Download A Valuable Reference Area to Assess the Effects of Climate Change

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup

Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup

Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup

Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup

Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in the Arctic wikipedia , lookup

Future sea level wikipedia , lookup

Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup

Hotspot Ecosystem Research and Man's Impact On European Seas wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
IP (number)
Agenda Item:
CEP 7e, ATCM 13
Presented by:
ASOC
Original:
English
The Ross Sea:
A Valuable Reference Area to Assess the
Effects of Climate Change
1
IP (number)
Summary
International Panel on Climate Change models predict that the Ross Sea will be the last portion of the
Southern Ocean with sea ice year round. Currently, the Ross Sea ecosystem is considered to be relatively
little affected by direct human-related impacts other than the past exploitation of marine mammals along its
slope and the recent exploratory Antarctic toothfish fishery. The indirect human impacts of CO2 pollution on
melting ice and ocean acidification have yet to be felt. The Ross Sea - with its several very long biotic and
hydrographic data sets - constitutes an important reference area to gauge the ecosystem effects of climate
change and distinguish those effects from the effects of current fisheries, tourism, and historic
overexploitation and recovery or lack of recovery of some seal, whale, and fish populations elsewhere. This,
in conjunction with a range of other scientific and biological reasons that has been laid out in prior ASOC
papers, underpins why the Ross Sea should be included as a key component in the network of marine
protected areas currently being considered for the Southern Ocean by the Commission for the Conservation
of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR).
1.
Introduction
Over the past few years, ASOC has put forward a number of papers making the ‘science case’ for supporting
full protection of the Ross Sea slope and shelf,1 in the context of establishing an important component of a
representative network of MPAs in the Southern Ocean.2 This paper focuses on the climate reference zone
potential of the Ross Sea.
2.
Background
Models used by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that best duplicate current conditions in
the Southern Ocean predict that the Ross Sea will be the last portion to have sea ice year round.3 Sea ice
coverage in the Ross Sea (both the length of the ice season and the amount of ice) is expected to continue
growth over the next few decades, but thereafter expected to decline although it will be present long after it
no longer forms in the remainder of the Southern Ocean. Therefore, the Ross Sea will be a ‘refugium’ for the
study of normal ice processes and associated biota, and can serve as an important reference area to help
gauge the magnitude and the ecological and economic significance of changes elsewhere in the Southern
Ocean and in other cold ocean ecosystems.
During the Last Glacial Maximum, the northwestern Ross Sea continental shelf was one of the few portions,
if indeed there were any other portions, of the Antarctic continental shelf that was not covered by an ice
sheet,4 and was open owing to a polynya in that location.5 Therefore, the Ross Sea shelf and adjacent slope
were a biotic refugium, possibly explaining the high degree of endemism there now6, and the existence of
biota such as barnacles and anchored alga (seaweed). It will become a different sort of refugium later in this
century, if current trends in climate and the loss of sea ice continue, providing a last location for many of the
pagophilic (ice loving) species now present in and dependent on the seasonally and permanently ice covered
parts of the Southern Ocean. It also will become the last refugium for studies to determine what and how
1
At the 2010 CCAMLR meeting ASOC introduced “The Case for Including the Ross Sea Continental Shelf and Slope
in a Southern Ocean Network of Marine Protected Areas”:
http://www.asoc.org/storage/documents/Meetings/CCAMLR/XXIX/ASOC_Ross_Sea.pdf.
At the 2010 ATCM ASOC introduced “The Case for Inclusion of the Ross Sea Continental Shelf and Slope in a
Southern Ocean Network of Marine Reserves”:
http://www.asoc.org/storage/documents/Meetings/ATCM/XXXIII/ross_sea_ip077_e.pdf.
2
At the 2010 ATCM ASOC introduced “Rising To The Challenge: Key steps to deliver a Comprehensive and
Representative Marine Protected Areas Network in the Southern Ocean by 2012”:
http://www.asoc.org/storage/documents/Meetings/ATCM/XXXIII/MPAs_ip083_e-1.pdf.
3
See IPCC 2007 Report, Lefebvre & Goosse 2008, Russell in Ainley et al. 2010a; Turner et al. 2009 report only that it
will be an area much less affected by sea ice loss that other portions of the Southern Ocean.
4
Anderson 1999.
5
Thatje et al. 2008.
6
ASOC 2010, Ainley et al. 2010b.
3
IP (number)
different species and biological communities adapt, or fail to adapt, to diminishing sea ice and increasing
ocean temperatures.
Significant and possibly accelerating changes to the Southern Ocean driven by climate change no doubt are
affecting or will affect fishery resources and dependent and associated species, posing a major challenge to
the effective implementation of the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources
(CCAMLR). Achievement of the innovative ecosystem conservation objective set forth in Article II of the
Convention is dependent upon being able to distinguish the impacts of fishing and associated activities from
natural environmental variation. The ways and rapidity that climate change affects the distributions,
abundance and productivity of fishery target species, and their ecological relationships with dependent and
associated species, will greatly complicate decision-making and thereby threaten to undermine
implementation of Article II itself. What is called for is a proactive and systematic research, monitoring and
adaptive management program to distinguish the effects of fishing and associated activities from those of
climate change. The designation of the Ross Sea shelf and slope as a special area for protection and scientific
study, as provided for in CCAMLR Article IX (2) (g), would provide an invaluable step toward the
development and implementation of a research and management strategy to meet the challenge of effective
implementation of the Convention.
As a result of decades of research beginning during the 1957-58 IGY, the Ross Sea now is the site of five of
the longest ecological data series in the Southern Ocean:
•
•
•
•
•
Adélie penguin population statistics since 19597
Species composition and growth of near-shore benthic communities since the late 1960s8
Demography and population numbers of Weddell seals since the late 1960s9
Antarctic toothfish population statistics since 197410
Hydrographic properties since the 1960s11
Moreover, the benthic fauna, studied more intensively than anywhere in the Southern Ocean, constitute an
unparalleled reference to climate-related change, beginning with the >400 types specimens logged since the
1840s,12 the earlier Ross Sea-wide survey work reported in Bullivant13 and Barry14, but most recently results
from the latitudinal gradient project led by New Zealand.15
These data series have been important in our attempt to understand biological and ecological responses to
interannual, decadal and longer-term climate change. They will increase in value with each passing year as
long as the effects of climate change do not become confused by the effects of fisheries or other activities in
the area. Currently, the Ross Sea is considered to be the least anthropogenically impacted ocean area
remaining on Earth.16
Owing to its long-term history of scientific activities, the Ross Sea was one of the first areas of the Southern
Ocean in which the short-term effects of the El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) were detected.17 It was
also among the first areas where decadal climate patterns related to the Southern Annular Mode (SAM) were
detected in the fauna.18 Both of these important, short-term climate change signals are now well known to
7
Wilson et al. 2001.
Dayton 1989, Kim, Conlan, Dayton et al. unpubl. data.
9
Cameron & Siniff 2004.
10
Devries et al. 2008.
11
Jacobs et al. 2002, Jacobs 2006.
12
See footnote 6.
13
Bullivant 1967.
14
Barry et al. 2003; see footnote 6.
15
http://www.sciencepoles.org/articles/article_detail/shulamit_gordon_discusses_the_latitudinal_gradient_project/; see
also Thrush et al. 2010.
16
Halpern et al. 2008, Ainley 2010, Aronson et al. 2011; Blight &Ainley 2008, Aronson et al. 2011.
17
Testa et al. 1991; see also review in Ledley & Huang 1997.
18
SAM; Dayton 1989, Ainley et al. 2005.
8
4
IP (number)
ecologists working elsewhere and are key to detecting longer-term changes and trends in species’ responses
to climate change.
Longer-term trends in the Ross Sea are part of a climate ‘see-saw’ or oscillation that complements
contrasting trends in the Antarctic Peninsula region. This spatial oscillation is related to SAM, known also as
the Antarctic Oscillation, and is best seen in the behavior of sea ice contrasted between the two regions –
(Antarctic Peninsula versus Amundsen/Ross Sea).19 Since the mid-1970s, due to the Antarctic Ozone Hole
and warming of mid latitudes, SAM has been stuck in a positive mode.20 As a result, in the Ross Sea region,
sea ice coverage, which includes seasonal formation, melt and extent, has been increasing - and is expected
to continue to increase, while in the Antarctic Peninsula region sea ice coverage has been decreasing and is
expected to continue to do so.21 Elsewhere in the Southern Ocean, sea ice coverage has so far shown minimal
long-term climate effects.22
While there is much concern regarding the corresponding decrease in Antarctic krill as sea ice coverage
decreases in the Antarctic Peninsula region,23 it is changes in populations of Adélie, chinstrap and gentoo
penguins that illustrate how the pack ice biota is responding to SAM. In the Ross Sea region, where 38% of
the world population of Adélie penguins resides, their populations have been increasing as sea ice coverage
and coastal polynyas both increase, owing to increasing offshore winds. On the other hand, in the Antarctic
Peninsula region, the opposite trend in sea ice, owing to the wind regime,24 has led to receding sea ice and
the southward retreat of Adélie penguin and chinstrap penguin populations; to some degree these penguins
are being replaced by the closely related gentoo penguin.25
CCAMLR has chosen the Adélie and gentoo penguins to be ‘indicator’ species in its Ecosystem Monitoring
Program (CEMP) for good reason. CCAMLR’s Scientific Committee consider that other more difficult-tomonitor pack ice species are likely to be changing in unknown ways in concert with the ongoing changes in
these penguin species.
The biological and ecological effects of climate change in the Antarctic Peninsula region can be confused
with the effects of the krill fishery, tourism, and the historic overexploitations - and recovery or lack of
recovery of some seal, whale, and fish populations. Except for the relatively recent development of the
‘exploratory’ commercial fishery for Antarctic toothfish, the biological communities and food webs of the
Ross Sea shelf and slope area are comparatively pristine. Therefore, they offer a unique opportunity for
developing research, monitoring and management programs that will enable distinguishing the effects of
climate change from those of fisheries and other activities in the Southern Ocean. This will minimize
climate-related challenges to the effective implementation of CCAMLR.26
3.
Conclusion
In order to enhance our ability to understand marine ecosystem processes as they respond to climate change,
and to facilitate the collective conduct of science,27 the Ross Sea shelf and slope must be included in the
network of marine protected areas now being instituted in the Southern Ocean. The Ross Sea foodweb and
ecosystem processes should be protected from extractive activities that will compromise its value as a
reference area.
Looking ahead to the August MPA workshop in Brest, France, ASOC urges all Antarctic Treaty Consultative
Parties to give open-minded consideration to according MPA status to the Ross Sea, based on the data and
scientific arguments contained in two detailed bioregionalization papers presented by the US to the 2010
19
Turner 2009.
Thompson & Solomon 2002, Russell et al. 2006a, b; Stammerjohn et al. 2008.
21
Parkinson 2002, Stammerjohn et al. 2008, Russell in Ainley et al. 2010.
22
Parkinson 2002, Zwally et al. 2002, Jacobs 2006, Stammerjohn et al. 2008.
23
Atkinson et al. 2004.
24
Stammerjohn et al. 2008.
25
Forcada et al. 2006, Ducklow et al. 2007;Hinke et al. 2007; Trivelpiece et al. 2011.
26
Branch 2007, Ainley 2010.
27
Arcese& Sinclair 1997.
20
5
IP (number)
meeting of the CCAMLR Working Group on Ecosystem Monitoring and Management,28 and the ASOC
papers presented at the ATCM and CCAMLR meetings of the past few years.
4.
References
Ainley, D.G. 2010. A history of the exploitation of the Ross Sea, Antarctica. Polar Record 46 (238):
233–243.
Ainley, D.G., E.D. Clarke, K. Arrigo, W.R. Fraser, A. Kato, K.J. Barton and P.R. Wilson. 2005. Decadalscale changes in the climate and biota of the Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean, 1950s to the 1990s.
Antarctic Science 17:171-182.
Ainley, D.G., G. Ballard, J. Weller. 2010b. Ross Sea bioregionalization, Part I: Validation of the 2007
CCAMLR Bioregionalization Workshop results towards including the Ross Sea in a representative
network of marine protected areas in the Southern Ocean. CCAMLR WG-EMM-10/11, Hobart.
Ainley, D.G., J. Russell, S. Jenouvrier, E. Woehler, P. O’b. Lyver, W.R. Fraser, G.L. Kooyman. 2010a.
Antarctic penguin response to habitat change as earth’s troposphere reaches 2°c above pre-industrial
levels. Ecological Monographs 80: 49-66.
Anderson, J.B. 1999. Antarctic Marine Geology.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
ASOC. 2010. The case for inclusion of the Ross Sea continental shelf and slope in a Southern Ocean
network of marine reserves. ATCM 33, IP077.
Atkinson, A., V. Siegel, E. Pakhomov, and P. Rothery. 2004. Long-term decline in krill stock and increase in
salps within the Southern Ocean. Nature 432:100–103.
Arcese, P. and A.R.E. Sinclair. 1997. The role of protected areas as ecological baselines. Journal of Wildlife
Management 61: 587-602.
Aronson, R.B., S. Thatje, J.B. McClintock and K.A. Hughes. 2011. Anthropogenic impacts on marine
ecosystemsin Antarctica. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1223: 82–107
Ballance, L., R.L. Pitman, R.P. Hewitt, D.B. Siniff, W.Z.Trivelpiece, P.J. Clapham and R.L. Brownell, Jr.
2006. The removal of large whales from the Southern Ocean: evidence for long-term ecosystem effects?
In: Whales, Whaling and Ocean Ecosystems (eds J.A. Estes, D.P. Demaster, D.F. Doak, T.E. Williams
and R.L. Brownell, Jr). University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 215–230.
Barry, J.P., J. Grebmeier, J. Smith, R.B. Dunbar. 2003. Bathymetric versus oceanographic control of benthic
megafaunal patterns in the Ross Sea, Antarctica. Antarctic Research Series 78: 327-354.
Blight, L.K, and D.G. Ainley. 2008. Southern Ocean not so pristine. Science 321: 1443.
Branch, T.A. 2006. Humpback abundance south of 60°S from three completed sets of IDCR/SOWER
circumpolar surveys. IWC Paper SC/A06/HW6:14pp.
Branch, T.A. 2007.Abundance estimates for Antarctic minke whales from three completed circumpolar sets
of surveys, 1978/79 to 2003/04. IWC SC/58/IA18.
Bullivant, J.S. 1967. Ecology of the Ross Sea benthos. Pp. 49-75 in The Fauna of the Ross Sea, Part 5.
General accounts, station lists, and benthic ecology (J.S. Bullivant & J.H. Dearborn, eds.). New Zealand
Oceanographic Institute, Bulletin 176. 77 pages.
Cameron, M.F and D.B. Siniff. 2004. Age-specific survival, abundance and immigration rates of a Weddell
seal (Leptonychotesweddellii) population in McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Canadian Journal of
Zoology82: 601–615.
Dayton, P.K. 1989. Interdecadal variation in an Antarctic sponge and its predators from oceanographic
climate shifts. Nature, 245, 1484–1486.
DeVries, A.L., D.G.Ainley and G. Ballard. 2008. Decline of the antarctictoothfish and its predators in
McMurdo Sound and the southern Ross Sea, and recommendations for restoration. CCAMLR Paper
EMM 08/xx, Hobart, Tasmania.
Halpern, B.S., S.Walbridge, K.A. Selkoe, C.B. Kappel, F. Micheli, C. D’Agrosa, J.F. Bruno, K.S. Casey, C.
Ebert, H.E. Fox, R. Fujita, D. Heinemann, H.S. Lenihan, E.M.P. Madin, M.T. Perry, E.R. Selig, M.
Spalding, R. Steneck and R.Watson. 2008. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems.
Science 319: 948-951.
28
Ross Sea Bioregionalization Part I, Ainley et al. CCAMLR 2010: http://assets1.thelastocean.co.nz/assets/Ross-SeaBioregionalization-Part-I-FINAL_1.pdf.
6
IP (number)
Handwerk, B. 2011. Penguin numbers plummeting – whales partly to blame? National Geographic News,
April 11, 2011.
Ducklow, H.W., K. Baker, D.G. Martinson, L.B. Quetin, R.M. Ross, R.C. Smith, S.E. Stammerjohn, M.
Vernet and W.R. Fraser. 2007. Marine pelagic ecosystems: the West Antarctic Peninsula. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B 362:67–94 doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1955.
Forcada, J., P.N. Trathan, K. Reid, E.J. Murphy and J.P. Croxall. 2006. Contrasting population changes in
sympatric penguin species in association with climate warming. Global Change Biology 12: 411–423,
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01108.x
Hinke, J.T., K. Salwicka, S.G. Trivelpiece, G.M. Watters and W.Z. Trivelpiece. 2007. Divergent responses
of Pygoscelis penguins reveal a common environmental driver. Oecologia 153:845–855.
IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the
Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M.
Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 996 pp.
Jacobs, S. 2006. Observations of change in the Southern Ocean. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society Series A 364:1657–1681.
Jacobs, S.S., C.F. Giulivi and P.A. Mele. 2002. Freshening of the Ross Sea during the Late 20th century.
Science 297: 386–389.
Ledley, T.S. and Z. Huang. 1997. A possible ENSO signal in the Ross Sea. Geophysical Research Letters 24:
3253-3256.
Lefebvre, W. and H. Goosse. 2008. Analysis of the projected regional sea-ice changes in the Southern Ocean
during the twenty-first century. Climate Dynamics 30:59–76, DOI 10.1007/s00382-007-0273-6.
Parkinson, C.L. 2002. Trends in the length of the Southern Ocean sea ice season, 1979–99. Annals of
Glaciology34:435–440.
Russell, J.L., K.W. Dixon, A. Gnanadesikan, R.J. Stouffer and J.R. Toggweiler. 2006a. The Southern
Hemisphere westerlies in a warming world: propping open the door to the deep ocean. Journal of
Climate 19:6382-6390.
Russell, J.L., Stouffer, R.J., and Dixon, K.W. 2006b.Intercomparison of the Southern Ocean circulations in
IPCC Coupled Model Control simulations.J. Climate 19: 4560-4575.
Stammerjohn, S.E., D.G. Martinson, R.C. Smith, X. Yuan and D. Rind. 2008. Trends in Antarctic annual sea
ice retreat and advance and their relation to El Niño–Southern Oscillation and Southern Annular Mode
variability. Journal of Geophysical Research 113, C03S90, doi:10.1029/2007JC004269.
Testa, J.W., G. Oehlert, D.G. Ainley, J.L. Bengtson, D.B. Siniff, R.M. Laws and D. Rounsevell. 1991. Temporal
variability in Antarctic marine ecosystems: periodic fluctuations in the phocid seals. Canadian Journal of
Fisheries and Aquatic Science 48:631-639.
Thatje, S., C.-D. Hillenbrand, A. Mackensen and R. Larter. 2008. Life hung by a thread: endurance of
Antarctic fauna in glacial periods. Ecology 89:682-692.
Thompson, D.W.J. and S. Solomon. 2002. Interpretation of recent Southern Hemisphere climate change.
Science 296:895-899.
Thrush, S.F., J.E. Hewitt, V.J. Cummings, A. Norkko and M. Chiantore. 2010. B-diversity and species
accumulation in Antarctic coastal benthos: Influence of habitat, distance and productivity on ecological
connectivity. PLoS ONE 5(7): e11899. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011899.
Turner, J., R.A. Bindschadler, P. Convey, G. Di Prisco, E. Fahrbach, J. Gutt, D.A. Hodgson, P.A. Mayewski,
and C.P. Summerhayes (eds.). 2009. Antarctic climate change and the environment. SCAR, Cambridge.
ISBN 978-0-948277-22-1
Trivelpiece, W.Z., J.T. Hinke, A.K. Miller, C.S. Reiss, S.G. Trivelpiece, and G.M. Watters. 2011. Variability
in krill biomass links harvesting and climate warming to penguin population changes in Antarctica.
Proceedings National Academy of Sciences, doi/10.1073/pnas.1016560108
Wilson, P.R., D.G. Ainley, N. Nur, S.S. Jacobs, K.J. Barton, G. Ballard and J.C. Comiso. 2001. Adélie
penguin population change in the Pacific sector of Antarctica: relation to sea ice extent and the
Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Marine Ecology Progress Series 213:301–309.
Zwally, H. J., J. C. Comiso, C. L. Parkinson, D. J. Cavalieri and P. Gloersen. 2002. Variability of Antarctic
sea ice 1979–1998. Journal of Geophysical Research 107, doi:10.1029/2000JC000733.
7