Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
First observation of gravitational waves wikipedia , lookup
Non-standard cosmology wikipedia , lookup
Dark energy wikipedia , lookup
Anti-gravity wikipedia , lookup
A Brief History of Time wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Chien-Shiung Wu wikipedia , lookup
Physical cosmology wikipedia , lookup
History of physics wikipedia , lookup
First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1 High School Three Course Model – 2 Physics in the Universe: Integrating Physics and Earth & Space Science 3 4 Introduction Physical processes govern everything in the Universe. Geoscientists require a 5 strong background in the laws of physics in order to interpret processes that shape the 6 Earth system. Forces of moving water push tiny particles of sand along beds of rivers, 7 sometimes hard enough that they collide with the rocks with such force that a piece of 8 the river bed breaks off. Over time, the Grand Canyon forms. Gravity pulls constantly on 9 rocks at the surface of the Earth, and sometimes the frictional forces resisting 10 movement falter. A landslide crashes down a canyon, destroying everything in its path. 11 The nuclei of atoms thousands of miles below the surface that have remained stable for 12 millions of years spontaneously explode apart, releasing massive amounts of energy 13 and heating up the surrounding rock. A geyser of hot steam erupts in California, 14 releasing some of this excess heat to the surface. In each case, an Earth or space 15 scientist is studying the physics of the situation, perhaps using a computer model to fast 16 forward millions of years of energy transfer to explain what we see on Earth today. 17 Alongside this scientist is a team of engineers, looking hoping to use this understanding 18 to design and test solutions to many of society’s problems from natural hazards to 19 global warming or to minimize our impact on the natural world. 20 Physics teachers may not have a strong Earth science background. While it is 21 true that there may be details and historical background that are new, the physical 22 processes are not. The laws of physics are universal. In fact, Earth and space science 23 applications are excellent motivations to the study of physical laws. A classic example is 24 waves, a topic with such universal importance that CA NGSS devotes an entire set of 25 DCIs in physical science to them. With such significance, it seems unfortunate that the 26 most common classroom application of them is a string held between two people. While 27 it is indeed elegant that such a simple demo can capture such a rich process, it is hard 28 to claim that this demonstration is truly exciting or invokes great curiosity. Earthquakes, First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 29 however, are all about waves and students are filled with questions motivated by 30 personal relevance in California. Earthquakes can be visualized with real time data 31 downloaded from around the world, or with accelerometers built into nearly every cell 32 phone. Frequency, period, and amplitude are all there on a seismogram, ready to be 33 interpreted. Earth science can be a door into physics. 34 Even a physics teacher that is enthusiastic about this integration in principle may 35 still feel apprehensive about teaching a course that deals with a discipline they may 36 never have studied. Research on self-efficacy shows that a teacher that is not confident 37 will not teach as effectively, often reverting to tasks with low cognitive demand rather 38 than the rich three-dimensional learning expected by CA NGSS. Districts should be 39 mindful and be sure to allocate resources to professional development and collaborative 40 planning time so that teachers can learn from one another. No matter what resources 41 are allocated, teachers will still have to choose how to react to the change. Science 42 teachers, as a general rule, became science teachers because they love learning about 43 science. Teachers can try to approach this course with an appreciation for the 44 opportunity to learn about a new science alongside students. They can be beacons of 45 curiosity and inquiry in their classrooms. A teacher asking questions and seeking 46 answers is a much better role model than a teacher that appears to know everything. 47 This section of the Science Framework is meant to be a guide for how to 48 approach the teaching of a high school course that integrates physics and Earth and 49 space sciences and is not meant to be an exhaustive list of what can be taught or how it 50 should be taught. Teachers are free to address the PEs with applications and 51 phenomena from ESS and PS that interest them most, and can present these lessons 52 in the order that makes the most logical and logistical sense to them. 53 Care was taken in designing this course so that it does not require a specific 54 sequence with respect to the biology or chemistry courses and should be useful in 55 helping course design regardless of sequence. As such, it lacks some of the rich 56 interdisciplinary connections that are possible. As schools and districts adopt a specific 57 sequence, they can take advantage of links to previous courses by making connections 58 to this prior knowledge. DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 2 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft 59 60 November 2015 Motivation for the Sequence of This Course There are many possible storylines, though a rich integration of ESS applications 61 does impact the sequence so that it probably needs to differ from the sequence 62 teachers would use for teaching core ideas from physical science alone. The benefit is 63 that the ESS concepts can help make the physical science concepts relevant and 64 exciting. 65 The decision for the focus and sequence of this model framework course is 66 based on a specific storyline surrounding renewable energy. Both physical science 67 (PS) and ESS DCIs emphasize how discoveries in their discipline influence society, but 68 the two differ in which aspects of society they focus upon. Physical science emphasizes 69 society’s use of technology while Earth and space science emphasizes humanity’s 70 impact on natural systems and the other way around (issues defined in California’s 71 Environmental Principles and Concepts, or EP&Cs). A major emphasis in the first 72 several instructional segments of this course is one societally relevant topic where these 73 two disciplinary focuses intersect: electricity production. The main engineering design 74 challenges relate to designing, building, evaluating, and refining systems for electricity 75 generation and considering the environmental impacts of each method on the different 76 components of Earth’s systems. The theme is not all-encompassing, as many of the 77 PE’s pertain to core ideas that are disjoint from renewable energy. 78 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 3 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 79 80 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 4 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 81 Model Course Mapping for Physics in the Universe 82 83 Teachers and educators are strongly advised to review the introductory chapters of this 84 framework, including the chapter on Instructional Strategies. 85 86 A primary goal of this section is to provide an example of how to bundle the PEs 87 into related groups that can form the basis for the instructional segments. There are six 88 instructional segments in this course, so each would correspond to a bit more than one 89 month of classroom instruction in a traditional school calendar year, though the 90 instructional segments are not equal in duration. 91 Within this document, an explicit description is provided of how each PE in an 92 instructional segment relates to one another. Ensuring that the scientific concepts 93 smoothly transition from one to the next emphasizes the fact that these topics build on 94 one another. 95 96 Table 1. Summary table for a model course integrating physics and Earth & space science in High School Instructional segment 1: Forces and Motion 97 Performance Expectations Addressed HS-PS2-1, HS-PS2-2, HS-PS2-3*, HS-ETS1-1, HS-ETS1-4 Highlighted SEP Highlighted DCI Highlighted CCC PS2.A – Forces and Analyzing and Cause and Motion interpreting data effect ETS1.A – Defining and Mathematics and Systems, and Delimiting Engineering computational system models Problems thinking Developing and using ETS1.B – Developing Possible Solutions models Planning and carrying out investigations Defining problems Designing solutions Summary of DCI DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 5 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 Force is equal the product of mass and acceleration. In a closed system, the total momentum is constant. Instructional segment 2: Forces at a distance 98 99 Performance Expectations Addressed HS-PS2-4, HS-PS2-5, HS-PS2-6*, HS- ETS1-1 Highlighted SEP Highlighted DCI Highlighted CCC Developing and using PS2.B – Types of Cause and Interaction models effect ETS1.A – Defining and Mathematics and Structure and Delimiting Engineering computational function Problems thinking Planning and carrying out investigations Analyzing and interpreting data Constructing explanations (for science) and designing solutions (for engineering) Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information Summary of DCI The inverse square law applies to gravity and electromagnetic interactions. Flowing electrons produce a magnetic field, and spinning magnets cause electric currents to flow. 100 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 6 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 Instructional segment 3: Energy conversion 101 Performance Expectations Addressed HS-PS1-8, HS-PS3-2, HS-PS3-5, HS-PS3-3*, HS-ETS1-2 Highlighted SEP Highlighted DCI Highlighted CCC PS3.D – Energy in Developing and Energy and Chemical Processes and using models matter: Flows, Everyday Life cycles and PS3.A – Definitions of conservation Energy PS3.B – Conservation of Energy and Energy Transfer PS3.C – Relationship Between Energy and Forces Summary of DCI Energy exists in a variety of forms. Humans depend on the ability to convert these forms from one in our bodies and our technologies. Instructional segment 4: Nuclear processes 102 Performance Expectations addressed HS-PS1-8, HS-ESS1-5, HS-ESS1-6, HS-ESS2-1 Highlighted SEP Highlighted DCI Highlighted CCC Developing and using PS1.C – Nuclear Energy & Processes models matter PS1.C – The History of Analyzing and Stability & Planet Earth interpreting data change ESS2.B – Plate Tectonics and Large-Scale System Interactions Summary of DCI Changes to atomic nuclei release energy and change atoms from one element to another. 103 104 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 7 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 Instructional segment 5: Waves and Electromagnetic Radiation Performance Expectations addressed HS-PS4-1, HS-PS4-3, HS-PS4-4, HS-PS4-5*, HS-PS4-2, HS- ETS1-1 Highlighted SEP Highlighted DCI Highlighted CCC PS4.A – Wave Properties Asking questions Energy & PS4.B – Electromagnetic matter Using mathematics Radiation and computational Cause & PS4.C – Information thinking effect Technologies and Engaging in Systems & Instrumentation argument from system PS3.D – Energy in evidence models ETS1.A – Defining and Obtaining, evaluating Stability and Delimiting Engineering and communicating change Problems information Summary of DCI Electromagnetic radiation has many applications, and can be modeled as a wave of changing electric and magnetic fields or as particles called photons. Instructional segment 6: Stars and the Origins of the Universe 105 106 Performance Expectations addressed HS-ESS1-1, HS-ESS1-2, HS-ESS1-3 Highlighted SEP Highlighted DCI Highlighted CCC Developing and using ESS1.A – The Universe Energy & and Its Stars models Matter PS1.C – Nuclear Constructing Patterns processes explanations Cause & effect Scale, proportion, & quantity Summary of DCI The light from stars tells us about their composition and how they are moving away from us. 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 8 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 115 116 Instructional segment-1 Forces and Motion Physics - Instructional segment 1: Forces and Motion Guiding Questions: How can Newton’s Laws be used to explain how and why things move? How can mathematical models of Newton’s Laws be used to test and improve engineering designs? Science and Engineering Practices: Analyzing and interpreting data Mathematics and computational thinking Developing and using models Planning and carrying out investigations Defining problems Designing solutions Crosscutting concepts: Cause and effect: Mechanism and explanation Systems and system models, structure and function Students who demonstrate understanding can: HS-PS2-1. Analyze data to support the claim that Newton’s second law of motion describes the mathematical relationship among the net force on a macroscopic object, its mass, and its acceleration. [Clarification Statement: Examples of data could include tables or graphs of position or velocity as a function of time for objects subject to a net unbalanced force, such as a falling object, an object rolling down a ramp, or a moving object being pulled by a constant force.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment is limited to one-dimensional motion and to macroscopic objects moving at non-relativistic speeds.] HS-PS2-2. Use mathematical representations to support the claim that the total momentum of a system of objects is conserved when there is no net force on the system. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 9 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 the quantitative conservation of momentum in interactions and the qualitative meaning of this principle.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment is limited to systems of two macroscopic bodies moving in one dimension.] HS-PS2-3. Apply scientific and engineering ideas to design, evaluate, and refine a device that minimizes the force on a macroscopic object during a collision.* [Clarification Statement: Examples of evaluation and refinement could include determining the success of the device at protecting an object from damage and modifying the design to improve it. Examples of a device could include a football helmet or a parachute.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment is limited to qualitative evaluations and/or algebraic manipulations.] HS-ETS1-1. Analyze a major global challenge to specify qualitative and quantitative criteria and constraints for solutions that account for societal needs and wants. HS-ETS1-4. Use a computer simulation to model the impact of proposed solutions to a complex real-world problem with numerous criteria and constraints on interactions within and between systems relevant to the problem. * This performance expectation integrates traditional science content with engineering through a practice or disciplinary core idea. 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 According to the NGSS storyline, The Performance Expectations associated with the topic Forces and Interactions supports students’ understanding of ideas related to why some objects will keep moving, why objects fall to the ground, and why some materials are attracted to each other while others are not. Students should be able to answer the question, “How can one explain and predict interactions between objects and within systems of objects?” The disciplinary core idea expressed in the Framework for PS2 is broken down into the sub ideas of Forces and Motion and Types of Interactions. The performance expectations in PS2 focus on students building understanding of forces and interactions and Newton’s Second Law. Students also develop understanding that the total momentum of a system of objects is conserved when there is no net force on the system. Students are able to use Newton’s Law of Gravitation and Coulomb’s Law to describe and predict the gravitational and electrostatic forces between objects. Students are able to apply scientific and engineering ideas to design, evaluate, and refine a device that minimizes the force on a macroscopic object during a collision. The crosscutting concepts of DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 10 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 November 2015 patterns, cause and effect, and systems and system models are called out as organizing concepts for these disciplinary core ideas. In the PS2 performance expectations, students are expected to demonstrate proficiency in planning and conducting investigations, analyzing data and using math to support claims, and applying scientific ideas to solve design problems; and to use these practices to demonstrate understanding of the core ideas. (NGSS Lead States 2013) Background for Teachers and Instructional Suggestions What does a mountain peak have in common with a pickup truck? If the vehicle 146 is involved in a crash, its hood will crumple and bend under the force of the collision. 147 Mountain ranges, like the Himalayas, are shortened and pushed upwards just like the 148 hood of a crashed car. Even though the two processes occur at very different scales, 149 they are both governed by Newton’s Laws. 150 151 152 Figure 1. Mountains and car crashes involve collisions whose movement and forces 153 can be modeled in computer simulations (bottom). (Insurance Institute for Highway 154 Safety 2011; Cinedoku Vorarlberg 2009; Willett 1999; Structural Tech 2006) 155 Engineers and scientists can apply Newton’s Laws mathematically or with 156 computational models to predict the motion of objects. These calculations (including 157 those depicted in the bottom panels of Figure 1) enable them to do things like build 158 safer automobiles and provide more reliable forecasts of earthquake hazard. 159 Predictions applying Newton’s Laws have been shown to be accurate for all objects 160 except those at certain extreme scales (such as objects traveling near the speed of DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 11 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 161 light and extremely small particles such as atoms or subatomic particles that obey the 162 principles of quantum mechanics). Newton’s Laws provide a basis for understanding 163 forces and motion, and therefore serve as a foundation for a study of physics. Newton’s 164 first law, the law of inertia, states that every object in a state of uniform motion tends to 165 remain in that state of motion unless it is subjected to an unbalanced external force. 166 Newton’s second law, the definition of force, states the relationship between the applied 167 force, F, an object's mass m, and its acceleration a, expressed as F = ma. Finally, 168 Newton’s third law, the law of reciprocity, states that when one body exerts a force on a 169 second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and 170 opposite in direction on the first body, often described as “for every action, there is an 171 equal and opposite reaction”. 172 173 174 Figure 2. Students can analyze many devices that minimize the force on a macroscopic 175 object during a collision. (Clemson University Vehicular Electronics Laboratory 2015; 176 Grabianowski 2008; Chandigarh Traffic Police 2015; VectorStock 2015) 177 Like practicing engineers, this instructional segment is organized around a 178 design challenge where students design a device that “minimizes the force on a 179 macroscopic object during a collision” (HS-PS2-3). For example, air bags, car crumple DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 12 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 180 zones, helmets, parachutes, and padded catcher’s mitts (Figure 2). reduce the potential 181 for injury by decreasing the force necessary to bring objects to a halt by increasing the 182 time over which such forces are applied. In the process, students are demonstrating 183 competence with HS-ETS1-1, which involves starting by considering a complex 184 problem, such as automobile collisions, or sports injuries, and specifying qualitative and 185 quantitative criteria and constraints for solutions. With teacher guidance the students 186 can then break down the problem into smaller, more manageable problems that can be 187 solved through engineering (HS-ETS1-2). The students should be encouraged to 188 generate multiple solutions, which they would then evaluate based on prioritized criteria 189 and trade-offs, taking into account cost, safety, and reliability as well as social, cultural, 190 and environmental impacts (HS-ETS1-3). Students can experience additional phases of 191 the engineering design process by building and testing a model of their most promising 192 idea and then modifying it based on the results of the tests. Testing can include 193 computer simulations that model how such solutions would function under different 194 conditions (HS-ETS1-4). Students performed a similar design challenge at the middle 195 grade level in which they applied Newton’s third law to design a solution to a problem 196 involving the collision of two objects (MS-PS2-1). The high school ETS standards also 197 have greater emphasis on quantifying trade-offs and prioritizing criteria (HS-ETS1-3), so 198 this design challenge might include added constraints about material costs. Middle 199 grade ETS standards heavily emphasize iterative testing and may lend themselves to 200 an emphasis on trial and error. The high school challenge implies a more detailed 201 understanding and calculation of forces. Throughout the process, the emphasis is on 202 explaining design choices and revisions in terms of these physics concepts. The 203 design challenge therefore serves as a culmination of the instructional segment, but 204 students should be introduced to the challenge at the beginning of the instructional 205 segment and the specific phenomenon investigated throughout the instructional 206 segment should be chosen to build towards the specific design challenge. 207 In order to successfully complete the design challenge, students need to develop 208 the mathematical tools to relate forces and motion. At the middle grade level, students 209 analyzed data to identify a relationship between force, mass, and motion (MS-PS2-2). DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 13 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 210 Now students employ mathematical thinking to apply the simple mathematical model 211 formulated in Newton’s second law (F=ma, Force = mass x acceleration). They analyze 212 and interpret tables or graphs of position as a function of time, or velocity as a function 213 of a time for objects subjected to a constant, net unbalanced force and compare their 214 observations to predictions from the mathematical model (HS-PS2-1). Given the force 215 and the mass, students learn to calculate the acceleration of an object. Given the mass 216 and the acceleration, students should be able to calculate the net force on the object. 217 Accordingly, students should be able to analyze simple free-body diagrams to calculate 218 the net forces on known masses, and subsequently determine their acceleration. In 219 each of these cases, the clarification statement for HS-PS2-1 states that students 220 should be examining situations where the force remains constant during the interaction. 221 Gravity is the most consistent way to apply a constant force, so the most consistent 222 results will come from analyzing objects moving down ramps or falling. Computer 223 simulations and digital video analysis tools generate graphs of position vs. time, speed 224 vs. time and acceleration vs. time, providing an opportunity to visualize, analyze and 225 model motion. 226 Newton’s second law can also be used to test the strength of different materials 227 for a design challenge. A satellite must withstand vibrations from a rocket launch, a 228 hospital must withstand earthquake shaking, and a child’s toy must be able to withstand 229 being sat upon by a toddler. In many of these cases, it is not practical to do iterative 230 testing on the actual objects (they cannot build various trials of a hospital and have each 231 of them fall down –each one takes years and cost millions of dollars to complete). 232 Instead, engineers do calculations to test their designs before investing the time and 233 materials of actually building a prototype. In the classroom, students could determine 234 the maximum force a toothpick can withstand before it snaps or a toilet paper tube 235 before it buckles. They do this by placing heavy objects on top of the test material and 236 measuring the amount of mass that causes the material to break. Since the 237 acceleration of gravity is constant, the force can be calculated using the mathematical 238 model W = mg (a special case of F = ma where W is the force of the object’s weight, m 239 is mass, and g is the constant of gravitational acceleration). By comparing this force to DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 14 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 240 calculations of the expected force on impact during their design challenge, they can 241 make informed decisions about materials. Engineers perform similar calculations to 242 provide evidence that their design will withstand the expected forces. Often, computer 243 simulations like Figure 1 are used for these calculations. 244 Newton’s second law is written from the perspective of an isolated object with a 245 net external force acting upon it. With a system of two or more objects interacting (such 246 as during a collision), Newton’s third law also becomes important for describing the 247 forces between the objects. Students made qualitative explanations of the exchange of 248 energy during collisions at the middle grade level (MS-PS3-5), but now students use a 249 mathematical model to describe a different aspect of the collision. A consequence of 250 Newton’s laws is that a quantity called linear momentum stays constant within a system 251 that has no net external forces acting upon it. Momentum is expressed as mass times 252 velocity and conservation of momentum means that the momentum lost by one object in 253 a two body system must equal the momentum gained by the other object. Conservation 254 of momentum can be applied to collisions and students can predict how much the 255 velocity of objects with known masses will change when they collide. Comparing 256 predictions to measurements provides evidence to support the claim that momentum is 257 conserved during a collision (HS-PS2-2). 258 The assessment boundaries for HS-PS2-1 and HS-PS2-2 are limited to one- 259 dimensional systems with constant forces. Most everyday interactions, however, are 260 more complicated and involve complex, three-dimensional systems in which forces and 261 accelerations change. Thus, the motion of such things as a swinging trapeze artist, the 262 crushing of a car door during a side impact, or the ground shaking during an earthquake 263 can be broken down and analyzed qualitatively in terms of the three-dimensional forces 264 acting on the objects at each moment during the motion. Computational models employ 265 this exact strategy, using Newton’s laws to calculate changes in motion over a series of 266 short, successive time increments. 267 There are a number of observations based on everyday experience that seem to 268 contradict Newton’s laws and the law of conservation of momentum that can be derived 269 from them. For example, a rolling basketball will come to a stop unless given an DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 15 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 270 additional push, while the momentum of a basketball reverses simply by bouncing off a 271 backboard in the absence of a visible force. Similarly, a runner races forward without 272 the earth moving backwards. In each of these situations, there are forces or parameters 273 that students often neglect in their intuition (such as friction or elastic forces). With 274 experience, they can begin to recognize evidence of these processes so that they can 275 slowly replace their preconceptions of how the world works with one that truly 276 incorporates the physics of Newton’s laws. Snapshot of a Physics Lesson: Forces and Motion in Geology Mr. H runs an efficient technology-enhanced classroom where he is helping students become self-starters on engaging individual projects. After a few weeks investigating Newton’s laws through laboratory data analysis (HS-PS2-1), direct instruction, guided practice, and homework problem sets, Mr. H. wants his students to be able to relate them to Earth processes. As Mr. H.’s students enter the room, they open the class website on their mobile devices and find today’s agenda. Each group of three students is assigned to investigate and characterize one of the following land and sea-floor features with a virtual globe, map and geographical information program such as Google Earth: trenches (Mariana, Aleutian, Puerto Rico, Japan), oceanic ridges (Mid-Atlantic, East Pacific, Nazca, Mid-Indian), seamounts (Loihi, Davidson, Tamu Massif, Banua Wuhu), mountain ranges (Himalaya, Sierra Nevada, Rocky Mountains, Alps), valleys (California Central Valley, Ethiopian Rift, Yosemite Valley, Rhone), or plateaus (Kukenan Tepui, Monte Roraima, Table Mountain, Auyantepui). As the opening bell rings, students are already actively searching their geomorphic features. Mr. H. uses remote desktop to freeze their devices so he can clarify the instructions printed on the agenda webpage. Each team is to develop a tour-guide script that one of their members will read as they introduce their geomorphic feature to the class. Each group is to create a narrated animated tour in which they provide voiceovers, and descriptive pop-up balloons, as they “fly” their audience around the globe in a video-like experience. Each animated “flyby” or “float-by” tour must include a description of the constructive forces (such as volcanism and tectonic movements) and destructive mechanisms (such as weathering, landslides, and coastal erosion) that have shaped their feature (HS-ESS2-1). Students work throughout the period, integrating their knowledge of plate motions and surface processes with the features they observe. Students are required to make strategic use of digital media (e.g., textual, graphical, audio, visual, and interactive elements) in their presentations to enhance understanding of findings, reasoning, and evidence and to add interest, thereby meeting CCSS SL.11-12. The following day, students proudly present their fly-by videos, providing the class with DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 16 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 an introduction to key oceanic and continental geomorphic features. Following the video presentations, Mr. H. asks students to describe how Newton’s Laws helps explain the formation of such features. Students type their responses into an online form that allows Mr. H to monitor their thinking in real-time. It soon becomes clear that although his students seem to have a good grasp of Newton’s laws as measured by a traditional assessment, and although they seem to have a good understanding of key geomorphic features, they seem to be unable to apply Newton’s Laws to explain the formation of such features. Mr. H. proceeds with an interactive lecture on the concept of geological stress (pressure), the ratio of force per unit area. Although pressure is easy to conceptualize and measure using the simple, homogenous, discrete objects commonly used in physics investigations, it is much more difficult to understand when discussing complex, heterogeneous, continuous objects such as the Earth’s crust. To help students visualize the application of Newton’s Laws in geological systems, Mr. H. presents a squeeze box with a screw mechanism (Figure x). Layers of dark and light sand are placed in alternating horizontal layers in the box and pressure is applied with a screw mechanism. As the crank turns, layers deform, simulating geological folding and mountain building. Unlike other physics problems the students have considered with rigid objects, the sand is clearly not rigid. Scientists often break down complex (Exploratorium Teacher problems like this into much smaller pieces, where the Institute smaller pieces each behave like a rigid body. Mr. H shows an example where scientists use this sort of computational 2000)/activities/The_Squeez e_Box.pdf thinking using computer simulations called ‘discrete element analysis.’ Image Credit: Handy 2006 Mr. H asks students to work in pairs to label the forces acting on a small section of sand near the middle of the model. Students upload photos of their diagrams to the class webpage so that everyone can see their peers’ work. Mr. H selects two student diagrams to show side-by-side and asks the class to identify the differences. Most of the students had correctly identified the force related to the crank pushing on one side, but DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 17 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 a substantial fraction of them forget to include the force of the opposing wall. Mr. H asks students to consider the vector sum of the forces to make sure it points in the same direction as the change in motion. Image Credit: M. d’Alessio Mr. H next asks students how Newton’s second law (F=ma) applies to this situation using the online student response form. This time, many students mention that force (applied through the screw) causes the mass of the individual particles (sand) to accelerate as evidenced by the movement of layers within the box. Mr. H tells the students that there is some truth to that statement, but he disagrees that this explanation describes most of the motion within the system. He challenges his students to identify the evidence that he is basing his argument upon. They are confused at first, but Mr. H walks around as teams of students discuss his statement. He asks them leading questions, such as “how would you describe the velocity of the wall?” Each team eventually realizes that once it started moving, the wall continued to move at a constant velocity and was therefore not accelerating. A large fraction of the sand in the model moves constantly but does not deform, so it too does not accelerate. At any given time, only a small fraction of the model is accelerating. The same thing happens in the real world. Mr. H shows observations from precise GPS measurements that reveal most plates move at constant rates in constant directions for decades (i.e., no acceleration). There are clearly forces being applied to the system, so how come it doesn’t accelerate despite the constant force applied on the edges? Some students recognize friction as being important as the grains of sand slide past one another. They reason that friction or other forces within the system must balance the external forces. Earth scientists studying plate tectonics consider both the driving forces that push and pull the plates (related to gravity and convective processes in Earth’s interior) as well as friction along the boundaries of plates (including drag along the bottom), momentum transfer from collisions with other plates, and the forces that arise from energy dissipation from friction within materials (often called ‘plastic deformation’). Even today, scientists are still trying to find ways to measure or estimate the strength of these forces to determine which ones are ‘most important’ for causing the plates to move and deform. Beyond plate motions, plastic deformation is an important part of the energy balance of devices that minimize force during collisions such as vehicle crumple zones (related to HS-PS2-3). DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 18 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 Science and engineering practices Disciplinary core ideas Cross cutting concepts Analyzing and interpreting data PS2.A: Cause and effect: Mechanism Using mathematics and computational thinking Newton’s second law accurately and explanation predicts changes in the motion of macroscopic objects. Stability and change Engaging in argument from evidence Connections to the CA CCSSM: MP. 2 Connections to CA CCSS for ELA/Literacy: SL.11-12.4, SL.11-12.5 Connection to CA ELD Standards : ELD.P1.11-12.C9-11 Connections to the CA EP & Cs: none 277 278 The design challenge described at the beginning of the instructional segment 279 tests students’ understanding of the momentum-impulse connection: FΔt=mΔv, where 280 F=force, t=time, m=mass, and v=velocity. The product of force and the time over which 281 the force is applied is known as the impulse (FΔt), and is equal to the change in 282 momentum of the object to which the force is applied (mΔv). One can decrease the 283 force necessary to bring a moving object to rest by increasing the time over which the 284 force is applied. HS-PS2-3 gives students the opportunity to design and test devices 285 that minimize the force necessary to bring moving objects to a standstill. A classic 286 activity that meets this PE is the egg-drop contest, in which students are challenged to 287 develop devices that protect raw eggs from breaking when dropped from significant 288 heights (Figure 3). This challenge employs a wide range of science and engineering 289 practices and enhance their understanding of crosscutting concepts. For example, 290 students define the problem by understanding the design objective and their material 291 constraints. They can break the mechanical problem of minimizing force down into 292 smaller, more manageable problems (HS-ETS1-2) such as finding ways to slow the 293 descent or lengthen the time of contact during the collision. Like many mechanical DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 19 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 294 engineering tasks, they are designing an object whose structure achieves a specific 295 function. The process of optimizing solutions forces students to isolate specific cause 296 and effect relationships between components of their structure and the performance 297 result. They realize that their device operates as a system with interacting components 298 where changes in one part of their design often lead to consequences for other parts. 299 300 Figure 3. Students learn physics principles such as impulse and momentum while 301 simultaneously learning engineering design and testing principles while designing and 302 developing devices for challenges such as the classic egg-drop contest. 303 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 20 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 304 305 Instructional segment-2 Types of Interactions (PS2.B) Physics - Instructional segment 2: Types of Interactions (PS2.B) Guiding Questions: How can different objects interact when they are not even touching? How do interactions between matter at the microscopic scale affect the macroscopic properties of matter that we observe? How do satellites stay in orbit? Science and Engineering Practices: Developing and using models Mathematics and computational thinking Planning and carrying out investigations Analyzing and interpreting data Constructing explanations (for science) and designing solutions (for engineering) Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information Crosscutting concepts: Cause and effect: Mechanism and explanation Structure and function Scale, proportion, and quantity Students who demonstrate understanding can: HS-PS2-4 Use mathematical representations of Newton’s Law of Gravitation and Coulomb’s Law to describe and predict the gravitational and electrostatic forces between objects. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on both quantitative and conceptual descriptions of gravitational and electric fields.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment is limited to systems with two objects.] HS-PS2-6 Communicate scientific and technical information about why the molecular-level structure is important in the functioning of DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 21 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 designed materials.* [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on the attractive and repulsive forces that determine the functioning of the material. Examples could include why electrically conductive materials are often made of metal, flexible but durable materials are made up of long chained molecules, and pharmaceuticals are designed to interact with specific receptors.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment is limited to provided molecular structures of specific designed materials.] 306 307 308 Background for Teachers and Instructional Suggestions Instructional segment 1 introduces the concept of force as an influence that tends 309 to change the motion of a body or produce motion or stress within a stationary body. 310 While forces govern a wide range of interactions, the design challenge and many of the 311 simplest applications from instructional segment 1 primarily involved interactions 312 between objects that appeared to be physically touching. Instructional segment 2 builds 313 upon this foundation by examining gravity and electromagnetism, forces that can be 314 modeled as fields that span space. Despite the fact that we cannot see them, we 315 interact with these fields on a daily basis and students are already familiar with their 316 pushes and pulls. 317 At the middle grade level, students laid out a firm groundwork for studying these 318 forces. They gathered evidence that fields exist between objects and exert forces (MS- 319 PS2-5), asked questions about what causes the strength of electric and magnetic 320 forces to vary (MS-PS2-3), and determined one factor that affects the strength of the 321 gravitational force (MS-PS2-4). This high school instructional segment extends those 322 skills by providing mathematical models of these forces. Though students’ everyday 323 experience with electric forces, magnetic forces, and gravity all seem to be independent 324 of one another, these mathematical models will reveal some important connections 325 between them. 326 Science and Engineering Practices and the History of Gravity 327 Although scientists have studied gravity and electromagnetism intensely for 328 centuries, many mysteries remain concerning the nature of these forces. The CA NGSS 329 learning progression mirrors the historical development of our understanding of gravity DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 22 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 330 and orbital motion. In 1576, Danish scientist Tycho Brahe set up the world’s most 331 sophisticated astronomical observatory of its time. He methodically investigated and 332 recorded the motion of celestial objects across the sky. Just before he died, Brahe took 333 on Johannes Kepler as a student who analyzed the data to develop a simple 334 descriptive model. Even though his model did a superb job of predicting the motion of 335 objects in the sky, it was incomplete because it could not explain the fundamental forces 336 driving the motions. In late 1600’s, Isaac Newton extended Kepler’s model by describing 337 the nature of gravitational forces. From his fundamental equations of gravity, Newton 338 was able to derive Kepler’s geometric laws and match the observations of Brahe. 339 Despite the fact that Newton’s work was revolutionary, he became so well-known 340 because his book, Principia Mathematica, did such a good job of communicating 341 information. In NGSS, elementary students mirror the work of Brahe, recognizing 342 patterns in the sky (1-ESS1-1, 5-ESS1-2). At the middle grade level, students mirror 343 the work of Kepler by making simple models that describe how galaxies and the solar 344 system are shaped (MS-ESS1-2). In high school, students add mathematical thinking 345 to their descriptive model (using Kepler’s laws, HS-ESS1-4) and then finally extend their 346 model to a full explanation with the equations of the force of gravity from Newton’s 347 model (HS-PS2-4). 348 349 350 Equations of Gravitational Force Newton’s Law of Gravitation is a mathematical expression to describe and 351 predict the gravitational attraction between two objects. Newton’s Law is expressed as 352 F=Gm1m2/r2, where F represents the gravitational force, m1 and m2 represent the 353 masses of two interacting objects, r represents the distance (radius) between the 354 centers of mass of these two objects, and G is the universal gravitational constant. 355 356 357 358 Common Core Connection: Rearranging Formulas The Common Core Mathematics standard MATH.HAS.CED.A.4 states that students should be able to “rearrange formulas to highlight a quantity of interest, using DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 23 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 359 the same reasoning as in solving equations.” Thus, given G and any three of the 360 variables, students should be able to apply basic algebra to calculate the value of the 361 remaining variable. Students are expected to make quantitative predictions using this 362 equation, and they must also be able to understand it qualitatively (HS-PS2-4). 363 364 Mathematical models, such as expressed in Newton’s Law of Gravitation, 365 provide the opportunity for students to conceptualize complex physical principles using 366 elegant equations. To assess understanding of such models, teachers can ask students 367 such questions as, “What happens to the force of gravity if one doubles the mass?”, or 368 “What happens to the force of gravity if the distance between the centers of mass of the 369 two objects is doubled?” All mathematical models in science are based on physical 370 principles of relationships between scale, proportion, and quantity. While students 371 may be mathematically adept at calculating quantities, instructors can probe for 372 understanding of the physical principles by asking questions about the equations such 373 as “Why does this equation have an “r2” value in the denominator?” or “Why does this 374 equation resemble equations for radiation intensity, sound intensity, illumination, 375 magnetism, and electrostatic forces?” This last question allows us to transition into the 376 discussion of electromagnetism. 377 Equations of Electrostatic Force 378 Working together, electricity and magnetism are a constant presence in daily life: 379 electric motors, generators, loudspeakers, microwave ovens, computers, telephone 380 systems, static cling, the warm glow of the Sun, maglev trains, and electric cars, to 381 name a few. 382 Asking students to identify the core ideas of science that are used by engineers 383 to design and improve such technologies provides opportunities to review prior learning, 384 and recognize the value of science in everyday life. It also opens the door to 385 understanding the interdependence of science, engineering, and technology, in which 386 scientists aid engineers through discoveries that can be incorporated into new devices, DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 24 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 387 while engineers develop new instruments for observing and measuring phenomena that 388 help further scientific research. 389 While students may readily see the application of electromagnetism to machines, 390 they may have difficulty realizing that electromagnetic forces are also essential for life 391 and govern every biochemical process in their bodies. Positively charged protons hold 392 negatively charged electrons in orbit around the nucleus, and electrons of one atom are 393 attracted to protons of neighboring atoms to form a residual electromagnetic force that 394 holds molecules together, governs biochemical reactions, and ultimately prevents you 395 from falling through the floor. All chemical reactions are driven by electromagnetic 396 forces, and all chemical bonds are held together by electrochemical forces. These tiny 397 electrical interactions can add up to some very large effects. For example, our sense of 398 touch is mislabeled because we never actually “touch” anything. Instead, the electrons 399 in our hand repel the electrons from other objects and we feel this electrostatic force as 400 a sensation that objects are solid. In fact all interactions between objects in contact with 401 one another are, at their essence, electrostatic interactions. 402 Well known physicist Michio Kaku said, “You may think that I am sitting on this 403 chair, but actually that’s not true. I’m actually hovering 10 -8 cm over this chair because 404 the electrons of my body are repelling the electrons of this chair (PonderAbout 2008).” 405 How does he know? He calculates this value using Coulomb’s Law, the equation that 406 describes the force of electrically charged objects as directly proportional to the 407 magnitudes of the charges and inversely related to the square of the distances between 408 them: F=k(q1q2)/r2 , where F is the electrostatic force, k is the Coulomb’s constant, q1 409 and q2 are the magnitudes of the charges, and r is the distance between the charges. 410 Given k and any three of the variables, students should be able to calculate the value of 411 the remaining variable. (Calculating the delicate balance between gravity and 412 electrostatic forces for an entire human body and an entire chair’s worth of electrons is 413 unfortunately too complex a challenge for most students, but students can calculate the 414 force between two electrons at 10-8 cm distance apart.). 415 416 Students should notice that Coulomb’s Law is strikingly similar to Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation. Both forces apparently have an infinite range and are DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 25 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 417 directly proportional to the magnitude of the component parts (the two masses or the 418 two charges), and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. 419 With guidance, students apply computational and mathematical thinking to conclude 420 that gravitational and electrostatic forces share a common geometry, radiating out as 421 spherical shapes from their point of origin (See snapshot below). 422 Snapshot: Coulomb’s Law, Newton’s Gravitation, and CA CCSSM Geometry 423 Imagine throwing a rock into a glassy-smooth pond. Waves emanate in all 424 directions from the point where the rock hits the surface of the pond. As a wave moves 425 from the point of impact, the same energy is spread over an increasingly large area. 426 Initially the waves are tall, but as the waves get farther from the source, they become 427 more diffuse. What is true of the water wave along the surface of the pond is similar to 428 what happens to any point source that spreads its influence equally in all directions. 429 Although the water waves are confined to the surface of the water, point sources, such 430 as radiation, sound, seismic waves, illumination, magnetism, electrostatics and gravity 431 display a similar attenuation with distance (Figure 3). 432 433 Students can model this effect mathematically with just a simple understanding of 434 the surface area of a sphere (CA CCSSM G-GMD.1). The energy from a point source 435 radiates out as a sphere so that energy initially concentrated at the source is distributed 436 over an imaginary spherical surface. To determine the intensity of the energy at a given 437 radius (r), we need to divide the source energy (S) by the surface area of the sphere to 438 which the energy is distributed. Since the surface area of a sphere can be calculated as I1r = S 4 pr 2 , where S is the 439 A=4r2, the intensity at one radius (r) can be calculated as 440 initial energy of the source, and I is the intensity at any radius (r) to which the energy 441 has been dispersed. As the energy continues to radiate, the intensity will decrease as a 442 function of the inverse square (1/r2) of the radius, even though the amount of energy (S) 443 remains constant. If the intensity of the energy at r=1 is defined as I1r , then the intensity 444 at r=2 will be I2r = 1 1 I1r I3r = I1r 4 , and the intensity at r=3 will be 9 . The intensity falls off as DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 26 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 445 the inverse square of the distance from the source simply because the surface area of 446 the spherical front increases as a function of the radius squared. 447 448 Understanding of the geometric foundations of the inverse square principle is an 449 important tool for understanding the mathematical representations of Newton’s Law of 450 Gravitation and Coulomb’s Law (HS-PS2-4). 451 452 Figure 4. Equations representing how different phenomena all obey the inverse square 453 law. (Herr 2008, 285) 454 455 456 457 Applications of Gravitational Force: Planetary motions In order to verify that his mathematical model of gravitation was correct, Newton compared his results to observations of planetary orbits. If gravity was holding the DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 27 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 458 planets in their orbits, Newton should be able to show it. He rearranged his equation in 459 order to compare its prediction to the previous work of Johannes Kepler who used 460 geometry to describe planetary motion. Indeed, Newton’s equation simplified to match 461 Kepler’s. The focus of this section is not on deriving Kepler’s Laws for elliptical orbits 462 directly from the gravitational force, but instead on interpreting the evidence of the 463 orbital period of different bodies in our solar system, including planets and comets. 464 These laws form an excellent illustration of the crosscutting concept of scale, 465 proportion, and quantity. By comparing the distance of objects away from the Sun 466 and the time it takes them to complete one orbit, students recognize a pattern. 467 Table 2 shows that the ratio determined by Kepler (orbital period squared divided by 468 orbital distance cubed) is nearly constant for objects in our solar system. Students can 469 calculate this ratio for Earth and other planets and then make measurements of the 470 orbital path of comets to try estimate how often they will return. The ratio is only true for 471 objects orbiting the same body (illustrated by the dramatically different ratio for the 472 Moon in 473 Table 2), but students can use measurements of the Moon to predict the height of 474 satellites in geosynchronous orbit (they have an orbital period of exactly one day, which 475 allows them to always be in the same position in the sky. Satellite Television receives 476 signals from these satellites), or the orbital period of the International Space Station 477 from its height above Earth. Students can also the more complete form of Kepler’s laws 478 to calculate the mass of distant stars using only the orbital period of newly discovered 479 planets that orbit them. 480 481 Table 2. Objects far away from the Sun take longer to orbit it, but ratios using Kepler’s 482 Laws are nearly the same for all bodies in our solar system. Period Average Distance Kepler’s ratio: T2/R3 Planet (yr) (AU) (yr2/AU3) Mercury 0.241 0.39 0.98 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 28 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 Venus 0.615 0.72 1.01 Earth 1 1 1.00 Mars 1.88 1.52 1.01 Jupiter 11.8 5.2 0.99 Saturn 29.5 9.54 1.00 Uranus 84 19.18 1.00 Neptune 165 30.06 1.00 Pluto 248 39.44 1.00 Halley’s comet 75.3 17.8 1.00 Comet Hale Bopp 2,521 186 0.99 0.0766 0.00257 345667* Moon (relative to Earth)* 483 * Kepler’s ratio only works for objects orbiting around the same body. Since Moon orbits 484 Earth, its ratio should be much different. 485 486 Engineering Connection: Computational models of orbits 487 When a company spends millions of dollars to launch a 488 communications satellite or the government launches a new weather 489 satellite, they employ computer models of orbital motion to make sure 490 these investments will stay in orbit. These models are based on the exact equations 491 introduced in the CA NGSS high school courses. In fact, students can gain a deeper 492 understanding of the orbital relationships and develop computational thinking skills by 493 interacting directly with computer models of simple two body systems. Even with 494 minimal computer programming background, students could learn to interpret an 495 existing computer program of a two-body gravitational system. They could start by being 496 challenged to identify an error in the implementation of the gravity equations in sample 497 code given to them. Next, students modify the code to correctly reflect the mass of the 498 Earth and a small artificial communications satellite orbiting around it. They can vary 499 different parameters in the code such as the distance from Earth or initial speed and DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 29 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 500 see how those parameters affect the path of the satellite. At what initial launch speeds 501 will the satellite stay in orbit versus spiral back into Earth’s atmosphere? 502 503 While Kepler’s laws present a simple view of orbital shapes and periods, the 504 NRC Framework pushes teachers to emphasize the importance of changes in orbits, 505 as these changes have large impacts on Earth’s internal systems: 506 Orbits may change due to the gravitational effects from, or collisions with, other 507 objects in the solar system. Cyclical changes in the shape of Earth’s orbit around 508 the sun, together with changes in the orientation of the planet’s axis of rotation, 509 both occurring over tens to hundreds of thousands of years, have altered the 510 intensity and distribution of sunlight falling on Earth. These phenomena cause 511 cycles of ice ages and other gradual climate changes. (National Research 512 Council 2012, 176) 513 514 Using realistic computer simulations of Earth’s orbit, students can investigate the 515 effects collisions (such as the impact that led to the creation of the Moon) or explore the 516 variation in the Earth-Sun distance to look for evidence of cyclic patterns. They would 517 discover some cyclic patterns called Milankovitch cycles, which have strong influence 518 on Earth’s ice age cycles. 519 Applications of Electrical and Magnetic Forces 520 The instructional segment then moves on to examining electromagnetic effects in 521 solid matter. In this part of the instructional segment, connections should also be made 522 to the electromagnetic interactions within and between molecules and the idea of 523 chemical bonds. At the middle grade level, students were asked to develop conceptual 524 models of the structure of solids, liquids and gases (MS-PS1-4). Here they work to 525 develop and refine those models, and to understand that the stability and properties of 526 solids depend on the electromagnetic forces between atoms, and thus on the types and 527 patterns of atoms within the material. Key to this step is an understanding of the 528 substructure of an atom, and of how the mass of the atom is determined by its nucleus, DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 30 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 529 but its electronic structure extends far outside the region where the nucleus sits. An 530 important idea here is that the geometric size of more massive atoms is not very 531 different from that of a hydrogen atom, and an explanation for this is the fact that the 532 higher charge of the nucleus pulls the electrons more strongly, so though there are 533 more electrons, and their patterns are more complex, there is a roughly common size 534 scale for all atoms. Models for materials help make the importance of this fact visible, 535 as students see that you can fit many different combinations of atoms together in space, 536 and thus make a great variety of molecules and materials. Once again, at this level the 537 understanding expected is qualitative, not quantitative, but students should experience 538 and consider a wide range of different types of materials, including some biological 539 examples, to build an idea of the power of understanding forces in materials and the 540 variety of consequences that can arise from their electromagnetic substructure. 541 Most collegiate STEM education is highly departmentalized, with students 542 majoring in biology, chemistry, geology, astronomy, physics, engineering, mathematics 543 or related fields. Students may inadvertently assume that particular topics belong to one 544 domain or another and may fail to see the elegance and power of crosscutting concepts 545 that have applications in a variety of fields. Teachers and students of physics may 546 therefore have difficulty understanding the relevance of such performance expectations 547 as HS-PS2-6, which states that students shall “communicate scientific and technical 548 information about why the molecular-level structure is important in the functioning of 549 designed materials.” This performance expectation sounds like it belongs in a 550 chemistry course because it deals with “molecular-level structure”, or perhaps in 551 engineering since it deals with the “functioning of designed materials”. In reality, this 552 performance expectation, like many, can be equally valuable in the study of chemistry, 553 engineering and/or physics. After studying electromagnetic interactions, students are 554 better prepared to study the attractive and repulsive forces that determine the properties 555 of matter. 556 HS-PS2-6 requires students to obtain, evaluate, and communicate 557 information related to the properties of various materials and their consequent 558 usefulness in particular applications. As stated in Appendix-M (Connections to the DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 31 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 559 Common Core State Standards for Literacy in Science and Technical Subjects) of the 560 NGSS, “reading in science requires an appreciation of the norms and conventions of the 561 discipline of science, including understanding the nature of evidence used, an attention 562 to precision and detail, and the capacity to make and assess intricate arguments, 563 synthesize complex information, and follow detailed procedures and accounts of events 564 and concepts.” Students “need to be able to gain knowledge from elaborate diagrams 565 and data that convey information and illustrate scientific concepts. Likewise, writing 566 and presenting information orally are key means for students to assert and defend 567 claims in science, demonstrate what they know about a concept, and convey what they 568 have experienced, imagined, thought, and learned.” HS-PS2-6 emphasizes these skills. 569 Students may study the molecular-level interactions of various conductors, 570 semiconductors and insulators to explain why their unique properties make them 571 indispensable in the design of integrated circuits or urban power grids. For example, if 572 students understand that the fundamental structure of metals, such as copper, 573 aluminum, silver, and gold, can be described as a myriad of nuclei immersed in a “sea 574 of mobile electrons”, they can then explain that these materials make good conductors 575 because the electrons are free to migrate between nuclei under applied electromagnetic 576 forces. By contrast, when students investigate the molecular level properties of covalent 577 compounds, such as plastics and ceramics, they should note that they behave as 578 electrical insulators because their electrons are locked in bonds and therefore resistant 579 to the movement that is necessary for electric currents. As students learn to 580 communicate such information, they obtain a better appreciation of cause and effect. 581 For example, students should be able to explain that electromagnetic interactions at the 582 molecular level (causes) result in properties (effects) at the macro-level, and that these 583 properties make certain materials good candidates for specific technical applications. 584 The role of engineering in this instructional segment is not to make a design, but 585 to use engineering thinking to analyze and explain a designed or natural material, and 586 to communicate conclusions about how the substructure relates to the macroscopic 587 properties of the material. 588 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 32 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 589 Physics - Instructional segment 3: Energy Conversion and Renewable Energy Guiding Questions: How do power plants generate electricity? What engineering designs can help increase the efficiency of our electricity production and reduce the negative impacts of using fossil fuels? Science and Engineering Practices: Developing and using models Crosscutting concepts: Energy and matter: Flows, cycles, and conservation Students who demonstrate understanding can: HS-PS2-5 Plan and conduct an investigation to provide evidence that an electric current can produce a magnetic field and that a changing magnetic field can produce an electric current. [Assessment Boundary: Assessment is limited to designing and conducting investigations with provided materials and tools.] HS-PS3-1. Create a computational model to calculate the change in the energy of one component in a system when the change in energy of the other component(s) and energy flows in and out of the system are known. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on explaining the meaning of mathematical expressions used in the model.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment is limited to basic algebraic expressions or computations; to systems of two or three components; and to thermal energy, kinetic energy, and/or the energies in gravitational, magnetic, or electric fields.] HS-PS3-2 Develop and use models to illustrate that energy at the macroscopic scale can be accounted for as a combination of energy associated with the motions of particles (objects) and energy associated with the relative position of particles (objects). [Clarification Statement: Examples of phenomena at the macroscopic scale could include the conversion of kinetic energy to thermal energy, the energy stored due to position of an object above the earth, and the energy stored between two electrically-charged plates. Examples of models could include diagrams, drawings, descriptions, and computer DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 33 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 simulations.] HS-PS3-5 Develop and use a model of two objects interacting through electric or magnetic fields to illustrate the forces between objects and the changes in energy of the objects due to the interaction. [Clarification Statement: Examples of models could include drawings, diagrams, and texts, such as drawings of what happens when two charges of opposite polarity are near each other.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment is limited to systems containing two objects.] HS-PS3-3. Design, build, and refine a device that works within given constraints to convert one form of energy into another form of energy.* [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on both qualitative and quantitative evaluations of devices. Examples of devices could include Rube Goldberg devices, wind turbines, solar cells, solar ovens, and generators. Examples of constraints could include use of renewable energy forms and efficiency.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment for quantitative evaluations is limited to total output for a given input. Assessment is limited to devices constructed with materials provided to students.] HS-PS4-5. Communicate technical information about how some technological devices use the principles of wave behavior and wave interactions with matter to transmit and capture information and energy.* [Clarification Statement: Examples could include solar cells capturing light and converting it to electricity; medical imaging; and communications technology.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessments are limited to qualitative information. Assessments do not include band theory.] HS-ESS3-2. Evaluate competing design solutions for developing, managing, and utilizing energy and mineral resources based on cost-benefit ratios.* [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on the conservation, recycling, and reuse of resources (such as minerals and metals) where possible, and on minimizing impacts where it is not. Examples include developing best practices for agricultural soil use, mining (for coal, tar sands, and oil shales), and pumping (for petroleum and natural gas). Science knowledge indicates what can happen in natural systems—not what should happen.] HS-ETS1-1. Analyze a major global challenge to specify qualitative and quantitative criteria and constraints for solutions that account for societal needs and wants. HS-ETS1-2. Design a solution to a complex real-world problem by breaking it down into smaller, more manageable problems that can be solved through engineering. DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 34 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 HS-ETS1-3. Evaluate a solution to a complex real-world problem based on prioritized criteria and trade-offs that account for a range of constraints, including cost, safety, reliability, and aesthetics as well as possible social, cultural, and environmental impacts. HS-ETS1-4. Use a computer simulation to model the impact of proposed solutions to a complex real-world problem with numerous criteria and constraints on interactions within and between systems relevant to the problem. Significant Connections to California’s Environmental Principles and Concepts Principle III Natural systems proceed through cycles that humans depend upon, benefit from and can alter. Principle IV The exchange of matter between natural systems and human societies affects the long term functioning of both. Principle V Decisions affecting resources and natural systems are based on a wide range of considerations and decision-making processes. 590 591 Background for Teachers and Instructional Suggestions We use energy every moment of every day, but where does it all come from? 592 Our body utilizes energy stored in the chemical potential energy of bonds between the 593 atoms of our food, which were rearranged within plants using energy from the Sun. The 594 light energy shining out from our computer was converted from the electric potential 595 energy of electrons from the wall socket that flowed through wires that may trace back 596 to a wind turbine, which did work harnessing the movement of air masses, which 597 absorbed thermal energy from the solid Earth, which originally absorbed the energy 598 from the Sun. Each of these examples represents the flow of energy within different 599 components of the Earth system. With each interaction, energy can change from one 600 form to another. These ideas comprise perhaps the most unifying crosscutting concept 601 in physics and all other science, conservation of energy. The first law of 602 thermodynamics elaborates on this idea by saying that the total energy of an isolated 603 system is constant, and that although energy can be transformed from one form to 604 another, it cannot be created nor destroyed. Conservation of energy requires that 605 changes in energy within a system must be balanced by energy flows into or out of the 606 system by radiation, mass movement, external forces, or heat flow. The vignette for the DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 35 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 607 4-course physics provides a framework for discussing many of these energy forms and 608 how they convert from one to another. This instructional segment selects a subset of 609 processes that follow a storyline of tracing the energy flow of our electricity back to 610 various power plants and renewable energy sources. This approach provides 611 integration with timely issues in engineering and Earth science. 612 Electricity in Daily Life 613 Before students jump into the physical processes that allow us to generate 614 electricity, students should be able to compare the range of different electricity 615 generation methods currently utilized. This basic familiarity will make all of the physical 616 principles more tangible, but it also allows students to engage in a real-world decision 617 making process (EP&C Principle V) because each of these energy sources has 618 advantages and disadvantages (ESS3.A). More than half of the electricity in California 619 was generated from fossil fuels in 2013 (California Energy Commission Energy 620 Almanac 2015). Many fossil fuel power plants emit toxic pollutants and can impact the 621 health of ecosystems and people nearby (EP&C Principles IV). Fossil fuels also emit 622 greenhouse gases that do not have a direct impact on health but contribute to global 623 climate change (ESS2.D; EP&C Principle III; HS Chemistry course instructional 624 segment 4). At the same time, these fuel sources are cheap and plentiful. New 625 technology in the last few years has made other energy sources increasingly viable and 626 California has pledged to increase the use of these renewable energy sources to one 627 third of California’s electricity supply by 2020 (up from less than 20% a decade earlier). 628 What issues have been driving California’s decisions? Excellent classroom resources 629 exist for teaching about different electricity generation strategies, including formats 630 where students debate the relative costs and benefits of each energy source 1 (HS- 631 ESS3-2). 1 http://www.switchenergyproject.com/education/CurriculaPDFs/SwitchCurricula- Secondary-Introduction/SwitchCurricula-Secondary-GreatEnergyDebate.pdf DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 36 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft 632 633 November 2015 The Physics of Power Plants A power plant can be thought of a system, and energy is constantly flowing out 634 of the system in the form of electricity. The energy in all systems is finite, so a power 635 plant would quickly run out of energy if it didn’t have a constant source of fuel. Each 636 power plant is built to produce a certain amount of energy in a given time (i.e., “power”), 637 and the power output of most plants can be easily found. Students can use internet 638 resources to find the power generation capacity and fuel source of the power plant 639 closest to their school. They can then create a mathematical model (HS-PS3-1) to 640 calculate the amount of fuel required to operate the power plant in a day or a year, 641 knowing that the electrical energy flowing out of the system has to equal the energy 642 from the fuel sources entering into the system (at this point, students can neglect 643 efficiency – it will be introduced later). 644 At the middle grade level, students have explored various forms of energy, 645 determining the factors that affect kinetic energy (MS-PS3-1) and potential energies 646 (MS-PS3-2), the relationship between kinetic energy and thermal energy (MS-PS3-4), 647 and the concept of energy transfer in engineering design (MS-PS3-3) and scientific 648 explanations (MS-PS3-5). Clarification statements for several of these PEs explicitly 649 state that calculations are excluded from the middle grade level. In high school, 650 students are now ready to quantify the amount of energy objects have and transfer 651 during interactions. The high school chemistry course also pays explicit attention to 652 these topics with emphasis on thermal and chemical potential energies. 653 The middle grade PEs are written broadly such that students might come into 654 high school with knowledge of different forms of energy. Here, students should 655 organize what they know about these different forms of energy to make the distinction 656 between energy from particle motion, potential energy due to interactions between 657 particles, and radiation. Potential energies arise from forces that act at a distance like 658 gravity and electromagnetism (as discussed in instructional segment 2). Students 659 “develop and use a model that energy at the macroscopic scale can be accounted for 660 as a combination of energy associated with the motions of particles (objects) and 661 energy associated with the relative position of particles (objects)” (HS-PS3-2). In other DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 37 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 662 words, the sum of the kinetic and potential energy of component particles (energy of 663 motion and position) must total the bulk energy measured at the macroscopic level. 664 Using diagrams, drawings, descriptions, and/or computer simulations, students should 665 be able to illustrate this summative relationship. This performance expectation is 666 designed to help students bridge concepts traditionally associated with chemistry (e.g. 667 the energy of atoms and molecules) with the concepts traditionally associated with 668 physics (e.g. the energy of macroscopic objects). Students can develop this model by 669 making a poster of the different stages in a typical thermoelectric power plant (Figure 5). 670 To generate electricity, these power plants use heat energy to eventually produce 671 electricity (most fossil fuel, nuclear, geothermal, and even concentrated solar power 672 plants fit in this category). They usually heat water into steam, which changes the 673 relative position of the particles from being densely packed in a liquid into particles that 674 are much farther apart. This change in relative position requires an increase in the 675 electrostatic potential energy of the water molecules, which we see macroscopically as 676 having ‘absorbed’ the latent heat of vaporization. The power plants then convert thermal 677 energy into kinetic energy during one stage of their process. Individual molecules 678 (usually water molecules heated to steam) are moving very fast and collide with a 679 turbine, transferring some of the kinetic energy in randomly moving molecules (i.e., 680 thermal energy) into the systematic motion of the turbine (i.e., kinetic energy of the 681 object). The turbine will turn the crank of a generator to convert the kinetic energy into 682 electricity, but it will not be 100% efficient because molecular collisions will result in 683 energy being transferred to particles moving in random directions again, detracting from 684 the total energy available in the object to move the crank forward. At the macroscopic 685 level, we attribute this lower efficiency to the process we call friction. At each stage, 686 students communicate the forms of energy at both the microscopic and macroscopic 687 level. DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 38 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 688 689 Figure 5. Schematic of a power plant. (Center for Climate and Energy Solutions 2015) 690 Converting Kinetic Energy to Electricity 691 Electric generators are an essential component in nearly all types of electric 692 power generation, including coal, nuclear, natural gas, geothermal, tidal, wind turbines, 693 hydroelectric (basically everything except fuel cells and solar photovoltaic). Students 694 might try to apply their understanding of microscopic collisions to the energy conversion 695 processes within a generator to come to the incorrect conclusion that these collisions 696 impart kinetic energy to electrons, which move through a circuit. In order to overcome 697 this misconception, students must replace that notion with a correct model for energy 698 conversion between kinetic energy of objects and electricity. This model requires that 699 students continue their exploration of electric and magnetic forces from instructional 700 segment 2. 701 For many years, scientists considered the electricity and magnetism to be 702 independent of each other. In 1819 Hans Christian Øersted discovered that electric 703 current generates a magnetic force, and in 1839, Michael Faraday showed that 704 magnetism could be used to generate electricity. Each discovery demonstrated that the 705 two were connected, but it was not until 1860 that James Clerk Maxwell developed a 706 mathematical model to show how electricity and magnetism are related. During this 707 section, students will follow in the footsteps of these famous scientists by planning and DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 39 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 708 carrying out investigations that illustrate the interactions between electricity and 709 magnetism (HS-PS2-5). These interactions are essential for understanding how most 710 electricity is generated in power plants. 711 Students need to experience multiple situations to develop a model that 712 changing the magnetic field through a conductive (wire) loop can cause an electric 713 current to flow in the loop, and that a current flowing in a wire creates a magnetic field 714 around the wire. Much like changing and dynamic mechanical forces in unit 1’s egg 715 drop can be analyzed one snapshot in time after another, these processes that involve 716 changing fields build upon the understanding of static electric forces defined by 717 Coulomb’s Law in instructional segment 2. Drawing explicit connections between the 718 static and time-varying cases is essential to understanding the relationship. Classroom 719 activities should highlight application of these principles to electrical generators 720 (turbines), electrical motors, and the myriad of applications of these principles in devices 721 in our homes. 722 723 Figure 6 Students can plan and conduct a variety of investigations to provide evidence 724 that an electric current can produce a magnetic field and that a changing magnetic field 725 can produce an electric current. (Privat-Deschanel 1876) 726 Teachers might show Øersted’s simple experiment in which he noticed that a 727 compass needle would be deflected from magnetic north when an electric current 728 passed through a wire that was held above the magnet (Figure 6a). Students should be DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 40 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 729 encouraged to examine a variety of variables to characterize this relationship. For 730 example, they can vary the direction of the wire, the voltage through the wire, and the 731 number of winds of the wire around the compass (Figure 6b). Eventually they should 732 discover that the deflection is greatest when the wire is aligned with the north/south 733 orientation of the compass needle. In addition, they will notice that this effect is 734 magnified by increasing the applied voltage or by increasing the number of winds 735 around the compass and that a circular field exists around a current-carrying wire 736 (Figure 6c). It should be emphasized that students are not just trying to verify Øersted’s 737 findings, but rather test variables to see their effect on creating a magnetic field to which 738 the compass needle responds. Students can also place iron filings on a glass plate that 739 lies on top of their wire coil and use that to map out the strength and orientation of the 740 magnetic field. As they tap on the plate, the filings align with the magnetic field, with 741 greater concentrations moving to those locations where the field is strongest. Adding a 742 second magnet, students can use the iron filings to visualize the interaction between 743 objects. Equipped with data on the direction and relative magnitude of the field, students 744 can draw a qualitative model of the magnetic field using vectors at various locations 745 surrounding the bar magnet (HS-PS3-5). In such a model, the direction of the field is 746 indicated by the direction of arrows, while its magnitude is indicated by the length of 747 these arrows. Upon analyzing and interpreting their data, students should be asked if 748 they can see any engineering applications to this phenomenon, and discover that it is 749 the basis for electric motors. 750 After seeing that an electric current creates a magnetic field, students should see 751 if the reverse is also true. Once again, they should plan and carry out an 752 investigation to see if a changing magnetic field can induce an electric current. The 753 simplest investigation requires connecting a galvanometer to a wire loop to measure 754 electric current in the wire. As they move the wire back and forth between two strong 755 magnets (Figure 6d), students will observe the galvanometer needle deflect in opposite 756 directions depending on which way the wire is moved (indicating that the electric current 757 flows in different directions). Students should be encouraged to use this equipment to 758 explore other variables. For example, they may coil the wire and move the magnet DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 41 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 759 through the center of the coil and see a similar response but generating a stronger 760 electric current (Figure 6e). Upon analyzing and interpreting their data, students 761 should be asked if they can see any engineering applications to this phenomenon, and 762 discover the basis for electric generators. 763 Converting Light to Electricity 764 Solar panels convert light energy into electricity. Students will learn more about 765 the nature of light in instructional segment 5, but the focus in this instructional segment 766 is on understanding the qualitative interactions between light energy and the matter in 767 solar cells well enough to communicate it to others (HS-PS4-5). Atoms in a solar cell 768 absorb the light energy, which causes electrons to be knocked loose. Free electrons are 769 a key ingredient to an electric current, but currents require those electrons to move 770 systematically around a circuit. Silicon semiconductors are set up so that they have a 771 systematic bias where electrons preferentially move in a single direction. How does this 772 happen? Pure silicon forms systematic crystal structures, but adding small amounts of 773 some types of elements disrupts those shapes and can even allow each silicon atoms 774 to be in a configuration where it can accept an additional electron. Adding other specific 775 elements causes the silicon atoms in the lattice to end up with an extra electron. 776 Engineers make thin crystals of each type (one with contaminants that have extra 777 electrons and one with ‘holes’ for additional electrons) and stack them on top of one 778 another. Now, when light hits the atoms in this material, the free electrons are repelled 779 by the extra electrons in one layer and automatically move towards the layer with space 780 for additional electrons. As the Sun continues to shine and more electrons get knocked 781 loose, they always flow in the same direction and set up a steady electric current. 782 Students must be able to understand this interaction between light and matter well 783 enough to communicate it to others (HS-PS4-5). Groups of students could make a fact 784 sheet, a stop-motion animation, or skit to articulate the ideas. 785 Snapshot: Evaluating plans for renewable power plants The city where Mrs. G’s city is located wants to build a new renewable energy power DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 42 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 plant. They are considering two options, a series of small hydroelectric power dams on a river coming out of the mountains and a set of windmills in the flat sections of town where it is always windy. Mrs. G divides the class into small groups and she assigns each one to either create a proposal for wind energy or a plan for hydroelectric power. Teams begin by using mathematical thinking to calculate the amount of energy their proposed project would generate. The hydroelectric group assumes that the dams will harness gravitational potential energy and use the appropriate equations to evaluate the energy produced by different height dams (Energy = mass x g x height, where the water mass is determined by the average annual flow rate on the rive calculated using data collected by a USGS stream gauge that is available on the internet). The wind energy group assumes that the kinetic energy of the air is harnessed and uses the appropriate equations to evaluate the energy produced by different sized windmills (Energy = ½ x mass x velocity2, where the mass is calculated using the average density of air combined with the size of the blades and the speed of the wind. Wind velocity is calculated using the average values from a nearby weather station that posts hourly data on the internet). Mrs. G teaches the students about the concept of efficiency when it comes to electric power generation where only a fixed proportion of the energy is actually successfully converted to electricity (while a large fraction is wasted as heat). Each team obtains information about the efficiency of their energy generation technology and uses it update their estimate of the electrical energy they can generate. With these basic calculations, each team must develop a specific proposal for a power plant that will provide 30% of the city’s energy. The wind teams must decide how many windmills, and the diameter of the blades. The hydroelectric teams must decide how many dams and their heights. Each team produces a report outlining the benefits of their plan. The class then hosts a town hall meeting where teams communicate their plans and present an argument that their proposal is better than the competing plans. This argument should be supported by evidence that goes beyond the simple energy calculations but also takes into account the relative benefits and impacts of each DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 43 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 technology on natural systems (EP&C II; for example, dams destroy aquatic habitat, use large volumes of CO2 in their cement, and result in water lost to evaporation; wind turbines obstruct scenic views, occupy large amounts of land, and only provide intermittent energy). These competing factors enter into all real world decisions about energy generation (EP&C V). Science and engineering practices Disciplinary core ideas PS3.A Definitions of Energy PS3.B Conservation of Energy and Energy Transfer PS3.D Energy and Chemical Processes in Everyday Life ESS3.A Natural Resources ESS3.C Human Impacts on Earth Systems ESS3.D Global Climate Change Using mathematics and computational thinking Engaging in argument from evidence Obtaining, evaluating and communicating information Crosscutting concepts Energy and matter: Flows, cycles, and conservation Influence of science, engineering, and technology on society and the natural world Connections to the CA CCSSM: Connections to CA CCSS for ELA/Literacy: Connection to CA ELD Standards : Connections to the CA EP&Cs: II, V 786 787 Engineering Energy Conversion Devices Now that students have learned extensively about the theory behind energy 788 conversion devices, they are now tasked with an engineering challenge to create one 789 themselves (HS-PS3-3). The vignette in High School Four Course Model – Physics 790 section of this Science Framework includes a template of what this design challenge 791 might look like. The first stage of the engineering design process is to place the goal in DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 44 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 792 the context of the major global challenge of providing affordable electrical energy 793 without the problems associated with fossil fuels (HS-ETS1-1). Students evaluated the 794 impacts of different electricity sources at beginning of this instructional segment, 795 including a discussion of how fossil fuels contribute to global climate change. The High 796 School Three Course Model – Chemistry in the Earth System course emphasizes 797 physical mechanisms causing climate change and the High School Three Course Model 798 – The Living Earth 799 course explores its effects on the biosphere. Depending on the sequence of courses 800 within each school district, this instructional segment should draw strong connections to 801 those courses. Designing, building, and improving energy conversion devices that are 802 more efficient or that pollute less involves breaking down the complex global problem 803 into more manageable problems that can be solved through engineering (HS-ETS1-2). 804 Students have learned some of the scientific principles behind the engineering tools that 805 can help address the challenge throughout this instructional segment. Students now 806 choose to build their own wind turbines, hydroelectric power plants, solar panels, or 807 other mini version of a power plant that transforms energy from less useful forms, such 808 as wind, sunlight, or motion, into electricity (arguably the most convenient and useful 809 form of energy in our modern world). Students learn to work within engineering 810 constraints as they strive to maximize efficiency (generate the largest power output 811 possible) while taking into account prioritized criteria and trade-offs (HS-ETS1-3). 812 Students can measure outputs and then refine their designs to maximize efficiency 813 given constant inputs. Students can also utilize existing computer simulations to 814 investigate the impact of these different energy solutions (HS-ETS1-4). 815 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 45 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 816 817 Physics - Instructional segment 4: Nuclear Processes and Earth History Guiding Questions: What does E=mc2 mean? How do nuclear reactions illustrate conservation of energy and mass? How do we determine the age of rocks and other geologic features? Science and Engineering Practices: Developing and using models Crosscutting concepts: Energy and matter: Flows, cycles, and conservation Students who demonstrate understanding can: HS-PS1-8 Develop models to illustrate the changes in the composition of the nucleus of the atom and the energy released during the processes of fission, fusion, and radioactive decay. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on simple qualitative models, such as pictures or diagrams, and on the scale of energy released in nuclear processes relative to other kinds of transformations.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment does not include quantitative calculation of energy released. Assessment is limited to alpha, beta, and gamma radioactive decays.] HS-ESS1-5. Evaluate evidence of the past and current movements of continental and oceanic crust and the theory of plate tectonics to explain the ages of crustal rocks. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on the ability of plate tectonics to explain the ages of crustal rocks. Examples include evidence of the ages oceanic crust increasing with distance from mid-ocean ridges (a result of plate spreading) and the ages of North American continental crust increasing with distance away from a central ancient core (a result of past plate interactions).] HS-ESS1-6. Apply scientific reasoning and evidence from ancient Earth materials, meteorites, and other planetary surfaces to construct an account of Earth’s formation and early history. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on using available evidence within the solar system to reconstruct the early history of Earth, which formed along with the rest of the solar system 4.6 billion years ago. Examples of evidence include the absolute ages of ancient materials (obtained by radiometric dating of meteorites, moon rocks, and Earth’s oldest minerals), the sizes and compositions of solar system objects, and the impact cratering record of planetary surfaces.] HS-ESS2-1. Develop a model to illustrate how Earth’s internal and surface DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 46 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 processes operate at different spatial and temporal scales to form continental and ocean-floor features. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on how the appearance of land features (such as mountains, valleys, and plateaus) and sea-floor features (such as trenches, ridges, and seamounts) are a result of both constructive forces (such as volcanism, tectonic uplift, and orogeny) and destructive mechanisms (such as weathering, mass wasting, and coastal erosion).] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment does not include memorization of the details of the formation of specific geographic features of Earth’s surface.] 818 Background for Teachers and Instructional Suggestions Energy related to changes in the nuclei of atoms drives about 20% of California’s 819 820 electricity generation (California Energy Commission Energy Almanac 2015) (from 821 fission in nuclear power plants), half the heat flowing upwards from Earth’s interior (from 822 the radioactive decay of unstable elements) (Gando et al. 2011), all of the energy we 823 receive from the Sun (from nuclear fusion in its core). In this instructional segment, 824 students will develop models for these processes. Students will need to apply an 825 understanding of the internal structure of atoms and be able to read the periodic table, 826 topics introduced in the high school chemistry class and no longer addressed at the 827 middle grade level. If students have not yet taken high school chemistry, teachers can 828 use nuclear processes to introduce these topics. 829 Changes in the nucleus occur at a length scale too small to observe directly, but 830 students can detect evidence of these processes by looking at energy and matter that 831 radiate out of the nucleus as a result of these changes. One can think of these 832 emissions as an effect and develop a model that explains the cause. Students begin 833 the instructional segment by making observations of a cloud chamber2 (as a video clip 834 or classroom demonstration). Strange streaks whiz through the cloud chamber. 835 Students can measure background radiation using a Geiger counter or even a 2 MIT Video, Cloud Chamber: http://video.mit.edu/watch/cloud-chamber-4058/ DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 47 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 836 smartphone app3. With these observations, students now obtain information about the 837 discovery of radioactivity and how scientists in the late 1800’s like Becquerel and the 838 Curies determined that the particles they see had mass, were often charged, and 839 emanated in high concentrations from different types of natural materials. Over time, 840 this understanding has led to the modern models of radioactivity and the modern tools 841 for measuring its effects. These concepts can generally not be explored in direct 842 experimentation in the classroom, so access to and analysis of data from external 843 sources and use of simulations will play an important role in engaging students in three- 844 dimensional learning. 845 Scientists know of only four fundamental interactions, also known as fundamental 846 forces: gravitational, electromagnetic, strong nuclear and weak nuclear. All interactions 847 between matter in the Universe involve one of these forces. Students studied the first 848 two during instructional segment 2, and the focus in this instructional segment is on the 849 effects of the remaining two. The strong force ensures the stability of ordinary matter 850 by binding the atomic nucleus together, while the weak mediates radioactive decay. 851 Although the strong and weak nuclear forces are essential for matter, as we know it, to 852 exist, they are difficult to conceptualize and relate to because they operate at distances 853 scales too small to be seen. As the nucleus gets larger, forces holding nuclei together 854 are overcome by electrostatic repulsion, which is why the largest atoms on the periodic 855 table are unstable. It is this instability that result in the nucleus changing in one or more 856 ways. 857 The Earth receives more energy from the Sun in an hour and a half than all of 858 humanity uses in a year, but this energy does not come from nothing. Nuclear reactions, 859 too, must obey conservation laws, but now students must apply the principle of mass- 860 energy equivalence (E=mc2) to revise the view that matter is conserved as atoms, to a 3 Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization, Smart phone radiation detector ‘app’ tests positive: http://www.ansto.gov.au/AboutANSTO/MediaCentre/News/ACS049898 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 48 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 861 more accurate view that the number of nucleons (sum of protons and neutrons) is 862 conserved. Neither mass, nor the number of atoms of each type are conserved in 863 nuclear processes, and although such mass conservation “laws” are applicable to 864 gravitational and electromagnetic processes they must be revised and refined as we 865 examine nuclear processes, This revision and refinement process should be stressed 866 as an essential part of the nature of science. 867 Nuclear changes all release large amounts of energy, but they do so by different 868 mechanisms. Scientists have recognized several classes of nuclear processes, 869 including combining small nuclei to make larger ones (fusion) and larger nuclei emitting 870 smaller pieces (fission, alpha decay, and beta decay). Students develop models to 871 illustrate the changes in the composition of the nucleus of the atom and the energy 872 released during each of these processes (HS-PS1-8). Such models could be in the form 873 of equations or diagrams (Figure 7). Although it is not necessary to include quantitative 874 calculations, the models should communicate the conservation of the combined mass- 875 energy system. 876 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 49 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 877 878 Figure 7 Students should be able to develop models to illustrate the changes in the 879 composition of the nucleus of the atom and the energy released during the processes of 880 fission, fusion, and radioactive decay. (Pares Space Warp Research 2015; Thomas 881 Jefferson National Accelerator Facility – Office of Science Education 2015) 882 In fusion, small nuclei combine together to form larger ones. Since all nuclei have 883 positive charges (made only of positive protons and neutral neutrons), electrostatic 884 forces will tend to repel nuclei apart from one another. The closer nuclei get to one 885 another, the stronger the electrostatic repulsion. Nuclei can get very close to one DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 50 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 886 another if they collide when they are moving very fast. If they manage to get close 887 enough to one another, another interaction becomes important: the strong nuclear force 888 which is what holds nuclei together in the first place. Like creating a new chemical bond, 889 creating new strong force interactions releases energy. Students will revisit fusion and 890 apply their qualitative model of it to stars in instructional segment 6, since stellar cores 891 are the only place where fusion naturally occurs. Efforts have been made to use fusion 892 to make energy on Earth, but the engineering task is challenging. If scientists and 893 engineers can get it to work, fusion would be cleaner and safer than just about any 894 other known energy source and is therefore a worthwhile area of research. Even though 895 fusion can be recreated in laboratories, a large amount of energy needs to be utilized to 896 speed nuclei up fast enough to achieve fusion. Unless the fusion device is extremely 897 efficient, it ends up taking more energy to start the fusion than the fusion actually 898 releases. California hosts the most advanced fusion experiment in the world at the 899 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory where scientists and engineers are working 900 daily to make breakthroughs. Students could explore an interactive computer simulation 901 of the experiment where they adjust the speed at which atoms are accelerated until 902 fusion is achieved, making measurements about the amount of energy used in the 903 device and the amount of energy released by fusion. 904 Weak interaction processes (beta decay) should be introduced as changes in 905 which neutrons transform into protons or protons transform to neutrons. Beta decay 906 allows atoms to move closer to the optimal ratio of protons and neutrons, and is key to 907 understanding why all stable nuclei have roughly equal numbers of protons and 908 neutrons, with a few more neutrons as nuclei gets bigger. Protons have an electric 909 charge while neutrons are neutral and have a slightly larger mass. Conservation laws 910 dictate that the charge and extra mass cannot just appear or disappear but must come 911 from somewhere. Applying the reasoning from conservation laws, students recognize 912 that other subatomic particles like positrons and neutrinos must exist along with protons, 913 neutrons, and electrons. 914 915 While beta decay involves small changes to nuclei, sometimes the competition between different forces within the nucleus cause it to spontaneously split apart to form DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 51 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 916 two or more smaller nuclei. One of these smaller products is often a helium nucleus 917 composed of two protons and two neutrons. This particle is often called an alpha 918 particle, so this type of fission is referred to as alpha decay. The smaller nuclei require 919 less total binding energy, so some of that energy is converted into kinetic energy 920 causing the smaller nuclei to rapidly fly away from one another. These nuclei are also 921 usually unstable because smaller nuclei require a different ratio of protons to neutrons 922 in order to be stable than the original larger nucleus. These smaller nuclei will often 923 release even more energy either undergoing beta decay or by releasing energy by 924 gamma radiation when their component protons and neutrons rearrange to a lower 925 (more stable) energy configuration. 926 Nuclear power plants rely on the release of energy from nuclear changes in 927 uranium (and sometimes plutonium). Nuclei of these atoms are unstable and naturally 928 decay primarily by alpha, beta, and gamma decay, but this process is very slow. 929 Reactors extract most of their energy by inducing fission. This is accomplished primarily 930 by separating out uranium-235 (a nucleus with 92 protons and 143 neutrons) from other 931 forms of uranium with different numbers of neutrons. These other forms of uranium 932 absorb neutrons, which prevents the fission process from speeding up. When fission 933 occurs in one atom of this purer uranium, neutrons that are given off are likely to collide 934 with other uranium atoms and induce them to fission. As a result, energy release can 935 maintained at a rate far above the typical background level for naturally occurring 936 concentrations of uranium. This energy is used to heat water just like other 937 thermoelectric power plants. Students can use an online simulator to model the fission 938 process and can be given the challenge to adjust the simulator settings to find the 939 minimum concentration of uranium-235 required to maintain a certain energy output 940 from fission.4 4 PhET, Nuclear Fission: https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/nuclear-fission DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 52 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft 941 942 November 2015 Using Radioactive Decay to Understand Earth Processes How old is the Earth? How long ago did human civilizations arrive in California? 943 How long has this boulder been exposed at the Earth’s surface? Practically any time 944 scientists want to know about the age of events older than the written historical record, 945 they turn to radioactive decay to help them find out. This section shows how students 946 can apply their model of microscopic radioactive decay to answer such real-world 947 questions. None of the PE’s related to radiometric dating require that students can 948 perform calculations of decay rates. The emphasis is instead on a qualitative model of 949 the radiometric dating process and, more importantly, on the analysis of results from 950 radiometric dating to identify patterns that provide evidence of processes shaping 951 Earth’s surface. 952 When an atom has an unstable nucleus, it will undergo decay at a random time. 953 Different elements behave differently as the number protons and neutrons in a nucleus 954 affects the probability that an atom will decay in a certain time period, but it is not 955 possible to predict when any given nucleus will decay. Science usually strives to find 956 cause and effect relationships to predict when future events will occur, but having 957 decay being largely based on fixed probabilities means that it is not sensitive to external 958 triggers (at least under most natural conditions). Scientists have learned to calibrate 959 radiometric clocks by measuring the proportion of radioactively unstable atoms (often 960 called ‘parent products’) to stable products that are produced following decay (so-called 961 ‘daughter products’). In a simple system of pure uranium-235 (a nucleus with 92 protons 962 and 143 neutrons), about 50% of the atoms will have decayed after 700 million years 963 (defined as its ‘half-life’). This probability has been calculated from much shorter 964 observations of radioactive decay in laboratories. By contrast, pure carbon-14 (a 965 nucleus with 6 protons and 8 neutrons) decays at a much faster rate with 50% of the 966 atoms decaying into nitrogen-14 within just 5,730 years. Students can visualize what is DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 53 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 967 meant by half-life using a computer simulation5 or classroom activity with pennies 968 representing individual atoms that ‘decay’ as they flip from heads to tails 6. 969 Real materials on earth rarely involve pure chunks of Uranium-235, Carbon-14, 970 or any other radioactive parent product. There are initial amounts of other types of 971 atoms, including daughter products. Additionally, the system may not be closed and a 972 portion of the daughter product may escape. Having ‘extra’ or ‘missing’ daughter 973 products would affect the calculated age, if not properly recognized. Scientists have 974 developed sophisticated tests involving comparisons of multiple parent-daughter 975 systems to account for these issues and ensure accurate date measurements. 976 Scientists use these radiometric clocks to calculate the age of natural materials 977 and learn about the past. For example, scientists have dated meteorites that have 978 crashed into Earth’s surface. These objects have compositions similar to what we 979 expect the core of the Earth to look like, and are therefore interpreted to be pieces of 980 other planetary objects that formed around the same time as our core. Many of these 981 meteorites have similar ages of around 4.5-4.6 billion years and none have been found 982 with ages older than that. Ages on the Moon are also similar, though a bit younger (4.4- 983 4.5 billion years old). Students can use all this information as evidence for making a 984 claim about the age of Earth itself and use information about the age of the Moon to 985 construct an account of the timing and possible mechanism by which it formed (HS- 5 PhET, Radioactive Dating Game: https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/radioactive- dating-game 6 Center for Nuclear Science and Technology Information of the American Nuclear Society, Half-Life : Paper, M&M’s, Pennies, or Puzzle Pieces: http://www.nuclearconnect.org/in-the-classroom/for-teachers/half-life-of-paper-mmspennies-or-puzzle-pieces DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 54 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 986 ESS1-6). A detailed assessment task for this PE was written by the authors of NGSS as 987 a model of how the 3-dimensional learning appears in the classroom7. 988 Since Earth formed, its surface has been constantly reshaped. We know this, in 989 part, due to evidence from radiometric dating. Plate tectonics is one process that 990 actively moves and deforms rocks, and students analyzed a range of data types 991 supporting this theory at the middle grade level (MS-ESS2-3). Now, students evaluate 992 the theory to see if it is consistent with evidence from rock ages calculated using 993 radiometric dating. The oldest individual minerals in some of Earth’s oldest rocks are about 4.4 994 995 billion years old, though these rocks form only a tiny fraction of the planet’s surface. 996 Few rock formations are older than even 3 billion years, and those rocks are only found 997 on the continents. The spatial distribution of the ages of rocks on continents has 998 complicated patterns. For example, some of the oldest rocks in California are located 999 just outside the Los Angeles area in the San Gabriel Mountains. They formed 1.8 billion 1000 years ago, they are literally touching rocks just 85 million years old, and with rocks with 1001 a range of ages in between are all located within the same mountain range. This jumble 1002 of ages is evidence of California’s complicated geologic history where faults slice up 1003 rock formations and move them across the state. Some might be surprised to find that 1004 the rest of the US does not appear that much different (Figure 8). In fact, all continents 1005 show evidence of very complicated geologic histories where rocks of very different ages 1006 are mixed as continents are built up by the collision of smaller pieces and then broken 1007 back apart by later episodes of motion in a different direction. 1008 Measurements of the seafloor age, however, are much younger (no rock being 1009 older than 280 million) years and show a clear pattern. We know that there must have 1010 been oceans older than 280 million years ago because we have found fossil marine 1011 creatures in rocks currently attached to continents that date back much older than that. 7 Achieve, Unraveling Earth’s Early History — High School Sample Classroom Task: http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/ngss/files/HS-ESS_EarlyEarth_version2.pdf DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 55 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1012 So what happened to the rest of the old seafloor? A clue comes from the fact that ages 1013 typically progress in a logical order in a symmetric pattern from the middle of the ocean 1014 outwards. 1015 1016 Figure 8. Map of rock ages in the continental US (left) and seafloor (right). Continental 1017 rocks are as old as 4 billion years and are a jumbled mix of ages. Seafloor rocks show a 1018 consistent pattern and are never older than 280 million years. (National Oceanic and 1019 Atmospheric Administration, National Centers for Environmental Information 2015) 1020 Running along the center of the ocean is a band of rock with zero age. This 1021 means that there is no accumulated daughter product from radioactive decay (above 1022 the background level). How can this be when the unstable parent isotopes are present 1023 and therefore constantly decaying into the daughter products? When rock is hot, atoms 1024 can move around relatively easily and daughter products for radioactive decay can 1025 therefore escape or equilibrate with the background concentration of that element. As a 1026 rock cools, atoms are locked into their positions in crystal lattices; this is the moment 1027 when the geologic clock starts ticking. The new crust in the center of the ocean was 1028 therefore very hot in the recent past, which is evidence that it rose up from Earth’s 1029 interior. As new crust is progressively forming, it also must move constantly away from 1030 middle of the ocean. Students can calculate the rate of this motion using the radiometric 1031 age dates. At the same time, older crust must therefore be sinking down (which would 1032 be expected as the crust becomes denser as it cools over time, and explains why there 1033 are no older seafloor ages). 1034 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 56 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1035 Physics - Instructional segment 5: Waves and Electromagnetic Radiation Guiding Questions: How do we know what is inside the Earth? Why do people get sunburned by UV light? How do can we transmit information over wires and wirelessly? Science and Engineering Practices: Asking questions Using mathematics and computational thinking Engaging in argument from evidence Obtaining, evaluating and communicating information Crosscutting concepts: Energy and matter: Flows, cycles, and conservation Cause & Effect Systems & System Models Stability & Change Interdependence of science, engineering, and technology Influence of science, engineering, and technology on society and the natural world Students who demonstrate understanding can: HS-PS4-1. Use mathematical representations to support a claim regarding relationships among the frequency, wavelength, and speed of waves traveling in various media. [Clarification Statement: Examples of data could include electromagnetic radiation traveling in a vacuum and glass, sound waves traveling through air and water, and seismic waves traveling through the Earth.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment is limited to algebraic relationships and describing those relationships qualitatively.] HS-PS4-3. Evaluate the claims, evidence, and reasoning behind the idea that electromagnetic radiation can be described either by a wave model or a particle model, and that for some situations one model is more useful than the other. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on how the experimental evidence supports the claim and how a theory is generally modified in light of new evidence. Examples of a phenomenon could include resonance, interference, diffraction, and photoelectric effect.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment does not include using quantum theory.] HS-PS4-4. Evaluate the validity and reliability of claims in published materials of the effects that different frequencies of DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 57 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 electromagnetic radiation have when absorbed by matter. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on the idea that photons associated with different frequencies of light have different energies, and the damage to living tissue from electromagnetic radiation depends on the energy of the radiation. Examples of published materials could include trade books, magazines, web resources, videos, and other passages that may reflect bias.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment is limited to qualitative descriptions.] HS-PS4-5. Communicate technical information about how some technological devices use the principles of wave behavior and wave interactions with matter to transmit and capture information and energy.* [Clarification Statement: Examples could include solar cells capturing light and converting it to electricity; medical imaging; and communications technology.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessments are limited to qualitative information. Assessments do not include band theory.] HS-PS4-2. Evaluate questions about the advantages of using a digital transmission and storage of information. [Clarification Statement: Examples of advantages could include that digital information is stable because it can be stored reliably in computer memory, transferred easily, and copied and shared rapidly. Disadvantages could include issues of easy deletion, security, and theft.] HS-ESS2-1. Develop a model to illustrate how Earth’s internal and surface processes operate at different spatial and temporal scales to form continental and ocean-floor features. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on how the appearance of land features (such as mountains, valleys, and plateaus) and sea-floor features (such as trenches, ridges, and seamounts) are a result of both constructive forces (such as volcanism, tectonic uplift, and orogeny) and destructive mechanisms (such as weathering, mass wasting, and coastal erosion).] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment does not include memorization of the details of the formation of specific geographic features of Earth’s surface.] (expanding on ideas from Instructional segment 4) 1036 Background for Teachers and Instructional Suggestions 1037 In the previous instructional segment, students found evidence that supported 1038 the idea that massive blocks of crust are moving, sometimes diving deep into Earth’s 1039 interior. One of the main ways that we investigate Earth’s interior is through seismic 1040 waves. Before students can understand that evidence, they must first understand the 1041 basic properties of waves. Ask students if they have ever experienced a thunderstorm DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 58 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1042 approaching. Students may be familiar with the idea that when they see a lightning bolt, 1043 they can figure out how far away it was by counting the time until they hear a clap of 1044 thunder. How does this work? Both the light from lightning and sound from thunder are 1045 dramatic forms of energy that travel away from the storm cloud. In this instructional 1046 segment, students will learn to explain the differences between the way these energy 1047 sources travel and how fast they travel. 1048 In many physics books, light, sound and other wave phenomena are described 1049 as “ways energy is transmitted without an overall flow of matter”. Such descriptions 1050 are important for understanding such things as the transmission of energy from nuclear 1051 reactions in the Sun across space to a solar panel that generates electricity, the 1052 transmission of sound energy from a performer on stage through the air to listeners 1053 throughout an auditorium, or the violent shaking in an earthquake traveling through solid 1054 rock from its source to a nearby city. However, a second aspect of light, sound, and 1055 other wave phenomena is also important, namely that they encode information, and 1056 hence are a critical tool for how we learn about and interact with the world around us. 1057 This is true not only for our natural senses, as stressed in earlier grades, but for the 1058 tools and technologies that we build and use, both for science and for everyday 1059 communication and information storage. 1060 While students are most familiar with light and sound, each of these is 1061 representative of the two broader classes of waves: mechanical and electromagnetic. 1062 Mechanical waves propagate through a medium, deforming the substance of this 1063 medium. The deformation is reversed due to restoring forces that act within the medium. 1064 For example, sound waves in the atmosphere propagate as molecules in the air hit 1065 neighboring particles and then recoil to their original condition. These collisions prevent 1066 particles from traveling in the direction of the wave, ensuring that energy is transmitted 1067 without the movement of matter over long distances. Light is an example of the second 1068 type of waves, electromagnetic. These do not require a medium for transmission, so 1069 they can travel through empty space. Electromagnetic waves consist of periodic 1070 oscillations of electrical and magnetic fields generated by charged particles. The 1071 frequency (or conversely the wavelength) of electromagnetic waves determine the DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 59 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1072 properties of the waves. There is a spectrum of electromagnetic radiation including 1073 radio waves, microwaves, infrared radiation, visible light, ultraviolet radiation, X-rays 1074 and gamma rays. Radio waves exhibit the lowest frequency (longest wavelength) and 1075 energy, while gamma rays exhibit the highest frequency (shortest wavelength) and 1076 energy. 1077 The medium that waves travel through has a huge impact on the speed at which 1078 the energy travels. Even though electromagnetic waves can travel through space 1079 without a medium, their speed is also affected when they are travelling through a 1080 medium. Electromagnetic waves are temporarily absorbed and re-emitted by atoms 1081 when they flow through a medium, a process which slows the wave down depending on 1082 the composition and density of the atoms in the medium. Light travels through a 1083 diamond at less than half the speed that it travels through space. For mechanical 1084 waves, the speed dependence is more intuitive because the strength of the restoring 1085 force that allows waves to propagate through a medium depends on the stiffness of the 1086 material and its density. Stiffer materials will ‘pop back into place’ faster and therefore 1087 move energy more quickly. Seismologists can measure the amount of time it takes 1088 seismic waves to travel different distances to map out the properties of materials in 1089 Earth’s interior. In an earthquake, seismic waves spread out in all directions (see the 1090 snapshot on geometric spreading in instructional segment 2) and can be recorded all 1091 over the globe. As the waves travel through denser material, they speed up and arrive 1092 sooner. These arrival time variations can be combined for thousands of earthquakes 1093 recorded at hundreds of stations around the globe to map out the materials in Earth’s 1094 interior. These ‘seismic tomography’ maps provide evidence for plate tectonics as they 1095 reveal dense plates sinking down into the mantle. At the end of the previous 1096 instructional segment, students interpreted data from radiometric dating to discover 1097 that there is no seafloor older than 280 million years and then asked questions about 1098 where it could have gone. With seismic tomography, they can gather evidence that 1099 answers this question – it is sinking into Earth’s interior. DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 60 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1100 1101 Figure 9. Seismic waves move faster or slower as they move through different 1102 materials. Seismologists use this fact to map out the structure of Earth's interior. This 1103 image reveals evidence of plate tectonics and California’s geologic history. The 1104 remnants of a large plate sinking beneath North America is believed to be the Farallon 1105 plate that used to subduct off the coast of California (a process that created the massive 1106 granitic rocks of the Sierra Nevada mountains). 1107 Seismic waves can also reveal information about the state of matter because 1108 they behave differently in liquids than they do in solids. Liquids flow because there is 1109 very little resistance when molecules try to slide past one another. When seismic waves 1110 involve oscillations with a sliding motion (such as transverse or shear waves called S- 1111 waves whose oscillations are perpendicular to their direction of travel), liquids do not 1112 have a force that restores the particles back to their original position and so S-waves 1113 cannot propagate. Liquids do have strong resistance to compression, so waves that 1114 move by compression and rarefaction continue to travel through liquids. When an 1115 earthquake occurs on one side of the planet, the shaking should be recorded DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 61 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1116 everywhere on the planet as the waves travel through the Earth. Stations on the exact 1117 opposite side of the Earth from an earthquake, however, do not record S-waves. This S- 1118 wave ‘shadow’ is evidence that there must be a small liquid layer within Earth’s core 1119 that blocks the flow of S-waves. This liquid layer of the outer core is essential for 1120 creating Earth’s magnetic field (See instructional segment 3). A pioneering female 1121 seismologist named Inge Lehmann used much more complicated evidence from 1122 seismic waves to infer the existence of yet another layer, the Earth’s inner core in 1936. 1123 While it sounds like a long time ago, Galileo discovered the first distant moons of Jupiter 1124 back in 1610, more than 300 years before anyone had the first clues about what lies in 1125 the very center of our own planet. Earth science is a young science in many ways. 1126 1127 High School Vignette 1128 Seismic waves 1129 1130 Seismologists are scientists that study the Earth using a detailed, quantitative 1131 understanding of wave propagation; they are the embodiment of integrating physical 1132 science and earth science disciplines. This vignette illustrates a lesson sequence that 1133 could be used to begin an instructional segment on waves in the Physical Universe 1134 course. Students learn ESS and PS DCIs in tandem, with an understanding of each 1135 enhancing the understanding of the other. 1136 Day 1: Observing Days 2-3: Earthquake Day 4 – Digital versus earthquakes Early Warning Systems: analog seismic Students observe Longitudinal and Shear information recordings of seismic Waves in the Earth Students try to encode waves and relate them to Students model earthquake seismic information using what earthquakes feel like. waves in a slinky and with analog and digital methods, their bodies to show how finding that the digital they could design an method works better. DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 62 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 earthquake early warning system. Day 5 – Damage to Days 6-7 – Probing Day 8 – Probing Earth’s structures: Frequency, Earth’s Interior: Wave Interior II: Seismic Wavelength, and velocity Tomography Resonance Students measure the Students use Students make a model of velocity of waves on a measurements of seismic a city and see how different spring. They discover the wave velocities to make height buildings respond to relationship between wave maps of materials within different frequency shaking. speed and material Earth’s interior. properties. 1137 1138 Day 1 – Observing earthquakes 1139 The first day of the lesson, Mr. J wants to get students to realize that earthquake 1140 shaking is energy moving in waves, and that wave energy takes time to travel through 1141 the Earth just like waves take time to travel towards the beach at the ocean. He wants 1142 students to discover these ideas for themselves and has designed a data-rich inquiry- 1143 based lesson. He recognizes this lesson takes a lot more time than just providing them 1144 the answer, but he knows they will have more ‘aha moments’ if they figure it out 1145 themselves. Mr. J asks students if anyone has ever felt an earthquake. A few students 1146 raise their hands and he asks them to describe what they felt, and to specifically show 1147 him with their hands the direction that their body moved during the earthquake. Some 1148 students move their hands side to side or shake them up and down. Mr. J emphasizes 1149 the differences, but highlights that one thing everyone shares in common is that the 1150 motion repeated back and forth many times, which means that they can describe the 1151 motion with waves. He begins to build a definition of waves that they will add to DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 63 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1152 throughout the next few days as they lean new 1153 things. 1154 Mr. J shows a short video clip of a web 1155 camera that happened to be recording during an 1156 earthquake while a man was sitting and eating 1157 his lunch. He reacts to gentle shaking at the 1158 beginning of the earthquake several seconds 1159 before strong shaking begins. Mr. J wonders if 1160 this is always true, and tells students that 1161 sensitive seismic recording devices measure 1162 shaking at different locations all around their city. 1163 He passes out papers with measurements of a 1164 single earthquake from different locations. Mr. J 1165 makes sure that students understand the axes and what the graph represents (how fast 1166 the earth was moving and in which direction over the course of an entire minute). Each 1167 student receives the recording from a different location, but all students recognize that 1168 their location felt two pulses of shaking. Sally asks if maybe there were two 1169 earthquakes, one big and one small but just a few seconds apart. Mr. J agrees that this 1170 is a good idea and asks her to how many seconds apart the two pulses were on her 1171 recording (scale, proportion, and quantity). “The second one happened about 10 1172 seconds after the first,” she says. Mr. J asks if other students also have the second 1173 pulse 10 seconds after the first and they find that every student seems to have a 1174 different time between pulses even though they are all recording the same earthquake 1175 on the same day. Why? Students compare seismograms and notice that the amplitude 1176 of the shaking is different. Evan asks Mr. J if stations with stronger amplitude shaking 1177 are closer to the earthquake source, and Mr. J confirms that this is, in general, true. He DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 64 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1178 asks the students to see if there is any systematic relationship between the time 1179 difference between the pulses and how far the sensor was away from the earthquake 1180 source. Students use their phones to enter the amplitude and arrival time of the two 1181 pulses from their assigned location into a collaborative spreadsheet that Mr. J has 1182 already set up. It instantly graphs the relationship and students can see that the farther 1183 away a station is from the earthquake source, the further apart the two pulses are. 1184 Mr. J then has two student volunteers act 1185 out the famous fable of a race between the 1186 tortoise and the hare as he narrates. Seismic 1187 waves, however, never take a nap like the hare in 1188 that story. For homework, Mr. J assigns students 1189 to create a visual infographic communicating an 1190 explanation about why the two pulses of energy arrive at different times at different 1191 locations. Their examples show that the two waves travel at different speeds. 1192 1193 Days 2-3: Earthquake Early Warning Systems: Longitudinal and Shear Waves in 1194 the Earth 1195 In an earthquake, people can certainly feel waves moving back and forth and at 1196 the ocean they can see them moving towards the beach. Do these two observations 1197 relate to the same type of phenomenon? Mr. J gives a short interactive lecture about 1198 mechanical waves, adding to the definition of waves the class started on the first day. 1199 Waves are caused when a disturbance pushes or pulls a material in one direction, and 1200 a restoring force ‘pops’ the material back to its original position. It’s hard to make waves 1201 in clay because it doesn’t pop back to its original position, but a material like rubber 1202 pops back instantly. Because every action has an equal and opposite reaction, the 1203 restoring force results in a ‘new’ disturbance in the adjacent material. Energy gets 1204 transferred throughout the material by a cascade of actions and reactions. Waves travel 1205 really well across a swimming pool because water always wants to flow back to its 1206 original flat shape (driven by gravity). The idea that the material a wave travels through DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 65 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1207 affects its ability to travel is crucial to understanding seismic waves, and Mr. J 1208 foreshadows that they will discuss the topic a lot more in a few days. 1209 Mr. J demonstrates waves using a physical model, a toy spring stretched out 1210 across the room. He asks students why he has chosen a spring for the demo instead of 1211 a piece of rope and students quickly identify that the spring will easily want to pop back 1212 into position. He shows how disturbing the spring by pulling it in different directions 1213 causes waves to travel down the spring differently, illustrating the difference between 1214 longitudinal and shear waves8. The waves go by very quickly on the spring, so Mr. J has 1215 students stand up and use their bodies as a physical model that represent the links of a 1216 slinky to act out the particle motion of the different types of waves 9. 1217 Mr. J wants to relate these two types of waves to the seismic recordings from 1218 Day 1. He passes them out again and asks students to look more carefully at the two 1219 pulses. How are they similar and how are they different? Students offer observations 1220 from their own seismograms, including Jorge’s comment that the second pulse is 1221 stronger than the first. Like yesterday, Mr. J wants to see if there are consistent 1222 patterns across all the seismograms. He has them measure the amplitude of the two 1223 pulses and submit their results to an online form using their smartphones. The class 1224 instantly analyzes the results from a graph projected on the screen and determines that 1225 almost all the locations experienced stronger shaking during the second pulse. Why 1226 would that be? 1227 Now that Mr. J has students curious, he shows a mini-lecture: Much like a storm 1228 cloud simultaneously produces lightning and thunder, earthquake waves release energy 1229 as both of these types of waves. As the blocks of crust slide past one another, the Earth 1230 is disturbed in several different directions. Textbooks and scientists refer to these 8 IRIS, Seismic Slinky, http://www.iris.edu/hq/inclass/video/seismic_slinky_modeling_p_and_s_waves_in_the_c lassroom 9 IRIS, Human Wave Demonstration, http://www.iris.edu/hq/inclass/demo/human_wave DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 66 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1231 motions as P-waves and S-waves, and they carry different amounts of energy moving at 1232 different speeds. P-waves are longitudinal waves caused by the sudden pushing or 1233 pulling of one section of rock against another. Because rocks are very strong when you 1234 push on them, this energy moves easily through rock and P-waves travel fast and arrive 1235 first. While they arrive quickly, relatively little energy is released as pushing/pulling, so 1236 P-waves don’t do much damage even in large earthquakes. Earthquakes mostly involve 1237 the sliding of two blocks of crust past one another, so they release most of their energy 1238 in the side-to-side motion of shear waves, or S-waves. Rock is weaker in shear than it is 1239 for pushing/pulling, so S-waves move more slowly through it. S-waves arrive second, 1240 but carry the powerful punch that causes great earthquake damage. The analogy with 1241 lightning and thunder holds, you quickly see lightning several seconds before booming 1242 thunder reaches you to rattle your windows. 1243 Students will explore wave speed more in a few days, but right now Mr. J tells 1244 them that they need to remember that P-waves travel faster than S-waves, but S-waves 1245 carry more energy when they finally do arrive. The fact that every earthquake comes 1246 with its own ‘gentle’ warning (a P-wave) has allowed scientists and engineers to develop 1247 systems to provide cities with advance warning of strong shaking. Mr. J shows students 1248 a short video clip about earthquake early warning systems. The video describes how 1249 automated sensors near the source of an earthquake can send warning to distant 1250 locations. Even though seismic waves travel faster than the fastest fighter jets (upwards 1251 of 6 km/s, or 13,000 mph), digital signals travel through wires and airwaves near the 1252 speed of light and can therefore provide seconds to minutes of warning prior to the 1253 arrival of strong shaking. Mr. J takes the class outside to the sports field and has them 1254 use their bodies as a physical model of slow P-waves and fast S-waves in a kinesthetic 1255 activity that illustrates early warning (d’Alessio and Horey 2013). Japan, Mexico, and a 1256 few other locations have early warning systems in place that send signals to schools, 1257 businesses, and millions of individual people via mobile phone and other media. 1258 California is even developing its own early warning. For homework, Mr. J assigns 1259 students to watch a few short YouTube videos of early warning in action during DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 67 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1260 earthquakes in Japan and Mexico and assigns students to write a reflection essay about 1261 1262 1263 what they would do with a few seconds of warning before an earthquake arrived. 1264 Earthquake early warning works because information from seismic recording stations in 1265 many different locations can send their measurements to a central processing center 1266 instantly. In order to avoid costly false alarms or failing to issue a warning about a 1267 damaging earthquake, the information must be transmitted reliably. Mr. J tells students 1268 that they will develop a technique for transmitting the shaking history shown by their 1269 seismogram to the students other side of the room using a small desk lamp with a 1270 dimmer attached to it. In middle school, students obtained information about the 1271 difference between analog and digital information transmission (MS-PS4-3), and today 1272 students will compare the two (HS-PS4-2). Half of the teams will transmit the 1273 information using analog techniques (adjusting the intensity of the light using the 1274 dimmer switch in order to represent the amplitude of shaking), and half will come up 1275 with a digital encoding system (such as using morse code or binary encoding to indicate 1276 amplitude values at fixed time intervals or listing frequency, amplitude, and duration 1277 values as a individual blinks to be counted). Teams can summarize their encoding 1278 protocol before beginning transmission so that everyone knows how to interpret the 1279 signals from the light. Without seeing the original seismogram, the team on the other 1280 side of the room must draw what they think the seismogram looks like based upon the 1281 signal transmitted to them and the agreed upon protocol. Students receiving the analog 1282 signal have trouble representing the shape of the signal as the solutions drawn by 1283 different students vary dramatically. Mr. J then asks what would happen if he gave 1284 students a seismogram with an amplitude just one tenth as strong as the one that they 1285 had. With the analog signal, the light gets very dim and it would be hard for students or 1286 even a computer light sensor to detect the slight variations in the light that represent the 1287 weaker shaking. The digital signal, however, just reports smaller amplitude numbers. 1288 Digital seismic recording devices can transmit information about weak signals and 1289 strong signals whereas analog seismic recordings are only useful within a certain Day 4 – Digital versus analog seismic information DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 68 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1290 amplitude range. Since earthquakes with magnitude 5 and 8 could both cause damage 1291 yet have amplitudes that differ by a factor of 1000, digital encoding is the best strategy 1292 for transmitting seismic waves. And since the information is already encoded digitally, it 1293 is easy for a computer to process it and issue an earthquake early warning if it looks like 1294 the earthquake is large enough. 1295 1296 Day 5 – Damage to structures: Frequency, Wavelength, and Resonance 1297 Mr. J starts the class off by showing a video of a life size apartment building 1298 being tested on a gigantic shake table10. Is a seven story apartment building safer or 1299 less safe than a one story house? How about a 100 story skyscraper? Mr J. tells 1300 students that they are going to simulate buildings using a much simpler physical model. 1301 They will model a city using different length rectangles of heavy paper to represent 1302 different height buildings11. They attach the rectangles to a ruler that represents the 1303 ground and attach a paperclip to the top of each building to represent air conditioners 1304 and other heavy objects on the buildings’ roofs. 1305 Mr. J then asks students which 1306 building they would rather live in during an 1307 earthquake. Different students have 1308 different ideas, so he invites everyone to 1309 shake their city. Sammy is very aggressive 1310 and shakes her city back and forth very 1311 quickly and is amazed to see that the 1312 shortest building starts moving more than 1313 the others. Roland shakes more slowly 10 World’s largest earthquake test, https://youtu.be/9X-js9gXSME 11 IRIS, Demonstrating building resonance using the simplified BOSS model, http://www.iris.edu/hq/inclass/demo/demonstrating_building_resonance_using_the_sim plified_boss_model DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 69 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1314 and sees the opposite effect with the tallest building moving more than the others. This 1315 allows Mr. J to add to the class definition of waves, adding that they can be described 1316 by the frequency at which they move back and forth. Mr. J asks the students to describe 1317 their shaking using the words frequency and amplitude instead of just saying ‘quickly’ or 1318 ‘slowly.’ He asks students to do a more controlled experiment where they shake with a 1319 constant amplitude (distance their hand moves back and forth), but change the 1320 frequency of shaking (how quickly their hands moves from one extreme to the other) 1321 from a low frequency to a high frequency and watch what happens to the buildings. He 1322 then asks them a series of questions: Mr. J’s Question Answers by his students What did you observe during the All the buildings shook, but different demo? buildings at different frequencies. How did this compare to your prediction? Was there a pattern in the shaking of the buildings? What controlled which buildings shook? Therefore, if the frequency of shaking is important can anyone propose a relationship between frequency of shaking and building height? Lets revisit our original question. Are any of these buildings more or less likely to be damaged or collapse during an earthquake? Different – I predicted that building X would shake the most, while the physical model showed that all buildings responded at one point or another. Yes, first the tallest progressing to the smallest. Students resort back to using terms like how “fast”, “quickly”, or “much” they moved their hand during the demo. Mr. J guides students to understand that the amplitude of the shaking was constant with only the frequency changing. Tall buildings shake the most at low frequencies while shorter buildings respond at high frequencies. It depends on the frequency of the seismic waves. All of them could be at risk, depending on the frequency. 1323 1324 Mr. J returns again to the class definition of waves, adding that they have a 1325 characteristic wavelength. For waves in the ocean, the wavelength is easy to visualize 1326 as the distance between two wave troughs. The buildings in the physical model shook DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 70 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1327 the most when their height matched the wavelength of the waves, a phenomenon called 1328 resonance. Mr. J provides a short lecture with demos using a string to visualize 1329 resonance in standing waves. He then presents a mathematical model, the equation 1330 speed = frequency x wavelength. The students perform some simple calculations to 1331 ensure that they can plug numbers in and handle the units of this equation (HS-PS4-1). 1332 Mr. J heard stories of people looking out over a valley during a large earthquake and 1333 literally seeing the earth ripple as waves passed through. He wants to know if this is 1334 reasonable. What would seismic waves look like? At the beach, ocean waves might 1335 have crests that are 30 feet apart (wavelength = 30 ft). What about seismic waves? 1336 Students return to their adopted seismic recording and look more carefully at the 1337 shaking. Mr. J asks students to calculate the frequency of the seismic waves during the 1338 earliest shaking. They might find frequencies in the range of 1-10 Hz. Scientists can 1339 calculate the velocity of seismic waves from experiments as simple as pounding a 1340 sledge hammer against the ground and measuring how long it takes the vibrations to 1341 reach a sensor a fixed distance away. The fastest waves travel in Earth’s crust is about 1342 6,000 m/s (about 13,000 miles per hour). Knowing these two values, students calculate 1343 the wavelength. Looking across a valley a bit more than a mile across, you might be 1344 able to see 2 crests of a wave with 600 m wavelength, so it is possible to see but the 1345 waves would be much broader than most ocean waves at the beach. 1346 Mr. J next shows video clips with the results of computer simulations of famous 1347 California earthquakes12. Making detailed measurements from the computer screen, 1348 students calculate two estimates of the wave velocities: one from the distance the wave 1349 fronts traveled divided by time, and one plugging frequency and wavelength 1350 observations into the equation above. Students verify that they get the same result from 1351 each equation. They then compare these computer models to a video that visualizes 1352 ripples as they were recorded by a very sophisticated network of seismic sensors during 12 USGS, Computer Simulations of Earthquakes for Teachers: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/nca/simulations/classroom.php DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 71 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1353 a much smaller earthquake13. Students discover that the velocity is quite similar in the 1354 two cases, but that the frequency and wavelength differ for different size earthquakes. 1355 This motivates the next activity relating seismic wave velocities to the properties of the 1356 materials. 1357 1358 Days 6-7 – Probing Earth’s Interior I: Wave velocity 1359 Mr. J starts class with a rock and a bucket of sand on the table and asks students 1360 whether they think seismic waves could travel through either of them. Most students 1361 answer no because they don’t think that either one would pop back into place like a 1362 spring. He asks them if the two different materials respond to force differently, or “Would 1363 it hurt the same amount if you fell on the solid rock versus the soft sand?” Mr. J tells 1364 them that by the end of the day, they will hopefully understand some of the differences 1365 between the materials. 1366 Mr. J returns to the physical model of the toy spring and illustrates a few more 1367 ‘example earthquakes.’ He shows gentle disturbances and big disturbances (changing 1368 ‘amplitude’) and changes the amount of stretch in the spring by pulling it longer or 1369 shorter before he causes the next earthquake. Students can’t visually see any 1370 consistent patterns because the spring moves so quickly, but a student records a video 1371 of the demonstration. Groups download the video and open it in a free video analysis 1372 software14 so that they can watch it in slow motion and measure and compare the 1373 speed of the waves in several sample earthquakes. When students analyze the data, 1374 they find that the speed the waves traveled was proportional to the length of the spring 1375 as it was stretched out longer or shorter. Students are surprised to see that the 13 AGI, Watch the ground ripple in Long Beach, http://blogs.agu.org/tremblingearth/2012/12/17/watch-the-ground-ripple-in-long-beach/ http://blogs.agu.org/tremblingearth/2012/12/17/watch-the-ground-ripple-in-long-beach/ 14 Brown, D. 2015. Tracker video analysis and modeling tool, http://physlets.org/tracker/. Accessed October 16, 2015. DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 72 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1376 amplitude of the disturbance doesn’t make much of a difference to the wave speed. Mr. 1377 J ends class by having students write an explanation describing the factors affecting 1378 wave speeds, giving them a sentence starter to “The speed waves travel along a spring 1379 depends on ______.” 1380 Mr. J returns to class the next day to the bucket of sand and the rock on the 1381 table. He asks students to work in pairs to draw a diagram that shows how the 1382 investigation of the loose versus stretched spring might be a good model for the way 1383 seismic waves might travel differently through the two materials. Olivia and Martin make 1384 the connection to restoring forces: “the restoring force is very strong in a stretched 1385 spring. Solid rock is really hard, so maybe it is like a really tight spring.” Mr. J validates 1386 their idea, explaining that it may be difficult to imagine that solid rock can act like a 1387 spring that compresses and stretches, but if you pull it hard enough it actually will do 1388 just that. Earthquakes represent massive forces from huge blocks of the earth’s crust 1389 applying forces of an unimaginable scale, and their sudden movements are strong 1390 enough to bend the rock like fingers temporarily bent the spring. In his honors class, Mr. 1391 J has students calculate wave speeds using equations that include the density and 1392 elastic modulus of the materials. 1393 Mr. J has students open up a free computer simulation to investigate waves 1394 moving through a medium15. The simulator models the behaviors of all types of waves. 1395 While the class is thinking of them as seismic waves, they could be water, sound, or 1396 light waves. Working in groups, students have a full 10 minutes to explore the program 1397 selecting some of the preset scenarios in the program and adjusting settings. Each 1398 team will present the ‘coolest’ picture they made and have to communicate their 1399 understanding of what it shows about wave behavior. Mr. J walks around interacting 1400 with each group, encouraging them to ask questions about what will happen and then 1401 try things out. After each group shares, Mr. J draws attention to Esmerelda and Dima’s 15 Ripple Tank, http://www.falstad.com/ripple/ (available as a JAVA app, Mac, Windows, and iOS) DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 73 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1402 scenario which shows what happens when waves travel through materials with different 1403 velocities. “This picture could be a slice through the Earth with different earth materials 1404 like sand on top of rock,” says Mr. J. The waves leaving the source near the top left 1405 must travel through both materials to reach the bottom right. He points out how the 1406 wavelength of the source is different as the waves travel through the two materials, and 1407 asks students to estimate which material has a faster wave velocity (HS-PS4-1). 1408 1409 1410 1411 Mr. J wants students to use their mathematical thinking to learn even more 1412 about rocks. Mr. J performs an example calculation of how long P-waves will take to 1413 travel 10 km in solid rock (just 1.7 seconds at 6,000 m/s) versus dry sand (20 seconds 1414 at 500 m/s). These differences are amazing because they allow us to determine the 1415 type of rock beneath our feet without even lifting a shovel to dig. Mr. J then presents 1416 students with measurements from a few different earthquakes recorded at different 1417 locations. The data table shows the time it takes waves to arrive at each location and 1418 the distance between that location and the earthquake source. He also provides 1419 students a table of typical wave speeds of common rock and soil materials. Mr. J asks 1420 students to analyze and interpret these data by 1) calculating the average speed of the 1421 waves; and 2) identifying the dominant rock type around the earthquake source in each Image credit: M. d’Alessio DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 74 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1422 situation (supports HS-PS4-1). Scientists use this exact approach to determine the 1423 types of material present at different depths in the Earth in a way that is very similar to 1424 some medical imaging technology like X-rays and MRI’s. For homework, Mr. J assigns 1425 students a video clip that shows examples of using seismic waves to locate pockets of 1426 oil and gas, map out faults before earthquakes happen, and estimate the storage 1427 capacity of a natural groundwater aquifer. Students must choose one of these earth 1428 science applications and create a one page infographic communicating the way that 1429 technology enables scientists to learn information about the earth materials through 1430 which the waves travel (HS-PS4-5). They must illustrate the path seismic waves take 1431 through this system and the different wave speeds in the different materials. 1432 1433 Day 8 – Probing Earth’s Interior II: Seismic Tomography 1434 The next day, Mr. J tells students that they are now ready to use seismic waves 1435 to probe deep inside the Earth to strengthen their model of Earth’s interior from 1436 instructional segment 4 (HS-ESS2-1). One-half of the class plays the role of theoretical 1437 seismologists and calculates the amount of time it will take waves to travel through the 1438 planet, assuming that the waves travel at a constant speed (MATH.N-Q.1, F-BF.1). The 1439 other half of the class acts as observational seismologists and analyzes data from 1440 actual earthquakes to determine their actual travel time. When the two groups compare 1441 their results, there is a point where the data and observations begin to be noticeably 1442 different, and students are able to determine the depth corresponding to this 1443 discontinuity using simple geometry (MATH.G-CO.1, G-CO.12, G-C.5). They have now 1444 used seismic waves to discover the boundary between Earth’s mantle and outer core. 1445 The different seismic wave speeds they observe reflect different densities that promote 1446 convection in Earth’s mantle (causing plate tectonics) and outer core (causing Earth’s 1447 magnetic field that protects the surface from damaging radiation in the solar wind 1448 ultimately allowing life to flourish) (HS-ESS2-1). (Adapted from DLESE Teaching Boxes 1449 2015) 1450 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 75 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 Performance Expectations HS-PS4-1 Waves and Their Applications in Technologies for Information Transfer Use mathematical representations to support a claim regarding relationships among the frequency, wavelength, and speed of waves traveling in various media. HS-PS4-5 Waves and Their Applications in Technologies for Information Transfer Communicate technical information about how some technological devices use the principles of wave behavior and wave interactions with matter to transmit and capture information and energy.* HS-PS4-2 Waves and Their Applications in Technologies for Information Transfer Evaluate questions about the advantages of using a digital transmission and storage of information. HS-ESS2-1 Earth’s Systems Develop a model to illustrate how Earth’s internal and surface processes operate at different spatial and temporal scales to form continental and ocean-floor features. Science and engineering practices Disciplinary core ideas Developing and Using Models PS4.A Wave Properties Planning and Carrying Out Investigations PS4.C Information Technologies and Instrumentation Analyzing and Interpreting Data Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information ESS2.B: Plate Tectonics and Large-Scale System Interactions ESS3.A Natural Resources ESS3.B Natural Hazards Crosscutting concepts Scale, Proportion, and Quantity Patterns Influence of Science, Engineering, and Technology on Society and the Natural World Science Addresses Questions About the Natural and Material World Connections to the CA CCSSM: MATH.N-Q.1, F-BF.1, MATH.G-CO.1, G-CO.12, GC.5 Connections to CA CCSS for ELA/Literacy: DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 76 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 Connection to CA ELD Standards: Connections to the CA EP & Cs: none 1451 1452 Vignette Debrief 1453 Science and engineering practices. The practice of developing and using models is a 1454 key focus throughout the vignette. Some of the models are physical (the toy spring on 1455 Days 2-3 & 6-8, and the two kinesthetic activities during Days 2-3), some are 1456 mathematical (the movement of waves through materials at different speeds on Days 6- 1457 7 and 8 and the relationship between frequency, wavelength, and velocity on Day 5), 1458 some are pictorial (like the model of Earth’s interior developed on Day 8), and some are 1459 mental models based on analogy (like the tortoise and hare fable from Day 1 and the 1460 lightning and thunder analogy on Days 2-3). Students also engage in mathematical 1461 thinking throughout the activity to answer fundamental questions such as which 1462 frequency seismic waves will damage buildings the most on Day 5 and which earth 1463 materials did waves travel through through on Days 6-7 and 8. Mr. J intentionally 1464 allowed the students unstructured exploration of the ripple tank simulator on Days 6-7 to 1465 allow them to engage in asking questions. It would have been quicker to direct 1466 students to a specific scenario within the simulator, but allowing them free reign to 1467 investigate questions that interest them gives them a crucial baseline understanding of 1468 what the simulator actually represents. It could also be the jumping off point for more 1469 detailed investigations into other aspects of wave behavior. The simulator allows for 1470 qualitative investigations, but the students also do more detailed investigations into the 1471 velocity of waves on the spring using frame-by-frame video analysis during Days 6-7. 1472 They have several instances where they briefly collect data from seismograms so that it 1473 can be analyzed, usually using their smartphones or other technology to submit their 1474 data so that the whole class can see patterns instantly. The PE’s pertaining to waves 1475 do not emphasize scientific argument or explanation, but communicating 1476 understanding is accomplished specifically using the concept of infographics on Day 1 1477 and again on Days 6-7. DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 77 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1478 1479 Disciplinary core ideas. The vignette uses an earth science phenomenon (earthquakes) 1480 to motivate detailed understanding of a physical science concept (waves). The 1481 relationship is not one way – the physical understanding enhances understanding of the 1482 Earth science phenomena, especially on Days 2-3 where an understanding of the 1483 nature of longitudinal and shear waves allows students to explain the strength and 1484 timing of the two pulses of shaking and on the last day where understanding wave 1485 velocities allow students to probe the interior of the Earth. Seismic recording devices 1486 are a key technology discussed throughout the instructional segment, and there is 1487 explicit attention to how these systems are engineered during the discussion of new 1488 earthquake early warning systems on Days 2-3 and the digital transmission of seismic 1489 data on Day 4. The concept of earthquake engineering is briefly introduced on Day 5, 1490 but would ideally be extended to include a full engineering design activity involving a 1491 shake table that integrate concepts of forces and motion with wave resonance. Both 1492 earthquake early warning and earthquake engineering are key concepts where science 1493 and engineering can benefit society by saving lives. Technology tools such as frame-by- 1494 frame video analysis and computer simulations allow students to visualize the physical 1495 systems in ways that would not be possible without technology. 1496 1497 Crosscutting concepts. Waves themselves are examples of repeating patterns of 1498 motion. At several times during the vignette, students made observations and were then 1499 asked to quantify them (the time between arrival of different pulses on Day 1, the 1500 amplitude of those pulses on Days 2-3, and the velocity of waves during Days 6-8). Not 1501 only did this help establish the quantity, but patterns in these measurements revealed 1502 proportional relationships in two cases: the time between earthquake waves was 1503 directly proportional to their distance from the earthquake source (Day 1) and the speed 1504 of waves was directly proportional to the tension from stretching in the spring (Days 6- 1505 8). 1506 Resources for the Vignette DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 78 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 November 2015 California State University Northridge. 2015. Earthquake Early Warning Simulator. http://www.csun.edu/quake (accessed November 3, 2015). Rapid Earthquake Viewer. 2015. http://rev.seis.sc.edu/ (accessed November 3, 2015). 1512 1513 1514 Students extend the mathematical representation of waves they made at the 1515 middle grade level (MS-PS4-1) to include the velocity of waves. Students must 1516 understand frequency, wavelength, and speed of waves, and understand the 1517 relationship between them (HS-PS4-1). For example, students should be able to 1518 evaluate the claim that doubling the frequency of a wave is accomplished by halving its 1519 wavelength. To evaluate such claims, students should be able to basic mathematical 1520 models of waves such as v = ƒλ (where v=wave velocity, f=frequency, and 1521 λ=wavelength), given that f=1/T (where T=the period of the wave). Students should be 1522 able to solve for frequency, wavelength or velocity given any of the other two variables. 1523 It is important that students realize that the equation for periodic waves is applicable to 1524 both mechanical and electromagnetic waves in a variety of media. 1525 The Nature of Light 1526 Students can also relate the mathematical representations of amplitude and 1527 frequency to electromagnetic waves by comparing light bulbs with different wattage and 1528 color temperature (e.g., packages labeled “soft white” versus “daylight”). Knowing that 1529 the wavelength of light changes its color, students are ready to learn more about the 1530 range of different frequencies of radiation in the electromagnetic spectrum. 1531 Electromagnetic radiation is an energy form composed of oscillating electric and 1532 magnetic fields that propagates at the speed of light. Electromagnetic radiation has a 1533 myriad of uses that are determined by its specific frequency and energy (Figure 10), 1534 with different ranges of frequencies given different names. Some examples of the many 1535 uses include: gamma radiation is used to kill cancer cells in radiation therapy, X-rays DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 79 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1536 are used to create noninvasive medical imagery, ultra-violet light is used to sterilize 1537 equipment, visible light is used for photography, infrared light is used for night vision, 1538 microwaves are used for cooking and radio waves are used for communication. Plants 1539 capture visible electromagnetic radiation (sunlight) and use the energy to fix carbon into 1540 simple sugars that subsequently provides food for all heterotrophic organisms. 1541 1542 1543 Figure 10. As students learn the physics of electromagnetic radiation, they also should 1544 learn the variety of applications that improve our quality of life. (Lightsources 2015) 1545 Even though electromagnetic radiation can clearly be described using waves and 1546 its behavior in most situations can be predicted using this model, over the years 1547 scientists have discovered certain cases where light acts more like collection of discrete 1548 particles than a wave. Students obtain, evaluate, and communicate information 1549 pertaining to the wave/particle duality of electromagnetic radiation, which has been one DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 80 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1550 of the great paradoxes in science (HS-PS4-3). As early as the 17th century, Christiaan 1551 Huygens proposed that light travels as a wave, while Isaac Newton proposed that it 1552 traveled as particles. This apparent paradox ultimately led to a complete rethinking of 1553 the nature of matter and energy. Taken together, the work of Max Planck, Albert 1554 Einstein, Louis de Broglie, Arthur Compton and Niels Bohr and many others suggests 1555 all particles also have a wave nature, and all waves have a particle nature. Students 1556 examine experimental evidence that supports the claim that light is a wave 1557 phenomenon, and evidence that supports the claim that light is a particle phenomenon. 1558 After analyzing and interpreting data from classic experiments on resonance, 1559 interference, diffraction and the photoelectric effect, students should be able to 1560 construct an argument defending the wave/particle model of light. 1561 One of the primary lines of evidences for the particle nature of light is the 1562 photoelectric effect, the observation that many metals emit electrons when light shines 1563 upon them. Students saw evidence of this effect in instructional segment 3 when they 1564 studied the basic principles of photovoltaic solar panels. Now, they revisit the same 1565 challenge with a new understanding of the nature of light. Thinking of light as pure 1566 waves would suggest that photoelectrons could be emitted if the amplitude of any form 1567 of electromagnetic radiation is increased sufficiently, but data shows that electrons are 1568 only dislodged if light reaches or exceeds a threshold frequency, regardless of the 1569 intensity (amplitude) of the light. This suggests that light is a collection of discrete wave 1570 packets (photons), each with energy (E) proportional to its frequency (f). Expressed 1571 algebraically, we now accept that E = hf where h is Planck’s constant (the physical 1572 constant that is the quantum of action in quantum mechanics, the discipline that deals 1573 with the mathematical description of the motion and interaction of subatomic particles.). 1574 If the energy of a photon exceeds the electron binding energy in the metal, a 1575 photoelectron will be ejected. If, however, the photon energy is insufficient, no electrons 1576 will escape, regardless of the intensity of the radiation. Thus, the energy of the emitted 1577 electrons does not depend on the intensity (amplitude) of the incident light, but only on 1578 the energy of individual photons. Electrons in the metal can absorb energy from photons 1579 when irradiated, but they follow an “all or nothing” principle in that all of the energy from DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 81 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1580 the photon must be absorbed to free an electron from atomic binding. If the photon 1581 energy is absorbed, some of the energy liberates the electron from the metal atom while 1582 the remainder contributes to its kinetic energy. 1583 The photoelectric effect is one example of the way that matter and 1584 electromagnetic radiation interact. As humans have become increasingly dependent on 1585 electromagnetic radiation in their everyday lives through the use of technology, their 1586 exposure to certain types of electromagnetic radiation is increasing. Many in society 1587 have asked the question about what sort of interactions there may between living tissue 1588 and radiation. Students examine claims in published materials such as websites or 1589 books and use their understanding of the nature of electromagnetic energy to evaluate 1590 the validity of those claims (HS-PS4-4). The clarification statement for this PE 1591 specifically states that the materials should be ones that are likely to contain biases, so 1592 the emphasis is on evaluating information. Teachers can build lessons that draw on 1593 existing educational resources describing how to interpret media messages and identify 1594 bias16. The key piece of scientific understanding is the model that photons of different 1595 frequency radiation have different amounts of energy (E = hf, where E is energy, h is 1596 Planck’s constant, and f is the frequency). Higher frequency radiation such as gamma 1597 rays, X-rays, and ultraviolet correspond to higher energy levels and the damaging 1598 effects of exposure to these frequencies of radiation is well documented. Students 1599 probably have even experienced it for themselves as sunburn from ultraviolet light. One 1600 way this radiation can cause damage is by breaking chemical bonds in DNA that cause 1601 mutations that lead to cancer. On the other hand, people have no concerns about being 1602 exposed to visible light from light bulbs because these photons are substantially lower 1603 energy and cause no damage. It is the intermediate energy levels of the 1604 electromagnetic spectrum where many people are asking questions about potential 1605 health-related effects, such as the microwaves used in mobile phone transmission. 16 University of California Museum of Paleontology, A scientific approach to life: A science toolkit: http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/sciencetoolkit_01 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 82 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1606 Microwaves photons are lower energy than x-rays or other high frequency radiation, so 1607 they do not have enough energy to break chemical bonds (and therefore should not 1608 cause biological damage). Students have everyday experience with this fact in that their 1609 microwave oven will heat water and even boil it away into steam, but even microwaving 1610 the water for a very long time never breaks the molecules apart into their constituent 1611 hydrogen and oxygen atoms (Do not try this at home because the steam expansion 1612 could conceivably build up enough pressure within the microwave to explode). Indeed, 1613 there are peer-reviewed studies documenting no effect of mobile phone use on cancer 1614 rates, but there are also others that show a small statistical effect. Approximately one in 1615 four Californians dies from a wide range of cancers that have a wide range of 1616 environmental causes (American Cancer Society, California Department of Public 1617 Health, California Cancer Registry 2014). Each of these people lives a different life in a 1618 different local environment, so it is extremely difficult (if not impossible) to isolate the 1619 effects of electromagnetic radiation on that cancer rate. This inability makes it difficult to 1620 make strong conclusions either way, but students should know that eventually any claim 1621 that these types of lower energy radiation cause health damage must include reasoning 1622 that explains the cause and effect mechanism (what does the radiation do to the 1623 tissue). That mechanism is well understood for high energy radiation like X-rays and 1624 has not been established for other types of radiation. 1625 Waves and Technology 1626 Waves can encode information, and technology makes use of this fact in two 1627 general ways: decoding wave interactions with mediums, and encoding our own signals 1628 on them. 1629 In some technology, we simply record waves as they travel through a medium 1630 and use our understanding of how they travel to learn about the medium itself. Medical 1631 imaging like magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) and X-rays and are one example, 1632 while seismic recording devices that detect seismic waves are another. Both of these 1633 tools have a long history. In 1895, the German physicist, Wilhelm Röntgen, discovered 1634 a high energy, invisible form of light known as X-rays. Röntgen noticed that a DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 83 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1635 fluorescent screen in his laboratory began to glow when a high voltage fluorescent light 1636 was turned on, even though the fluorescent screen was blocked from the light. 1637 Roentgen hypothesized that he was dealing with a new kind of ray that could pass 1638 through some solid objects such as the screen surrounding his light. Röntgen had an 1639 engineering mind, and realized that there could be practical applications of this newly 1640 discovered form of radiation, particularly when he made an X-ray image of his wife’s 1641 hand, showing a silhouette of her bones. Röntgen immediately communicated his 1642 discovery through a paper and a presentation to the local medical society, and the field 1643 of medical imaging was born. 1644 In other technology, engineers have learned how to add waves together to 1645 encode signals on them. Italian scientist Guglielmo Marconi learned how to harness 1646 electromagnetic waves to build the first commercially successful wireless telegraphy 1647 system in 1894, harnessing radio waves to transmit information. Information can be 1648 encoded on radio waves in a variety of manners, including pulsating transmission to 1649 send Morse Code, modulating frequency in FM radio transmission, modulating 1650 amplitude in AM radio transmission, and propagating discrete pulses of voltage in digital 1651 data transmission. Students can use computer simulations or even oscilloscope apps 1652 on computers and smartphones to visualize how each of these techniques affects the 1653 shape of waveforms. Wireless transmission has revolutionized human communication 1654 and is at the heart of the Information Revolution, which is arguably one of the biggest 1655 shifts in human civilization on par with the Agricultural and Industrial Revolutions. 1656 HS-PS4-2 requires students to “evaluate questions about the advantages of 1657 using digital transmission and storage of information.” This performance objective can 1658 be met by analyzing and interpreting data regarding digital information technologies 1659 and similarly purposed analog technologies. By comparing and contrasting such 1660 features as data transmission, response to noise, flexibility, bandwidth use, power 1661 usage, error potential and applicability, students can assess the relative merits of digital 1662 and analog technologies. This PE requires students to ponder the influence of those 1663 technologies on our modern world. As students evaluate digital transmission and 1664 storage of information, they learn how scientists and engineers have applied physical DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 84 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1665 principles to achieve technological goals, and how the resulting technologies have 1666 gained prominence in the marketplace and have influenced society and culture. 1667 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 85 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1668 1669 Physics - Instructional segment 6: Stars and the Origins of the Universe How do we know what are stars made out of? What fuels our Sun? And will it ever run out of that fuel? Do other stars work the same way as our Sun? How do patterns in motion of the stars tell us about the origin of our Universe? Crosscutting concepts: Energy and Matter, Patterns, Cause and effect, Scale, proportion, & quantity Science & Engineering Practices: Developing and using models Constructing explanations Students who demonstrate understanding can: HS-ESS1-1. Develop a model based on evidence to illustrate the life span of the sun and the role of nuclear fusion in the sun’s core to release energy in the form of radiation. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on the energy transfer mechanisms that allow energy from nuclear fusion in the sun’s core to reach Earth. Examples of evidence for the model include observations of the masses and lifetimes of other stars, as well as the ways that the sun’s radiation varies due to sudden solar flares (“space weather”), the 11- year sunspot cycle, and non-cyclic variations over centuries.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment does not include details of the atomic and sub-atomic processes involved with the sun’s nuclear fusion.] HS-ESS1-2. Construct an explanation of the Big Bang theory based on astronomical evidence of light spectra, motion of distant galaxies, and composition of matter in the universe. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on the astronomical evidence of the red shift of light from galaxies as an indication that the universe is currently expanding, the cosmic microwave background as the remnant radiation from the Big Bang, and the observed composition of ordinary matter of the universe, primarily found in stars and interstellar gases (from the spectra of electromagnetic DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 86 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 radiation from stars), which matches that predicted by the Big Bang theory (3/4 hydrogen and 1/4 helium).] HS-ESS1-3. Communicate scientific ideas about the way stars, over their life cycle, produce elements. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on the way nucleosynthesis, and therefore the different elements created, varies as a function of the mass of a star and the stage of its lifetime.] [Assessment Boundary: Details of the many different nucleosynthesis pathways for stars of differing masses are not assessed.] HS-ESS1-6. Apply scientific reasoning and evidence from ancient Earth materials, meteorites, and other planetary surfaces to construct an account of Earth’s formation and early history. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on using available evidence within the solar system to reconstruct the early history of Earth, which formed along with the rest of the solar system 4.6 billion years ago. Examples of evidence include the absolute ages of ancient materials (obtained by radiometric dating of meteorites, moon rocks, and Earth’s oldest minerals), the sizes and compositions of solar system objects, and the impact cratering record of planetary surfaces.] Significant Connections to California’s Environmental Principles and Concepts: None 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 From the NGSS storyline: High school students can examine the processes governing the formation, evolution, and workings of the solar system and universe. Some concepts studied are fundamental to science, such as understanding how the matter of our world formed during the Big Bang and within the cores of stars. Others concepts are practical, such as understanding how short-term changes in the behavior of our sun directly affect humans. Engineering and technology play a large role here in obtaining and analyzing the data that support the theories of the formation of the solar system and universe. (NGSS Lead States 2013) 1680 Background for Teachers and Instructional Suggestions 1681 The Colors of Stars 1682 Students now apply their understanding of the electromagnetic spectrum to 1683 studying the light from stars. Teachers can start this instructional segment the same 1684 way humans have for millennia – looking up in the sky and wondering what is in the 1685 heavens. In a classroom, students can zoom in and out to explore the “maps” of the DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 87 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1686 stars and galaxies in space (such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey17) to engender 1687 interest in what is out there, and to get a basic sense that the Universe is a varied place, 1688 with dense and less dense regions of stars and gas distributed throughout it. Students 1689 discuss and share their favorite astronomical pictures and communicate to others about 1690 what they see. 1691 1692 1693 1694 Figure 11. Color spectrum of our Sun. The rainbow image and the height of the graph 1695 depict the same information. The rainbow image is created by splitting the light from a 1696 telescope with a prism. The values of the graph are measurements of the relative 1697 intensity of each color. The graph dips lower where the rainbow image is dimmer. Image 1698 credit: (CC-BY-NC-SA) by M. d'Alessio. 1699 Looking carefully, students notice different stars have slightly different colors – 1700 those differences reveal a huge amount about what stars are and the way they work. 1701 When viewing the rainbow of light from our Sun through a prism, some colors appear 1702 brighter than others (Figure 11). What causes these variations? Are they the result of 1703 errors in the equipment, something peculiar about our Sun, or a common feature of 1704 stars? Like all good science, this general observation with the naked eye can be refined 1705 with detailed measurement of specific quantities such as the intensity of light at each 1706 wavelength. Students can collect color spectra from many different stars using an online 17 Sloan Digital Sky Survey, SDSS DR12 Navigate Tool: http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr12/en/tools/chart/navi.aspx DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 88 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1707 tool18 and compare them, noticing several important patterns. These patterns give 1708 clues about the cause of different phenomena. 1709 1710 Figure 12. Comparison between the color spectra of six different. Image credit: (CC- 1711 BY-NC-SA) by M. d’Alessio with data from Sloan Digital Sky Survey 2015b 1712 Students notice that many stars have bands of low intensity at the exact same 1713 wavelength (Figure 12). Understanding this observation requires additional background 1714 in physical science. The NRC Framework lays out strong connections between the DCIs 1715 in this instructional segment and physical science: 1716 The history of the universe, and of the structures and objects within it, can be 1717 deciphered using observations of their present condition together with knowledge of 1718 physics and chemistry. (NRC Framework, p. 173) 1719 spectra from stars unites the study of matter and the study of waves. Students must 1720 build upon their understanding of matter that is too small to see (5-PS1-1) by looking at 1721 the specific make-up of atoms (HS-PS1-8). They must understand that atoms are made 18 The concept of absorption lines in Sloan Digital Sky Survey, What is Color: http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr1/en/proj/basic/color/whatiscolor.asp DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 89 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1722 of nuclei of protons and neutrons that the number of protons helps determine the 1723 physical properties of the diverse materials that make up the Universe, and that atoms 1724 have electrons that can move closer or further away from the nucleus. Understanding 1725 the evidence about light spectra requires building on the idea that light is part of the 1726 broader electromagnetic spectrum (PS4.B: HS-PS4-1). The dark bands common in star 1727 spectra occur because atoms of different elements absorb specific colors of light (Figure 1728 13). Students have studied energy conversion as early as grade four and throughout the 1729 grade spans (PS3.B: 4-PS3-4, MS-PS3-3, 4, 5, HS-PS3-3), and now they must consider 1730 a very sophisticated example of individual atoms working as tiny energy conversion 1731 devices. Atoms absorb some of the light energy that hits them (or other energy from the 1732 electromagnetic spectrum), which pushes electrons to higher energy levels than their 1733 normal “ground state,” temporarily storing the energy as a potential energy (Figure 13). 1734 The atom quickly converts the energy back to light energy to return to its ground state, 1735 but that energy may be emitted in a completely different direction than the original 1736 energy or may be at a different wavelength. Each element on the periodic table has 1737 unique electron orbitals, so different elements absorb light energy at very specific colors 1738 (wavelengths). Students can therefore use the absorption bands as ‘fingerprints’ to 1739 identify the types and relative quantity of elements in a given star. Figure 12 shows that 1740 common star spectra include fingerprints of a number of elements, and more detailed 1741 analysis allows scientists to determine the full range of elements and even their relative 1742 abundance to construct the complete chemical composition of a star’s atmosphere. 1743 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 90 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1744 1745 Figure 13. Absorption spectra work because individual atoms can temporarily convert 1746 light energy into potential energy. Image credit: (CC-BY-NC-SA) by M. d’Alessio with 1747 public domain images from Wikipedia and NASA. 1748 The absorption of specific wavelengths of electromagnetic waves occurs 1749 in stars, but also all around on Earth, including greenhouse gases in Earth’s 1750 atmosphere. Elements like CO2 and water vapor absorb infrared energy heading away 1751 from the planet and re-emit it back towards Earth so that energy that would have 1752 otherwise have left the system is retained. This process is fundamental to Earth’s 1753 energy balance as discussed in instructional segment 2 (HS-ESS2-4). 1754 Evidence for Fusion 1755 For ages, scientists have pondered what has caused the Sun to shine. In 1854, 1756 William Thomson (who later became so well known as a scientist that he was knighted 1757 and now is known as Lord Kelvin) published a paper calculating that the Sun would run 1758 out of fuel completely in just 8,000 years if it were made entirely of gunpowder (the most 1759 energy-dense self-contained fuel he could think of at the time) (Kelvin 1854). Even at 1760 the time, geologists had evidence that the Earth needed to be considerably older than 1761 that, so controversy ensued over what causes the Sun to shine. DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 91 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1762 Lord Kelvin correctly determined that no chemical reaction would yield enough 1763 energy to power the Sun, but he incorrectly concluded that the Sun must be getting a 1764 constant replenishment of energy from meteors that collide with it. He died in 1907, 1765 more than a decade before scientists discovered a fuel that could release previously 1766 inconceivable amounts of energy, nuclear fusion (instructional segment 4). Under most 1767 conditions, when two atoms collide they bounce off one another because of the 1768 repulsive forces between their nuclei. If the atoms are moving fast enough, collisions 1769 can bring their nuclei enough together that they fuse, releasing more than a million 1770 times more energy per unit of mass than any chemical reaction. 1771 Students can repeat Lord Kelvin’s calculation about how long the Sun can last if 1772 it continues to emit energy at its current rate, but this time using information he didn’t 1773 have about the composition of the Sun from spectral lines (not gunpowder, but 75% 1774 hydrogen) and the energy release of hydrogen fusion (instead of chemical reactions). 1775 This approximate calculation of the scale of energy release shows that the Sun’s 1776 lifetime will be on the order of several billion years, which is consistent with what we 1777 know from radiometric dating about the age of our Solar System. 1778 A Model of Fusion in Stars Over Their Lifecycle 1779 The key to fusion is getting atoms up to a high enough temperature that they 1780 move fast enough to fuse together, typically millions of degrees. Such temperatures do 1781 not occur naturally anywhere on Earth – they only happen in the interiors of stars where 1782 temperatures and pressures are so high due to gravity and the kinetic energy of in 1783 falling matter. But even at the center of a star, conditions can change that cause fusion 1784 to start and stop. As a result, we say that stars are born and die. 1785 Stellar Birth and Activating Fusion 1786 A star begins its life as a cold cloud of dust and gas. Gravity attracts the 1787 individual dust and gas particles and they fall towards one another, decreasing the 1788 gravitational potential energy of the system. Since energy must be conserved in the 1789 system, the particles gain kinetic energy (much like a ball falling downward speeds up 1790 as it gets lower). The temperature of an object is a measure of the average kinetic DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 92 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1791 energy of its molecules, so we say that the star warms up as it contracts. At some point, 1792 the particles may be moving fast enough that they undergo nuclear fusion when they 1793 collide. Within the same cloud of dust and gas, many objects can form simultaneously. 1794 Objects that accumulate enough mass to start fusion are called stars. Planets are made 1795 of the exact same material as stars and accumulate by the exact same gravitational 1796 processes, but their mass is not sufficient to begin fusion. 1797 Mid-life as a Star: a Balance 1798 Once fusion begins, the energy it releases causes particles to push one another 1799 apart and the star begins to expand again. This is the opposite situation as the original 1800 star formation and involves an increase in gravitational potential energy that must be 1801 balanced by the particles slowing down (much like a ball thrown upward slows down as 1802 it gets higher). At slower speeds, fusion is less likely to occur and the star stops 1803 expanding. This balancing feedback between the explosive force of fusion and the 1804 attraction due to gravity keeps stars stable during most of their lifespan. This stable 1805 period of a star’s life is referred to as the main sequence and it means that hydrogen is 1806 fusing in the star’s core. 1807 1808 1809 Figure 14. Negative (“Balancing”) feedbacks in stars. The explosive force of fusion 1810 balances the attractive force of gravity keeping stars stable during most of their lives. 1811 Image credit: (CC-BY-NC-SA) by M. d’Alessio DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 93 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft 1812 1813 November 2015 Growing older Even the core of a young star is not typically hot enough to fuse anything except 1814 hydrogen. Larger stars burn it more quickly because they are a higher temperature, and 1815 all stars eventually fuse all the hydrogen in their core into helium, so fusion stops 1816 (marking the end of the period called the main sequence). Without fusion pushing the 1817 star outward, the balancing feedback shown in Figure 14 becomes unbalanced, and 1818 then gravity acts alone to contract star. 1819 Contraction causes temperature increases in both the core and the surrounding 1820 envelope. If the star has enough mass, it may heat enough for helium atoms to begin 1821 fusing together. If that helium gets used up, the same processes will create, in 1822 sequence, large elements up to the size of iron. Only stars that start off their lives with a 1823 large enough mass are able to generate elements larger than helium during their 1824 lifetimes. Contraction of the star’s envelope triggers hydrogen to begin fusing there. The 1825 outer envelope is less dense, so gravity does not act as effectively to hold the star 1826 together and fusion in the envelope causes the star to expand to a massive size, which 1827 is why some stars are called “giants” and “supergiants.” 1828 Our Sun is currently in its main sequence, so it has not yet been a giant and still 1829 only fuses hydrogen in its core. So how does it get all the more massive elements than 1830 helium that show up in its spectra? Where did they come from? 1831 The End of Stars 1832 Once hydrogen fusion stops in the Sun’s core, hydrogen fusion in its envelope 1833 will cause it to grow to be a giant star. Eventually its envelope will expand away and 1834 leave behind a core made primarily of carbon and oxygen. That core will still be 1835 incredibly hot and it will continue to glow for a long time even without fusion. Some of 1836 the stars we see in the night sky are actually the hot, dying cores of stars that have 1837 finished fusion. 1838 Larger stars continue fusing atoms until they end up entirely with iron in their 1839 cores and spontaneous fusion stops. The core is already very dense and gravity can 1840 cause the entire core to collapse within a few seconds. This rapid core collapse leads to DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 94 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1841 such high temperatures and pressures that there is finally enough extra energy to fuse 1842 elements larger than iron. Practically all of the atoms in the Universe larger than iron 1843 formed during the cataclysmic collapse of these large stars. The collapsing core 1844 rebounds in a dramatic explosion called a supernova, ejecting all of its material out into 1845 space where it can eventually coalesce into new stars. The carbon in our bodies came 1846 from carbon made in a star that exploded and was ejected into a region of space where 1847 our solar system was born. As Carl Sagan has said, “We are made of star stuff.” 1848 Students combine their model of fusion (HS-PS1-8) with the balancing feedbacks 1849 in Figure 14 to construct a model of how fusion relates to a star’s lifecycle (HS-ESS1- 1850 1). They apply this model to a product that communicates how material got from the 1851 random hydrogen atoms inside a young star to the complex range of elements inside 1852 their own bodies (HS-ESS1-3). They create a diagram, storyboard, movie, or other 1853 product that illustrates this step-by-step sequence. At each stage of their diagram, they 1854 should be able to answer the question, “What is the evidence that this particular stage 1855 happens?” 1856 1857 Snapshot: Asking Questions About Patterns in Stars 1858 Students review a table of a number of properties of the 100 nearest stars and the 100 1859 brightest stars using a spreadsheet. They construct graphs of different properties 1860 looking for patterns in this data. They find that many of the factors, are uncorrelated (“It 1861 looks like bright stars can be located both near and far from us.”), but they should see a 1862 definite pattern between brightness and temperature—hotter stars are brighter and 1863 colder stars are dimmer. They may begin with a linear scale, but with such a large 1864 range in the brightness of stars (less than 1% as bright up to 100 times brighter than the 1865 Sun), they discover will need to adjust to a logarithmic scale. DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 95 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1866 1867 Anaya: Not all the bright stars are hot, though. Are those outliers? 1868 Cole: And not all the dim stars are cold. 1869 Ms. M.: Why do you think that is? Should we graph more data? 1870 Jordan: Maybe those dim ones are farther away. 1871 Diego: I don’t think so. We graphed distance versus brightness and there wasn’t 1872 any trend. But I’ll look specifically at the data for those stars to make sure. 1873 Jordan: Well maybe they’re smaller then. If they’re small, maybe they wouldn’t be 1874 very bright even if they were hot. 1875 1876 Anaya: And maybe those cold ones would be bright if they were really big. 1877 Students ask questions that lead them to further investigation. The example student 1878 dialog is idealized, but effective talk moves can help structure conversations so that 1879 students move towards this ideal (as outlined in the Instructional Strategies for CA 1880 NGSS Teaching and Learning in the 21st Century chapter)). 1881 This pattern in the data was discovered by Ejnar Hertzsprung and Henry Russell 1882 around 1910 and is commonly referred to as a Hertzsprung-Russell (H-R) Diagram. It 1883 appears in several different forms including color or “spectral type” instead of DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 96 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1884 temperature. Like the coals in a fire, cooler stars are red and hotter stars are orange, 1885 yellow, or even blue. (Several online simulations are available to allow students to 1886 explore this relationship between temperature and color.) Students can add this 1887 relationship to their model of the Sun’s energy emissions (HS-ESS1-1) because it helps 1888 explain the overall broad range of colors emitted by the Sun in Figure 11. It relates to 1889 the star’s lifecycle because most of the stars fall along the central diagonal line in the H- 1890 R diagram, which is referred to as the main sequence. As they move through their life 1891 cycle and stop fusing elements in their core, stars plot in different sections of the H-R 1892 diagram than they did during their main sequence. 1893 1894 1895 Getting Energy to Earth As early as grade five in the CA NGSS, students generate a model showing that 1896 most of the energy that we see on Earth originated in the Sun (5-PS3-1). In 1897 instructional segment 2, students expand that model to a complete energy balance 1898 within the Earth system. Now students will expand their system model to trace the flow 1899 of energy back to fusion in the Sun’s hot core (HS-ESS1-1). Students will draw on their 1900 understanding of physical science where they conduct experiments to observe a 1901 number of processes that transfer thermal energy from hot components to cold 1902 components of a system (HS-PS3-4) such as radiation and convection. They developed 1903 a model of convection at Earth’s surface at the middle grade level (MS-ESS2-6) and in 1904 Earth’s interior in instructional segment 3, now they can apply it to the interior of the 1905 Sun. Convection occurs in a large section of the outer envelope, moving heat from the 1906 interior out to the visible surface (Figure 15). Evidence for this convection can be seen 1907 in high resolution optical images of the sun’s surface that look like a bubbling cauldron. 1908 This convection plays a role in the eruption of solar flares and other variations in solar 1909 intensity, which have been recorded for centuries (NASA 2003). Some of these 1910 variations are periodic (the Sun’s magnetic field flips about every 11 years, causing 1911 changes in the amount of radiation of about 0.1%) while slightly larger variations are 1912 less well understand but can make a big difference in Earth’s climate over much longer DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 97 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1913 timescales (from decades to millions of years). The existence of these variations is 1914 evidence for convection, which constantly bubbles up new high temperature material 1915 that emits more energy than the material the cooler and denser material that sinks 1916 down. Even though no fusion occurs on the visible surface, it still shines via a process 1917 known as thermal radiation (or “black body” radiation). Most of this radiation travels 1918 directly towards earth, but a small fraction of it is absorbed, creating the absorption 1919 spectra of Figure 13. 1920 1921 1922 Figure 15. Energy transfer by radiation and convection moves energy from the Sun's 1923 core to Earth. There are a number of steps along the way. Image credit: (CC-BY-NC- 1924 SA) by M. d’Alessio 1925 1926 1927 Origins of the Universe Students will apply their skill at analyzing spectra to stars beyond the Sun. They 1928 are given examples of stellar spectra and asked to match the multiple absorption lines 1929 to a set of correctly spaced and identified lines determined in a laboratory. They find 1930 that they must shift the star spectrum as a whole to higher or lower frequency in order to 1931 match the lines from the laboratory. Understanding the significance of this observation 1932 requires understanding of the Doppler Effect, a topic that builds on physical science 1933 DCIs related to waves but is not required to meet other CA NGSS PEs. When stars DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 98 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1934 move towards or away from a viewer, the wavelength of their light shifts. We can 1935 therefore use the Doppler shifts to map out the movements of stars towards or away 1936 from us. For example, we find that galaxies rotate, so even if overall the galaxy is 1937 moving away from us, stars on one side of it may be less Doppler shifted than stars on 1938 the other side. When students examine different stars in different parts of the sky, they 1939 will make the discovery that almost all galaxies shifted towards longer wavelengths, 1940 revealing that they are all moving away from us. Since longer wavelengths are closer to 1941 the red end of the visible spectrum, this effect is referred to as a ‘redshift.’ Students are now ready to read or watch a historical account of Edwin Hubble’s 1942 1943 surprising discovery that the Universe is expanding (Sloan Digital Sky Survey 2015a). 1944 Hubble noticed a pattern in the redshifts: the farther away a galaxy is from Earth, the 1945 faster it moves away from us. In fact, some very distant galaxies appear from their 1946 redshift to be receding from us at greater than the speed of light, which is impossible (if 1947 they were moving that fast, their light would never reach us and we would not be able to 1948 see them). He made a model that could explain this pattern in which stars are not really 1949 moving in space, but rather the space between the stars is getting bigger (much like 1950 raisins expanding in a lump of dough). This model replaces the Doppler shift with a 1951 different explanations where the wavelengths got stretched by the stretching of space 1952 itself! Students can perform their own investigation of redshifts using simulated 1953 telescope data from online laboratory exercises19. That investigation requires an 1954 understanding of how distances are measured in the Universe, which builds on the 1955 argument students constructed in 5th grade that the apparent brightness of stars in the 1956 sky depends on their distance from Earth (5-ESS1-1). Students can work independently 19 Two older examples include Project CLEA: http://www3.gettysburg.edu/~marschal/clea/hublab.html or University of Washington Astronomy Department: http://www.astro.washington.edu/courses/labs/clearinghouse/labs/HubbleLaw/hubbletitl e.html. More modern resources could be developed. DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 99 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1957 or in small groups to obtain information about one of the methods for determining 1958 distance in the Universe and then combine their findings with other students to develop 1959 a report, a poster, or a presentation that describes the scale of the universe and how it 1960 is measured. 1961 Students now have evidence that the Universe is expanding, which invites them 1962 to ask questions such as, “What is causing this expansion?” and “What would the 1963 Universe look like if we could ‘rewind’ this expansion to look back in time?” The 1964 inevitable answer is that everything that we can see as far as we can look out into the 1965 Universe was all once contained in a tiny region smaller than the size of an atomic 1966 nucleus! This region was so hot and dense at this time that it effectively exploded in 1967 what we call the Big Bang. We can see evidence of this explosion in the matter and 1968 energy that exists in the Universe today. Calculations by scientists reveal that the 1969 massive explosion would produce elements in specific proportions, and we can look for 1970 that fingerprint by using spectral lines to determine the relative abundance of different 1971 elements in stars like our Sun (graph in the middle in Figure 16). While Sun’s relatively 1972 small proportion of heavier elements were formed in distant supernovas, its overall 1973 composition is similar to most other stars and matches the fingerprint predicted by the 1974 Big Bang with roughly three quarters hydrogen and one quarter helium. A hot, dense 1975 early Universe would also have emitted radiation, which should still be traveling towards 1976 us. In 1963, a group of scientists detected a constant stream of microwave radiation 1977 coming in every direction. They were worried it was something wrong with their 1978 equipment, but it became apparent that the signal they were detecting was also 1979 consistent with models of emissions of the hot early Universe. We now call that energy 1980 the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation and can use it to get a picture of what the 1981 Universe looked like shortly after the initial Big Bang (image on the right in Figure 16). 1982 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 100 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 1983 1984 Figure 16. Evidence of the Big Bang comes from the redshift versus distance of stellar 1985 spectra (left), the relative abundance of elements in the Sun determined from absorption 1986 spectra (middle) and the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation that reveals minute 1987 differences in temperature in the early Universe (right). Image credit: LEFT (CC-BY-NC- 1988 SA by M. d’Alessio with data from Jha, Riess, and Kirshner 2007; MIDDLE (CC-BY-NC- 1989 SA) by M. d'Alessio with data from Lodders (2003); RIGHT NASA 2008 1990 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 101 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft 1991 1992 November 2015 Works Cited 1993 1994 American Cancer Society, California Department of Public Health, California Cancer 1995 Registry. 2014. California Cancer Facts and Figures 2014. Oakland, CA: American 1996 Cancer Society, Inc. California Division. 1997 http://www.ccrcal.org/pdf/Reports/ACS_2014.pdf (accessed August 5, 2015). 1998 1999 California Energy Commission Energy Almanac. 2015. Total Electricity System Power. 2000 http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/total_system_power.html (accessed August 5, 2001 2015). 2002 2003 Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. 2015. Electricity Emissions in the United 2004 States. http://www.c2es.org/technology/overview/electricity (accessed August 5, 2015). 2005 2006 Chandigarh Traffic Police. 2015. Safety Helmets. 2007 http://www.chandigarhtrafficpolice.org/helmet.htm (accessed July 1, 2015). 2008 2009 Cinedoku Vorarlberg. 2009. Hoher Ifen Sommer Kleinwalsertal Bregenzerwald Hanno 2010 Thurnher Filmproduktion. 2011 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CINEDOKU_VORARLBERG_Hoher_Ifen_Som 2012 mer_Kleinwalsertal_Bregenzerwald_Hanno_Thurnher_Filmproduktion.jpg (accessed 2013 July 31, 2015). 2014 2015 Clemson University Vehicular Electronics Laboratory. 2015. Airbag Deployment 2016 Systems. http://www.cvel.clemson.edu/auto/systems/airbag_deployment.html 2017 (accessed July 1, 2015). 2018 2019 d’Alessio, M. and T. Horey. 2013. “Simulating Earthquake Early Warning Systems in the 2020 Classroom.” Science Scope 37 (4): 51–57 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 102 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 2021 2022 DLESE Teaching Boxes. 2015. What’s THAT Inside Our Earth? 2023 http://www.teachingboxes.org/earthquakes/lessons/rev-WhatsTHAT.jsp (accessed 2024 August 5, 2015). 2025 2026 Exploratorium Teacher Institute. 2000. Eric Muller, The Squeeze Box. 2027 http://www.exo.net/~emuller/activities/The_Squeeze_Box.pdf (accessed November 3, 2028 2015). 2029 2030 Gando, A., D.A. Dwyer, R.D. McKeown, and C. Zhang. 2011. “Partial Radiogenic Heat 2031 Model for Earth Revealed by Geoneutrino Measurements.” Nature Geoscience 4 (9): 2032 647–651. 2033 2034 Grabianowski, Ed. 2008. "How Crumple 2035 ZonesWork." http://auto.howstuffworks.com/car-driving-safety/safety-regulatory- 2036 devices/crumple-zone.htm (accessed July 31, 2015). 2037 2038 Handy, M. 2006. “Subproject G2: Controls on lithospheric deformation, erosion and 2039 plateau formation in the Central Andes inferred from thermomechanical modeling.” 2040 http://www.cms.fu-berlin.de/sfb/sfb267/projects/research_themes/g2.html (accessed 2041 October 18, 2015). 2042 2043 Herr, N. 2008. The Sourcebook for Teaching Science – Strategies, Activities, and 2044 Instructional Resources. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 2045 2046 Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. 2011. Small Pickups Deliver Disappointing 2047 Performances in 40 mph Crash Tests. 2048 http://www.carsafety.org/iihs/news/desktopnews/small-pickups-deliver-disappointing- 2049 performances-in-40-mph-crash-tests (accessed July 31, 2015). 2050 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 103 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 2051 Jha, S., A.G. Riess, and R.P. Kirshner. 2007. “Improved Distances to Type Ia 2052 Supernovae with Multicolor Light-Curve Shapes: MLCS2k2.” The Astrophysical Journal 2053 659 (1). 2054 2055 Kelvin, William Thomson. 1854. “On the Mechanical Energies of the Solar System.” 2056 Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 21. 2057 http://quod.lib.umich.edu/u/umhistmath/aat1571.0002.001/24?view=image (accessed 2058 August 4, 2015). 2059 2060 Lightsources. 2015. Terahertz Radiation or T-Rays. 2061 http://www.lightsources.org/terahertz-radiation-or-t-rays (accessed July 1, 2015). 2062 2063 Lodders. 2003. 2064 2065 NASA. 2008. LAMBDA Data Products. 2066 http://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/product/map/dr1/max_ILC_get.cfm (accessed August 4, 2067 2015). 2068 2069 NASA. 2003. “The Inconstant Sun.” Science @ NASA. http://science.nasa.gov/science- 2070 news/science-at-nasa/2003/17jan_solcon/ (accessed August 4, 2015). 2071 2072 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Centers for Environmental 2073 Information. 2015. Age of Oceanic Lithosphere. 2074 http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/ocean_age/data/2008/image/age_oceanic_lith.jpg 2075 (accessed August 4, 2015). 2076 2077 National Research Council. 2012. A Framework for K–12 Science Education: Practices, 2078 Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies 2079 Press. 2080 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 104 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 2081 NGSS Lead States. 2013. High School Physical Sciences Storyline. 2082 http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/ngss/files/NGSS%20Combined%20Topics%2011.8 2083 .13.pdf (accessed August 5, 2015). 2084 2085 Pares Space Warp Research. 2015. The Fusion Process. 2086 http://www.paresspacewarpresearch.org/Future/Fusion.htm (accessed July 1, 2015). 2087 2088 PonderAbout. 2008. We Do Not and Can Not “Sit On” a Chair. 2089 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hq3m_iS6MnA (accessed August 5, 2015). 2090 2091 Privat-Deschanel, Agustin. 1876. Elementary Treatise on Natural Philosophy, Part 3: 2092 Electricity and Magnetism. New York: D. Appleton and Co. 2093 2094 Sloan Digital Sky Survey. 2015a. The Expanding Universe. 2095 http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr1/en/astro/universe/universe.asp (accessed August 5, 2015). 2096 2097 ———. 2015b. What is Color? 2098 http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr1/en/proj/basic/color/whatiscolor.asp (accessed November 3, 2099 2015). 2100 2101 Structural Tech. 2006. Pickup Truck FEM Model. 2102 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vWbfKKJUD8 (accessed July 31, 2015). 2103 2104 Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility - Office of Science Education. 2015. 2105 Glossary, Beta Decay. 2106 http://education.jlab.org/glossary/betadecay.html (accessed July 1, 2015). 2107 2108 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 105 of 106 First 60-Day Public Review Draft November 2015 2109 VectorStock. 2015. Doodle Baseball Glove Vector. https://www.vectorstock.com/royalty- 2110 free-vector/doodle-baseball-glove-vector-1112699 (accessed July 1, 2015). 2111 Willet. 1999. California Department of Education Posted November 2015 DRAFT CA Science Framework-Chapter 7: HS Three Course Model – Physics in Universe Page 106 of 106