Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
GRO: modelling the impact of resources constraints on growth Dr. Irene Monasterolo Global Sustainability Institute, Cambridge (UK) The global challenge • Get the balance right between economic growth/environmental loading to allow future generations enjoying comparable well-being in safe, bio-diverse planet: • At the global level resources limited yet fundamental for life are being depleted at a faster pace than the planet can replace (UNEP, 2011; FAO SOFI 2012; EC 2012) • Emissions from human activities cause an irreversible loss of biodiversity (Global Footprint Network’s Biodiversity Indicators Partnership) and worsen climate change. 2 Why this project 1. 2. 3. 4. We live in a planet with finite resources Resources are getting more scarce as population increases The resource scarcity issue is causing price spikes Price spikes cause political instability 3 GRO objectives Investigate most likely level of GDP (and beyond) in the short-term given resource constraints: – What kind of composition of GDP required for growth/green growth? – ‘Composition’: sector (e.g. % of GDP in services, investment, agri), energy & resource intensity – List of credible disruptive events to affect the situation Provide clear information on sustainable scenarios: – Close time-lag btw short term governments’ agenda/long-term modelling – Commit governments to targeted sustainability measures..and follow policy recommendations. 4 Filling the knowledge gap Previous studies (e.g., LtG, Mann, IPCC) on human interaction with environment and its (negative) feedback on our activities: ..Waiting for full IPCC 5° Report 5 The state of play Limits to growth 1972: role of human activity on resources depletion and impact on global growth – Simulate interaction of 5 global economic subsystems: population, food production, industrial production, pollution, consumption non-renewables. Message: overshoot & collapse in standard run - Continued growth leads to (i) planetary limits being exceeded in 21st century (in all 12 resources/pop. interaction scenarios) (ii) collapse of pop and eco. systems due to resources overuse and pollution – Collapse avoidable if combination of main changes in behaviour, policies, technol. (stabilized world) – Significant controversy and rejection of its scenarios: end to growth followed by a long period of relatively high human welfare. 6 Not predictive in details but analysis of interaction of global eco. Systems (indication of system’s behavioural tendencies only, Meadows, ‘72) It introduced Forrester’s new computational SD modelling approach and quantitative scenarios analysis into environmental discipline Since then, increase in data, indicators (ecological footprint, GHG emissions), models, programmatic docs and actions (Agenda 21, Kyoto Protocol), institutions …but low impact on sustainable policies of influential countries EU2020 ambitious strategy to provide sustainable development while tackling climate change… but discrepancies willingness/actual implementation. 7 Anthropocene and its consequences Alarming LtG results partially confirmed (Turner 2008): • human-led resource depletion (Mann, 1998, Steffen et al., 2011) & impact of climate change (more frequent floods, droughts) affect access to global resources and environment (ecological debt increasing as “Earth Overshoot Day” occurs earlier every year) 8 Multidimensional consequences – Uncertainty with regards to future economic growth (capital constraints and productivity challenge, McKinsey, 2011 ) – Systemic risks in high indebted (and resources intense, e.g. USA) countries – High volatility of commodity prices (Grantham 2012, FAO) due to costly resource extraction and conversion, D/S imbalances – High inequality, poverty, famine, vulnerability (WB) – Resources exploitation & land grabbing (Oxfam) – Political instability (e.g., Arab spring) – Quality of life of future generations at risk (WWF). 9 Resources nexus: local issues… Source: FAO, ‘Dimensions of need: An atlas of food and agriculture’, 2012. • Most resources have both local and global impacts such as soil degradation and water abstraction and the presence of phosphorous and potassium which are very local issue with global consequences through food availability 10 And global impacts Oil 150 Tin Gas 100 50 Copper Coal 0 Zinc Uranium Indium Silver 50 years left for tin, zinc and oil (approximate number of years left= current global reserves/ current annual consumption (assuming no growth in demand) Source: Jones et al., 2013. Data: BP 2012, Cohen, 2007. Rockstrom et al (2009) 9 ecological boundaries which human activity should not cross (green circles) - red wedges: current situation, 3 boundaries already crossed 11 In a more crowded... UN Pop Dept (2013): from 7.2 to 9.6 bn by 2050, most growth in LD regions (Africa), to double in least developed countries. India to be largest country passing China (2028), Nigeria to overtake the US. Reasons: higher fertility, fast increase in life expectancy at birth. 12 And aged world 810 million people 60y or over (2012), 55% in Asia, 21% in EU. Over 60 expected to grow to 2bn by 2050 (from 1 out of 9 to 1 out of 5), outnumbering children for the first time. .. effects on environment and States budgets (health care, insurance, pension)! Consequences for the environment Planet’s temperature expected to increase by 4-6 degrees by 2100, with possible loss of Artic summer-ice by 2016 • IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) 2007: CO2 now at 35 000 m metric tons py (projected to rise to 41,000 m metric tons in 2020), CO2 concentration rising at 1.8 ppm (parts per million) py • World temperature kept increasing and now at 0.8 degrees above pre-industrial levels • Oceans to rise 15-20 cm this century, damaging coastal cities • Change in precipitation patterns will increase droughts and floods. 14 Source: Turn Down the Heat (IPCC & WB, 2012) 15 ..and for the global economy Grantham (2012) ‘We are experiencing a paradigm shift: after 200 years characterized by declining prices, since 2002 resources prices started to rise’. See 2007/2008 volatility of food commodity prices… 16 Models contribution to policy making for sustainable prosperity Several projects at the EU (FP 6th and 7th) developed models which tried to understand limits to sources of capital (natural, human) and what this means for society, e.g.: – – – – – Planetary Boundaries by Stockholm Institute; One Planet Living by WWF & EUREAPA (I-O), Stern’s PAGE 2002, OECD’s ENV-LINKAGES (GEM+SAM) DSGE 17 Unconventient modelling limits These models present several limits which prevent the application to reach our research goals: – – – – – not transparent about the reasons of impacts do not model physical limitations, sectorial model on long time scales strong equilibrium assumptions do not directly tell a story through their scenarios – too complex to be used as initial decisionmaking tool. 18 A new model army Development and application of SD and ABM: System Dynamics: Deterministic representation of the world Long tradition of complex system thinking application to sustainability (1972 LtG, MIT) Agent Based Models: Shaping micro heterogeneity which interacts with macro ‘New wave’ from ‘90s thanks to data and computational power First applied to biology (agents=turtles) 19 Building a better model Innovativeness: ABM integration into SD – more info for more modelling transparency (process and output interpretation) – Higher consistency and correctness of results through control over of methodological steps (double statistical internal validation systems) Short-term focus (next 5 y.): – What if scenarios during a government term – Better understanding of results and dissemination to create the basis for higher public commitment towards sustainability Move from empirical evidence: multidimensional dataset (1995-2010): – Analysis of historical countries behaviour – Geographic detail (country/regional/global) 21 GRO outputs New global database of national demand, supply and flow figures relevant to global natural resources (in)security. Global 'debt map' for natural resources availability, specifying for each UN country (212) current supply of resources that can be found within its borders compared to current consumption. A world-scale SD model to investigate current interaction between resources/global economy. An ABM to investigate possible future economic growth pathways – Accounting for list of disprutive events, ie. Wild cards Case study country/regional analyses selected for specific resources relevance (e.g., socio-economic and environmental). 22 Database Multidimensional dataset at global level (212 UN countries) Time series: from 1995 onwards 6 main groups of commodities – i.e., food, water, land, fuel, minerals, air) including social (socio-economic, demographic, social cohesion), financial (markets and prices), agri-enviornment (env.loading, footprints, emissions) Vars. gathered from official sources (internationally validated) comparable, consistent, and yearly updated. To be completed by December 2013. Statistical analysis (using exploratory econometric methods and multivariate statistics) to understand correlations between resources and global economic system. Model for disclosing resource-price dynamics to be complete by December 2013. 23 Global debt map Calculated as countries’ reserves of specific natural resources (food, water, land, fuel, minerals) divided by their annual consumption Maps to geographically visualise number of ‘years left’ until a resource is fully depleted by each country based only on their own national reserves the quantity of a renewable source consumed each year GDM input for SD to describe resourceseco/pol systems behaviour, accounting for market imperfections. 24 Oil debt map Oil Proved Reserves (Mil. Barrels) 1995-2010 (52 c.): Recoverable reserves in reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions Oil Consumption (t. million barrels) 1995-2010 (72 c.): Includes inland demand, internat.aviation, marine bunkers, oil products for refining process, fuel ethanol biodiesel. Calculation: Reserves /consumption = years left 25 Analysis Mainland Europe under much oil stress – Canada, Middle East and Vietnam as the potential traders of their oil supplies (inc. Brazil, Kazakhstan, Australia, Norway) Africa not as dependent and lacks resources Can see the development of the BRIC nations Lack of data for Africa, Iceland, Central Americas Next steps: get per capita figures, and fill in countries gaps 26 From World 3... 4 key elements to understand constraints & behaviour of world system: – feedback loops (pos. And neg) – Resources depleted by eco.systems (land) – Delays in info transmission (eg transmission of pollution on life exp.) – World eco system as complete system of subsystems (no sectorial) Characteristics - 8 variables (demographics, fertility, industrial output, nonrenew. resources, life exp., agri.productivity, pollution, service output) - Aggregate variables (pop=tot.pop, ind.output=avg.) - No spatial/socio-economic disaggregation - Causal links=loops, made mathematically to reflect mutual vars. influence Complex to design policy mitigation solutions. 27 World 3: demographics - Total population per class of age is function of initial value of reproductive_lifetime, population_equilibrium_time, total_fertility, which adds to the effect of the other variables which contribute to dynamics of the system. - Population is the most important variable because it is used in the other classes to determine/define other key values of variables which are relevant for a full understanding of the system. 28 ..to World 4 SD (‘World4’) to analyse interconnections btw natural resources (water, food, land, fuel, minerals), countries and growth Current links btw resources parameterised in new SD model (World4) Links to include: – substitution (e.g.,liquefying coal as an oil substitute), – feedback loops (prices, water availability for food production) – time delay loops (investment into infrastructure providing future resilience). – Tipping points – Rebound effect (eroding goals) These parameters derived from global database Future projections derived from most discussed international model outputs (e.g.,IPCC). 29 Updating World 3 Exploit new information available (resource prices, climate change and planetary boundaries) New influential variables added (e.g., prices, oceans acidification, sea level and temperature, precipitations and their disruptive effects, emissions by sectors, eco. Footprint) Prices and food fundamental: – Prices endogenous in SD (because short term analysis), to become exogenous in ABM (to inform agents’ behaviour) – Food central for global political instability&sustainable living being closely related to demographic, economic growth, inequality, resources management& fuel prices. Comparing W3/W4: – Run statistical analysis on both groups of initial variables, eplaining differences as regards (i) correlation results, (ii) PCA (identification and meaning). – Graphical visualization: comparison of the two SD diagrams. 30 ABM for sustainability analysis Proper method to model socio-economic-ecological systems and simulate policy scenarios (Building better models) To explore country behaviour characteristics: – Comprehensive picture of relation btw agents’ properties, behaviour in resource use, GDP level, composition – Able to shape single defined agents which interact within a dynamic environment, given assumptions Allows to analyse micro¯o levels at the same time (and mutual influence) in the same environment Impact of policy introduced in year 1 visible at year 5 (govt. term): – Change in country/region/global GDP level and composition – Change in main resources use (trade off and resource substitution effects) 31 ABM Strenghts Display and describe emergent collective behaviour: – ‘Wild cards’ (e.g., extreme weather events or resource shocks) scenarios modelled to explore key stress variables that could lead to political instability. Use of generative approach (emerging prop., bottom-up) Possible to shape heterogeneous and hierarchical agents Analyse non-linear interactions at micro-level to results in macro level patterns Explore world’s resiliency to a set of credible circumstances, e.g., under BAU, global economy may be stable but there may be a number of connected events which could destabilise regions or even global economic activity. Able to test these connections (internal validation) Interdisciplinary approach into modelling 32 ABM weaknesses Time-consumin initial data-gathering phase Complex modelling and simulation phase – Computationally intense thus need for powerful processors, and time... ..but time well spent! Informative scenarios provided 33 ABM Characteristics ABMs include the following elements (Bravo et al. 2012): – an environment, i.e., a set of objects the agents can interact with; – a set of agents who interact with each other; – a set of relationships linking objects and/or agents; – a set of operators that allow the interaction between the agents and the objects. 34 Agents’ behaviour assumptions Agents: 212 UN countries Countries wish to maximise GDP growth given resource availability, productive structure, specialization Agents behave in a social network (geo, trade, pol.) Countries decide whether to consume their own resources or to import If they import, they look for the closest country to which they are linked When all their neighbours are red, they look for the closest green/yellow country Model stops when the world is red SD informs (historical behaviour) what agents can trade change in relative prices) and consumption implications 35 Social network Agents embedded in a social network (each country linked to its neighbours) Agents randomly positioned in a 3D world Links randomly created according to the “proximity” of the countries 2 indexes to better define countries relationship: 1. Trade index, e.g. WTO membership, multi & bilateral trade agreements, cross-country investments, actual trade 2. Political/cultural index, i.e. what drives political fragility given resource constraints (e.g. religion, political ideology, corruption, language) Each index will correspond to a type of link and will be assigned to a different colour. 36 Pilot ABM overview 1 Software -> NetLogo 197 countries (agents) 1 resource -> Oil Size -> Population Colour -> Years-left: – Green > 20 – Yellow > 5 and < 20 – Red < 5 37 Building the social network Population: – Birth rates – Death rates – Randomness (up to 0.5%) Oil: – New discoveries (up to 2% of all oil stock) – Consumption – feedback from population growth – up to 5% randomness 38 Preliminary results 1 1000 Runs Oil stocks get depleted in 36 years on average 39 40 THANK YOU FOR THE ATTENTION! GSI Team, Cambridge 41