Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
PSA, PCA-3 and peace of mind in suspected prostate cancer Kieran Jefferson Consultant Urological Surgeon Partner, Warwickshire Urology Biography • • • • • • • 2008 2006 2005-6 1998-05 1994-8 1990-3 1987-90 Partner, Warwickshire Urology Consultant Urological Surgeon UHCW Post-CCT fellow in Uro-oncology SpR Urology, Southwestern Deanery Basic Surgical Training, Bristol Clinical Medicine, Oxford Medical Sciences, Cambridge Potential conflict of interest • Ipsen (Decapeptyl) Paid consultant; principal trial investigator; book sponsorship; meeting sponsorship • Wyeth/Takeda (Prostap) Trial co-investigator; meeting sponsorship; paid lecturer; book sponsorship • Glaxo (Dutasteride) Trial co-investigator, meeting sponsorship, paid lecturer • Astrazeneca (Zoladex) Principal trial investigator; meeting sponsorhip; paid lecturer • Novartis (Zoledronate) Trial co-investigator; meeting sponsorship • Sanofi Synthelabo (Docetaxel) Meeting sponsorship; book sponsorship NICE guidelines Prostate cancer issues • • • • • Prevention Screening/PSA/PCA-3 Management of localised CaP Hormone ablation Castration-resistant disease Prostate-specific antigen • Seminal protein with probable role in dissolving seminal clot • Serum levels rise in prostate cancer, benign prostatic enlargement, urinary tract infection, acute urinary retention and after urethral instrumentation or catheterisation • Used since 1990s to detect prostate cancer Who should have PSA testing? • Pick winners (young/fit) - do a DRE! • Men >40 with LUTS (beware UTI). • Screening not currently recommended; small survival advantage not deemed costeffective. ERSPC trial • • • • 182,160 men included (50-74 years) Median follow-up 9 years CaP in 8.2% screened; 4.8% non-screened 20% reduction in prostate cancer deaths • Need to screen 1410 patients and treat 48 to save one life after 9 years Why does screening not save more lives? Who would I perform PSA test on? • Any male with LUTS aged over 40 years • Any healthy male over 50 years who requests testing or has a family history • ? Healthy males from age 50 • NOT asymptomatic males over 70 PCA-3 • Gene over-expressed in prostate cancer (no protein product) • DRE releases prostate cells into urine • Urine sample sent for central analysis using RTqPCR PCA-3 • Gene over-expressed in prostate cancer (no protein product) • DRE releases prostate cells into urine • Urine sample sent for central analysis using RTqPCR PCA-3 assay 1. Bead capture of mRNA 2. Amplification of captured gene 3. Hybridisation protection assay using labelled DNA probes PCA-3 score • PCA-3:PSA mRNA ratio in urine is ‘PCA-3 score’ • PCa-3 score offers specificity to complement sensitive but non-specific serum PSA assay • High score increases likelihood of +ve biopsy Problems with PCA-3 • Most patients have a PCA-3 score giving a risk of cancer between 25% & 50% • It is labour-intensive/expensive and not currently available for NHS patients • No current role in prognostication Management of localised CaP • • • • Active surveillance Radical prostatectomy External beam radiotherapy Brachytherapy • Not Cryotherapy/HIFU Active surveillance Aim To individualise treatment Patient Fit for radical treatment 15-year life expectancy Tumour characteristics T1–T2 GS ≤7 Initial PSA <15 Monitoring Frequent PSA testing Repeat biopsies Indications for treatment Rapidly rising PSA Symptomatic progression Upgrading on biopsy Parker Lancet Oncol 2004 Rationale for active surveillance • Reduce overtreatment (probably > 50 patients treated for each life saved) • Frequent monitoring should enable detection of higher risk patients (PSADT/PSA velocity) • Regular re-biopsy minimises undergrading Any questions? [email protected] [email protected] Why does screening not save more lives? Why does screening not save more lives? Why does screening not save more lives?