Download Foraminiferal assemblages on the Antarctic shelf are often

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Effects of global warming on oceans wikipedia , lookup

Biogeography wikipedia , lookup

Marine pollution wikipedia , lookup

Marine habitats wikipedia , lookup

Marine biology wikipedia , lookup

Abyssal plain wikipedia , lookup

History of research ships wikipedia , lookup

Southern Ocean wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
Benthic Foraminifera
Andrew J. Gooday1, Nina Rothe1, Samuel S. Bowser2, Jan Pawlowski3
1
National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, University of Southampton
Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
2
Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York
12201-0509, USA
3
Department of Zoology and Animal Biology, University of Geneva, Sciences III,
1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
Introduction
Foraminifera are heterotrophic protists that occur in almost all marine environments
from intertidal mudflats and salt marshes to the deepest ocean trenches, as well as in
freshwater and terrestrial habitats. Molecular genetic analyses place them within the
supergroup Rhizaria, together with the radiolarians, gromiids and other protists that
are characterised by root-like branching rhizopods (Adl et al., 2005; Pawlowski &
Burki 2010). Most of the foraminiferan species that have been described scientifically
have a test (‘shell’) composed of calcium carbonate secreted by the cell or
agglutinated from mineral or biogenic sediment grains stuck together with an organic
or calcareous cement. The shells are often multichambered with the chambers
arranged in patterns (e.g. linear, biserial, triserial, spiral) that are characteristic at the
family or generic level (Loeblich & Tappan 1987; SenGupta 1999). In addition,
recently studies have revealed a wealth of ‘primitive’, largely undescribed species
(e.g. ‘allogromiids’ and ‘saccamminids’) with single-chambered shells composed of
agglutinated or organic material (e.g. Habura et al., 2008).
Because they are abundant in all parts of the Southern Ocean and of interest to both
biologists and geologists, a considerable body of literature exists on foraminifera from
Antarctic waters, starting with the publication of Ehrenberg (1844). The Atlas
includes a selection of commonly reported species and those that appear to be
endemic to these regions.
Methods, including limitations of coverage
Foraminifera have been collected in either quantitative or qualitative samples around
much of the Antarctic continent since the first half of the 19th century. Sampling sites
are concentrated around the Antarctic Peninsula, in the Drake Passage, the Weddell
and Scotia Seas and to a lesser extent in the Ross Sea (Cornelius & Gooday 2004).
The Adelie-George V shelf and slope and Prydz Bay are also fairly well sampled.
Soviet expeditions (1956-1990) collected material at numerous points around the
coast of East Antarctica between Oates Land and Enderby Land (Mikhalevich 2004).
Apart from the Peninsula, coverage is sparse around the coast of West Antarctica, i.e.
in parts of the Bellingshausen Sea and the Amundsen Sea.
2
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
A wide variety of sampling gears has been used to obtain this material. Many of the
early foraminiferal studies, which were linked to major national expeditions, involved
a combination of small sounding samples and large dredge or trawl samples
(Chapman; 1916; Pearcey 1914; Heron-Allen and Earland, 1922, 1932; Earland 1934,
1933, 1936; Wiesner 1931; Chapman and Parr, 1937). CHECK PARR (1950). A
mixture of Petersen grab, trawl, dredge and small gravity (Phleger) core samplers
were used in many studies published in the 1960s and 1970s (e.g., Uchio, 1960;
McKnight, 1962; Pflum, 1966; Kennett 1968; Echols, 1971; Herb, 1971) and later
(Violanti, 1996). Although they are not quantitative, gears such as dredges and trawls
that are towed across the seafloor have the advantage of concentrating substantial
amounts of material, including the large species that are common in some SO settings
(Theyer 1971). Gooday et al. (2007a,b) based a description of Weddell Sea
komokiaceans on samples collected using an epibenthic sledge, which concentrates
the lighter specimens that are easily thrown into suspension.
While the earlier investigations were largely descriptive, many studies published
during the 1960s and 1970s incorporated some quantitative data and analyses, for
example, of the abundance of foraminiferal species (e.g. McKnight 1962; Pflum 1963;
Kennett 1968). Another important development during this period was the
introduction of Rose Bengal staining to distinguish dead tests from those that were
assumed to be living at the time of collection (Uchio 1960; Echols, 1971; Herb 1971;
Basov, 1974). The most recent phase of research on SO benthic foraminifera has seen
the introduction of box cores (Mackensen and Douglas 1989; Mackensen et al., 1990,
1993; Ascoli 1995; Schmiedl and Mackensen 1997; Murray and Pudsey, 2004) and
hydraulically-dampened multiple corers (Harloff and Mackensen, 1997; Cornelius
and Gooday, 2004). The multiple corer is a particularly effective sampling device
because it is able to retain the light, flocculent surface sediment layer in which many
living foraminiferans reside.
Several different methods have been used to process Antarctic foraminiferal samples.
Wet-sieving is normal but the sieve size used has varied widely: 63 µm (e.g. Milam &
Anderson 1981; Ascoli 1995; Violanto 1995; Murray & Pudsey 2004), 74-75 µm
(Kennett 1968; Anderson 1975; Jones & Pudsey 2004), 100 µm (Lindenberg & Auras
1984), 125 µm (Quilty 1985; Mackensen 1990, 1993; Harloff & Mackensen 1997;
Gazdzicki & Majewski 2003), 150 µm (Mead & Kennett 1987). The sieve fraction
analysed has an important influence on the species recovered (Schroeder et al. 1987).
In some cases foraminifera were picked from dried residues (Kennett 1968; Mead &
Kennett 1987; Mackensen et al. 1990; Violanti 1995), or the residues were dried and
then either re-wetted for picking (Murray & Pudsey 2004) or the foraminifera
concentrated from dried residues using a heavy liquid (carbon tetrachloride) (Echols
1971; Bernhard 1987; Ward et al. 1987). In more recent studies (e.g. Cornelius &
Gooday 2004, the sample residues have been sorted wet, a procedure that ensures the
preservation of soft-shelled taxa.
Molecular data (partial sequences of the small subunit rhibosomal DNA gene; SSU
rDNA) are available for a number of Antarctic monothalamous (Pawlowski et al.,
2002; Gooday et al. 2004; Gooday and Pawlowski, 2004; Sinniger et al., 2008;
Cedhagen et al., 2009) and polythalamous (Pawlowski et al., 2007b; Schweitzer et al.,
in press) species from McMurdo Sound, Admiralty Bay (Majewski et al. 2007;
Majewski and Pawlowski, 2010) and the Weddell Sea. This requires picking living
3
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
foraminifera from chilled, unfixed samples soon after their collection. In addition,
Habura et al. (2004) and Pawlowski et al. (2011) explored foraminiferal diversity by
extracting total DNA from environmental (sediment) samples collected in Explorers
Cove (McMurdo Sound) and the deep Weddell Sea, respectively.
General composition of the Southern Ocean fauna
At the higher taxon level, foraminiferal faunas around Antarctica are similar to those
found at lower latitudes. They comprise a mixture of calcareous, agglutinated and
organic-walled species, although, as discussed below, assemblages dominated by
either agglutinated or calcareous species have been described from some settings.
Large species of agglutinated genera such as Cyclammina, Hormosina, Hyperammina,
Pilulina, Psammosphaera, Rhabdammina and Saccammina, as well as miliolids (e.g.
Cornuspira, Pyrgo, Pyrgoella) and other calcareous taxa (e.g. Hoeglundina,
Dentalina) often abound in trawl samples (e.g. Wiesner 1931; Herb, 1971 Schmiedl &
Mackensen 19??). Among smaller calcareous foraminifera, species of the genera
Globocassidulina, Cibicides, Trifarina, Epistominella, Pullenia are common
(Majewski & Pawlowski 2010). Although frequently ignored, monothalamous taxa
(‘allogromiids’ and ‘saccamminids’) are abundant and diverse where an effort has
been made to look for them, as in Explorers Cove, McMurdo Sound (Gooday et al.,
1996, Pawlowski et al. 2002), Admiralty Bay, King George Island (Majewski et al.,
2007; Sinniger et al., 2008) and the deep Weddell Sea (Cornelius & Gooday, 2004).
Komokiaceans and other enigmatic forms are abundant and diverse in the deep
Weddell Sea, and probably other abyssal areas around the continent (Gooday et al.,
2007).
Sessile foraminifera are often found on glacially transported dropstones and other
hard substrates around Antarctica. For example, agglutinated species belonging to the
attached genera Dendrophrya, Dendronina, Sorosphaera and Tholosina are common
on the continental slope around South Georgia, the Antarctic Peninsula and in the
Scotia Sea (Earland, 1933, 1934). More than two-thirds (69%) of the 852 stained
foraminifera in a box core (>300 µm fraction, 0-5 cm layer) from the upper slope in
the NW Weddell Sea (Station PS???133; 1100 m water depth) were attached to
dropstones (Cornelius 2005). Elsewhere, cibicidiids and other calcareous species live
on biogenic substrates such as scallop shells (Alexander & DeLaca 1987).
Bathymetric distribution
Foraminifera are present at all depths around the Antarctic continent. Like benthic
faunas generally (Carney 2005), foraminiferal species tend to be zoned with water
depth, possibly reflecting the combined influences of hydrostatic pressure and food
availability (De Rijk 2000; Carney 2005). More or less clearly defined sequences of
depth-related assemblages have been recognised in several areas of the Southern
Ocean, including Lutzow-Holm Bay (Uchio 1960), the Ross Sea (McKnight 1962),
the Drake Passage (Herb 1971) and the Scotia Sea area (Echols 1971). Based on the
data of McKnight, Bandy & Echols (1964) delineated eight depth-related groups of
species, each of which only occurred below a certain depth (164, 384, 475, 612, 800,
1281, 1670, 2620 m). Kennett (1968) also compiled depth ranges for species in the
Ross Sea and recognised ‘abrupt changes in the fauna’ at 270, 450-550, 1,300 and
2,200 m. However, he noted that many species have depth ranges that are different
4
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
from those observed elsewhere in the Antarctic, making it impossible ‘to define a
foraminiferal depth zonation which will apply to the Antarctic as a whole.’
Calcareous genera (e.g. Epistominella and Globocassidulina) are often represented by
only 2-3 species in Antarctic waters, with one species occurring in deep water and
another in coastal settings. Some species, however, have bathymetric ranges spanning
several 1000s metres, from the shelf to the abyss (Bandy & Echols 1964; Kennett
1968; Murray 1991), raising the possibility that they comprise two or more cryptic
species. Alternatively, broad depth ranges may reflect the dispersal ability of
foraminiferal propagules combined with a more or less isothermal water column.
These factors could explain the wide bathymetric distribution of Bathyallogromia
weddellensis, a monothalamous species that is genetically coherent between 1100 and
6300 m depth (Gooday et al., 2004).
Zoogeography
Many of the foraminiferal species reported from Antarctic waters are known from
other parts of the World Ocean. Bathyal and abyssal regions, in particular, are
inhabited by typical deep-sea forms. This conclusion was already reached by Earland
(1934) based on his own and earlier investigations and is supported by later studies.
Murray (1991) recognised a series of deep-water associations from the Southern
Ocean dominated by cosmopolitan species such as Cyclammina pusilla, Epistominella
exigua, Nuttallides umboniferus and Globocassidulina subglobosa. Cornelius &
Gooday (2004) estimate that around 2/3 of the calcareous species in Weddell Sea
samples also occurred at the Porcupine Abyssal Plain. In the Southern Ocean to the
south of the Antarctic convergence Gooday et al. (2007) recognised ~40 species of
Komokiacea and similar forms, 61% of which also occur in the North Atlantic.
Recent molecular studies suggest that some of the calcareous species found in the
deep SO are genetically coherent across a geographical range that spans several
oceans (Pawlowski et al., 2007b; Lecroq et al., 2009). However, there are a few
foraminiferal species that may be endemic to the Antarctic deep sea. These include
Haplophragmoides umbilicatum Pearcey, 1914, first described from the abyssal
Weddell Sea (Pearcey 1914) and subsequently reported from depths down to 5000 m
west of the Antarctic Peninsula (Theyer 1971) and at shallower sites in the Ross Sea
(Kennett 1968).
The extent of endemism in coastal and shelf settings around Antarctica is difficult to
assess. Some species reported from these regions are apparently widely distributed.
According to Ward et al. (1987), 23% of species in their samples from 79-856 m
water depth in McMurdo Sound also occurred at Arctic sites. Schröder et al. (1989)
report that similar proportion (17 out of 58) of agglutinated species shared between
Prydz Bay (Antarctica, 410-987 m) and Lancaster Sound and Baffin Bay (Canadian
Arctic, 93-823 m). However, these wide ranges are based almost entirely on test
morphology and some could be artefacts of inaccurate identifications or cryptic
speciation. Based on an analysis of partial SSU rDNA gene sequences, Pawlowski et
al. (2008) showed that Antarctic (McMurdo Sound, 22-28 m) representatives of three
monothalamous morphotypes were genetically distinct (3.8-5.9% divergence) from
similar forms from Arctic (Svalbard) and northern European sites. Only specimens of
Psammophaga magnetica were sufficiently similar (divergence < 1%) for Arctic and
Antarctic populations to be considered conspecific, although even these populations
5
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
differed by a few mutations suggesting either recent separation or extremely slow
mutation rate (Pawlowski and Majewski 2011). Similarly, Pawlowski et al. (2005)
reported that ~50% of monothalamous phylotypes (foraminifera and gromiids) from a
site 12 km from the edge of the Ross Ice Shelf (923 m depth) were unknown at other
high latitude localities, including McMurdo Sound, the Weddell Sea, the Arctic
Ocean) from which molecular data are available. However, the small number of
comparative sites made this conclusion preliminary.
In an important contribution, Mikhalevich (2004) emphasised the need to establish an
accurate taxonomy for Antarctic species. She drew attention to Antarctic species
described by Russian authors (notably Saidova 1975) that have been assigned in the
non-Russian literature to species that are widely reported from other oceans (Table 1).
The validity of one of Saidova’s species has been confirmed recently by molecular
studies. A species living on scallop shells in Explorers Cove (McMurdo Sound) and
previously identified as C. refulgens was reassigned to C. antarcticus (Saidova 1975)
by Schweitzer et al. (in press). SSU rDNA sequences (in Schweitzer et al., 2009)
revealed that this species forms a well-supported clade that is distinct from
Mediterranean specimens of C. refulgens. The more restricted distributions of
continental shelf species compared to those in deeper water is well illustrated by an
analysis of Saidova’s data (Table 2). Of the 1791 species listed in her monograph on
Pacific Ocean foraminifera (Saidova 1975, Tables 1-11 therein), 221 occur in
Antarctic waters. The majority (~77%) of those confined to the Antarctic (i.e not
occurring in the temperate or tropical Pacific in Saidova’s material) are restricted to
the shelf (depths <1000 m); 9 of the 13 species occurring in Antarctic and adjacent
southern temperate regions have a similar depth distribution. In contrast, the majority
(~79%) of species with wide ranges extending from the Antarctic to parts of the
Pacific beyond the S. temperate zone are confined to depths >1000 m.
As well as a substantial degree of endemism, DNA analyses suggest that benthic
foraminifera living on the Antarctic shelf are genetically homogenous. Ribosomal
DNA sequences were almost identical in populations of Epistominella vitrea from the
Ross Sea (<30 m water depth) and the Weddell Sea (1000 m depth) (Pawlowski et al.,
2007a). Despite considerable morphological variability, all examined specimens of G.
biora from Admiralty Bay (King George Island) had identical ITS rDNA sequences
(Majewski and Pawlowski 2011). The same lack of genetic differentiation was found
in 12 morphospecies from the Antarctic Peninsula (Admiralty Bay, King George
Island) and McMurdo Sound (New Harbor), suggesting a pan-Antarctic gene flow in
shelf soft-bottom foraminifera (unpublished data). Earland (1934) already pointed to
the circum-Antarctic distribution of some species and Mikhalevich (2004) concluded
that most of the species that characterise the Antarctic shelf fauna display this pattern.
However, there are some apparent exceptions, notably the genus Notodendrodes,
which appears to be endemic to the Ross Sea. The type species, N. antarctikos, was
described from a coastal setting in Explorers Cove on the west side of McMurdo
Sound (DeLaca et al. 1980), and has not been reliably reported outside this restricted
area (we are not convinced that N. cf antarctikos of Violanti 1996 from 163-1010 m in
the Ross Sea belongs to this species). The other species of this genus, N.
hyalinosphaira, also occurs in Explorers Cove, as well as other localities in McMurdo
Sound (DeLaca et al. 2002) and under the Ross Ice Shelf in much deeper water (923
m depth) and 12 km from the open ocean (Pawlowski et al. 2005).
6
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
Factors and processes influencing geographic distribution
The complex patterns of bathymetry, sediment types, water mass characteristics, seaice cover and surface productivity around the Antarctic continent make it difficult to
untangle the factors underlying the geographical distribution of foraminiferal species
and assemblages. However, the fact that Antarctic shelf faunas are often either
predominately calcareous or predominately agglutinated, suggests that carbonate
dissolution at fairly shallow depths is often an overriding factor (Saidova 1998;
Mikhalevich 2004). This separation has been recognised in the Ross Sea (Kennett
1968; Ward et al., 1987), Weddell Sea (Anderson 1975), the southern and eastern
Scotia Ridge (Echols 1971) and the George V – Adelie shelf (Milam and Anderson
1981). A shallow CCD in the Ross Sea is believed to be responsible for the
confinement of calcareous assemblages to depths <400 m, with mixed
calcareous/agglutinated assemblages at 400-650 m and agglutinated assemblages
>650 m (Kennett 1968). Dissolution boundaries appear to be related to water masses
and ice cover in the Ross and Weddell Seas (Anderson 1975; Osterman and Kellog
1979; Milam and Anderson 1981). For example, shallow calcareous assemblages are
associated with Fresh Shelf Water in the eastern Weddell Sea. However, some of the
same dissolution-resistant species are associated with Saline Shelf Water on the
George V – Adelie margin, indicating that calcareous species are not entirely
controlled by water mass properties. In the Ross Sea, there is no apparent relationship
between the temperature and salinity of the bottom water and faunal patterns.
Coarser (sandy to gravelly) sediments often predominate in shallow coastal settings
and on topographic highs, with muddy sediments in deeper water (Kennett 1968;
Echols 1971). The relationship between sediment types and foraminiferal assemblages
is somewhat ambiguous. In the Ross Sea, Kennett (1968) found no link between
faunal trends and sediment types, or with bottom water characteristics (salinity and
temperature). On the Adelie-George V continental shelf and slope, however, Milam &
Anderson (1981) report a close association between faunal distributions and sediment
types, calcareous species dominating in areas of sand or muddy sand on topographic
highs with agglutinated species dominated on organic-rich siliceous muds and oozes
in shelf basins and depressions. These sediment types reflect different hydrodynamic
regimes, the sandy sediments being linked to moderate to intense currents and the
muddy sediments to sluggish currents. Similarly, an assemblage dominated by
Trifarina angulosa is associated with strong bottom currents and sandy sediments
around the shelf break on the eastern Weddell Sea continental margin (Mackensen et
al. 1990). In the deep (>2000 m water depth) Scotia Sea, some foraminiferal species
are more or less restricted to diatomaceous sediments while others are found only in
sediments without diatoms (Echols 1971). Finally, sessile species attached to stones
and biogenic debris are common in Antarctic waters, where suitable substrates are
readily available.
Summary
Although a large body of literature describes the distribution and diversity of benthic
foraminifera around Antarctica, our understanding of the zoogeography of these
protists is often hampered by taxonomic issues. However, in general terms, deepwater assemblages (>1000 m water depth) include many species with wide
distributions in other oceans, while coastal and shelf (<1000 m) assemblages include a
higher proportion of endemic species, at least some of which appear to have circum-
7
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
antarctic distributions. These contrasting biogeographic patterns between shelf and
deep-water species are supported by recent molecular genetic studies and are
consistent with evidence from other regions of the world (Gooday & Jorissen 2012).
Although many factors (e.g. sediment types, current flow, productivity) influence
species distributions on regional scales, the occurrence of predominately calcareous
and predominately agglutinated assemblages suggests that carbonate dissolution,
linked to a multibathic carbonate compensation depth, is often an overriding factor.
References
Adl SM, Simpson AGB, Farmer MA, Andersen RA, Anderson OR,Barta JR, Bowser
SS, Brugerolle G, Fensome RA, Fredericq S,James TY, Karpov S, Kugrens P, Krug
J, Lane CE, Lewis LA, Lodge J, Lynn DH, Mann DG, McCourt RM, Mendoza
L,,Moestrup O, Mozley-Standridge SE, Nerad TA, Shearer CA,,Smirnov AV,
Spiegel FW, Taylor MFJR (2005) The new higher, level classification of
eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists. Journal of Eukaryotic
Microbiology, 52,399–451.
Anderson, J.B., 1975. Ecology and distribution of foraminifera in the Weddeel Sea of
Antarctica. Micropaleontolgy, 21, 69-96.
Alexander, S. P, DeLaca, T. E. (1987). Feeding adaptations of the foraminiferan
Cibicides refulgens living epizoically and parasitically on the Antarctic scallop
Adamussium colbecki. Biological Bulletin, 173, 136-159.
Anderson, J.B., 1975. Ecology and distribution of foraminifera in the Weddeel Sea of
Antarctica. Micropaleontolgy, 21, 69-96.
Asioli A. 1995. Living (stained) benthic Foraminifera distribution in the western Ross
Sea (Antarctica). Paleopelagos, 5, 201-214.
Bandy, O.L., Echols, R.J., 1964. Antarctic foraminiferal zonation. In: Lee, M.O. (ed.)
Biology of the Antarctic Seas, 1, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.,
pp. 73-91.
Basov, I.A., 1974. Biomass of benthic foraminifers in the region of the South
Sandwich Trench and the Falkland Islands. Oceanology, 14, 277-279.
Bernhard, J. M., 1987. Foraminiferal biotopes in Explorers Cove, McMurdo Sound,
Antarctica. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 17, 286-297.
Burki F, Kudryavtsev A, Matz MW, Aglyamova GV, Bulman S, Keeling PJ and
Pawlowski J. (2010) Evolution of Rhizaria: new insights from phylogenomic
analysis of uncultivated protists. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 10, 377, pp 1-18.
Carney, R.S., 2005. Zonation of deep biota on continental margins Oceanography and
Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 43, 211-278
Cedhagen, T., Gooday, A.J., Pawlowski, J. 2009. A new genus and two new species
of saccamminid foraminiferans (Protista, Rhizaria) from the deep Southern Ocean.
Zootaxa, 2096, 9-22.
Chapman, F. 1916. Report on the Foraminifera and Ostracoda out of marine muds
from soundings in the Ross Sea. British Antarctic Expedition 1907-1909, Reports
of the Scientific Investigations, Geology, 2, 53-80, pls 51-56.
Chapman, F., Parr, W.J., 1937. Foraminifera. Australian Antarctic Expedition 19111914. Scientific Reports. Series C – Zoology and Botanym, 1, 1-190, pls 1-10
Cornelius, N., 2005. Biodiversity and Ecology of Benthic Foraminiferans from the
Antarctic Deep Sea. PhD thesis, University of Southampton, 258 pp.
[Unpublished.]
8
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
Cornelius, N. and Gooday, A.J. 2004. ‘Live’(stained) deep-sea benthic
foraminiferans in the western Weddell Sea: trends in abundance, diversity, and
taxonomic composition along a depth transect. Deep-Sea Research II 51, 15711602.
De Rijk, S., Jorissen, F.J., Rohling, E.J. and Troelstra, S.R. (2000). Organic flux
control on bathymetric zonation of Mediterranean benthic foraminifera. Marine
Micropaleontology, 40, 151-166.
DeLaca, T.E., Lipps, J.H., Hessler, R.R. 1980. The morphology and ecology of a new
large agglutinated Antarctic foraminifer (Textulariina: Notodendrodidae nov.).
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 69, 205-224.
DeLaca, T.E., Bernhard, J.M., Reilly, A.A. & Bowser, S.S. 2002. Notodendrodes
hyalinosphaira (sp. nov.): structure and autecology of an allogromiid-like
agglutinated foraminifer. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 32, 177-187.
Ehrenberg, C.G. (1844). Einige vorläufige Resultate seiner Untersuchungen der ihm
von der Südpolreise des Captain Ross, so wie von den Herren Schayer und Darwin
zugekommenen Materialien über das Verhalten des kleinsten Lebens in den
Oceanen und den grössten bisher zugänglichen Tiefen des Weltmeeres. Bericht
über die zur Bekanntmachung Geeigneten Verhandlungen Der Königl. Preuss.
Akademie Der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1844, 182-207.
Fillon, R.H., 1974. Late Cenozoic foraminiferal paleoecology of the Ross Sea,
Antarctica. Micropaleontology, 20, 129-150.
Earland, A. 1933. Foraminifera, Part II, South Georgia. Discovery Reports, 7, 27-138.
Earland, A. 1934. Foraminifera. Part III. The Falklands sector of the Antarctic
(excluding South Georgia). Discovery Reports 10 (1935), University Press,
Cambridge, p 1-208
Earland, A. 1936. Foraminifera, Part IV. Additional records from the Weddell Sea
sector from material obtained by the S.Y. 'Scotia'. Discovery Reports, 13, 1-76.
Echols, R.J. 1971. Distribution of Foraminifera in sediments of the Scotia Sea area,
Antarctic waters. In: Reid, J.L. (Ed.), Antarctic Oceanology 1. Antarctic Res. Ser.
Washington, 15, 93-168.
Finger, K.L., Lipps, J.H. (1981). Foraminiferal decimation and repopulation in an
active volcanic caldera, Deception Island, Antarctica. Micropaleontology, 27, 111139.
Gazdzicki, A., Majewski, W., 2003. Recent foraminifera from Goulden Cove of King
George Island. Polish Polar Research, 24, 3-12.
Gooday, A.J., Bowser, S.S., Bernhard, J.M. (1996) Benthic foraminiferal assemblages
in Explorers Cove, Antarctica: a shallow-water site with deep-sea characteristics.
Progress in Oceanography 37, 117-166.
Gooday, A.J., Pawlowski, J. 2004. Conqueria laevis gen. and sp. nov., a new softwalled, monothalamous foraminiferan from the deep Weddell Sea. Journal of the
Marine Biological Association of the UK, 84, 919-924.
Gooday, A.J., Jorissen, F.J., 2012. Benthic foraminiferal biogeography: controls on
global distribution patterns in deep-water settings. Annual Review Marine Science.
4, 237–62.
Gooday, A.J, Holzmann, M., Guiard, J., Cornelius, N., Pawlwoski, J. 2004. A new
monothalamous foraminiferan from 1000-6300 m water depth in the Weddell Sea:
morphological and molecular characterisation. Deep-Sea Research II, 51, 16031616.
9
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
Gooday, A.J., Cedhagen, T., Kamenskaya, O., Cornelius, N., 2007a. The biodiversity
and biogeography of komokiaceans and other enigmatic foramininferan-like
protists in the deep Southern Ocean. Deep-Sea Research II, 54, 1691-1719.
Gooday, A.J., Kamenskaya, O.E., Cedhagen, T., 2007b. New and little-known
Komokiacea (Foraminifera) from the bathyal and abyssal Weddell Sea and adjacent
areas. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 151, 219-251.
Habura A, Goldstein ST, Broderick S, Bowser SS (2008) A bush, not a tree: the
extraordinary diversity of cold-water basal foraminiferans extends to warm-water
environments. Limnology Oceanography, 53,1339–1351
Harloff, J. and Mackensen, A., 1997. Recent benthic foraminiferal associations and
ecology of the Scotia Sea and Argentine Basin. Marine Micropaleontology, 31: 129.
Habura, A., Pawlowski, J., Hanes, S.D., Bowser, S.S. 2004. Unexpected foraminiferal
diversity revealed by small-subunit rDNA analysis of Antarctic sediment. J.
Eukaryot. Microbiol. 51 (2), 173-179.
Herb, R. 1971. Distribution of Recent benthonic foraminifer in the Drake Passage. IN:
G.A.Llano and I.E. Wallen (Editors), Biology of the Antarctic Seas, IV. Am.
Geophys. Un. Antarct. Res. Ser., 17: 251-300.
Heron-Allen, E., Earland, A. 1922 Protozoa. Part 2, Foraminifera. Natural History
Reports, British Antarctic (“Terra Nova”) Expedition, 1910 (Zoology), 6, 25-268.
Heron-Allen, E., Earland, A., 1932b. Foraminifera. Part I. The ice-free area of the
Falkland Islands and adjacent seas. Discovery Report 4, 291-460, pls 6-17.
Kennett, J.P., 1968. The fauna of the Ross Sea. Pt. 6. Ecology and distribution of
Foraminifera. New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research
Bulletin 186, 1-47.
Lecroq, B., Gooday, A.J., Pawlowski, J., 2009. Global genetic homogeneity in deepsea foraminiferan Epistominella exigua. Zootaxa 2096: 23-32
Lindenberg HG, Auras A. 1984. Distribution of arenaceous foraminifera in depth
profiles of the Southern ocean (Kerguelen Plateau area). Palaeogeography,
Palaeoclimatology. Palaeoecology. 48: 61-106
Loeblich Jr., A.R. and Tappan, H., 1987. Foraminiferal genera and their
classification. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York: 970 pp.
Mackensen, A. and Douglas, R.G., 1989. Down-core distribution of live and dead
deep-water benthic foraminifera in box-cores from the Weddell Sea and the
California borderland. Deep-Sea Research, 36, 879-900.
Mackensen, A., Grobe, H., Kuh, G., Fuetterer, D.K. 1990. Benthic foraminiferal
assemblages from the eastern Weddell Sea between 68 and 73oS: distribution,
ecology, and fossilization potential. Marine Micropaleontology 16, 241-283.
Mackensen, A., Fütterer, D.K., Grobe, H., Schmiedl, G., 1993. Benthic foraminiferal
assemblages from the eastern South Atlantic Polar Front region between 35° and
57°S: distribution, ecology and fossilization potential. Mar. Micropaleontol. 22, 3369.
McKnight, W.M.J., 1962. The distribution of foraminifera off parts of the Antarctic
coast. Bulletin of American Paleontology, 44: 65-158.
Majewski W., Lecroq B., Sinniger F., Pawlowski J., 2007. Monothalamous
foraminifera from Admiralty Bay, King George Island, West Antarctica. Polish
Polar Research, 28,187-210.
Majewski, W., Pawlowski, J., 2010. Morphologic and molecular diversity of the
foraminiferal genus Globocassidulina in Admiralty Bay, King George Island.
Antarctic Science doi:10.1017/S0954102010000106
10
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
Mead, G.A. and Kennett, J.P., 1987. The distribution of recent benthic foraminifera in
the polar front region, southwest Atlantic. Marine Micropaleontology, 11: 343-361.
Murray, J.W., 1991. Ecology and Palaeoecology of Benthic Foraminifera. Longman
Scientific & Technical, 397pp.
Murray, J.W., Pudsey, C.J. 2004. Living (stained) and dead foraminifera from the
newly ice-free Larsen Ice Shelf, Weddell Sea, Antarctica: ecology and taphonomy.
Marine Micropaleontology 53, 67-81.
McKnight, W.M., 1962. The distribution of the foraminifera off parts of the Antarctic
coast. Bulletin of American Paleontology, 44, 65-158.
Mead, G.A., 1985. Recent benthic foraminifera in the Polar Front region of the
southwest Atlantic. Micropaleontology 31, 221-248.
Mikhalevich, V.L., 2004. The general aspects of the distribution of Antarctic
foraminifera. Micropaleontology, 50, 179-194.
Milam, R.W., Anderson, J.B., 1981. Distribution and ecology of recent benthonic
foraminifera of the Adelie-Georg V continental shelf and slope. Marine
Micropaleontology, 6, 297-325.
Osterman, L.E. and Kellogg, T.B., 1979. Recent benthic foraminiferal distributions
from the Ross Sea, Antarctica: relation to ecologic and oceanographic conditions.
Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 9, 250-269.
Pawlowski & Burki 2010
Parr, W.J., 1950. Foraminifera. Report B.A.N.Z. Antarctic Research Expedition 19291931, Series B, 5, 233-392, pls 3-15.
Pawlowski, J., Fahrni, J.F., Brykczynska U., Haburn, A., Bowser, S.S. 2002.
Molecular data reveal high taxonomic diversity of allogromiid Foraminifera in
Exploreres Cove (McMurdo Sound, Antarctica). Polar Biology, 25, 96-105.
Pawlowski, J., Fahrni, J.F., Brykczynksa, U., Habura, A. & S.S. Bowser 2002a.
Molecular data reveal high taxonomic diversity of allogromiid foraminifera in
Explorers Cove (McMurdo Sound, Antarctica). Polar Biology, 25, 96-105.
Pawlowski, J., Fahrni, J.F., Guiard, J., Conlan, K., Hardecker, J., Habura, A. & S.S.
Bowser 2005. Allogromiid foraminifera and gromiids from under the Ross Ice
Shelf: morphological and molecular diversity. Polar Biology, 28: 514-522.
Pawlowski, J., Bowser, S.S. & A.J. Gooday 2007a. A note on the genetic similarity
between shallow- and deep-water Epistominella vitrea (Foraminifera) in the
Antarctic. Deep-Sea Research II, 54,: 1720-1726.
Pawlowski, J., Fahrni, J.F., Lecroq, B., Longet, D., Cornelius, N., Excoffier, L.,
Cedhagen, T., Gooday, A.J., 2007b. Bipolar gene flow in deep-sea benthic
foraminifera. Molecular Ecology, 16, 4089-4096.
Pawlowski, J., Majewski, W., Longet, D., Guiard, J., Cedhagen, T., Gooday, A.J.,
Korsun, S., Habura, A.A., Bowser, S.S., 2008. Genetic diferentiation between
Arctic and Antarctic monothalamous foraminiferans. Polar Biology, 31, 1205-1216.
Pawlowski, J., Majewski W. (2011) Magnetite-bearing foraminifera from Admiralty
Bay, West Antarctica, with description of Psammophaga magnetica, sp.nov.
Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 41,1-11.
Schröder-Adams, C.J., Scott, D.B., Medioli, F.S., 1987. Can smaller foraminifera be
ignored in paleoenvironmental analyses? Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 17,
101-105.
Pearcey, F.G., 1914. Foraminifera of the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition.
Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 49, 991-1044.
11
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
Pflum, C.E., 1966. The distribution of the foraminifera of the eastern Ross Sea,
Amundsen Sea and Bellingshausen Sea, Antarctica. Bulletin of American
Paleontology, 50, 151-209.
Quilty, P.Q., 1985. Distribution of foraminiferids in sediments of Prydz Bay,
Antarctica. Special Publication South Australian Department of Mines and Energy
5, 329-340.
Saidova, K.M. 1998. Communities of benthic foraminifera of the southern ocean.
Oceanology, 38, 506-512.
Schmiedl, G., Mackensen, A., 1993. Cornuspiroides striolatus (Brady) and C.
rotundus nov. spec.: large miliolid foraminifera from the Arctic and Antarctic
Oceans. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 23, 221-230.
Schröder-Adams, C.J., Scott, D.B., Medioli, F.S., 1987. Can smaller foraminifera be
ignored in paleoenvironmental analyses? Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 17,
101-105.
Schröder, C.J. 1990. High latitude agglutinated foraminifera: Prydz Bay (Antarctica)
vs. Lancaster Sound (Canadian Arctic). In: C. Hemleben, M.A. Kaminski, W.
Kuhnt, D. Scott (eds) Paleoecology, Biostratigraphy, Paleoceanography and
Taxonomy of Agglutinated Foraminifera. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
Boston, London, pp. 315-343.
Schweitzer, M., Pawlowski, J., Kouwenhoven, T.J., van der Zwaan, B., 2009.
Molecular phylogeny of common cibicidids and related Rotaliids (Foraminifera)
based on small subunit rDNA sequences. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 39,
300-315.
Schweizer, M., Bowser, S.S., Korsun, S., Pawlowski, J., in press. Emendation of
Cibicides antarcticus (Saidova, 1975) based on molecular, morphological and
ecological data.
SenGupta, B.K., 1999. Systematics of modern Foraminifera. In: SenGupta, B.K. (ed.)
Modern Foraminifera. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers,
7-36.
Sinniger, F., Lecroq, B., Majewski, W., Pawlowski, J., 2008. Bowseria arctowskii
gen. Et sp. Nov., new monothalamous foraminiferan from the Southern Ocean.
Polish Polar Research, 29, 5-15.
Theyer, F., 1971. Benthic foraminiferal trends, Pacific-Antarctic Basin. Deep-Sea
Research, 18, 723-738.
Uchio, T., 1960. Benthonic Foraminifera of the Antarctic Ocean. Special Publications
Seto Marine Biology Laboratory, 12, 3-20.
Violanti, D., 1996. Taxonomy and distribution of recent benthic foraminifers from
Terra Nova Bay (Ross Sea, Antarctica), Oceanographic Campaign 1987/1988.
Palaeontographica Italica 83, 25-71
Ward, B.L., Barret, P.J., Vella, P. 1987. Distribution and ecology of benthic
foraminifera in McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Paleogeogr. Paleoclimatol.
Paleoecol. 58, 139-153.
Wiesner, H. 1931. Die Foraminiferen der Deutschen Südpolar Expedition 1901-1903.
Deutschen Südpolar Expedition, Berlin (Zoology) 20, 53-165.
12
541
542 Table 1. Possibly endemic Antarctic species described in Russian literature but often
543 assigned to well-known cosmopolitan species; based on data in Mikhalevich (2004)
544
Revised name
Commonly used name(s) in nonNon-Russian
Russian literature
records
Rhabdammina antarctica S 1975
Saccammina basisopiculata
Mikhalevich, Pronina, Nestell 2000
Hormosinella distans antarctica S 1975
Pauciloculata antarctica (S 1975)
Cribrostomoides antarcticus S 1975
Cyclammina orbicularis asellina
Rhumbler 1931
Cyclammina pusilla antarctica S 1975
Conicotrochammina antarctica S 1975
Planispirinoides antarcticus S 1975
Cibicides antarcticus (S 1975)
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
R. abyssorum M. Sars 1869
S. sphaerica Brady 1871
8
1, 3, 7, 8, 10
Reophax distans Brady 1881
Alviophragmium jeffreysii
(Williamson 1858),
Cribrostomoides jeffreysii
(Williamson 1858),
Haplophragmoides canariensis
(d’Orbigny 1839)
C. subglobosa (G.O. Sars 1872)
Cyclammina orbicularis Brady 1881
1, 3, 5, 6, 10
2, 3, 5-10
Cyclammina pusilla Brady 1884
Trochammina antarctica Earland
1934
Planispirinoides bucculentus Brady
1884
Cibicides lobatulus Uchio 1960
1, 3, 4, 5, 10
4, 5, 8
4, 8, 10
2-5, 10
2, 4, 8,
2, 5-7, 10
S = Saidova.1 = Wiesner (1931), 2 = Uchio 1960, 3 = Kennett (1968), 4 = Fillon
(1974), 5 = Anderson (1975), 6 = Osterman & Kellog (1979), 7 = Finger & Lipps
(1981), 8 = Milam & Anderson (1981), 9 = Bernhard (1987), 10 = Mackensen et al.
(1990)
13
553
554
Table 2. Bathymetric distribution of benthic foraminiferal species that occur in
555
Antarctic waters. Species are divided into three categories: those that occur 1) only
556
around Antarctica, 2) around Antarctica and in the adjacent south temperate zone, 3)
557
around Antarctica and in the tropical and/or north temperate zones. Based on data in
558
Saidova (1975, Tables 1-11)
559
Depth zone
Antarctic only
Antarctic + S.
Antarctic + one or more
temperate
other zones (except S.
temperate)
N
%
N
%
N
%
<1000 m
<1000 to >1000 m
>1000 m
TOTAL species
560
79
12
12
103
76.7
11.7
11.7
9
4
0
13
69.2
30.8
0
7
15
83
105
6.8
14.3
79.0