* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download DCM
Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup
Mitral insufficiency wikipedia , lookup
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Aortic stenosis wikipedia , lookup
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Staff Lecture (2012년 8월 23일) Role of Echocardiography in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Kyung Hee University Hospital Cardiovascular Center Woo-Shik Kim Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) DCM can be characterized by dilation and reduced contraction of left ventricle or both left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) Diagnostic Evaluation Heart failure by history and examination Echocardiography LVEF ≥ 50% LVEF < 45% Rule out aortic stenosis, HT, hypertrophic CMP Doppler echocardiography Non-dilated LV LVEDD >112% Work-up for DCM Role of Echo in DCM 1) accurate and complete diagnosis 2) high-risk features & prognosis 3) guiding therapeutic interventions Etiology of DCM Kasper EK et al. JACC 1994:23:586 Etiology of DCM • Idiopathic • Sepsis • Familial • Doxorubicin toxicity • Peripartum • Takycardia induced • Takotsubo syndrome • Myocarditis from immune or viral causes • Extensive ischemic heart disease • Noncompaction • Sarcoidosis Case 1 • 남자, 20세 • ROTC 신검 후 정밀검사 위해 내원 • 증 상 : 없음 • 청 진 : no murmur Case 1 M/20 Case 1 M/20 Case1 (M/20) EF=45%, LVEDV/LVESV = 199 / 109 ml Accurate and complete diagnosis Idiopathic DCM • Prevalence : 40 per 100 000 persons (USA) • Genetic factors : >25% of cases autosomal dominant This has important implications for screening of first-degree relatives • LV dilatation and/or LV dysfunction Accurate and complete diagnosis Familial DCM One individual diagnosed with idiopathic DCM in a family, with at least: • one relative also diagnosed with idiopathic DCM -or• one first-degree relative with an unexplained sudden death under the age of 35 years. Example of a family history with autosomal dominant transmission, the most common mode of inheritance for familial DCM Ku, L. et al. Circulation 2003;108:e118-e121 Accurate and complete diagnosis Valve disease • Chronic LV volume or pressure overload d/t valvular pathology → LV dilatation & dysfunction • Obvious management implications → corrective surgery Case 2 Aortic stenosis (low flow / low gradient AS) Peak velocity = 3.6 m/s Mean PG = 29 mmHg Case 2 Dobutamine echo (1) Case 2 LVO T flow Aortic flow Dobutamine echo (2) (LVOT/AV = 0.16) (LVOT/AV = 0.17) Baseline Peak PV= 0.4 m/s, TVI=12 cm PV= 1.0 m/s, TVI=16 cm Baseline Peak PV= 3.6 m/s, TVI=71 cm PV= 5.4 m/s, TVI=95 cm Accurate and complete diagnosis Cardiomyopathies HCM DCM ARVC RCM Unclassified European Guideline • Left ventricular non-compaction • Takotsubo cardiomyopathy Accurate and complete diagnosis LV non-compaction LVNC is characterized by prominent trabeculations on the endocardial surface of the LV with deep recesses extending into the LV wall LV non-compaction (DDx) DDX) Prominent normal myocardial trabeculations False tendons and aberrant bands Cardiac tumors LV apical thrombus Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Case 3 M / 59 Case 3 M / 59 Accurate and complete diagnosis Takotsubo cardiomyopathy Case 4 F / 53 Assessing Prognosis in DCM Assessing High Risk Features & Prognosis in DCM LV size and systolic function LV dysfunction has long been regarded as the main determinant of clinical symptoms, functional class, and prognosis • Eyeball • Biplane modified Simpson’s rule • Contrast agents • 3D echo Assessing High Risk Features & Prognosis in DCM Case 5 (male / 57 y, 2008) Assessing High Risk Features & Prognosis in DCM Biplane modified Simpson’ s rule 4C Diastole 4C Systole 2008 EF = 29% LVEDV = 169 ml 2C Diastole 2C Systole LVESV = 120 ml Assessing High Risk Features & Prognosis in DCM Case 5 (male / 58 y, 2009) 2009.10 Heart Failure 2009.11 Heart Failure (f/u) Assessing High Risk Features & Prognosis in DCM Case 5 (male / 60 y, 2011) • 2005) 14% 115 / 99 ml • 2008) 29% 169 / 120 ml • 2009) 28% 168 / 121 ml • 2009) 23% 158 / 122 ml • 2011) 17% 154 / 128 ml Assessing High Risk Features & Prognosis in DCM Case 6 (F / 72) Assessing High Risk Features & Prognosis in DCM Case 6 (F / 72), Contrast Echo Assessing High Risk Features & Prognosis in DCM LV diastolic dysfunction Nagueh et al. JASE 2009;22:107 2008.7 2009.10 /29 aggravation E = 48, A = 21 E = 51, A = 18 E = 43, A = 30 E = 57, A = 24 E/A = 2.3 E/A = 2.8 E/A = 1.4 E/A = 2.4 DT = 142 DT = 118 DT = 138 DT = 89 E’= 3.4 E’= 2.7 E’= 2.9 E’= 2.7 E/e’= 14.1 E/e’= 18.9 E/e’= 14.8 E/e’= 21.1 2009.11/3 2011.9/30 Assessing High Risk Features & Prognosis in DCM RV dysfunction • RV dysfunction may be present in DCM and is an important adverse prognostic marker, associated with significantly worse functional class and outcome • TAPSE <14 mm is associated with an adverse prognosis with DCM Assessing High Risk Features & Prognosis in DCM Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) RV LV TAPSE RA LA Ghio. AJC 2000;85:837 Assessing High Risk Features & Prognosis in DCM Mitral regurgitation Secondary MR apical tenting of the leaflet tips annular dilatation ventricular dyssynchrony Case 7 Assessing High Risk Features & Prognosis in DCM Stress echocardiography • Stress echocardiography is a useful tool in guiding management in DCM, by identifying the presence or absence of contractile reserve (improvement in wall motion score, fractional shortening, or EF) during dobutamine infusion (10–40 mcg/kg/min). • The presence of contractile reserve predicts a good response to therapies (including drug treatment and MV repair), whereas absence of contractile reserve predicts a poor survival rate. This has been used to guide management decisions in the context of need for cardiac transplantation. Case 8 Assessing High Risk Features & Prognosis in DCM F / 52 Case 8 Assessing High Risk Features & Prognosis in DCM Dobutamine echo Assessing dyssynchrony in DCM -guiding cardiac resynchronization therapy • M-mode • Doppler echo • Tissue-Doppler imaging • Tei index SPWMD septal-to-posterior wall motion delay M-mode Short – axis view SPWMD 130 ms predicted a response to CRT • Pitzalis MV et al. (Bari, Italy) • JACC 2002;40:1615 • Heart failure : 20 pts (non-random) • LVEVI & LVESVI - Remodeling • Limited predicted value for CRT response Poor feasibility • Marcus et al. JACC 2005;46:2208 • Bleeker et al, AJC 2007;99:68 Doppler echo (pulsed wave Doppler) Patients with severe DCM - fusion of E – and A – waves → prolongation of total isovolumic time (t-IVT) → reduction in effective filling time (LVFT) → diastolic MR Aortopulmonary preejection interval >40 ms Doppler echo (MPI or Tei index) role in selecting patients for CRT, but appear most useful in assessing response to therapy guiding therapeutic interventions Measures of Ventricular Dyssynchrony • QRS duration > 120 ms • Increased aortopulmonary mechanical delay of >40 ms • Increased septal posterior mechanical delay of >130 ms • Increased time to peak velocity of opposing LV wall of >65 ms • Increased time to peak negative strain of opposing LV walls • Increased Yu index of >31 ms • Segmental delay in radial strain • Timing of endocardial excursion or regional EF by 3D echo • Global LV strain by speckle tracking Current Indications for CRT Device • Systolic heart failure • NYHA III or IV symptoms • EF 35% • QRS duration 120 msec Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Is echo useful in selecting patients for CRT? • PROSPECT trial – did not support using echo for selecting patients for CRT Several methodological deficiencies • poor training of the centers • multiple vendors • multiple core labs • poor reproducibility of the measures Benefits of CRT • Reduction in LV size • Improvement in EF • Improved LV dP/dt • Improvement in MR • Improved exercise tolerance • Reduced hospitalization • Reduced mortality Response Rate to CRT about 70% Conclusion (1) Suspected heart failure or LV dysfunction Echocardiography LVEF < 45% LVEDD >112% LV size and function Conclusion (2) (i) diagnosis of DCM or features of the ‘DCM phenotype’ (ii) identify associated cardiac abnormalities - valve disease (iii) highlight features requiring specific therapeutic Mx (iv) identify high-risk features associated with an adverse Px 경청해 주셔서 감사합니다.