* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Proposal - Texas Water Resources Institute
Survey
Document related concepts
Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup
Human impact on the nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup
Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Introduced species wikipedia , lookup
Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup
Overexploitation wikipedia , lookup
Lake ecosystem wikipedia , lookup
Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Brian Langerhans Conservation Biology of Endemic and Endangered Livebearing Fish of Texas Human use of water resources have numerous and varied consequences on aquatic ecosystems. Activities such as damming, aquifer pumping, pollution, and introduction of non-native species often produce profound effects on freshwater ecosystems in Texas. Major alterations in freshwater ecosystems involve changes in species abundance and composition1 . This can include modification of system components at all trophic levels (e.g. periphyton, zooplankton, mollusks, insects, fish). These alterations affect the overall health of the ecosystem, as well as the basic ecology of many constituent species (e.g. life history, predator-competitor interactions). In many areas of Texas, water is drawn from aquifers at a rate faster than rainfall can replenish it2 . This has led to the decline of spring- fed waters that provide critical habitat for many native species. Additionally, many of these areas have suffered introductions of non-native fish that consume aquatic vegetation and compete with or prey on native species. These activities have contributed to the dramatic decline of native populations of six endemic species of the genus Gambusia (Table 1). Gambusia are small, freshwater fishes in the livebearing family Poeciliidae. Of these six native fish species, one species is presumed extinct, another possibly extinct, one extirpated in Texas and three are federally endangered. The primary causes of their decline are believed to be decrease in spring flows, competition and hybridization with a congener (Western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis; often introduced), and predation by native and introduced species (e.g. largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, green sunfish, Lepomis cyanellus). Table 1. Gambusia Species of Concern Scientific Name Common Name Listing Status Current Range Gambusia amistadensis Amistad gambusia Delisted, presumed extinct Presumed extinct. Gambusia gaigei Big Bend gambusia Federally Endangered, 1967 Big Bend National Park, TX Gambusia georgei San Marcos gambusia Federally Endangered, 1980 San Marcos River, TX; extinct? Gambusia heterochir Clear Creek gambusia Federally Endangered, 1967 Clear Creek, TX Gambusia nobilis Pecos gambusia Federally Endangered, 1970 Jeff Davis and Pecos counties, TX Gambusia senilis State Threatened Devils River, TX extinct; Mexico Blotched gambusia My research seeks to provide a sound functional basis for the conservation of endangered Gambusia species. I plan to investigate the major biotic interactions of the closely related but non-endangered congener, Gambusia affinis, to elucidate possible causes of decline and potential routes of conservation for the endemics. Since G. affinis is highly similar in all respects (i.e. morphology, life history, ecology) to the endangered gambusia species, my research should provide crucial insight into the functional ecology of endangered species without harming any threatened animals. My research involves two facets: (1) detailed morphological analyses of native gambusia (all species) and other representatives of the family and (2) mesocosm study investigating predator impacts and multiple predator effects in the non-endangered species. Morphological analyses–I will obtain museum specimens of all gambusia species native to Texas (eight species) and conduct a morphological comparison using geometric morphometrics. Additionally, I will include other representatives of the family in which much is known of their ecology (e.g. Poecilia reticulata, Gambusia hubbsi). To date, there has been no major morphological analysis of this sort. The study will capture high resolution discrimination of morphologies that has significant implications for ecology of endangered fish. For example, I can apply intraspecific morphological diversification related to predation that I recently discovered in three species in the family3 to interspecific diversification discovered in this study. This could produce important indirect evidence of competition and evolutionary history with (or without) predators. Mesocosm study–I will conduct an experiment in 200-gallon aquaria constructed with three depth levels, sand substrate, and aquatic vegetation to examine the effects of multiple predators on gambusia. This study will investigate the impacts of largemouth bass and dragonfly larvae (Anax sp.) on mortality, morphology and behavior of G. affinis. The experiment will consist of four treatments (no predators, bass, Anax, and bass and Anax) with 20 individuals of G. affinis in each treatment. Predation will be allowed for 24 h with ten replicates of each treatment. This study has two primary goals: (1) determine magnitudes of impacts of multiple predators and (2) determine morphological and behavioral traits that increase survivorship in G. affinis. Many ecological communities are characterized by emergent properties resulting from interplay between component biotic mechanisms. Predation is a primary structuring force in aquatic communities and often involves complex interactions 4 . A multiple predator effect (MPE) occurs when interactions at work within a community do not reflect the sum of the individual effects (Fig. 1). Emergent impacts may occur in this system due to functional tradeoffs in the behavior and morphology of gambusia species. In the presence of predatory fish, hiding in aquatic vegetation should increase survivorship. But in the presence of dragonfly nymphs, hiding in aquatic vegetation should increase vulnerability to predation. Additionally, larger prey may avoid predation by Anax but may be more susceptible to predation by visually-cued fish predators. So the impact of predation on gambusia species may be greater than traditionally assumed. My previous experience with mesocosm studies should facilitate the execution of this experiment 5 . My proposed research should greatly increase the ecological understanding of endangered Gambusia in Texas. For example, the mesocosm study might reveal the importance of aquatic vegetation for survival of gambusia, and the morphological analyses could reveal that several endangered gambusia seem hyper-vulnerable to predation. These results focus conservation efforts on providing aquatic vegetation and combating predation. These factors prove especially important considering most native habitats of the endangered gambusia suffer introduced predators and declining aquatic vegetation due to decreasing spring flow and introduced fish species (e.g. common carp, Cyprinus carpio, grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella). My research should provide a better understanding of biocomplexity in the environment, which will allow for more informed conservation, management and policy strategies. While it emphasizes the biotic interactions of these freshwater ecosystems, the abiotic factors of aquifer use, dam construction, fish introductions, and related activities largely dictate what interactions might be present. With this research, I hope to provide insight into important ecological mechanisms in order to produce more efficient and successful conservation programs. Literature Cited 1 Jackson, D.A., Peres-Neto, P.R. and Olden, J.D. 2001. What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities - the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58, 157-170. 2 National Wildlife Federation Report. 2002. Population, water, and wildlife. 3 Langerhans, R.B., Layman, C.A., Shokrollahi, A.M. and DeWitt, T.J. Predatorassociated morphological divergence among populations of livebearing fishes. To be submitted to The American Naturalist. 4 Sih, A., Englund, G. and Wooster, D. 1998. Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 350-355. 5 Langerhans, R.B., DeWitt, T.J. and Layman, C.A. Multivariate selection and emergent ecological impacts of multiple predators. To be submitted to Ecology.