 1403.5839 H2O ice lines around accreting super-Jovians FIGURE UNDER PUBLICATION EMBARGO (Heller & Pudritz 2014, submitted) René Heller 1408.6164 1403.5839 H2O ice lines around accreting super-Jovians We randomize disk opacities (κP) and shutdown accretion rates (Ṁshut). Dust-to-mass ratio is X = 0.006, all planets are at 5.2 AU from a Sun. FIGURE UNDER PUBLICATION EMBARGO (Heller & Pudritz 2014, submitted) René Heller 1408.6164 1403.5839 H2O ice lines around accreting super-Jovians FIGURE AND CONCLUSIONS UNDER PUBLICATION EMBARGO René Heller 1403.5839 20 20 If we further inspect Fig Mass Mass [M!] [M!] Population synthesis method points to a statistically sign 20 104 mass of approximately 40 E tary desert”, Ida & Lin 2004 3 10 15 interesting question f 103 a very 15 that will be discussed later o 3 Jupiter 10 Jupiter Jupiter et al.152011). The semimajor axis distr 2 10 Jupiter Saturn 2 Saturn 10 Saturn function are two fundamen 10 10 encoded into the a-M that are 2 10 Saturn Neptune are (besides of the radius di Neptune 10 Uranus Neptune statistical studies (e.g., Ida Uranus 10 Uranus UranusNeptune Uranus 10 2008; Mordasini et al. 2009a Uranus 5 Radial velocity Uranus retical5results with Kolmog 10 Venus Radial velocity & Transits et al. 52009b). The planetary Earth Earth Venus & Transits Microlensing 1 Radial velocity Earthin Sect. 6.1. ther addressed Earth Venus Venus Earth Microlensing Direct imaging 1 & Transits Nep In the Earth figure there are Venus Earth Venus Direct imaging Microlensing 0 1 Nt ered by direct imaging. In Direct imaging 0,1 Venus 1 1 10 10 102 10–2 0 Nep course not the mass, but th 0,1 Semimajor 1 axis [AU] 10 1 of luminosity 10 102 conversion 10–2 0 Mass i[ 0,1 Semimajor 1 axis [AU] 10 1 10 Mass 102 10–2 and uncertain as shown by Semimajor axis [AU] & Burrows (2012). InMass Mord[ Fig. 1. Semimajor axis mass diagram of extrasolar planfor planets of Fig. III.1.1: Two of the most important2014) statistical observational mass-radius (Mordasini+ pointed outlines which is impor René Heller ets. The colors show the observational technique that was 10 102 103 Mass [M! ] Mass [Earth masses] 0 1 Neptune III. Selected Research Areas 4 4 1010 alone. An example are the observational constraints coming from the M – R diagram on the extent of orbital migration. Efficient inward migration brings ice-dominated, low-density planets from the outer parts of the disk close to the star. These planets can be distinguished from planets consisting only of silicates and iron, which have presumably formed in situ in the inner, hotter parts of the disk. In future, the atmospheric composition of exoplanets as measured by, e.g., the planned EChO mission will provide additional, important constraints. Radius [R ] Radius [R ] Earth Earth Radius [REarth ] Another important goal of population synthesis that goes beyond the purely planetary properties is to understand the correlations between planetary and host star properties. H O ice linesC.around accreting super-Jovians Mordasini et al.: Global Models of Planet Formation and Evol III.Selected SelectedResearch ResearchAreas Areas III. 2 mass-radius lines for planets of different compositions. In both panels, the planets of the Solar System are also shown. Note that these figures are not corrected for the various observational biases, which favor for the radial velocity and the transit technique the detection of close-in, giant planets. 104 1408.6164 1403.5839 10 102 103 Mass [M! ] Mass [Earth masses] 104 3 10 103 103 20 20 If we further inspect Fig Jupiter Jupiter Jupiter points tosuper-Jovians a statistically sign These 20 mass of approximately 40 E should be orbited tary desert”, Ida & Linby 2004 15 interesting question f a very 15 Mars-mass moons! that will be discussed later o Population synthesis method et al.152011). The semimajor axis distr 2 10 Jupiter Saturn 2 Saturn 10 Saturn function are two fundamen 10 10 encoded into the a-M that are 2 10 Saturn Neptune are (besides of the radius di Neptune 10 Uranus Neptune statistical studies (e.g., Ida Uranus 10 Uranus UranusNeptune Uranus 10 2008; Mordasini et al. 2009a Uranus 5 Radial velocity Uranus retical5results with Kolmog 10 Venus Radial velocity & Transits et al. 52009b). The planetary Earth Earth Venus & Transits Microlensing 1 Radial velocity Earthin Sect. 6.1. ther addressed Earth Venus Venus Earth Microlensing Direct imaging 1 & Transits Nep In the Earth figure there are Venus Earth Venus Direct imaging Microlensing 0 1 Nt ered by direct imaging. In Direct imaging 0,1 Venus 1 1 10 10 102 10–2 0 Nep course not the mass, but th 0,1 Semimajor 1 axis [AU] 10 1 of luminosity 10 102 conversion 10–2 0 Mass i[ 0,1 Semimajor 1 axis [AU] 10 1 10 Mass 102 10–2 and uncertain as shown by Semimajor axis [AU] & Burrows (2012). InMass Mord[ Fig. 1. Semimajor axis mass diagram of extrasolar planfor planets of Fig. III.1.1: Two of the most important2014) statistical observational mass-radius (Mordasini+ pointed outlines which is impor René Heller ets. The colors show the observational technique that was Mass Mass [M!] [M!] 0 1 Neptune III. Selected Research Areas 4 4 1010 alone. An example are the observational constraints coming from the M – R diagram on the extent of orbital migration. Efficient inward migration brings ice-dominated, low-density planets from the outer parts of the disk close to the star. These planets can be distinguished from planets consisting only of silicates and iron, which have presumably formed in situ in the inner, hotter parts of the disk. In future, the atmospheric composition of exoplanets as measured by, e.g., the planned EChO mission will provide additional, important constraints. Radius [R ] Radius [R ] Earth Earth Radius [REarth ] Another important goal of population synthesis that goes beyond the purely planetary properties is to understand the correlations between planetary and host star properties. H O ice linesC.around accreting super-Jovians Mordasini et al.: Global Models of Planet Formation and Evol III.Selected SelectedResearch ResearchAreas Areas III. 2 mass-radius lines for planets of different compositions. In both panels, the planets of the Solar System are also shown. Note that these figures are not corrected for the various observational biases, which favor for the radial velocity and the transit technique the detection of close-in, giant planets. 104 1408.6164 1408.6164 1403.5839 Predictions FIGURE AND CONCLUSIONS UNDER PUBLICATION EMBARGO René Heller Related Literature Heller, R., Williams, D., Kipping, D. et al. AsBio (2014) 1408.6164 Formation, Habitability, and Detection of Extrasolar Moons Heller, R. ApJ (2014) 1403.5839 Detecting extrasolar moons akin to Solar System satellites with an orbital sampling effect Heller, R., Armstrong, J. Superhabitable Worlds AsBio (2014) 1401.2392 Heller, R., Barnes, R. Int. J. of Astrobiology (2014) 1311.0292 Runaway greenhouse effect on exomoons due to irradiation from hot, young giant planets. Heller, R., Zuluaga, J. ApJL (2013) 1309.0811 Magnetic shielding of exomoons beyond the circumplanetary habitable edge René Heller