* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Ch10 Positioning Positioning: refers to both the place a product or
Social media marketing wikipedia , lookup
Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup
Market analysis wikipedia , lookup
Product lifecycle wikipedia , lookup
Dumping (pricing policy) wikipedia , lookup
Perfect competition wikipedia , lookup
Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
First-mover advantage wikipedia , lookup
Product placement wikipedia , lookup
Food marketing wikipedia , lookup
Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup
Brand awareness wikipedia , lookup
Price discrimination wikipedia , lookup
Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup
Service parts pricing wikipedia , lookup
Street marketing wikipedia , lookup
Consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Target audience wikipedia , lookup
Predictive engineering analytics wikipedia , lookup
Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup
Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup
Visual merchandising wikipedia , lookup
Pricing strategies wikipedia , lookup
Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup
Value proposition wikipedia , lookup
Supermarket wikipedia , lookup
Market segmentation wikipedia , lookup
Brand equity wikipedia , lookup
Personal branding wikipedia , lookup
Brand ambassador wikipedia , lookup
Brand loyalty wikipedia , lookup
Market penetration wikipedia , lookup
Emotional branding wikipedia , lookup
Green marketing wikipedia , lookup
Target market wikipedia , lookup
Global marketing wikipedia , lookup
Services marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup
Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup
Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup
Product planning wikipedia , lookup
- Ch10 Positioning Positioning: refers to both the place a product or brand occupies in customers’ mind relative to their needs and competing products or brands and to the marketer’s decision making intended to create such a position. The positioning notion comprises both competitive and customer needs considerations. 10.1: Differentiation: The Key to Customer Preference and Competitive Advantage Consumers or organizational customers choose what they buy for one of two reasons: what they choose is better, in some sense, or cheaper. In case, the good or service they choose is, in some way, almost always different from others they could have chosen. Differentiation is a powerful theme in developing business strategies, as well as in marketing Most of the time, differentiation is the reason why people buy. I. Differentiation in Business Strategies Michael Porter’s classic book on competitive advantage identified three generic strategies: cost leadership, differentiation, and focus. These strategies, which differ in the scope of the target market and market needs they serve (broad or narrow competitive scope) and on whether they base their competitive advantage on low cost (lower prices to the customer for equivalent products) or differentiation (products that are superior on some important dimensions) represent distinctly different ways in which companies can compete for the minds and wallets of customers in their target markets. Porter argues that the worst strategy is to be ‘stuck in the middle,’ to be neither different nor lower in cost than one’s competitors. Companies in such a position offer customers little reason not to take their business elsewhere. But customers don’t really buy strategies. They buy specific goods and services and effective execution: on-time delivery, proper installation, responsive customer service, and so on. Exhibit 10.1 Generic competitive strategies II. Differentiation among Goods and Services Customers in one market segment have wants and needs that differ in some way from those of customers in other segments. Brand positioning allows the marketer to take advantage of and be responsive to such differences and position particular goods and services so as to better meet the needs of consumers in one or more of these segments. These differences are often physical. Creating both physical and perceptual differences, using all the elements of the marketing mix – product, pricing, promotion, and distribution decisions – is what effective positioning seeks to accomplish. 10.2: Physical Positioning In many cases a physical positioning analysis can provide useful information to a marketing manager, particularly in the early stages of identifying and designing new product offerings. Physical comparisons can be an essential step in undertaking a positioning analysis. This is especially true with the competitive offerings of many industrial goods and services, which buyers typically evaluate largely on the basis of such characteristics. In addition, it contributes to a better marketing/R&D interface by determining key physical product characteristics; helps define the structure of competition by revealing the degree to which the various brands compete with one another; and may indicate the presence of meaningful product gaps. 1 I. Limitations of Physical Positioning A simple comparison of only the physical dimensions of alternative offerings usually does not provide a complete picture of relative positions because, as we noted earlier, positioning ultimately occurs in customers’ minds. Even though a brand’s physical characteristics, package, brand name, price, and ancillary services can be designed to achieve a particular position in the market, customers may attach less importance to some of these characteristics than, or perceive them differently from, what the firm expects. Perceptual positioning analysis – whether aimed at discovering opportunities for new product entries or evaluating and adjusting the position of a current offering – is critically important. 10.3: Perceptual Positioning The evaluation of many goods and services is subjective because it is influenced by factors other than physical properties, including the way brands are presented, our past experiences with them, and the opinions of others. Thus, physically similar brands may be perceived as being different because of different histories, names, and advertising campaigns. Exhibit 10.3 Comparison of physical and perceptual positioning analyses Physical positioning Perceptual positioning • Technical orientation. • Consumer orientation. • Physical characteristics. • Perceptual attributes. • Objective measures. • Perceptual measures. • Data readily available. • Needs marketing research. • Physical brand properties. • Perceptual brand positions and positioning intensities. • Large number of dimensions. • Limited number of dimensions. • Represents impact of product specifications and price. • Direct R&D implications. • Represents impact of product specifications and communication. • R&D implications need to be interpreted. 10.4: Levers Marketers Can Use to Establish Positioning Marketing decision makers seeking to win a particular position in customers’ minds will seek to endow their brand with various kinds of attributes, which may be categorized as follows: Simple physically-based attributes. These are directly related to a single physical dimension such as price, quality, power, or size. While there is a direct correspondence between a physical dimension and a perceptual attribute, an analysis of consumers’ perception of products on these attributes may unveil phenomena of interest to a marketing strategy. Complex physically-based attributes. Because of the presence of a large number of physical characteristics, consumers may use composite attributes to evaluate competitive offerings. The development of such summary indicators is usually subjective because of the relative importance attached to different cues. Essentially abstract attributes. Although these perceptual attributes are influenced by physical characteristics, they are not related to them in any direct way. Price. A brand’s price may imply other attributes, such as high or low quality. The importance of perceptual attributes with their subjective component varies across consumers and product classes. Thus, it can be argued that consumers familiar with a given product class are apt to rely more on physical characteristics and less on perceptual attributes than consumers who are less familiar with that product class. It can also be argued that while perceptual positioning is essential for many consumer goods, such is not the case for many industrial goods. Perceptual attributes must be considered in positioning most brands. One reason is the growing similarity of the physical characteristics of more and more products. This increases the importance of other, largely subjective dimensions. 10.5: Preparing the Foundation for Marketing Strategies: The Positioning Process Positioning a new brand in customers’ minds or repositioning a current brand involves a series of steps, as outlined in Exhibit 10.4. These steps are applicable to goods and services, in domestic or international markets, and to new or existing brands. Thus, when we say ‘brand’ in the rest of this chapter and those that follow, we include both 2 existing goods and services and planned new products – goods or services – that do not yet exist. This is not to suggest that the determinant product attributes and the perceptions of consumers of the various competitive offerings will remain constant across countries or other market segments; rather, they are likely to vary with most products. Exhibit 10.4 Steps in the positioning process for goods and services 1. Step 1: Identify a Relevant Set of Competitive Products Positioning analyses are useful at many levels: company, business unit, product category, and specific product line or brand. At the company or business-unit level, such analyses are useful to determine how an entire company or business unit is positioned relative to its competitors. The results of such analyses are sometimes displayed graphically by plotting competing companies or businesses in their respective quadrants of the generic strategies grid. Larger or smaller dots or circles may be used to indicate relative sizes of competing firms. At the product category level, the analysis examines customers’ perceptions about types of products they might consider as substitutes to satisfy the same basic need. a marketer could obtain customer perceptions of the new product concept relative to likely substitute products on various critical determinant attributes, as we describe in Steps 3 and 4 of the positioning process A positioning analysis at brand level can be helpful to better understand how various brands appeal to customers, to position proposed new products or brands or reposition current ones, and to identify where new competitive opportunities might be found. At whichever level the positioning analysis is to be done, the analyst’s choice of competing products (or product categories or firms) is critical. Marketers who omit important substitute products or potential competitors risk being blindsided by unforeseen competition. 2. Step 2: Identify Determinant Attributes Positioning, whether for goods or services, can be based on a variety of attributes – some in the form of surrogates that imply desirable features or benefits as a positioning base. Some common bases are the following. Features are often used in physical brand positioning and, hence, with industrial products. Benefits, like features, are directly related to a brand. Parentage includes who makes it (bottled by a French vintner; ‘At Fidelity, you’re not just buying a fund, a stock, or a bond – you’re buying a better way to manage it’) and prior products (‘Buying a car is like getting married. Manufacturing process is often the subject of a firm’s positioning efforts. 3 3. 4. - Ingredients as a positioning concept is illustrated by some clothing manufacturers saying their sports shirts are made only of organic cotton. Endorsements are of two types – those by experts Comparison with a competitor’s brand is common Proenvironment positioning seeks to portray a company as a good citizen Price/quality is used in cases such as Wal-Mart successful positioning itself as the lowest-price seller of quality household products. Theoretically, consumers can use many attributes to evaluate competing brands, but the number actually influencing a consumer’s choice is typically small, partly because consumers can consider only attributes of which they are aware. The more variables used in positioning a given brand, the greater the chance of confusion and even disbelief on the part of the consumer. The positioning effort must be kept as simple as possible and complexity should be avoided at all costs. Thus, for most products, experienced marketers hang their hat on one, or at most two, attributes for positioning purposes. It is important to recognize that the importance attached to these attributes often varies. Deposit safety is an important attribute to consider when choosing a bank, but most consumers perceive all banks to be about equally safe. Consequently, deposit safety is not a determinant attribute: It does not play a major role in helping customers to differentiate among the alternatives and to determine which bank they prefer. Step 3: Collect Data about customer’s Perceptions for Products in the Competitive set This market knowledge is developed by first conducting qualitative research, perhaps interviews or focus groups, to learn which attributes are determinant. Then quantitative research follows, perhaps a survey of consumers about their perceptions, to gather data on how competing products score on these attributes. Later in this module, we discuss several statistical and analytical tools that are useful in this portion of the positioning process. Step 4: Analyze the Current Positions of Products in the Competitive Set A useful tool for doing so is the positioning grid, also called a perceptual map. The positioning grid provides a visual representation of the positions of various products or brands in the competitive set in terms of (typically) two determinant attributes. Where more than two attributes are to be considered in a positioning analysis, multidimensional grids, or multiple grids, are produced. Alternatively, a value curve, which comprises more than just two dimensions, can be generated. But not all products or brands exist in the minds of most consumers. Determining the attributes on which the brand’s positioning will be based is a key outcome of the positioning process and a driver of the marketing communication strategy, as well as the marketing strategy overall, that will ultimately be developed. Without clear guidance about the intended position of the brand, advertising agencies, sales forces, and others charged with building the awareness and recognition of the product in the marketplace will be ill-equipped to do this important job. Building a Positioning Grid Positioning for a new store could be done by examining the positioning map for empty spaces (competitive gaps) where no existing store is currently located. There is such a gap in the upper right quadrant of the ‘value/fashionability’ map. This gap may represent an opportunity for developing a new entry or repositioning an old one that is perceived to offer greater fashionability than Nordstrom at a lower price. Of course, such gaps may exist simply because a particular position is either (1) impossible for any brand to attain because of technical constraints or (2) undesirable since there are few prospective customers for a brand with that set of attributes. Exhibit 10.5 Perceptual map of women’s clothing retailers in Washington, DC 4 - - - 5. Marketing Opportunities to Gain a Distinct Position The main opportunity for competitors generally lies in obtaining a profitable position within a market segment not dominated by a leading brand. Competing head-on against the leaders on the basis of attributes appropriated by larger competitors is not likely to be effective. A better option is to concentrate on an attribute prized by members of a given market segment. Constraints Imposed by an Intense Position Although marketers should seek a distinctive and intense position for their brands, attaining such a position imposes constraints on future strategies. If shifts in the market environment cause customers to reduce the importance they attach to a current determinant attribute, Repositioning carries with it the threat of alienating part or all of the brand’s current users regardless of success with its newly targeted group. Success in its repositioning efforts may well ensure losing its current group of users. Another concern is the dilution of an existing intense position as a result of consolidation. Another danger associated with an intensely positioned brand is the temptation to overexploit that position by using the brand name on line extensions and new products. The danger here is that the new products may not fit the original positioning and the brand’s strong image is diluted. Limitations of Product Positioning Analysis Product positioning indicates how alternative brands are positioned relative to one another in customers’ minds. o The problem with this analysis, though, is that it does not tell the marketer which positions are most appealing to customers. o Thus, there is no way to determine if there is a market for a new brand or store that might locate in an ‘open’ position or whether the customers in other market segments prefer brands or stores with different attributes and positions. o To solve such problems it is necessary to measure customers’ preferences and locate them in the product space along with their perceptions of the positions of existing brands. This is called a market positioning analysis. Step 5: Determine Customers’ Most Preferred Combination of Attributes There are several ways analysts can measure customer preferences and include them in a positioning analysis. For instance, survey respondents can be asked to think of the ideal brand within a category – a hypothetical brand possessing the perfect combination of attributes. Respondents could then rate their ideal brand and existing brands on a number of attributes. An alternative approach is to ask respondents not only to judge the degree of similarity among pairs of existing brands but also to indicate their degree of preference for each. In either case, the analyst, using the appropriate statistical techniques, can locate the respondents’ ideal points relative to the positions of the various existing brands on the product space map. Another method of assessing customers’ preferences and trade-offs among them is a statistical technique called conjoint analysis. Customers are surveyed and asked their preferences among various real or hypothetical product configurations, each with attributes that are systematically varied. By analyzing the resulting data, the marketer can learn which of several attributes are more important than the others. These results can then be used in positioning analyses such as those described here. 5 6. 7. - Using price as one dimension of a positioning grid, or as a key dimension on which a brand is positioned, is typically not very useful unless price is a key driver of the marketing strategy. This is the case for two reasons. First, price is easily imitable by competitors. Unless the firm has a clear cost advantage over its competitors, by virtue of its processes or other sources of efficiency, using low price as a basis for positioning can be a fast road to a price war that no one (except consumers) will win. Second, claims that one’s brand – whether a good or a service – is low-priced are sometimes not very credible, because so many marketers make such claims. Consider Fit of Possible Positions with Customer Needs and Segment Attractiveness An important criterion for defining market segments is the difference in the benefits sought by different customers. Because differences between customers’ ideal points reflect variations in the benefits they seek, a market positioning analysis can simultaneously identify distinct market segments as well as the perceived positions of different brands. When customers’ ideal points cluster in two or more locations on the product space map, the analyst can consider each cluster a distinct market segment.[15] For analytical purposes, each cluster is represented by a circle that encloses most of the ideal points for that segment; the size of the circle reflects the relative proportion of customers within a particular segment. Analysts can learn much about (1) the competitive strength of different brands in different segments, (2) the intensity of the rivalry between brands in a given segment, and (3) the opportunities for gaining a differentiated position within a specific target segment. But it also can uncover locations in the product space where additional new brands could be positioned to serve customer needs not well served by current competitors. Step 7: Write Positioning Statement or Value Proposition to Guide Development of Marketing Strategy The final decision about where to position a new brand or reposition an existing one should be based on both the market targeting analysis and the results of a market positioning analysis. The position chosen should match the preferences of a particular market segment and should take into account the current positions of competing brands. It should also reflect the current and future attractiveness of the target market (its size, expected growth, and environmental constraints) and the relative strengths and weaknesses of competitors. Such information, together with an analysis of the costs required to acquire and maintain these positions, allows an assessment of the economic implications of different market positioning strategies. Where there are no real product differences, as in so-called me-too products, or no differential benefits to the user, not only is success hard to achieve, but also ethical issues may arise. Once the desired positioning for the brand has been determined, it’s a good idea to write it down so those charged with developing and implementing the marketing strategy have a clear understanding of what is intended for the brand and where it will fit in its competitive set. Two approaches are commonly used for doing so. In the classical approach, a positioning statement is written. A more recent approach, one being adopted in a number of firms, involves writing a value proposition for the brand. Writing a Positioning Statement or a Value Proposition A positioning statement is a succinct statement that identifies the target market for which the brand is intended and the product category in which it competes and states the unique benefit the brand offers. An example of a positioning statement that reflects Volvo’s marketing strategy in the United States. A value proposition is similarly explicit about what the brand does for the customer (and sometimes, what it does not do) and typically also includes information about pricing relative to competitors. Both positioning statements and value propositions should reflect a unique selling proposition that the brand embodies. In this sense, they reflect the basis on which the marketer intends to win sustainable competitive advantage by differentiating the brand from others in its competitive space. In its shortest form, a value proposition typically looks like this: Target market Benefits offered (and not offered) Price range (relative to competitors) Detailed value propositions such as these are particularly helpful in positioning industrial goods and services, where quantifiable customer benefits are often essential to make the sale. 6 It is important that the positioning statement or value proposition states benefits that the user of the product will obtain, rather than features or attributes of the product itself, or vague or ambiguous platitudes about high quality or excellent service. By benefits, we mean the resulting end-use measurable consequences that the user will experience through the use of the brand, in comparison to others. The marketer generally writes positioning statements and value propositions for use internally and by others, such as advertising agencies, engaged to develop the marketing strategy. They are short and succinct, and are typically not written in catchy consumer language, though catchy slogans and tag lines for communication with customers often follow. For products, they play several important roles. They provide direction for R&D and product development about what kind of attributes should be built into the product . They provide direction for those who create advertising campaigns about what the focus of those campaigns should be The value proposition provides direction for pricing decisions. In a very real sense, the positioning statement or value proposition constitutes the foundation upon which the marketing strategy is built. More broadly, when used at the business level, as they sometimes are, these statements articulate the strategic direction toward which the company’s activities in all arenas should be directed. Promising a certain sort of positioning, or value, to the target market is one thing. Delivering it is another. Clear and concise positioning statements and value propositions can play important roles in effectively executing the intended strategy. 10.6: Analytical Tools for Positioning Decision Making Collecting marketing research data so positioning decisions are anchored in solid evidence, not mere supposition or naïve opinion. Advances in computing power and statistical techniques have made possible a broad range of tools to help the marketing decision maker make the best use of marketing research. 7