Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Transient Protein-Protein Interactions (TPPI) Presented By: Muhammad Shoaib Amjad 11 arid 3758 PhD Botany 1st Semester Contents Protein-protein interactions Transient protein interaction Transient protein and drug interaction Experimental techniques used for detecting TPPIs List of databases Summary References 2 Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) Interaction of two proteins Play an essential role in the proper functioning of living cells The forces responsible for these interactions include Electrostatic forces Hydrogen bonds Van der waals forces Hydrophobic effects 3 Types of Potien-Protien interactions PPIs can be classified on the bases of Composition Homo and hetero-oligomeric complexes Affinity Non-obligate and obligate complexes Stability/Life time Transient and permanent 4 5 Transient and Permanent Permanent Stable Irreversible Strong Long life Electrostatic force Example: α/β tubulin dimer and many enzymeinhibitor complexes 6 Transiet protein-protein interactions (TPPI) TPPIs are involved in many biological processes: Signal transduction Protein complexes or molecular machinery Protein carrier Protein modifications (phosphorylation) Hormone receptor binding Allostery of enzymes Inhibition of proteases Correction of misfold protein by chaperones 7 Transient protein and drug interaction Transient interactions might be important in drug mechanisms in two ways: the drugs that 1. act on TPPIs 2. act transiently on their multiple targets A cancer-related example for the former type of drugs is nutlins 8 Transient protein and drug interaction Nutlins MDM2 MDM2 p53 p53 Tumor suppressed 9 Experimental Techniques Yeast two-hybrid screens Mass spectrometry Intracellular localization of proteins with fluorescence markers 10 11 Yeast Two-hybrid Researchers insert a gene in yeast for a "bait" protein alongside DNA for half of an "activator" protein. The other half of the activator DNA is then inserted alongside DNA for random "prey" proteins. The yeast cells are then grown up and the proteins are allowed to interact. If bait and prey proteins bind, the two halves of the activator protein be close enough to work together to turn on another yeast gene that turns the cell blue, signaling a match. 12 How does it work? Uses yeast as a model for eukaryotic protein interactions A library is screened or a protein is characterized using a bait construct Interactions are identified by the transcription of reporter genes Positives are selected using differential media 13 Transcriptio n Activating Region Bait Protein Prey Protein Reporter Gene DNA-Binding Domain DNA-Binding Site 14 15 What is the yeast two-hybrid system used for? Identifies novel protein-protein interactions Can identify protein cascades Identifies mutations that affect protein-protein binding Can identify interfering proteins in known interactions 16 Steps to Screen a Library Create the Bait Plasmid Construct from the gene of interest and the DNA binding domain of Gal4 or LexA or other suitable domain Transform with the bait construct a yeast strain lacking the promoter for the reporter genes and select for transformed yeast Transform the yeast again with the library plasmids Select for interaction 17 Sequence analysis Isolate plasmid from yeast and transform E. coli Purify plasmid from E. coli and sequence Blast sequence against database for known proteins or construct a possible protein sequence from the DNA sequence and compare to other proteins 18 Sample Plasmid From Golemis Lab Homepage 19 Reporter Genes LacZ reporter - Blue/White Screening HIS3 reporter - Screen on His+ media LEU2 reporter - Screen on Leu+ media ADE2 reporter - Screen on Ade+ media URA3 reporter - Screen on Ura+ media 20 False Positives False positives are the largest problem with the yeast two-hybrid system Can be caused by: Non-specific binding of the prey Ability to induce transcription without interaction with the bait (Majority of false positives) 21 Elimination of False Positives Sequence Analysis Plasmid Loss Assays Retransformation of both strain with bait plasmid and strain without bait plasmid Test for interaction with an unrelated protein as bait Two (or more) step selections 22 Advantages Immediate availability of the cloned gene of the interacting protein Only a single plasmid construction is required Interactions are detected in vivo Weak, transient interactions can be detected Can accumulate a weak signal over time 23 Examples of Uses of the Yeast Two-Hybrid System Identification of caspase substrates Interaction of Calmodulin and L-Isoaspartyl Methyltransferase Genetic characterization of mutations in E2F1 Peptide hormone-receptor interactions Pha-4 interactions in C. elegans 24 The Study of Protein-protein Interaction by Mass Spectrometry 25 26 27 28 29 30 Summary The components of transient complexes associate and dissociate rapidly while transiently interacting with each other to function dynamically in crucial regulatory and signaling pathways. The identification and analysis of these complexes have become more manageable with the emerging sensitive and high-resolution experimental techniques accompanied by the high-throughput computational methods. 31 32 As the coverage of these techniques increase, they can provide a good template to understand and design new transient complexes. An example for such advanced techniques is, PRISM, which uses available transient interactions as a template set and searches structural and evolutionary similarities between the template set and the target proteins to be predicted. References James R. Perkins, I. Diboun, B.H. Dessailly, J. G. Lees and C. Orengo. 2010. Transient Protein- Protein Interactions: Structural Functional And Network Properties. Cell:1233-1244. Saliha E. A. O., H. B. Engin, A. Gursoy and O. Keskin. 2011. Transient Protein- Protein Interactions. Protein Interaction Designed And selection: 1-14 Costel C. D., K. Deinhardt, G. Zhang, H. S. Cardasis and M. V. C.A. Neubert. 2011. Identifying transient protein–protein interactions in EphB2 signaling by blue native PAGE and mass spectrometry Proteomics J:11, 4514–4528 Lakshmipuram S. S., R. M. Bhaskara, J. Sharma and N. Srinivasan. 2012. Roles of residues in the interface of transient protein-protein complexes before complexation. Scientific reports: 334. 33 34